Slashdot Log In
New Map IDs the Core of the Human Brain
Posted by
samzenpus
on Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:17 AM
from the I-want-to-see-what-you're-thinking dept.
from the I-want-to-see-what-you're-thinking dept.
gerald626 writes "An international team of researchers has created the first complete high-resolution map of how millions of neural fibers in the human cerebral cortex — the outer layer of the brain responsible for higher-level thinking — connect and communicate. Their groundbreaking work identified a single network core, or hub, that may be key to the workings of both hemispheres of the brain. So basically our brain is a network connected to a hub. I wonder if I can get an upgrade to a GigE switch?"
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
hub? (Score:5, Funny)
all running round robin =)
Re:hub? (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
D:
Google Brain (Score:4, Funny)
We knew that already. (Score:5, Funny)
Their groundbreaking work identified a single network core, or hub, that may be key to the workings of both hemispheres of the brain.
The female of the species' "hub" goes straight to the left ring finger.
How much friggin' tax money did these guys spend discovering what we've already known for at least six millennia now?
Re:We knew that already. (Score:5, Funny)
Their groundbreaking work identified a single network core, or hub, that may be key to the workings of both hemispheres of the brain.
The female of the species' "hub" goes straight to the left ring finger.
Absolutely. And one needs to insert Gateway to establish a VPN.
It's different story that females PKI mechanism is still unknown, and male species have to rely on brute force techniques to decipher some of the data, which unfortunately takes years after VPN is established.
Parent
So if our brains are like a hub... (Score:5, Funny)
Are schitzophrenics equipped with a neural equivalent of a dlink hub?
Now to find out what it does. (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"Christian" filters... "Jihad" algorithms.... Conservative and Liberal perception devices.... Behavioral controls, perhaps used as terms of parole (for violent criminals OR political prisoners).
Why have disagreeable children when you can program perfectly behaved clones of yourself?
Re:Now to find out what it does. (Score:4, Insightful)
> Imagine fitting your kids with filters and "plug-ins" to make sure they turn out a certain way.
We already do. It's called "parenting". You do it by talking to them, and yes, it does work if you do it properly.
Parent
Re:Find someone on death row? (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Not a switch. (Score:5, Interesting)
You would not want a switch. Isolating all but broadcast packets to just their destination would stifle creativity. It has to be a hub and bandwidth in a highly-interconnected net may be unimportant.
Re:Not a switch. (Score:5, Informative)
I'm trying to figure out what you mean by this, but I'm not sure I have it. If you meant the hub metaphor the whole way, then no that isn't how it works. If all messages went to all destinations, you can imagine how difficult it would be to make any sense of them. Further, when an area receives input, it is not a stateless message. It is received in a state of "sensitivity" (for lack of a more detailed explanation) and the fact that it is received in its state also alters the local state for future messages. The easiest example is sensory desensitization... like when you no longer smell that horrible smell once you've been in the sysadmin's office for a few minutes. The same destinations are getting the same inputs, but the local state has changed due to previous inputs and therefore there is a different result.
So you can see that if all destinations got all inputs the brain would basically "white out" and be useless. The fact is that there is a very specific network structure. Each local network has projections into other local networks, which is why emotions and different sensory modalities have impacts on each other and on other "unrelated" areas of the brain.
Parent
Maybe Descartes wasn't so far off... (Score:4, Insightful)
Hmm... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Thanks, asshole. That link crashed Firefox.
Parent
Re:Hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
'Support the troops...'
'Think of the children...'
'Pater noster...'
'Microsoft Sucks...'
Parent
Al Gore's next project: Interbrain (Score:3, Interesting)
Now it's just a matter of figuring out the protocol used and hooking up a few brains together. Seriously
Required Statement: (Score:5, Funny)
Male VS female brain (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:If I was from Control (Score:5, Funny)
I thought Control was located somewhat further south.
Parent
Re:If I was from Control (Score:5, Informative)
Overnight being the last 14 years.
It comes from
Deep Space Homer [wikipedia.org], an episode of the simpsons that first aired on February 24, 1994.
Spoiler:
When in space Homer flies into the Ant colony, breaking it open sending Ants everywhere. The ants make it onto the camera. Since the ants are so close to the camera, they appear very large. Kent Brockman (the Simpsons news anchor) then says "And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords".
The more you know(tm)
Parent
Re:If I was from Control (Score:4, Funny)
Pull the stick out of your ass and learn to take a fucking joke.
Parent
Re:Who needs an IQ score... (Score:4, Funny)
GP started typing that post a few weeks ago.
Parent