Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Going Pink For October

Posted by kdawson on Sun Oct 01, 2006 05:27 PM
from the in-all-seriousness dept.
Matthew Oliphant is inviting anyone and everyone to turn their Web sites pink during October, which is National Breast Cancer Awareness month. Nearly 150 sites have done so as of this writing. And by the way, guys can get breast cancer too.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Going Pink For October 50 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • OMG Ponies!!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by nacturation (646836) on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:29PM (#16269609) Journal
    Imagine a month filled with pink fluffy ponies. Bring it on.
     
  • Finally (Score:4, Funny)

    by IPFreely (47576) <mark@mwiley.org> on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:30PM (#16269621) Homepage Journal
    A good reason to revert to OMG Ponies!
  • Hmm. (Score:2)

    I redid mine last month ... but went with Brown. Oops. Who could've expected that pink would make a comeback? Ah well. Maybe I could put a ribbon-image on it instead ...
  • Strangely unfamous cancer (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Henry V .009 (518000) on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:31PM (#16269633) Journal
    What color do I make my website for prostate cancer?
    • Re:Strangely unfamous cancer (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:43PM (#16269769)
      I always make that point too. Prostate cancer is as prevalent in males as breast cancer is in females, and kills about the same number of people too.
      But for some reason there isn't the same concern for it.

      What is really disappointing is that some women criticise men for not caring about breast cancer, but seem completely unconcerned themselves about one of the most common cancers for men.

      As with most things gender-related, it shouldn't be a case of competition, but it is for the simple fact that there is an overwhelming lack of effort out there on the part of men's health issues.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Prostate cancer has a much higher tendency to affect older people than brest cancer. When you're old, people expect you to get sick... People don't like the idea of previously healthy 40 year olds suddenly getting mortally ill and prostate is less of a p
      • Re:Strangely unfamous cancer (Score:5, Insightful)

        by t-twisted (937590) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:13PM (#16270053)
        I have mod points but I can't let this pass:

        The only reason breast cancer awareness is so high is because women, WOMEN, organized themselves and brought both the public and government's attention to it. This was more a grass-roots effort that became a force to be reckoned with than a "oh, never mind the men, we women are more important!" action. Breast cancer was thought to be treatable and curable through early detection and women set out to prove it through these campaigns, rather than continue the barbaric treatment of lopping off their breasts and blasting them with chemotherapy to treat any and all signs of cancer.

        Yes, prostate cancer is high among men, it's the second leading cancer for men. For every 3 men who die of prostate cancer, 4 women die of breast cancer, so it's almost, but not quite, equal. What makes it more unequal is 70% of all prostate cancer cases occur in men 65 years or older in age. Compare that to 50% of all cases of breast cancer cases occur in women 61 years or older in age. In addition, prostate cancer can be so slow-growing as to be a non-issue in men - they frequently die of causes OTHER than prostate cancer due to age.

        I think it's misguided to be "bitter" that one group garners more attention than the other, when one group isn't doing as much as the other to bring attention, publicity and resources to their cause. You're right, this isn't about a competition, this about who is doing what for their "own". And don't think men do not benefit from the publicity and research generated from these campaigns, as men can get breast cancer, too.

        However, I can't even believe you went there with your "overwhelming lack of effort out there on the part of men's health". Please. Do you know how differently signs of a heart attack present themselves in women than men? Yet the rhetoric (tingling in left arm, shortness of breath, etc) is always about signs of impending heart problem in a man, not a woman, yet heart disease is the #1 killer of women, too.

        Don't be upset because a group of people got organized. Organize yourself and get out there.

        T.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Strangely unfamous cancer (Score:5, Insightful)

          by mordors9 (665662) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:29PM (#16270189)
          You are certainly correct about women organizing and making breast cancer more of a cause celebre than prostate cancer or for that matter lung cancer or heart disease. And I agree it shouldn't be an us against them situation. Unfortunately the competition for research dollars does seem to be a zero sum game. It also reminds me of the outrage that arose a few decades ago when women's groups raised the awareness of the American public that little girl's weren't being treated fairly in the schools. Now girls are graduating high school and going to college at a much higher rate than boys. There seems to be very little concern about that either.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          For the most part, males don't discuss this sort of thing in quite the detail women do, when it comes to body functions. It's a fundamentally old, and stupid, social firewall rule. *snarky*
            • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

              Totally ditching my mod points for this, but I thought I'd chime in and say that the proctologist gives you a pill that will cause you not to remember a few hours after taking the pill, then goes to work. So yes, even though you will be horribly violated,
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        Thank you, thank you, thank you. This is one of my biggest pet peeves about breast cancer awareness.

        I think the risk of prostate cancer is higher by a considerable margin. A quick Googling for information got me: 18% for prostate cancer, 14.3% for breast c
        • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

          What would you rather talk about, breasts or prostates? I think you have your answer! That, or you have a rodent fetish...
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Apparently, it's light blue for Prostate Cancer, and Prostate Cancer awareness month is September (at least it was last year).

