Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Pictures of Titan's Lakes

Posted by samzenpus on Wed Jan 03, 2007 09:39 PM
from the in-space-nobody-can-hear-you-fish dept.
sighted writes "For decades, scientists have wondered if the thick orange haze that shrouds Saturn's giant moon Titan hid lakes of liquid methane on the surface, but there was no way to confirm it, until now. The Cassini flyby of July 22, 2006 took these striking images and were released today."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Pictures of Titan's Lakes 25 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • Vacation on Titan (Score:5, Funny)

    by Stephen Tennant (936097) on Wednesday January 03 2007, @09:43PM (#17453122) Journal
    Swimming in liquid farts
  • by suv4x4 (956391) on Wednesday January 03 2007, @09:44PM (#17453134)
    I heard they wander around the Solar system wrecking anything they see.
  • Confirmed? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Cthefuture (665326) on Wednesday January 03 2007, @09:44PM (#17453138)
    You mean "more evidence suggesting liquid"?

    Hardly proof.
    • Re:Confirmed? (Score:4, Informative)

      by Nasarius (593729) on Thursday January 04 2007, @12:35AM (#17454414)
      They seem fairly certain. From the original Nature article [nature.com]:
      Only two hypotheses are consistent with the radiometric and morphological characteristics of the dark patches: either we are observing liquid-filled lakes on Titan today, or depressions and channels formed in the past have now been infilled by a very low-density deposit that is darker than any observed elsewhere on Titan. The absence of any aeolian features in this area makes low-density, porous, unconsolidated sediments unlikely. This, combined with the morphologic characteristics of the dark patches, leads us to conclude that the dark patches are lakes containing liquid hydrocarbons.
      [ Parent ]
  • More information at ... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 03 2007, @09:48PM (#17453164)
    This other location at the Cassini site [nasa.gov], and this older article from the BBC [bbc.co.uk].

    The original article is in the journal Nature [nature.com], but you need a subscription to view it. You can still read the abstract [nature.com], though.
  • I'm surprised this isn't being reported as evidence that cows once lived on Titan.
  • Somebody has to say it (Score:5, Funny)

    by LarryLong (899387) on Wednesday January 03 2007, @09:50PM (#17453192)
    Maybe the methane came from Uranus? Sorry. :)
    • Re: (Score:2)

      I believe the phrase from "Flash Bazbo, Space Explorer!" was,

      "Languish in caves of methane ice!"

      But at the moment, I can't even remember where the Flash Bazbo reference came from - maybe it was Firesign Theater.
  • why is liquid methane a big deal? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Eto_Demerzel79 (1011949) on Wednesday January 03 2007, @09:57PM (#17453228)
    I can understand that if we found liquid water elsewhere in the solar system it should make news, but who cares about liquid methane? Afterall Jupiter (http://www.nineplanets.org/jupiter.html [nineplanets.org]) has "exotic" liquid metallic hydrogen and liquid helium. I doubt it is possible to drive any biologically important reactions at the temperatures present on Titan. We simply confirmed that our knowledge of the methane phase diagram is correct. Let me know if they find something useful, like platinum or palladium on Phobos...
    • Re:why is liquid methane a big deal? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by darkonc (47285) <stephen_samuel @ b c g r e e n.com> on Wednesday January 03 2007, @10:21PM (#17453372) Homepage Journal
      The reactions that we're used to will obviously not work on Titan, but there's always a (very small) possibility that other forms of life could could evolve in the context of methane seas. If nothing else, a liquid base would allow simple life forms to develop without having to figure out the physics of supporting themselves and move around (as per the way that life is believed to have evolved on earth).

      However, given that just about any chemical process is gonna run rather slow at the kinds of temperatures that exist on Titan we shouldn't expect any life that we find there to be very developed.

