Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

MIT Finds Cure For Fear

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:43 PM
from the fear-itself dept.
Doom con runs away writes "MIT biochemists have identified a molecular mechanism behind fear, and successfully cured it in mice, according to an article in the journal Nature Neuroscience. They did this by inhibiting a kinase, an enzyme that change proteins, called Cdk5, which facilitates the extinction of fear learned in a particular context."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 16 2007, @12:44PM (#19877629)
    Because I saw some MIT guys talking to GIRLS!
  • by elrous0 (869638) * on Monday July 16 2007, @12:45PM (#19877641)
    President Bush introduced a bill this week to eliminate all research funding at MIT.
  • by sqlguy33 (898340) on Monday July 16 2007, @12:46PM (#19877653)
    It is also called Liquid Courage. Drinking enough alcohol leaves me with no fear as well...
  • uh oh... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by leeharris100 (890639) on Monday July 16 2007, @12:47PM (#19877671)
    Why would you want to cure fear? Fear keeps me from giving in to a friend's bet and swallowing a live hamster. But seriously, unless you could target certain fears to help people with crippling phobias, this seems dangerous.
    • Re:uh oh... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by dotpavan (829804) on Monday July 16 2007, @12:56PM (#19877831) Homepage
      yes, isnt fear supposed to be an in-built mechanism to prevent us from putting ourselves in dangerous situations (in which others have suffered bad consequences), just like comedy tells us that everything is OK with a false alarm like situation [bbc.co.uk] ["So what I'm arguing is, laughter is nature's false alarm. Why is this useful from an evolutionary standpoint? So what you are doing with this rhythmic stocatto sound of laughter is informing your kin who share your genes, don't waste your precious resources rushing to this person's aid, it's a false alarm everything is OK. OK, so it's nature's OK signal."]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 16 2007, @12:47PM (#19877685)
    I am terrified at the implications of this!
  • Cool! (Score:5, Funny)

    by MillionthMonkey (240664) on Monday July 16 2007, @12:48PM (#19877689)
    I hope to see commercials advertising fear-curing pills within the next few years so I can rush to the pharmacy with a prescription. In fact I think we should charge ahead with this and eliminate fear everywhere by putting it in the water with the fluoride. I see no downside or risk!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 16 2007, @12:50PM (#19877721)
    ...the Darwin Awards suddenly recieves a flood of new entries.
  • by fahrbot-bot (874524) on Monday July 16 2007, @12:50PM (#19877727)
    Joo Janta 200 Super-Chromatic Peril Sensitive Sunglasses have been specially designed to help people develop a relaxed attitude to danger. At the first hint of trouble, they turn totally black and thus prevent you from seeing anything that might alarm you.

    - The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

  • Fear is a useful mechanism in preventing humans from doing things that have potentially bad consequences for the person.
    • by RingDev (879105) on Monday July 16 2007, @01:13PM (#19878127) Homepage Journal
      And I share the concerns about the abuse of this potential drug.

      But there are mental illnesses that deal with crippling fears, where extreme fear of seemingly insignificant things can prevent a person from interacting with society in a meaningful way. For those people, this drug could bring relief, and a chance for a normal life. But control is paramount, and I'd need to see a LOT of clinical trial and years in the open market before it gets into military use. Fear will keep you alive on a battle field, but crippling fear will get your unit killed. Not only that, but being in a war zone isn't 24x7 guns blazing and shells falling. It's minutes of near death experiences followed by minutes, hours, days, even weeks of no activity. Knowing that at any second an explosion could rip you to shreds, or small arms fire could light you up. That is the stress that kills, the constant fear tearing at the back of your mind. Some people have even described the start of an attack as a relief, as they no longer do they have to sit in anticipation of the attack. If this drug could help prevent soldier from locking up in high stress moments, and relieve the pressure from the tedium of war, then I could have a solid benefit for the military.

      If on the other hand, it takes away their fear of bullets, reprisal, and other control mechanisms... then it is nothing we want to give to anyone with a gun.

