Slashdot Log In
Pictures of Titan's Lakes
Posted by
samzenpus
on Wed Jan 03, 2007 09:39 PM
from the in-space-nobody-can-hear-you-fish dept.
from the in-space-nobody-can-hear-you-fish dept.
sighted writes "For decades, scientists have wondered if the thick orange haze that shrouds Saturn's giant moon Titan hid lakes of liquid methane on the surface, but there was no way to confirm it, until now. The Cassini flyby of July 22, 2006 took these striking images and were released today."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading ... Please wait.

Vacation on Titan (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Vacation on Titan (Score:5, Insightful)
Any signs of Transformers...? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Any signs of Transformers...? (Score:5, Insightful)
Confirmed? (Score:5, Interesting)
Hardly proof.
Re:Confirmed? (Score:4, Informative)
More information at ... (Score:5, Informative)
The original article is in the journal Nature [nature.com], but you need a subscription to view it. You can still read the abstract [nature.com], though.
Evidence of life? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Evidence of life? thars petrolium (Score:4, Funny)
Now if we could only start a rumor there are weapons of mass destruction, terrorist training camps, and Oceans of petroleum product on Titan, we could leave Iraq, and start a gold rush like rocket race to Saturn's moon.
Ye Ha , lakes full or petro.
Cheers
Somebody has to say it (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
"Languish in caves of methane ice!"
But at the moment, I can't even remember where the Flash Bazbo reference came from - maybe it was Firesign Theater.
why is liquid methane a big deal? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:why is liquid methane a big deal? (Score:5, Interesting)
However, given that just about any chemical process is gonna run rather slow at the kinds of temperatures that exist on Titan we shouldn't expect any life that we find there to be very developed.
The next obvious step is to send something down to swim in the methane oceans of titan, and see if it gets eaten (or, at least, finds signs of (non)organic life. I don' think that it's that much lower a probability than finding life signs on mars (presuming that we figure out how to look for methane-based life), although it's admittedly a bit more expensive to go to Jupiter than it is to go to Mars.
Re:why is liquid methane a big deal? (Score:4, Insightful)
The discovery is a "big deal" because we know something about part of our solar system we didn't know before. If you read the articles, part of the discovery is a likely methane rainfall cycle, including "methanifers" (analogous to aquifers). It's fascinating stuff, IMO.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
To me, it seems extremely unlikely that we could give any kind of reliable estimate on how unlikely that is...
OTOH, all we'd need is a version of U
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Here's a question... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Because thats how long it took to false color the image to look like a desert with lakes...
Titan by Stephen Baxter (Score:3, Interesting)
We've already landed there ffs. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:We've already landed there ffs. (Score:4, Informative)
Looks like Minnesota (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Liquid methane? Maybe. (Score:4, Informative)
Actually the intensity of the backscatter data is what is being shown.
The brightness is logarithmic, therefore anything dark is very smooth
and anything really bright is very bumpy. Since it is a log scale and
there is a good idea what kind of backscatter to absorption ratio to expect
from the synthetic aperture radar for various targets, they can conclude that
the dark patches are glassy/ice-rink flat.
They can also conclude that the dark patches could be liquid based on
change detection, provided they have another series of overlapping data
to compare. If the glassy areas undulate slightly between images (waves)
they are probably liquid.
Having noted this, 500 metres is kind of crappy resolution for
SAR data. You'd think they'd make a closer flyby or put a better
instrument onboard. I believe 1 (one) metre resolution SAR was available
from instruments at the same altitude when cassini was designed.
NASA just cheaped out.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)