Slashdot Log In
Revisiting the Physics of Buckaroo Banzai
Posted by
ScuttleMonkey
on Tue Dec 19, 2006 03:22 AM
from the blast-from-the-past dept.
from the blast-from-the-past dept.
serutan writes "Shortly before the release of 'The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai: Across the 8th Dimension' in 1984, physicist Carl Sneider of U.C. Berkeley wrote a surprisingly interesting essay on the physics behind the movie. Since the essay is not widely available on the web and I could only find it in plain text, I posted a more readable HTML version on my site. Among the more interesting points Sneider makes are that the oscillation overthruster is the result of decades of research instead of the usual laboratory accident, and its development corresponds surprisingly well with the evolution of particle physics from the 1930s to the 80s."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading ... Please wait.

Weird science (Score:5, Interesting)
There's no doubt a lot of fun speculation to be made here, but if you're going to get your science from the web, it's best to stay away from Slashdot.
Re:Weird science (Score:5, Insightful)
The fact that phrases like "intermediate vector bosons" tossed around in the movie actually have a connection of any sort at all to the issues being discussed puts BB already a few parsecs ahead of the typical S.F. junk that hollywood puts out.
I'd always thought of BB as a camp fantasy classic. It's refreshing to know that the writers actually knew a little science and applied it, even if the final product was entirely improbable.
Re:Weird science (Score:5, Funny)
All the I know, is that The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai (Across the Seventh Dimension), was the worst thing that I ever ever got in charades once. My sister got Jaws!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Weird science (Score:5, Interesting)
Fun stuff, and highly recommended if you really like Science Fiction, as you can see where much of it came from. The Philip José Farmer take on the characters later in the century is a different beast (enjoyable, but not what we're talking about). Things like ice bullets and enzymes are the high tech weapons, plus a little dabbling in the (even at the time) classics of SF like hollow world theory. (There was an official Doc Savage movie that was done to be camp and sucked monkey balls).
--
Evan
Re:Weird science (Score:4, Interesting)
Here's hoping that Raimi does wind up doing Doc (he recently got the rights to do movies based off of Street & Smith characters).
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.baen.com/library/aallston.htm [baen.com]
Enj
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
WWIII is being fought with the media.
I dunno (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I dunno (Score:4, Funny)
Now excuse me while I go phlib my enjuntificator.
Re: (Score:2)
That's disgusting.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Weird science (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Weird science (Score:4, Insightful)
Right. It's basically an inside joke. Most people think Buckaroo might as well be reversing the polarity of the neutron flow but a few people out there are really going to appreciate the effort put forth in creating the technobabblish scenes. And this sort of inside joke is a lot harder to pull off than throwing Gil Garrard's name into a Family guy episode.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Weird science (Score:4, Interesting)
- particles would fall due to gravity (unless this effect also weakened gravity,
but current theory wouldn't support that). But it would take a signifigant
portion of a second for the particles to move much due to gravity.
- particles vibrating due to brownean motion would possibly continue past each other
possibly rearranging crystaline structures
Once you turned the field back off, the forces between the atoms would reappear, and most of the molecules would snap back into place.If you left the field on a long time, yes you would possibly get a tunnel, as the particles would fall to the bottom of the region at which point their fields would turn back on, and there would possibly be... fusion? an explosion?
Disclaimer: I am not a particle physicist, but I do talk with them in the cafeteria...
Cool car mod (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Move fast enough, and banzai!, you tunnel through.
It is interest
Re: (Score:2)
Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Real soon!
(I knew I wasn't the only one with this idea)
Just remember (Score:3, Insightful)
This was already discussed by Londo Molari (Score:3, Informative)
He discussed it a long time ago in the far off, but rather close future.
Here is the link -
http://www.rogerborn.com/commentary/a-walk-among-
""These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others."
Best Quote (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed a timeless line. I sometimes use this on my 9-year-old son (who watched the movie with me), and as often as not, my nickname for him is "monkey boy".
Buckaroo Banzai was easy to identify with (Score:2)
Since BB was a Adventurer/surgeon/rock musician like most of us, he was easy to identify with.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
(I can't stand watching it now, because of the nasty 1980's rock-video hairstyles and costumes. But the dialog was some of the funniest stuff in cinema history - - big boo TAY!)
Buck-A-Roo! (Score:4, Funny)
Curse that headline. I thought this was going to be an article about the inner workings of some extreme version of Buckaroo! [firebox.com].
I was so disappointed when I found out it was about a sci-fi film.
Buck-A-Rooooo!
He got to see the director's cut! (Score:2, Informative)
Dr. Sneider must have seen an early edit of the film in 1984. The home movie segme
Lesson to be learned (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, but one heat-seeking missile and he's *history*.
Thanks, guy. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And now, you've got that stuck in y
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
This is one of my all time favorite movies. Stylist wardrobe, excellent cast, fun characters, campy but a true classic.
Copyright? (Score:5, Interesting)
Atoms are mostly empty? (Score:2, Interesting)
Important questions (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Big Trouble in Little China (Score:3, Interesting)
Since I read this I can't watch BTiLC without thinking of Buckaroo and crew going deep under Chinatown.
Jonah HEX
Alignment solves everything (Score:3, Interesting)
It has been long known that spacetime has a granular quality, in fact when you get small enough everything is spin networks (you can learn more about it on Wikipedia) which can basically be thought of as a quantum of space. in other words we are all just living on particles strung on lattices (see lattice theory). But since the granularity of spacetime is at a resolution of Planck units, there is obviously an infinity of other universes that can exist between the lines as it were, made of particles strung along a lattice just out of step with our own. If you can gauge the distances correctly along this string-net and apply a constant field to shift the center of gravity of space quanta a little to one side and perfectly coincide with the spin networks on a different lattice, then voila! you can continue motion over that other dimension, which is only confusing because we use the word dimension when clearly it is simply a spacetime superimposed on our own but with a topology ordered along a geometry that is slightly out of step with ours.
This duality over the lattice may seem difficult to stomach but it will be invariably clear to anyone who has gotten used to the television version's compression of the entire x-axis into the tube's smaller aspect ratio (the ultra-cool credits scene). That, and if you can believe a key researcher is named Joan Baez.
This is what the movie is trying to illustrate when the Buckaroo's nemesis gets himself stuck halfway through a wall. That probably happened partly because they were using an inefficient energy carrier (as TFA suggests), bosons not being known in the 30s, but mostly in fact due to insufficient speed, since if you lose momentum while in the interface you would have to push against quite a lot of knots in the spin network to extricate yourself. It is a kind of rigged Hilbert space, with the knots rigged along the lattices like a ship's rigging, and it is all so intertwined you really have to push with a lot of oomph.
Hence the 700 miles per hour rocket. Obviously the characters are pushing through onto another lattice and not disintegrating the matter in front of them, because if they were destroying matter not only would things probably get quite hot, but also gravity would drag down the nose of Buckaroo's craft toward the center of the Earth! And that doesn't happen at all in fact.
We shall soon see how well the movie predicts reality with the next generation of particle accelerators. TFA only makes one terrible mistake, in that they suggest the movie is wrong about magnitudes because Buckaroo is superhumanly able to miniaturize accelerators. In fact just recently research scientist Anatoly Maksimchuk and Donald Umstadter, and another team in Europe, have been able to focus high energies with table-top devices. Certainly as higher energies are reached there will be a manifold of possibilities to study. Just remember, wherever you go, there you are.
Blatant pitch (Score:3, Informative)
Just... just hold on... that's good. (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)