Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Space Legos! 42

Posted by michael from the space-station-on-the-cheap dept.
mfarver writes "The Air Force is seeking research proposals for Space Legos. Now you can have your childhood fantasies of playing with blocks and getting paid for it. Actually, its not a bad concept, standarized components that can be "plugged" together in space for different functions."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Space Legos! More

Space Legos!

Comments Filter:

  • Say It With Me... (Score:4, Informative)

    by GTRacer ( 234395 ) <gtracer308&yahoo,com> on Friday August 08, 2003 @05:05PM (#6649883) Homepage Journal
    ...space legos

    Space Lego Blocks, dammit!

    GTRacer
    - Looking for a 953...

    • Yes! thank you! (Score:4, Informative)

      by bad_fx ( 493443 ) on Saturday August 09, 2003 @12:02AM (#6652696) Journal
      Troll? WTH? Take a look at this quote from lego.com:

      If the LEGO trademark is used at all, it should always be used as an adjective, not as a noun. For example, say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGO BRICKS". Never say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGOs".


      from here [lego.com]. "Legos" makes no sense, dangit. How and why did people even start saying "legos"? The blocks/parts aren't legos! They're called LEGO blocks or blocks of LEGO or LEGO bricks or LEGO pieces... See, there's so many damn choices, why do people insist on legos? Gah! When I wuz a kid we knew what to call LEGO.
      • Ask any kid who has a Lego product what the pieces are called, and he will say "Lego's". Not "lego bricks", not "lego blocks". Frankly, kids don't really care about the correct usage of a term.

        • Ask any kid who has a Lego product what the pieces are called, and he will say "Lego's". Not "lego bricks", not "lego blocks". Frankly, kids don't really care about the correct usage of a term.

          *Heh, decides not to get pedantic over "Lego's" (Lego is?) vs Legos* (Muahahaha - fear my grammar nazism)

          Maybe it's just 'cause I don't live in the US, but seriously when I was a kid, none of us called them legos (IIRC). Perhaps it's just another of your weird Americanisms :P When refering to them in plural it was
          • "Maybe it's just 'cause I don't live in the US, but seriously when I was a kid, none of us called them legos (IIRC). Perhaps it's just another of your weird Americanisms :P When refering to them in plural it was still lego. "

            Definitely a nationality issue. Where are you from that the singular is Lego and not Legos?

            • South Africa.

              PS: Sorry, I didn't mean singular, maybe I confused the issue by saying "still" - Neither lego nor legos makes sense for a single piece.

  • Lego, no Legos! (Score:1, Redundant)

    by psyconaut ( 228947 )
    The name of the product is Lego. The plural is Lego. Only Americans seem to have this problem of pluralisation! Grrrrrrrr!

    -psy

  • Didn't Berke Breathed have Opus spend millions of dollars in tax-payer money during the Reagan initiated "Star Wars" program only to deliver a Lego based defense strategy?

    -2 point for non-originality.

    • There was also a joke in the BSD fortune program that made a reference to a "Lego Carpet Bomb", which when deployed, would scatter millions of pieces of tiny plastic bits that hurt like hell when you stepped on them.
    • Initial testing was done by Olver Wendell Jones with legos (sic), but in the end they just sewed the bills together into a kind of giant net.

  • Accuracy (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tsa ( 15680 ) on Friday August 08, 2003 @05:41PM (#6650271) Homepage
    We tried to build a machine from Lego in our research group a few years ago, when Mindstorm had just hit the shelves, but we found the accuracy of the movement was quite bad. So it can only be used for a limited range of experiments. On the other hand, it is very cheap compared to custom-build machines and therefore certainly worth taking a look at.

    • Re:Accuracy (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Smidge204 ( 605297 ) on Friday August 08, 2003 @06:00PM (#6650481) Journal
      Indeed. I've made several robots out of legos (not even mindstorm sets - just plain old Technic sets, motors salvaged from old coputer hardware, an old PC, and a good dollop of hot melt glue ;) )

      The gears and other components are certintly NOT indended for accuracy by any stretch of the imagination. But they are fairly cheap, robust (except for those little 8-tooth gears...) and easy to assemble into just about anything you need.

      I even built a joystick out of legos once. There was a bit of play in it, but not too much. What really killed it was the lack of a self-centering mechanism. You really go all over the place in an energetic game of Descent!
      =Smidge=
    • From the article: The Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate is soliciting information and follow-up discussions to support research and development of concepts for rapid-prototyping of space systems based on a kind of space "LEGO_TM". These "LEGOS", also referred to as "protosats", would be a (hopefully small) family of building blocks, from which any complex structure could be built, in this case the skeletal structures of spacecraft. The protosats could, for example, be panels that con

  • A good idea? (Score:4, Funny)

    by MacEnvy ( 549188 ) <jbocinski&bocinski,com> on Friday August 08, 2003 @05:45PM (#6650313) Journal
    Doesn't this sounds a lot like how the Replicators got started on Stargate SG-1? Believe me, we don't need any damn replictors ...

    My motto is, if the Asgard can't do it, I shouldn't attempt it.

  • aaa (Score:1)

    by magsymp ( 562489 )

    Space Legos + Slashdot =

    Millenium Falcon and bad jokes [robotcity.com]

  • This and that... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by neglige ( 641101 )
    Hmmmm...

    You might want to build some of this [dolphination.co.uk] like that [skizzers.org]. Lego all the way.

  • It's the Borg! (Score:2, Funny)

    by Ydna ( 32354 )
    From the website:

    In this example, five or more modules, each with processors, are connected together, forming a collective. When one module is removed, the "collective" senses the removal and adjusts accordingly.
    Next thing you know, we'll build this thing and send it off to the delta quadrant for further development.

  • Although, I thought they did a lot of this already? Don't folks recycle software and module designs as much as possible when designing new satellites now?
  • There is no such word as "Legos", just as there is no such word as "sheeps". The correct word to use is simply Lego.

    I'm sure that everyone who has ever read a slashdot story about lego must know this by now, so why are people still getting it wrong? Obstinacy? Stupidity? Or maybe posters (and the US Air Force) just think they are right and the Lego company are wrong about this?
  • Most of the barriers to this goal are: (1) wiring harnesses, (2) software, (3) human fallibility, and (4) closed, proprietary "standards".

    Hmmm...I'm guessing Microsoft's bids on this will fall on deaf ears...

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Close