Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space

Budget Satellite 213

codejunkie writes: "Check out this story from the Baltimore Sun. Apparently the middies were laughed at when they proposed a budget satellite for 50K. Boeing said it couldn't be done and gave them 250K. Well now they can build five more because the smart minds on the bay have built one."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Budget Satellite

Comments Filter:
  • The quality? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Modus Nonsens ( 461848 ) on Saturday August 25, 2001 @03:09AM (#2215742)
    But will the quality be the same? Aren't the more expensive parts expensive just because they are designed for outer space use?
  • by baptiste ( 256004 ) <{su.etsitpab} {ta} {ekim}> on Saturday August 25, 2001 @05:19AM (#2215972) Homepage Journal
    I can't believe that /.ers are being so negative about this! Cut them some slack! I think its a really neat project. All I see is "It'll never last/work" or "What about the launch costs"

    Hell, I wish them the best of luck. I hope the satellite lasts them 5 years instead of one. The idea here ISN'T making satellites out of cheap parts, its coming up with less expensive ways to accomplish the tasks needed to operate a saltellite. Sure using a tape measure for an antenna sounds hokey, but maybe it'll give the professionals some ideas for the future (gee antennas that unroll on their own instead of requriing some advanced deployment system that only gets used once) etc.

    For as much as folks bitch about the gov't here, I think if a few students decide to show that a satellite CAN be constructed cheaply - more power to them. The information they gather will be very useful. Yes, sure, the launch costs aren't part of the $50K, but that wasn't part of the equation. Most satellites themselves WITHOUT launch costs are millions and millions of dollars. Nobody said they could launch it and build it for < $50K. So they hitch a ride on a rocket going up anyway. Remember, this thing is pretty small and it probably is tucked into the payload bay where a normal size satellite wouldn't fit.

    But even if it isn't. I'd think geeks like us would be proud that some students got laughed at when applying for the grant and managed to pull it off through some everyday common sense and ingenuity. I say good luck and I hope everything works as planned!

  • Why Alaska? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by eean ( 177028 ) <slashdot@monrTIGERoe.nu minus cat> on Saturday August 25, 2001 @01:08PM (#2216245) Homepage
    Why are they launching the rocket from the Kodiak islands?
    Don't you need a more powerful rocket the farther away you get from the equator? I heard that was why the Russians built such powerful rockets because they launched them from Siberia.

    Florida makes a lot more sense.

    There is that one company the launch's rockets from a ship so that they can do it at the equator and avoid the here-today-gone-tomorrow governments that are on the equator.

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...