Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Paper Stronger Than Cast Iron

Posted by kdawson on Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:20 PM
from the write-on dept.
TaeKwonDood writes "All paper is made of cellulose, which at the nanoscale level is quite strong, but paper processing makes large, fragile fibers that break easily. Researchers in Sweden have have come up with a manufacturing process that keeps the fibers small, resulting in 'nanopaper' with over 1.6 times the tensile strength of cast iron (214 megapascals vs. 130 mPa). And since cellulose is the most abundant organic compound on the planet, it's cheap to use compared to other exotic, expensive-to-produce options — such as carbon nanotubes."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by camperdave (969942) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:23PM (#23719371) Journal
    It's strong enough to build a ship out of... as long as you don't get it wet.
  • by Armon (932023) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:24PM (#23719381)
    Coming next summer, the Epic battle between Robert Downy Jr. as Iron Man, and an unknown antagonists who goes by the mysterious PAPER MAN! /attempt at humor
  • by Chas (5144) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:25PM (#23719387) Homepage Journal
    Or treatable to be fire-resistant?

    I can see a lot of uses for it even if it isn't. But I can see some fairly awe-inspiring ones if it's possible.
  • Milli-pascal? (Score:5, Informative)

    by dascandy (869781) <dascandy@gmail.com> on Monday June 09 2008, @11:26PM (#23719397)
    > 214 megapascals vs. 130 mPa

    214 megapascal (singular, it's a unit) is about 1.6*10^9 more than 130 millipascal. Use your units properly.
    • Re:Milli-pascal? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 09 2008, @11:40PM (#23719579)
      What's he trying to say is that those units should be MPa (capital M and capital P) for both.

      Also most steels are above 400 MPa (some as high as 1800) so this isn't that strong, in fact Aluminum alloys can reach into the 400 MPa range.

      Cast Iron (in its 2 major forms grey & white cast) is very brittle and therefore does not have good tensile strength. However compressive strength and its good vibration tolerance is why a lot of large machining equipment uses a cast iron base.
    • by pablomme (1270790) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:57PM (#23719793)

      Use your units properly.
      AND they should be using MebiPascals: "204 MiPa vs. 124 MiPa".

      IEC 60027-2 : making life easier for everyone since 1999.
  • Papery (Score:5, Funny)

    by Deltaspectre (796409) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:27PM (#23719413)
    It's just like irony but stronger
  • by Tumbleweed (3706) * on Monday June 09 2008, @11:28PM (#23719421) Homepage
    Perfect for government documents and voting machine audit results. :)
  • 1.6 times (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 09 2008, @11:30PM (#23719449)

    over 1.6 times the tensile strength of cast iron
    Considering that cast iron isn't particularly renown for its tensile strength, being 1.6 times stronger isn't that impressive.
  • by professorfalcon (713985) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:32PM (#23719473)
    This is going to mess up so many games of Paper, Rock, and Scissors.
  • hang on! (Score:5, Funny)

    by H0D_G (894033) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:36PM (#23719521)
    Wait, so paper beats scissors now?
  • by dbIII (701233) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:37PM (#23719531)
    The tensile strength of grey cast iron is fairly low because the carbon comes out in the form of graphite. That's right - the same thing that is in pencils. When you have large flakes of graphite, say a few millimetres in size, you have a fairly low tensile strength (stretch it and it breaks) and low toughness (drop it and it cracks). The compressive strength isn't so bad and cast iron is a lot easier to make than steel which is why it is still used.

    With the paper there is the advantage that small particle sizes dramaticly increase strength.

  • cast iron? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Tmack (593755) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:41PM (#23719583) Homepage Journal
    Really, cast iron is weak in comparison to a lot of metals. 130mPa is also the ultimate strength of human bone [wikipedia.org], which would have made a much more interesting comparison. Cast iron isnt really used as much for anything anymore since steel is much stronger and is almost as cheap. The article's claim to replacing carbon nano tubes is a bit of an exaderation, as they have a strength of 62GPa

    Tm

  • Like Paper Construction Cranes?
    • by Garridan (597129) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:34PM (#23719501)
      Oops, just RTFA'd. They didn't show that paper was as strong as paper. They made paper twice as strong as old "high strength" paper. Which still has very, very little tensile strength. Comparing to cast iron really doesn't help their case.
    • by Jeff DeMaagd (2015) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:51PM (#23719725) Homepage Journal
      But... cast iron has the tensile strength on the order of concrete.

      I think you might be two orders of magnitude off. Cast iron shows up as having around 130 to 200MPa (depending on your figures), concrete shows up at 3MPa. Having used it, cast iron can be pretty cheesy stuff. But I imagine that strength-to-weight is pretty good.
      • Re:First! (Score:5, Informative)

        by serviscope_minor (664417) on Monday June 09 2008, @11:47PM (#23719675)
        wood has the highest tensile strength of any building material known to man based either on weight or cross sectional area.

        No, steel does. That's why I-beams are steel, not wood. It's also why the cables in suspension bridges are steel, not wood poles.

        Not a lot of our building techniques rely primarily on tensile strength, most rely on spanning gaps with weight bearing members.

        And what determines how well you can span a gap? A combination of compressive and tensile strength. You need to revise your beam bending...

        Tensile strength does come into play on collapsing structures, as weight bearing members are removed, and buildings end up hanging from their walls or rafters.

        So what does some in to play? Probably a mixture of tensile and compressive strength, depending on what is failing and why.

        • Re:First! (Score:5, Insightful)

          by icebike (68054) on Tuesday June 10 2008, @12:30AM (#23720101)
          > No, steel does. That's why I-beams are steel, not
          > wood. It's also why the cables in suspension
          > bridges are steel, not wood poles.

          The same weight of wood would be stronger.

          Some respect has to be paid to longevity. Who would use wood suspension cables in termite country?

          There are also problems of attaching wood to other objects. Hard to weld wood you know.
      • Re:First! (Score:5, Informative)

        by mrcaseyj (902945) on Tuesday June 10 2008, @12:01AM (#23719827)
        Icebike wrote
        >...wood has the highest tensile strength of any building material known to man based either on weight or cross sectional area.

        I Think your estimate of wood is much too high. Wikipedia's article of tensile strength http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensile_strength lists pine wood at 40 MPa    I know there are some woods that are significantly stronger but still.

        For comparison some other tensile strengths listed in MPa are:

        Cast Iron           200
        structural steel    400
        steel piano wire   2500
        Concrete              3
        HDPE plastic         37
        Aluminum Aloy       455
        Glass              4710
        Carbon fiber       5650
        Carbon nanotubes  63000