      The next obvious step is to send something down to swim in the methane oceans of titan, and see if it gets eaten (or, at least, finds signs of (non)organic life. I don' think that it's that much lower a probability than finding life signs on mars (presuming that we figure out how to look for methane-based life), although it's admittedly a bit more expensive to go to Jupiter than it is to go to Mars.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:why is liquid methane a big deal? (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Nasarius (593729) on Thursday January 04 2007, @12:54AM (#17454584)
        Ehhh...the average surface temperature of Titan is estimated to be 90 Kelvin, compared to Mars at 210 Kelvin. It seems extremely unlikely that the kinds of chemical reactions necessary for any kind of life could occur.

        The discovery is a "big deal" because we know something about part of our solar system we didn't know before. If you read the articles, part of the discovery is a likely methane rainfall cycle, including "methanifers" (analogous to aquifers). It's fascinating stuff, IMO.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          It seems extremely unlikely that the kinds of chemical reactions necessary for any kind of life could occur.

          To me, it seems extremely unlikely that we could give any kind of reliable estimate on how unlikely that is...

          OTOH, all we'd need is a version of U
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      I worked on this project as a grad student at Caltech, so I think I may actually have something useful to add. The reason we care is that Titan is the only other body in the solar system to exhibit anything remotely analogous to a hydrological cycle at Ea
  • Here's a question... (Score:2, Interesting)

    Why did it take them 6 months to release the images?
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      Why did it take them 6 months to release the images?

      Because thats how long it took to false color the image to look like a desert with lakes...
  • Titan by Stephen Baxter (Score:3, Interesting)

    by AHuxley (892839) on Wednesday January 03 2007, @10:27PM (#17453418)
  • We've already landed there ffs. (Score:5, Informative)

    by mollymoo (202721) on Wednesday January 03 2007, @11:00PM (#17453672) Journal
    Am I the only one who can remember that we put a lander [esa.int] on Titan a good 18 months prior to taking this image? The presence of liquid methane on the surface was confirmed [esa.int] one week later. Nice image, bad caption.
    • Re:We've already landed there ffs. (Score:4, Informative)

      by Tablizer (95088) on Thursday January 04 2007, @12:50AM (#17454546) Homepage Journal
      The lander did *not* detect existing pooled or flowing liquid. The radar evidence appears to be the first evidence of existing pooled/flowing liquid. The lander found plenty of *hints* of erosion typical of that associated with liquid, but it did not detect any active liquid (except maybe methane mist). The area it landed at is often characterized as a "dry lake bed".
      [ Parent ]
  • Looks like Minnesota (Score:3, Funny)

    by tinrobot (314936) on Wednesday January 03 2007, @11:36PM (#17453948)
    ...except Minnesota seems way colder that Titan.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      I would imagine the imagine is a long strip like that because the Cassini radar instrument simply flew along in a straight line, therefore only capturing a narrow strip of surveyed data along that straight line (as opposed to getting a large square or circ
    • Re:Liquid methane? Maybe. (Score:4, Informative)

      by stoicio (710327) on Thursday January 04 2007, @12:41AM (#17454466) Homepage Journal
      "The images are blatantly false-colour. The blue areas meant to potray liquid (making people think of water) but could just as easily be ice or lava flows."

      Actually the intensity of the backscatter data is what is being shown.
      The brightness is logarithmic, therefore anything dark is very smooth
      and anything really bright is very bumpy. Since it is a log scale and
      there is a good idea what kind of backscatter to absorption ratio to expect
      from the synthetic aperture radar for various targets, they can conclude that
      the dark patches are glassy/ice-rink flat.

      They can also conclude that the dark patches could be liquid based on
      change detection, provided they have another series of overlapping data
      to compare. If the glassy areas undulate slightly between images (waves)
      they are probably liquid.

      Having noted this, 500 metres is kind of crappy resolution for
      SAR data. You'd think they'd make a closer flyby or put a better
      instrument onboard. I believe 1 (one) metre resolution SAR was available
      from instruments at the same altitude when cassini was designed.
      NASA just cheaped out.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        HAHAHAHAHA. Oh who ever knew that quoting Jim Carey could be flamebait.