      -Rick
  • Social Anxiety (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Verteiron (224042) on Monday July 16 2007, @12:53PM (#19877785) Homepage
    Aside from treatments for shell-shocked war vets, I wonder if this could be used to treat more mundane fears as well such as phobias and social anxiety. That could be a boon to many, many people; social anxiety may sound wussy, but it is a misery-inducing and debilitating condition.
  • by Dun Malg (230075) on Monday July 16 2007, @12:57PM (#19877839) Homepage
    Fear is what keeps us from doing dangerous things. Fear is an important part of our survival system. Targeting contextual fears could be therapeutically useful, but I think "cure" is the wrong word. The ultimate word on fear, though, comes from Jack Handy:

    Fear can sometimes be a useful emotion. For instance, say you were an astronaut on the moon and you fear your partner had been turned into Dracula. The next time he goes out for moon pieces, WHAM!, you just slam the door behind him and blast off. He might call you on the radio and say he's not Dracula, but you just say, "Think again, Batman!"
  • by Control Group (105494) * on Monday July 16 2007, @01:03PM (#19877973) Homepage
    Everyone seems to be hopping on the "but fear is useful!" bandwagon - but I'm not sure it is. Fear, the emotion, is an instinctive reaction to danger, whether that danger is real or simply perceived. I don't see that it's necessarily bad to replace the gut response with a rational response.

    That is, I doubt the drug will remove awareness of danger, simply the emotional reaction to it. While supersoldiers leap to every SF fan's mind, imagine what this could do for everyone who's got any kind of irrational fear. Fear of flying, fear of public speaking, fear of talking to girls, the whole list of phobias. Even in situations where fear is justified - wartime combatants, for example - I don't know that fear is helpful in comparison to the ability to rationally assess threats.

    Regardless, in society at large most people most of the time aren't afraid of real threats, they're afraid of imagined (or at least, disproportionately perceived) threats.

    Besides which, even the real threats faced by a significant percentage of people in modern industrialized society strike me as predominantly not susceptible to the "fight, flight, or freeze" response.
    • by A beautiful mind (821714) on Monday July 16 2007, @01:17PM (#19878193)
      Gut response is fast. Thinking is slow. When you're dead to react rationally, it doesn't help much. Yeah, it might misfire 9 times out of 10. That one occasion saves your life when it is not a misfire.

      The "breakthrough" is about blocking fear not about replacing it with another mechanism.

      On a related did you know that we live around half a second in the PAST? That is the delay of the mind. Our brain fakes the memories so we don't notice it practically, but there is a reason why subconscious or gut responses exist.
  • RTFA! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kiick (102190) on Monday July 16 2007, @01:09PM (#19878059)
    I see from all the comments that nobody actually read the article.

    The 'cure' doesn't eliminate any and all fear. It doesn't address situational fear at all.
    What it 'cures' is LEARNED fear responses. It's specific application to, for example, soldiers would be
    for PTSD.

    And even if there was a way to get read of all fear reactions, you'd still have a BRAIN and the ability
    to choose not to do things that you reason are too risky.

    Seriously, read the article. It's interesting.

    Sheesh.
  • by Stefanwulf (1032430) on Monday July 16 2007, @01:19PM (#19878215)
    As I read this article, it isn't about making something fearless or preventing fear...it's more about increasing the rate at which a learned fear response decays in the absence of reinforcement. Essentially, the brain has built in mechanisms to "cure" fear on its own, given enough time without reinforcement of that particular fear. Inhibition of this enzyme--oddly enough one linked with plasticity and neural development--makes that process easier/faster.

    If I understand correctly, then they are right in saying this would be potentially wonderful for treating cases of PTSD where the fear response does not significantly decrease even at points in time far removed from the initial trauma, but I don't think we have to worry about inhibition of this enzyme erasing people's ability to feel fear or leading to fear-based weapons systems. Those things are almost certainly possible (lesions on the amygdala are thought to tame animals by destroying their ability to feel fear), but I don't think they'll appear as a result of this study.
  • fear is good. It stops us from doing stupid things.

    Like posting without RTFA.

    Tom