Nanotechnology, US Government, and Secrecy 275
Glenn Reynolds has written an interesting, albiet a bit speculative, in regards to the role of the US Government in the possible quieting of nanotechnology research. As Gleen points out, there's some good pre-existing guidelines to research as well, from the Foresight Institute.
Nanotech != Good. (Score:2, Interesting)
Nanotechnology is a way to apocalypsis (Score:2, Interesting)
The evil in such technology is that after some time you can lose control after it...
Sad that defense is involved in it...
Re:Nanotech != Good. (Score:4, Interesting)
Kintanon
the twilight of scientific openness (Score:3, Interesting)
U.S. is clearly by itself as the worlds only superpower,
its looking at errecting barriers to entry against
competitors aspiring to catch up and surpass. Forget
Europe here, think ahead a generation and look at
India & China. We are talking about technology as
a strategic asset, not just militarily but economically.
And I think it won't be just a nanotech thing.
Amazing how this trend runs counter to movements
(enabled by the internet!) for scientists to be
more open and abondon traditional publishers for
easily accessable electronic publishing!
The Deliberate restriction of technology... (Score:1, Interesting)
Comment on Foresight.org... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Is Everyone on this thread a doofus luddite? (Score:2, Interesting)