Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming

Posted by CowboyNeal on Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:05 PM
from the slightly-off-course dept.
Harmonious Botch wrote in with a CNN story that opens: "A spent Russian booster rocket re-entered the atmosphere Thursday over Colorado and Wyoming, the North American Aerospace Defense Command said. NORAD spokesman Sean Kelly said the agency was trying to confirm a report that a piece of the rocket may have hit the ground near Riverton, Wyoming, at about 6 a.m. Kelly said military personnel had not yet reached the scene. No damage was reported and the debris was not believed to be hazardous, NORAD said. Eyewitnesses reported seeing flaming objects in the sky at the time the rocket was re-entering, Kelly said."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by PurifyYourMind (776223) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:07PM (#17468462) Homepage
    Wyoming hits rocket!
  • hmmm... (Score:5, Funny)

    by User 956 (568564) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:07PM (#17468466) Homepage
    No damage was reported and the debris was not believed to be hazardous, NORAD said. Eyewitnesses reported seeing flaming objects in the sky at the time the rocket was re-entering, Kelly said.

    Are they sure it wasn't just a weather balloon, or maybe some swamp gas?
  • by RexHowland (71795) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:07PM (#17468468)
    For what the story is...

    The headline sort of makes you think of a Cold-War Russian rocket attack.

    At least, it made me think that. -- And I'd already heard about the story.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:12PM (#17468506)
      The title is: "Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming". Now let us see if it is in any way misleading.

      "Russian": The rocket is Russian. Nothing misleading here.

      "Rocket": The object in question is indeed the remains of a rocket. Nothing misleading here.

      "Hits": The rocket did indeed crash into the ground in Wyoming. It "hit" Wyoming, if you will. Nothing misleading here.

      "Wyoming": The location of the rocket crash was Wyoming. Nothing misleading here.

      I'm not sure how you justify your claim of the title being misleading. Every word in the sentence is correct and factual. The sentence as a whole is also completely correct.

      • by RexHowland (71795) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:22PM (#17468596)
        I think the key word is "hits," as opposed to "falls in," or "lands in."

        If you shoot an arrow, and the arrow "hits" the apple, you worry that something might have happened to the apple.

        If you shoot an arrow, and it "lands in" the forest... -- You're probably not too concerned for the forest.

        Maybe I'm just a stickler. -- I think it could be easily misunderstood, though.
        • by megrims (839585) on Thursday January 04 2007, @11:02PM (#17468950)
          I don't know.
          What if the arrow "lands in" your eye, for example?

          It's probably justified to be concerned for the state of an apple that an arrow lands in. Changing the victim to a forest is misleading.

          Of course the differing connotations of the two terms make it all a big mess anyway. Landing in terms of missiles gives a different impression than it would with a bullet or a loosed arrow.
      • by MyLongNickName (822545) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:25PM (#17468626) Journal
        "Anonymous coward will not stop molesting badgers"

        Since the Anonymous coward never molested badgers in the first place, the above headline is correct. Simply because something is technically correct does not mean it is misleading. You might want to look at the difference between "mislead" and "lie" in the dictionary. Kind of reminds me of the RNC fund raising letter where "Bush cuts deficit 40% in two years". Factually correct, but does not mention that Bush caused the deficit in the first place.
        • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:50PM (#17468836)
          Since the Anonymous coward never molested badgers in the first place

          Speak for yourself there, buddy. I'm proud of my family traditions.
    • Sorry.
  • by syousef (465911) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:11PM (#17468496) Journal
    Come on. Try Russian space debris hits...not rocket. It hasn't been (part of) a rocket in some time...

    Oh wait, that'd actually be good journalism. Can't have that.
  • Dupe! (Score:5, Funny)

    by naoursla (99850) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:15PM (#17468530) Homepage Journal
    This is just a cover for the UFO story posted on slashdot the other day.
  • Poor Aim (Score:5, Funny)

    by edwardpickman (965122) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:16PM (#17468534)
    Today President Bush responded to the space attack by launching a counter attack on Boswanna. The Boswannan space program being seen as a threat to national security. He's also considering attacking the Moon for the unprovoked attack by Martian meteors on Antarctica thousands of years ago.
  • by theinfobox (188897) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:17PM (#17468546) Homepage Journal
    Here is video taken by a local news crew this morning: ABC 7 [thedenverchannel.com] Note: They use an embedded Windows Media Player.
  • by Bamafan77 (565893) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:17PM (#17468548)
    Wyoming High School students unite to fend off Russian invasion. Fortunately, Hollywood has taught us exactly how to deal with such things.
  • by NoseBag (243097) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:18PM (#17468554)
    "...No damage was reported..."

    Well, duh! It's Wyoming, fer christsake.
  • by MillionthMonkey (240664) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:18PM (#17468556)
    Oh give me a home
    Where the buffalo roam
    And the deer and the antelope play

    Where seldom is heard
    a discouraging word
    and the skies are not full of spent Russian booster rockets
  • More info (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:18PM (#17468558)
    From Spaceweather.com

    Something from space disintegrated over Denver, Colorado, this morning around 6:20 am MST (1320 UT). Witnesses describe it as "brilliant, slow, twinkling, sparkly and full of rainbow colors." It was not a meteor. The fireball was the decaying body of a Soyuz U rocket that launched the French COROT space telescope on Dec. 27th. The re-entry caused no damage on the ground--just a beautiful display in the sky.
  • by lpangelrob (714473) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:19PM (#17468568)
    Link [google.com]. This story could use a visual. Clearly, as opposed to what the poster of the video would like us to think, it is not a UFO.
  • by dubdays (410710) on Thursday January 04 2007, @10:32PM (#17468684)
    ...duck and cover.
  • by JeanBaptiste (537955) on Thursday January 04 2007, @11:37PM (#17469214)
    My fellow Russians, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Wyoming forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.