Slashdot Log In
Space Station Gyro Problem Dangerous?
Posted by
Hemos
on Mon Oct 16, 2006 09:58 AM
from the addressing-the-issues dept.
from the addressing-the-issues dept.
mysterystevenson writes "After bringing more mass than ever before up to the ISS, one of the gyros has failed. Gyros help maintain attitude position in space; the more mass needed to be controlled, the more force that is exerted on the gyros. Now there is the danger that the Shuttle may be bringing yet more mass and starting construction while turning off another gyro, which could cause a need for thrusters to maintain attitude. The assemblies are not all constructed to be able to withstand such force and in a bad situation there could be a collapse which could affect the Shuttle and the ISS as well. Worse case could be total loss; a wise idea might be to alter the construction schedule and address the Gyro and Gyro design problems, before going forward with the introduction of more mass."
Related Stories
[+]
Space Station Partners Bicker Over Closure Date 222 comments
jcdick1 writes "The current partners in the ISS are in discussion regarding the closure date of the space station, even though it still has not been fully assembled. 'The United States insists it will pull out of the station at the end of 2015 while Russia wants its life prolonged, said European Space Agency (ESA) chief Jean-Jacques Dordain at an astronautics congress in Hyderabad, southern India. NASA administrator Michael Griffin has told space station partners that the US agency has no plans for "utilization and exploitation" of the science research lab for more than five years after it is completed, Dordain said.'"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
MysteryStevenson to the rescue! (Score:5, Funny)
AAAGH (Score:5, Funny)
It's only 11:00, the gyro cart won't be out for another hour!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Crab juice, anyone?
Re: (Score:2)
I'll stay in Colorado though. The view/people/traffic/cost of living/clean air/clean water/cab drivers/attitude/etc. is better here. And I can get just about anything at the restaurants. Rattles
Re: (Score:2)
They need to stop off at Alexandros (best take-out gyros in Toronto -- Danforth and Logan -- just behind the statue of Alexander) to pick up some tasty replacements.
(I'm getting hungry just thinking about it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The food has a gen
No spares for the RAIG array? (Score:2)
Shouldn't they have had more than *one* spare in the production pipeline, or placed bids or whatever for a second spare back in 2003?
Ask any system admin: RAIG only improve
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Surely, the problem is moment of inertia (Score:1)
Solar arrays can't handle rocket fires??? (Score:2, Informative)
Withstanding attack (Score:3, Funny)
But if the attacking ships use phasers instead of rockets, the solar arrays can take
WTF? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
While I do think they should've been thinking more about keeping enough spares handy, they can't exactly afford to propel an entire second space station into or
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Solar arrays can't handle rocket fires??? (Score:5, Informative)
ISS is not in imminent danger. First off, it can hold attitude indefinitely on two of four gyros. Second, the solar arrays can withstand the RCS thrusters firing, they just need to lock down the assemblies that rotate the solar arrays first. Therein lies the rub.
The next shuttle mission brings up more parts and re-wires a large section of the ISS's power grid. This means bringing some systems offline for the duration of a spacewalk, reconfiguring them, and bringing them back up shortly thereafter. Naturally, during this process, the ISS will be running on less redundancy than it is now. One of the spacewalks is slated to bring down two of the gyros, on the assumption that the other two can maintain attitude, while running off the new solar arrays which must rotate in order to generate the specified amount of power. Without the other gyro, RCS firings might be necessary, which make the solar cells unhappy.
This is a nontrivial but solvable problem. Solutions currently being proposed:
- Bring up the failing gyro for the duration of the spacewalk. It didn't up and die one day -- it's just vibrating a lot, and might do the trick.
- Leave the failing gyro off, and be prepared to bring it up only if the one operational gyro can't maintain attitude.
- Lock the solar array into a suboptimal orientation, and fire the RCS thrusters as necessary.
- Bring up a replacement gyro. They're about 800 pounds and aren't simple to install, which is a lot to be adding to a mission three weeks from launch, so this is unlikely.
They are rocket scientists, you know.This seems rather alarmist (Score:5, Interesting)
This seems rather alarmist. First off, why would they risk destroying the station to preserve the attitude? It seems that letting it turn somewhat for a limited amount of time would be far better than risking its destruction to preserve its orientation at all costs.
And the time would be limited. Remember, there is conservation of angular momentum. If you are tumbling, you will need to use the thrusters to stop it in any case (gyros don't create or destroy angular momentum--if you want to get rid of some permanently, you'll need to cast off some reaction mass). But for what they do do, which is reorienting a ship by temporarily holding some angular momentum, they can be used as slowly as you want. Heck, if you weren't in a hurry you could turn the ship by hand (actually, foot) by just "walking" around the outer wall without any gyros at all.
--MarkusQ
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Again, this is a question of angular momentum (which is conserved), not of or
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
... as portrayed in SG-1, not in Atlantis.
There was an episode of Atlantis where they basically had a catfight between Rodney McKay and Samantha Carter. McKay was telling Carter that he had been studying their mission logs, and that they had been ignor
Re: (Score:2)
Most of our spacecraft are designed to turn, rotisserie style, under the sun's undiminished glare.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Heck, if you weren't in a hurry you could turn the ship by hand (actually, foot) by just "walking" around the outer wall without any gyros at all.
Now that's real spacewalking. None of this jetpack shit.
Re: (Score:2)
And the original article as "irrational person who thinks he knows more than the rocket scientists".
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I think we're talking at cross purposes. If there's a consistant net torque (e.g. tidal forces pulling the station to be perpendicular to the ground) that's something you'll have to fix with thrusters. Gyros won't do it for you, as there is a limit to ho
Re: (Score:2)
No, they don't.
You might be thinking of "friction." But even that doesn't destroy the angular momentum, it just thermalize
Running out of Attitude? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Dangerous gyro (Score:2)
Perhaps this might be because the left the mayonnaise-laden sandwiches sitting in the back of someone's station wagon for 3 days before loading them in the shuttle.
Re: (Score:2)
Get it right.
Now mod me off-topic already.
Sarcasm Follows (Score:2)
OB Trek Quote (Score:2, Funny)
"I canna change the laws of physics!"
Don't Panic (Score:1)
The situation is being assessed but things continue to progress. Other "minor
And this is why we need(ed) the ISS (Score:2)
Case? (Score:1)
Wrong category (Score:2)
Attitude Position? (Score:1)
Let me know when it starts singing "Bicycle Built For Two."
Mystery Summary ; Thumbs up Slashdot ! (Score:1)
I'd like to state at the beginning , that this post is not for points , a zero is fine by me , just want you to know I really mean the next sentence . I thank Slashdot for going ahead and publishing this story ; you had to know
ISS (Score:1)