Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Cassini Geyser-Tasting a Bust

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Friday March 14, @01:54PM
from the techno-ageusia dept.
Maggie McKee writes "The Cassini spacecraft flew into the icy geysers erupting from Saturn's moon Enceladus on Wednesday in an attempt to figure out what they were made of, but a glitch prevented the probe from actually 'tasting' the plumes. An 'unexplained software hiccup' put the Cosmic Dust Analyzer (CDA) out of commission. Ironically, new software designed to improve the ability of the CDA to count particle hits may be to blame. Mission managers may try to re-attempt the plume fly-through later this year."

Related Stories

[+] Cassini's Best Images 28 comments
CheshireCatCO writes "The winners of the best images from the Cassini spacecraft (taken since Cassini images of Saturn were first acquired in February 2004) have been announced. The winner of best color image is In Saturn's Shadow, the stunning, high-phase portrait of Saturn from opposite the Sun. Winners of best black-and-white and best movie (both categories resulted in ties) are also available."
[+] Spacecraft to Fly Through Geyser Plumes On Saturn Moon 80 comments
Riding with Robots writes "Today the robotic Saturn probe Cassini will make its closest buzz ever over the surface of the enigmatic ice moon Enceladus, whose surprising giant water geysers hint at a hidden ocean of liquid water. The spacecraft will fly right through the tops of the geyser plumes in order to sample the material that originated beneath the surface. NASA is offering a video, interactive guide and image gallery in advance of the event."
[+] Cassini 'Tastes' Organic Material at Enceladus 4 comments
Riding with Robots writes "As previously reported, the robotic spacecraft Cassini recently flew through the mysterious geyser plumes at Saturn's icy moon Enceladus. Today, NASA released the preliminary results of the flyby, including some intriguing findings, such as organic materials 20 times denser than expected and relatively high temperatures along the fissures where the geysers emanate. 'These spectacular new data will really help us understand what powers the geysers. The surprisingly high temperatures make it more likely that there's liquid water not far below the surface,' said one mission scientist."
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Cassini Geyser-Tasting a Bust 25 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • There were alien bacteria in the ice samples, and NASA is covering it up by claiming that the probe didn't work.
  • by Alsee (515537) on Friday March 14, @02:09PM (#22753152) Homepage
    Tastes like.....

    chicken.

    -
    • Re: (Score:2)

      But how does the probe even know what chicken tastes like? Maybe it really doesn't, so anything it tastes that it doesn't recognize it decides tastes like chicken..

      Aikon-

      • Re: (Score:2)

        "Now how did the machines know what Tasty Wheat tasted like, huh? Maybe they got it wrong. Maybe what I think Tasty Wheat tasted like actually tasted like, uh ... oatmeal or tuna fish. That makes you wonder about a lot of things. You take chicken for examp
  • Irony? (Score:2, Funny)

    I'm not sure I see how a software upgrade causing a "software hiccup" is an example of irony. Maybe I'll try that on my boss sometime... "No, that's not a regression... That's an ironic hiccup"

  • This isn't the first time that software changes have caused problems. Software change freezes should be in place prior to certain mission segments to allow for this sort of problem to be sorted out prior to when it goes live. At least it did
  • Hmmm (Score:2, Funny)

    Ctl+Alt+Del

    Task Manager to kill the hung process.

    Sheesh... DUH.
  • Doomed to fail (Score:3, Funny)

    by Icarus1919 (802533) on Friday March 14, @02:26PM (#22753376)
    You should always ask before you try tasting a bust - last time I got slapped in the face. And probing? Hoo boy.
  • One Instrument Failed! (Score:4, Informative)

    by CheshireCatCO (185193) on Friday March 14, @03:19PM (#22753858) Homepage
    OK, lookit. There are about a dozen instruments on Cassini. One (1) failed to return data on this pass. Yes, this pass was good for CDA, but it isn't the only instrument. It isn't even the only one that can sample the plume in situ. INMS, RPWS, MIMI, and CAPS all come to mind as candidates to give us useful information (INMS in particular can help clarify composition). All of these returned their data from what I've heard. (And no, that's all I can say until those teams want to speak up.)

