SETI@Home Publishes Skymap 317
An anonymous reader writes "The skymap of where in the night sky to find the most promising SETI@Home signals is reported today, along with the research plan for the March Stellar Countdown project. The dedicated use of the Arecibo Telescope to revisit these spikes, pulses, and steady signals, focused on 166 star candidates. Those 166 were pruned from the five billion signals that have been found since 1999, depending on the signal's persistence, closeness to a known star, and frequency. The next step is particularly fascinating, if a signal appears to have increased since the first observation put that star on the checklist."
"Star candidates"? (Score:3, Funny)
out of money (Score:0, Funny)
Re:"Star candidates"? (Score:5, Funny)
And here's the surprise: the newlywed alien couple will have Disaster Area play at their wedding, and be given their own Heart of Gold Spaceship as a wedding present!!
Re:Proximity to a star? (Score:3, Funny)
I have contributed.. (Score:5, Funny)
And to think my computer use to just fly toasters when it was idle.
If the signal has INCREASED? (Score:3, Funny)
"The next step is particularly fascinating, if a signal appears to have increased since the first observation put that star on the checklist."
How could it have increased?
These signals are coming from light-years away.
Even if the aliens learned, somehow (say, a year ago) that we were listening for them, finding this out instantly via some sort of "subspace radio" or the like, the signals we have received since then were ALREADY IN TRANSIT when the SETI@home program began.
Besides, there'd be no way for them to know we're listening, let alone to find that out within the last year.
Or maybe I just grossly misread the poster's meaning?
in the end... (Score:1, Funny)
(or possibly "If all you can detect is this signal, you're too stupid to bother with. Stay home and evolve for a few million years.")
Re:SETI is a crock- here's why (Score:2, Funny)
I think you answered your own criticism here. Nobody fricken knows. It is a Columbus-like exploration: sail and see what you bump into.
Ok, so you send a reply.
Who says we would send a reply? Maybe we will just listen more in and watch their version of I Love Lucy.
Re:A little OT but (Score:3, Funny)
I can just picture it (Score:3, Funny)
A universe full of introverts, wouldn't it be ironic.
Re:If the signal has INCREASED? (Score:5, Funny)
We could all watch Omicron Persei 8's version of Single Female Lawyer.
Re:A little OT but (Score:5, Funny)
oh wait...
Re:A little OT but (Score:2, Funny)
Re:SETI is a crock- here's why (Score:2, Funny)
Maybe we should work this from the opposite end... Use the highest power transmitters available to broadcast something for years and years!
How about Pr0n, for example? I'd love to see what aliens would think about "That blue Pr0nWorld orbiting the yellow star".
Perhaps they'd have anal-probe tours... Perhaps they ALREADY DO!
N.
Re:I have contributed.. (Score:5, Funny)
Why is it that... (Score:2, Funny)
Holy shit, distributed processing program on all of our computers. The machines plotting against us is already happening!
Aliens (Score:5, Funny)
These are some serious questions that need to be addressed before we invite more aliens into the country, I think.
can SETI break DRM? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Doppler Drift Rate "chirping" seems way redunda (Score:2, Funny)