Slashdot Log In
Particle Physicists Share the Physics Nobel
Posted by
timothy
on Tue Oct 07, 2008 09:39 AM
from the wave-physicists-get-it-simultaneously dept.
from the wave-physicists-get-it-simultaneously dept.
somegeekynick writes "The 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics has been jointly awarded to Yoichiro Nambu of the University of Chicago 'for the discovery of the mechanism of spontaneous broken symmetry in subatomic physics,' and Makoto Kobayashi of the KEK lab and Toshihide Maskawa of the Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, both in Japan, 'for the discovery of the origin of the broken symmetry which predicts the existence of at least three families of quarks in nature.'"
Related Stories
[+]
Irrelevant Scientific Research Honored 93 comments
More than 1,000 people attended this year's Ig Nobel awards, a light-hearted alternative to the Nobel Prizes. Scientists who unlocked the inner secrets of dog fleas, crisps and tangled string swept the show. Handing out awards was William Lipscomb, the 1976 Nobel laureate for chemistry, also doubling Thursday, at the age of 89, as the hero in the "Win-a-Date-With-a-Nobel-Laureate Contest." The prize itself is a plaque that reads, "This Ig Nobel Prize is awarded in the year 2008 to an Ig Nobel Prize Winner, in recognition of the Ig Nobel Prize Winners' Ig Nobel Prize winning achievement." At last I can submit my paper, "Everything is Really Wet, Even Dry Stuff." for peer review.
[+]
Nobel Prize For Medicine Awarded, Physics Soon To Follow 135 comments
Nobel Prize season is here again, and the first award for Physiology or Medicine was split between two virologists who discovered HIV and one who demonstrated that a virus causes cervical cancer. Coming soon is the announcement for Physics. Look to the right for a chance to pit your selection wit against the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences with a poll for which scientific achievement deserves the prize. Front runners, according to Reuters, are; Andre Geim and Kostya Novoselov, discovers of graphene, Vera Rubin, provider of the best evidence yet of dark matter, and Roger Penrose and Dan Shechtman, discoverers of Penrose tilings and quasicrystals.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
w00t (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
How do you know they are "boys"? Japanese names are hard (for non-Japanese) to determine the gender just by reading them.
Sexist!
Re: (Score:2)
How do you know they are "boys"? Japanese names are hard (for non-Japanese) to determine the gender just by reading them.
Sexist!
Unless I magically happened to know them (not necessarily personally)? Or I made some research. Or I know how male and female japanese names are differentiated. Or D) all of the above.
Re: (Score:2)
Or I know how male and female japanese names are differentiated.
You might want to add a "usually" to that sentence. I know a Chihiro whose parents didn't think it was strictly a female name.
Re:w00t (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Yoichiro and Toshihide are typically male first names.
Makoto is dual gender.
Speaking of broken symmetry... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Am I the only one that thinks (Score:2)
sharing prizes on subatomic particles studies is ironic???
Re:Am I the only one that thinks (Score:5, Funny)
[Am I the only one that thinks] sharing prizes on subatomic particles studies is ironic???
Maybe you are, maybe you are not. We won't know until someone observes your post, thus collapsing the waveform...
Parent
Curious (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Curious (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Curious (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Not for experimental particle physics. (Score:2, Informative)
Theory is one thing, experiment another. (it's quite relevant due to the wording in Nobel's will)
Prizes to experimental discoveries, in particular anticipated ones, can come quite quickly.
CERN's last Nobel, to Carlo Rubbia, was in 1984 for a discovery (W and Z bosons) made the previous year.
If the LHC discovers the Higgs boson, a Nobel prize within short order is almost certain.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
They also tend not to award prizes so soon after the discoveries (the prize for medicine this year was for discovering HIV almost 30 years ago).
Part of the requirement of receiving a Nobel prize is living long enough after your work to be recognised for it (they are not awarded posthumously).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It's interesting that they should award a Nobel for particle physics now, when there's a very real possibility that discoveries at the LHC will make an outstanding case for another within just a few years.
Even if the LHC changes how we view the subatomic world, their contributions can't be denied. I even think that it was on purpose: knowing that the LHC will make more discoveries worthing of a Nobel, they decided to award it now, as not to award again on an even shorter period of time.
I'm not sure if I agree with the Committee politics of awarding the prizes after many years, "to let the theory settles", although I agree it is a good way to avoid things like the cold fusion. But I'm sure whoever finds th
Nambu ok, but... (Score:5, Informative)
The Nobel prize to Yoichiro Nambu is highly deserved, but the other two are not really. It should have gone to Nicola Cabibbo, their work is just a multidimensional generalization of his model.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa_matrix
Re:Nambu ok, but... (Score:5, Interesting)
Not exactly. The prize was awarded "for the discovery of the origin of the broken symmetry which predicts the existence of at least three families of quarks in nature", that is, for realizing that CP-violation can only take place if there are at least three families of fermions.
Cabibbo made a theory of quark flavours with two families (predicting the charm-quark). Kobayashi and Maskawa found out that with two families there is no CP-violation, and that one needs a third quark family. This last reason is the one which the comitee mentions.
Whether Cabibbo should be awarded a price for the prediction of the charm-quark is another story.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Cabibbo did not predict the charm quark. Glashow, Iliopoulos, and Maiani did.
What Cabibbo did was to express the relationship between [down, strange] strong eigenstates and [down, strange] weak eigenstates by means of a 2x2 rotation matrix, characterized by a rotation angle (known as the Cabibbo angle, which is around 13 degrees). Useful, but not Nobel-prize stuff. What Kobayashi and Maskawa did was not simply to change from two to three. They used Cabibbo's germ of an idea to describe the entire weak h
Re:Bose anyone? (Score:5, Informative)
As an Indian, its kinda disheartening that Bose didn't get the Nobel.
Well, Satyendra Nath Bose died in 1974... one of the rules of the Nobel prize that they don't break is that it only goes to living scientists, so they were hardly likely to give the 2008 prize to him. (The dead scientists can't appreciate the honor, so it makes sense to give it to them while they're alive.)
Parent
Re:Bose anyone? (Score:5, Funny)
I go around giving people preemptive Darwin Awards for just this reason...
Parent
Re:Bose anyone? (Score:5, Interesting)
Bose had bad luck. He only had one big, Nobel-worthy work (Bose-Einstein statistics).. but it came about during a generation when there were quite a lot of great discoveries being made in Physics. But Raman did get one, so Indian physicists of that generation aren't entirely unrepresented.
Gandhi was as much a given prizewinner as anyone, but his tragic death came too shortly after independence.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Half of the particles are named after Bose. I think that's a much better deal than getting a price that will be forgotten in a few hundred years.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)