Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science News

The Sky in X-Rays 12

Today's TBTF has interesting data and links on the state of X-ray astronomy; ABCNews has an overview. For five months, the orbiting Chandra observatory has been producing great data and potential desktop art. Now, by focusing on a small area of sky, Chanda has resolved what was formerly just known as "X-rayglow" into distinct sources (photo), many of which even Hubble can't find in visible light. The American Astronomical Society will talk about this and other Chandra findings in a live webcast today at 2P.M. EST. For a two-year overview of our universe's secret life in invisible radiation, check out All-Sky Monitor Movies. And oh yeah, in visible-light news, microlensing provides strong evidence for stellar-size black holes being numerous.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Sky in X-Rays

Comments Filter:
  • You mean the stars would have to be larger. The black holes themselves would be much smaller. That is why they are black.
  • This is exactly what we need... more satellites producing more high quality NASA Desktop Art. Send em up by the dozen! (Im serious too)
  • And oh yeah, in visible-light news, microlensing [bbc.co.uk] provides strong evidence for stellar-size black holes being numerous.

    By "stellar size" they must mean mass. By way of quick calculation (R = 2GM/c^2), we find that these black holes that are "about six times heavier than the Sun", are only 17.74 km(11 mi) in radius. For comparison, the sun has a radius of about 696,000 km(432,474 mi), and the earth 6,370 km(3,958 mi). Keep in mind these are radii. I don't know a whole lot about astronomy, particularly star sizes, but I've heard that the sun is a releativly small star.

    The thing that makes me wonder, is if these are so common, what are the chances of coming accross one? It's probably about the same as coming accross an asteroid. I realize that there is a lot of space out there too. Also, the farther away we look, the farther back in time we look as well. Seeing many of these black holes would suggest that there are even more now, and our chances of finding new holes closer to home increase as time passes. I think it will be interesting to see new progress being made in this branch of science. Especially now that the HST is working again and can help out with the workload.


    Wigs

  • [nasa.gov]
    e0102electricbluet.jpg

    Object Name: E0102-72
    Object Category: Supernova Remnant
    Coordinates: (J2000) Right Ascension 01h04m02s Declination -72d01m56s
    Constellation: Tucana (Tuc)

    Object Description: E0102-72 is a supernova remnant in the Small Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way. This galaxy is 190,000 light years from Earth. E0102 -72, which is approximately a thousand years old, is believed to have resulted from the explosion of a massive star. Stretching across forty light years of space, the multi-million degree source resembles a flaming cosmic wheel. Astronomer's Notebook: ACIS detector

    PHOTO CREDIT: Chandra X-ray Image

An adequate bootstrap is a contradiction in terms.

Working...