Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Mud on Mars: Look for Life in Russell Crater 26

An anonymous reader writes "Mars Global Surveyor satellite images show mud may have flowed on Mars as recently as the last 100 years. The place is called Russell Crater, in the southern hemisphere. Water would exist during summer noon, long enough to carve out the embankments and dams that make these patterns different from rocky avalanches. The BBC has an interview."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mud on Mars: Look for Life in Russell Crater

Comments Filter:
  • seriously, though (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Rxke ( 644923 ) on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @03:52PM (#6060208) Homepage
    The article mentions the mud/liquid water could be present THIS VERY DAY, if this would turn out to be true,... boy, staggering.... Liquid water on Mars! I hope they really decontaminated all previous probes properly, would be quite a shock to discover earth-bacteria living there, instead of martian bugs.
  • Saxifrage Russell (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @03:53PM (#6060222)
    Was who I first thought of when I saw "Mars" and "Russell" in the same sentence.
  • Water on Mars... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by akgunkel ( 567825 ) * on Wednesday May 28, 2003 @04:08PM (#6060392) Homepage Journal
    I just wonder if all these water on Mars claims will be verified before we send Humans there.

    By that I mean, if all of our probes can't confirm this and in 10, 20, or 30 years we finally get Humans out there and they do confirm water on Mars, will that justify the expense and danger of manned space exploration?

    It just seems to me that if there is any water on Mars, a probe will have a lot harder time finding definative proof of it than an intelligent human being.
  • Re:COLOR Please? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by pyr0 ( 120990 ) on Thursday May 29, 2003 @01:07AM (#6065095)
    Why do you need color? Seriously...I'm not trying to troll you or anything. When all you want is to see surface features, black and white is perfectly adequate. If the images were in color, you'd just see what color the sediments are (some varying shades of red and yellow probably). Personally, I think black and white pictures of landscapes look pretty neat.

Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.

Working...