Slashdot Log In
New Method Discovered For Making Telescopes On the Moon
Posted by
Soulskill
on Saturday June 07, @01:16PM
from the i'm-sure-macgyver-has-some-ideas-too dept.
from the i'm-sure-macgyver-has-some-ideas-too dept.
NASA scientists have discovered a way to craft very large mirrors using carbon nanotubes, some epoxy, a little bit of aluminum, and large quantities of lunar dust. They say the technique will allow the construction of massive telescopes on the moon without the expense and risk of transporting the mirrors from Earth. Douglas Rabin of the Goddard Space Flight Center is quoted saying, "Our method could be scaled-up on the moon, using the ubiquitous lunar dust, to create giant telescope mirrors up to 50 meters in diameter." While this breakthrough was relatively cheap, NASA is currently offering up to $10 million for other good lunar research projects.
Related Stories
[+]
What Shall We Do With the Moon Once We Get There? 507 comments
MarkWhittington writes "For the first time in over thirty five years, the Moon has become the next frontier. The United States has committed to returning human astronauts to the Moon by the end of the next decade. China has hinted that it intends to do this also. A variety of countries, including the United States and China, but also India, Europe, and Japan, have either sent robotic probes into lunar orbit or are on the verge of doing so." Contribute your favorite moon ideas below; I'd like to see it used as the set to film The Moon is a Harsh Mistress .
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

dustbuster (Score:3, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re:First time using extraterrestrial materials? (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:First time using extraterrestrial materials? (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
Parent
MacGyver-scope (Score:4, Funny)
Reply to This
He still needs paperclips (Score:3, Funny)
Aluminum? (Score:3, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:Aluminum? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Forget your stupid observatory! (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Oh great More Outsourcing (Score:5, Funny)
Somebody contact Lou Dobbs!
Reply to This
Re:Oh great More Outsourcing (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
I, for one... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
What's the old method ... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:What's the old method ... (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
Parent
Ikea (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, their biggest seller is called Skope, but you can also get the Refraktor or Kassegrain.
Reply to This
Parent
Ingenious (Score:5, Informative)
Heck, the first thing that came to my mind was "When did NASA hire MacGyver?" :-) Anyway, the process sounds quite reasonable. And Moon would make a wonderful observatory. I have been dreaming about lunar observatories since I was a kid quarter a century ago (at that time, I stumbled upon books written by a well-known local popular science writer).
No atmosphere, sixth the gravity, little need for compensating the structure deformations? Sounds good. The question is how heavy the manufacturing equipment would be. And there might more problems at least with optical telescopers - I recently stumbled upon a nice article [space.com] on this topic.
Reply to This
Re:Ingenious..But (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
I want a degree in... (Score:5, Interesting)
How cool would it be to design and build huge projects in 1/6 gravity? There would have to be some incredible designs that would just be too fragile to stand up under Earth atmosphere and gravity, and the range of materials you could use would seem limitless. Maybe a nest of lasers to give a long-term boost to an interstellar probe?
There's got to be huge advantages to building in a lunar environment, with raw materials available right there, and the chance to create living space just by drilling and sealing instead of fabricating from scratch.
Reply to This
Overheard on comm channel: (Score:5, Funny)
"That's no space station. It's a moon!"
Reply to This
One of those "next" steps seems hard (Score:4, Interesting)
Getting a large enough volume at room temperature (assuming you need some air pressure too) on the moon to mix it with epoxy and spin it (also presumably at room temperature) might be pretty hard to do without some bulky equipment. Although vacuum coating the mirror blank might seem easier on the moon, as other commentors noted, how do you keep it dust free?
So to summarize...
1. Bring epoxy, carbon nanotubes, aluminum and big spinner to the moon
2. ???
3. Coat resulting lunar dust blank with aluminum to make a mirror
4. Profit?!? (until it's covered with dust)
Reply to This
Re:One of those "next" steps seems hard (Score:4, Interesting)
The moon lacking an atmosphere, and there as such being no weather, the moon dust is quite stable.
It only shifts when something (like an astronaut's boot or a meteorite) pushes it, so the odds of a mirror staying largely dust-free are pretty good.
As to spinning stuff in room temperature on the moon... That part sounds harder
Reply to This
Parent
Lunar mirror fab means big manufacturing changes (Score:4, Interesting)
Lunar telescope manufacturing would require some exciting scientific, engineer, and processing improvements that would also pay off for terrestrial manufacturing.
First, assuming they're not planning to house and employ a standard aerospace company, with 1000 engineers, technicians, and managers on the moon, this would be fully automated. Mirror making is anything but automated. The development of highly automated methods for processing and testing mirrors would be quite a move forward. It would also have direct benefits for conventional manufacturing.
Second, making a mirror on the moon would seem to require a tolerance of risk currently not accepted. Every time a mirror is moved, a crew of people must oversee the affair, sign the (physical) paperwork, and manually inspect the mirror afterwards. For lunar construction, this would have to become an assembly line that ran without that direct oversight, paperwork, or crews. Enabling more efficient methods would certainly benefit normal processes as well.
Moreover, the task of creating such a facility would keep many, many aerospace workers employed for years
Reply to This
As strong as concrete... (Score:4, Interesting)
myke
Reply to This
Re:Slow process (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Slow process (Score:4, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Practical applications (Score:5, Funny)
We carry a harpoon
But their ain't no whales so we tell tall tales
And sing this whaling tune
Brett
Reply to This
Parent