'Non-Invasive Polygraph' Uses Infrared Light 77
opticsorg writes "Infrared laser pulses could soon be used to determine whether someone is telling the truth or is under stress. In patent application WO 03/057003, US firm Defense Group describes a non-invasive polygraph machine that fires infrared pulses at the subject. The reflected and scattered pulses are gathered and analysed by a receiver. 'The receiver is connected to an information processing device capable of determining various physiological characteristics exhibited by the human subject,' say the authors." Whether "various physiological characteristics" are reliable signs of truth-telling is another issue, though.
Still subjective measurements (Score:3, Insightful)
Anyone know when this concept was first used? Sending someone to stand in front of a mystic or seer so as to evoke a confession?
If it really worked (Score:4, Insightful)
Since there is no scientific standard for lie detectors (and the current ones are obviously a scam), you can use any kind of dubious technology you like. A medical device, however, has to demonstrate efficacy which is a much higher standard.
Re:Polygraph story (Score:3, Insightful)
Stop right there. You have just described the whole "science" of polography. The only reason it sticks around is there is enough money being pumped into it, that the purveyors of this snake oil can keep lots of people convinced that it works. The only thing it is useful for is convincing weak minded idiots that you actually have a way to see inside their heads, and get them to confess. Other than that, it is total bunk.
Since they started using the 4th definition (Score:2, Insightful)
If there is anything that should be private, it should be one's own thoughts. Attempting to read these is invasive.
Re:Since when were standard polygraphs invasive? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This would make politics interesting (Score:1, Insightful)