Stopping Killer Asteroids 627
Drog writes "Earth has had a few near misses with asteroids recently (although "near hits" would be more accurate). It's just a matter of time, though, before we detect one with our name on it. In this New York Times article, experts discuss the various ways that we might go about saving our planet. Remarkably, nuclear detonations are not a good option, as they would break the asteroid into many pieces and merely increase our odds of being hit. And a detonation some distance away may simply be absorbed by the asteroid with virtually no effect. Instead, say scientists who study asteroid hazards, a gentle sustained push is what's needed (slow and steady wins the race). Some of the approaches have been discussed in science fiction for years--a mass driver, an electromagnetic machine which hurls dirt from the surface, an orbiting parabolic mirror to heat up the surface and create a plume of vaporized material. All of these methods require one thing, however. Time. At least several decades warning."
As long as Bruce WIllis is with us (Score:2, Funny)
Huge Asteroids: (Score:5, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:As long as Bruce WIllis is with us (Score:2, Funny)
Bring it on (Score:2, Funny)
Where's Voltron?? (Score:2, Funny)
A couple of ideas (Score:0, Funny)
As for pushing them aside, there are several options. You can deflect an asteroid. You can perturb the orbit. You can also lateralize the velocity vector. One approach that I haven't seen talked about much is bending the worldline of the asteroid such that it no longer intersects Earth's worldline, but that method may require some scientific advances beyond our current technology.
Just my $.02.
Stargate? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm reminded of an episode of Stargate SG1 (Failsafe) when Anubis sent an asteroid towards Earth.
"O'Neill: I've seen this movie, it hits Paris."
Re:As long as Bruce WIllis is with us (Score:5, Funny)
That should take care of the problems with Asteroids...
S
Re:Where's Voltron?? (Score:5, Funny)
Solution (Score:2, Funny)
You can tie couple of them to a powerful rocket, point the rocket to the asteroid and press the button.
Newsflash! (Score:2, Funny)
Frenchman Jaques Fernoi states, "As long as I can make my cheese and drink wine freely, I welcome our new leaders in this asteroid."
More updates as they present.
I am relieved (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Fo r a nuclear detonation to be effective... (Score:5, Funny)
-B
Easy solution. (Score:5, Funny)
Clearly, the pointdexter astrophysicists who offered this opinion have never seen Armageddon.
My Plan.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Bear with me (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Can't test a nuke in space (Score:5, Funny)
Burn the observatorium! (Score:2, Funny)
Faked asteroid hit spoof.... (Score:5, Funny)
Oh the laughter from the IT dept...
Re:Don't we get hit all the time??? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:As long as Bruce WIllis is with us (Score:5, Funny)
What about the new national security solution by Pres. Bush...
Unfortunately, unless the asteroid has ties to Al Qaeda or Saddam Hussein, Bush won't be interested.
Bad people do bad things... (Score:3, Funny)
I've recently applied for patents on various technologies to eliminate or deviate asteroids on an intercept course with Earth.
If anyone should attempt to use those devices to save the Earth, I will promptly send a horde of evil barbarian lawyers with a cease and desist order.
You can't save your punny planet now... I've used your own vices against you!
My minions at the patent office have served me well on this day.
cylix,
The Lord of Evil and Terror
New Jersey Reference (Score:2, Funny)
Good Idea! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:As long as Bruce WIllis is with us (Score:3, Funny)
It may not alter the tragectory of the asteroid, but it would probably make the asteroid less noticable, in the "if a tree falls in the woods, but nobody hears it, does it make a sound" sense.
Chalk one up for the nuclear age!
Next problem, please.
Re:As long as Bruce WIllis is with us (Score:1, Funny)
The Easy Solution (Score:3, Funny)
If an additional course corrections are required, announce one of the following:
1) A security hole has been found in IE
2) Ellen Fiess will make another Apple commercial
3) Microsoft buys the rights to Ogg Forbis
The resulting explusion of hot air should be sufficent.
More on the nuclear option - 1979 technology (Score:3, Funny)
1979 technology [klov.com] that has been safely used to defend against both asteroids and alien vessels for 23 years.
Save the Asteroids! (Score:2, Funny)
Forget Bruce Willis! (Score:1, Funny)
Near Miss, Far Miss, Huge Miss (Score:1, Funny)
Purists will howl, but, very generally: A Near miss is anything within 640K, a Far miss is between 640K and 1024K, and a Huge miss is anything beyond 1024K.
Re:Yeah, but that's not the first solution we can (Score:2, Funny)
Don't forget the telephone sanitisers, hairdressers and management consultants - in fact lets put them in the same ark as the politicians and telemarketers...
I believe we solved this problem in the 80's (Score:3, Funny)
It's very simple. We need a ship. A ship the shape of a triangle. This ship should be of simple control. Forward movement and rotation only! A single gun capable of halving (on occasion trifurcating) any size asteroid will be mounted on the front. When it has halved the pieces to a significantly small size, they will disappear upon further assault. This ship will also be fitted with a shielding system. Pulling down on the joystick or using a separate button system should activate a circular shield capable of withstanding a certain period of collision with objects, regardless of frequency. In future revisions of this vehicle, we will include a hyperwarp feature to jump out of harms way (unfortunately, technology will not allow us to determine the point of reentry, making this a daunting choice for the pilot).
Finally, be sure to look out for ellusive UFOs with hostile aliens ready to destroy our ship (regardless of its peaceful intentions of saving our planet).
I distinctly remember training many hours on the simulator for this solution not twenty years ago. I don't know why we're worried about this problem seeing as we already have the solution.
Good point (Score:3, Funny)