    CDA's failure is unfortunate to be sure, but it isn't catastrophic. Could the entire news media please stop sensationalizing this?
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      There wasn't anything mentioned about the software beyond what the summary said, so we are left to speculate. Unless someone who works on the software is around here, you're not gonna find an answer other than maybe the stock "NASA sucks these days" that h
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      NASA is probably not entirely to blame. They contract out so much stuff, that a lot of problems are created by interoperability issues between hardware and software designed by different companies.
    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      Note to self: Turn off Windows Automatic Update...
    • by Lumpy (12016) on Friday March 14, @02:20PM (#22753296) Homepage
      Overheard in a NASA deep space probe software lab....

      "It compiles! ship it!"

    • by iluvcapra (782887) on Friday March 14, @02:38PM (#22753476) Homepage

      This is just one data point in a rather big history. At least they didn't confuse feet-per-second with meters-per-second; at least they didn't cause their CPU to thrash due to a radar being left on and overloading the interrupts. Also, this is the same organization that managed to put two quite-autonomous rovers on Mars and keep them rolling for, what is it now?, 4 years. When one of the rovers did have a software failure, and a really bad mission-killing one, they were able to debug it and update firmware OTA from light-minutes distance, on a machine that was only intermittently alive.

      They screw things up, but they seem to do very well at fault-tolerance and recovery, and I think if I were in automated systems, I'd wanna be at NASA over anywhere else, period.

    • by LMacG (118321) on Friday March 14, @02:47PM (#22753556)
      Seriously? Somebody modified a program so that a system designed to do one thing could do something else and sent the modifications millions of miles across space on a radio link. There's probably not much chance of a three tier development/test/production environment here.

      In the meantime, the overall Cassini project has already been incredibly successful; the happy little Mars rovers have gotten unstuck by virtue of some pretty good software hacks, but you, "Phat Tony", call into question NASA's procedures.

      Seriously?
    • by necro81 (917438) on Friday March 14, @02:48PM (#22753574) Journal
      These craft - their software, hardware, and the interactions between them - are so complex that there is no way to exhaustively test everything. It's complex enough that you can't even determine what an exhaustive test criteria would be. If we wanted exhaustive testing to ensure that nothing wrong ever happens, we'd never get anything off the ground. Mistakes happen, the unforeseen happens, and when communications take hours to go through, it is just plain hard. You live with it, correct mistakes as they happen, and make the best of it. They'll get a chance to try again. They have already logged tremendous amounts of data that couldn't have been gotten any other way - it's not like the whole $1.5b mission is a bust. This probe, the largest and most complex NASA has ever launched, has been operating continuously, with very few problems and no critical failures, for over a decade now.

      NASA, in general, is a lot more stringent with its software than most organizations. If you would like to know more about it, you could start here [nasa.gov].

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Taxpayers complain about having to foot the bill for millions of dollars of research in something where the actual value to those taxpayers isn't properly explained to them. Government legislators get elected by promising to cut "pork barrel spending" to
    • by Tablizer (95088) on Friday March 14, @11:15PM (#22757342) Homepage Journal
      It doesn't give me much confidence that we're heading towards applications and operating systems that won't crash anytime soon when we can't even get something this important right. It really makes me curious about the whole software quality assurance program at NASA.

      Hold your horses, Tex. It says in the article that they tuned the software to better pick up such particles. They may have had a big choice to keep it the way it was and play it safe, or get fancy to pick up much more data. You don't know what decisions they faced and are thus judging prematurely.

      Remember, the instruments weren't originally designed for such, so they may have had to "get creative". There's always risk in exploration.

      NASA has some of the best QA practices ever invented:

      http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/06/writestuff.html [fastcompany.com]

      However, it takes time and money. I doubt the Geyser team had much time, for this pass-by is relatively recent in the probe plans.
       
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Why are you ignoring the Japanese, Chinese, Indians, Russians, and Europeans for baseline comparisons? Not to mention our own home-grown private industries like Ball, Boeing, and Lockheed-Martin. Or perhaps you'd prefer the military (as the grandfather p
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        So maybe the lesson here is "spaceflight is hard," and not "NASA sucks"? You're talking about writing software for custom-built hardware to do things that no Earth-based software has to do. And it's not like you can beta test stuff out like Mozilla does,
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      No, Cassini is a joint NASA/ESA project. The Cosmic Dust Analyzer (CDA) was provided by ESA.