Delta 4 Inaugural Launch A Success 163
brandido writes "Space.com is reporting that the Delta 4 has lifted off from Cape Canaveral at 5:40 pm EST. According to the Article: 'Boeing's Delta 4 has lifted off from pad 37 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. Everything appeared to be working normally with the rocket as it made its initial climb out over the Atlantic Ocean during the first minute.' It will now take the two-stage rocket some 37 minutes to deliver the Eutelsat W5 spacecraft to orbit, so keep your fingers crossed all continues to go well.'" Looks like everything went swimmingly well.
All Looked good from a live view (Score:3, Interesting)
You could watch each stage fire off. Pretty neat.
Real question I ask, is why are they back to using the Deltas? Didn't the older ones blow up enough or are the Shuttles THAT booked up?
why so many launch pads? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:All Looked good from a live view (Score:5, Interesting)
I was working for a company that did work on both, and I remember the huge disappointment when one of the Titan 4's exploded at launch...it seemed like the program would be declining rather quickly after that. Job security and all. The Delta program always seemed much more reliable in comarison.
Can I see too? (Score:2, Interesting)
-Trev
Finally... (Score:4, Interesting)
I hope so. While I totally support "real" space exploration, the shuttles have, for the past few decades, scammed the US out of billions (trillions, yet?) of dollars. We use them for nothing even remotely interesting, yet pay a fortune to maintain and occasionally launch them.
Re:All Looked good from a live view (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, they can't buy services elsewhere (the Russians have comparable or larger vehicles, for maybe 1/10 the cost), but a lot of these space programs, pretty much, are job creation programs for American citizens so they try to keep the tax dollars in America (quite apart from any security issues).
Re:Can I see too? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:All Looked good from a live view (Score:3, Interesting)
What i saw when I watched this one go (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Cost and reliability (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Yes, it could. Re:range (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Cost and reliability (Score:3, Interesting)
The STS is a 100 tonne to LEO launch vehicle.
How can that be? Well, if you take off that 90 tonne waste-of-space 70s technology monster that is the frickin' orbiter we could get some real lifting done around here! Has this "radical" design been actually engineered? of course it has [marssociety.org]. It's called the Ares booster.
Now if only NASA would get over their bad case of NIH we could do things, like, oh, I don't know, throw the ISS to orbit in 3 shots, go to Mars (2 shots), go back to the moon (1 shot)? And that's just three off the top of my head. In 6 launches. Sigh.