      Breast Cancer strikes fear in the heart of many women despite being one of the most treatable cancers. I'm sure TFA has h
  • Not ponies (Score:4, Funny)

    by Kuku_monroe (753761) on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:32PM (#16269649) Homepage
    OMG, Cancer!!!
  • I'm in what else can I do? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by josepha48 (13953) on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:39PM (#16269713) Journal
    less than two years ago one of my sisters was diagnosed with breast cancer. Today I just discovered my other sister has breast cancer. It's spread to her bones, so the doctors are treating her with chemo. She's 47!

    So what's the #xxxxxx code for pink or do we just use 'pink' ( which is kinda dark ).

    What else can we do?

    BTW: guys, get your selves checked for prostate cancer!

    • Re:I'm in what else can I do? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Speare (84249) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:16PM (#16270089) Homepage
      If you are somehow GIMP-challenged to the point of not understanding the eyedropper tool, here are a few I snagged from graphics on a breast cancer site:
      • #ff99cc
      • #eeaac3
      • #f594cb
      • #f197c0
      • #fbd9e1
      • #f50f95
      The first one is a "safe 216" color, which I threw in as a bonus for the really ancient websites and video cards stuck in 256-color modes.
      [ Parent ]
  • Breasts (Score:5, Funny)

    by Tx (96709) on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:40PM (#16269729) Journal
    I'm all sypathetic for cancer sufferers of course, but I have to say I'm personally much more interested in non-cancerous mammaries. I vote we have a National Breast Awareness month (without the cancer) next month. Dunno what color we should turn our websites for that though, I would've said pink, but apparently it's been taken :).
      • Re:Breasts (Score:4, Insightful)

        by nacturation (646836) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:01PM (#16269951) Journal
        Theres a time and a place for jokes, but this is a rather serious thing which could one day kill you. Being a little horny asshole who wants to see porn isn't an important thing.

        Lighten up. Seeing breasts != porn. Seeing people fucking == porn. And many things could one day kill you... should we be serious about everything and just stop joking altogether?
         
        [ Parent ]
  • questioning its use (Score:4, Funny)

    by xIcemanx (741672) on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:41PM (#16269739)
    We should stop celebrating breast cancer awareness and start celebrating breast awareness [theonion.com]. Millions of lives are tragically affected by unawareness of the full size and scope of these breasts. Failure to screen breasts early and often can lead to a rapid deterioration of sexy roles and a premature end to one's film career. Regular examination of breasts needs to be an important part of people's lives.
  • "Awareness"? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Hao Wu (652581) on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:55PM (#16269891) Homepage
    What does awareness do except make people falsely believe that something is being done about a problem?

    "Awareness" is organized complacency.

    If you want to fight breast cancer, then do it in a laboratory or hospital setting - someplace where caring actually matters. (...and stick your "pink-website" concept back up your ass where it came from...)

    • Re:"Awareness"? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by davidc (91400) <davidc@POLLOCKcc ... du minus painter> on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:28PM (#16270181)
      Awareness might make the difference between a woman having a mammogram, or not.

      Let's not be ignorant about this: screening and early detection can make a huge difference in breast cancer (others, too!). I just don't agree that awareness makes people think they are safe. And, yes, something is being done about the problem, starting with screening.

      Every bit of publicity helps. Please don't belittle educational programs. Grass-roots education for regular screening arguably helps as much as the latest whiz-bang chemotherapeutic agent. If you catch it early, you markedly improve survival rates.
      [ Parent ]
  • by Will_Malverson (105796) on Sunday October 01 2006, @05:57PM (#16269915) Journal
    Is there any woman still out there not aware that sometimes her boobs can develop lumps that will kill her? If such an utterly clueless person exists, is turning websites pink really the best way to communicate with her?
  • Why the focus on breast cancer? (Score:5, Informative)

    by windowpain (211052) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:09PM (#16270007) Journal
    I lost a dear friend to breast cancer in 1998 but I think it's screwy to focus so much on it. Look at this PDF table [cancer.gov] from the National Cancer Institute. It shows that estimated deaths from digestive system cancers (136,180) will be more than triple the number of deaths from breast cancer (41,430) this year. Both figures are for both male and female deaths. Even when you look at just female deaths, digestive system cancers will kill half again as many women as breast cancer will (60,970 vs. 40,970).

    Another example of misplaced public health priorities due to the publicity machine.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      I think part of it is that breast cancer can be detected and treated early much easier than other cancers. Are there very good warning signs of digestive system cancers? If not, what will awareness do? Possibly get people to donate money is about all it ca
  • Disease Gap... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by evilviper (135110) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:11PM (#16270023) Journal
    Nothing disturbs me more about "charities" than the promotion of one disease over another.

    Besides breast cancer, we all hear about AIDS constantly, and calls for donations. Yet, AIDS research already recieves a disproportionally large ammount of money, if you look at the number of people who die from it, and the ammount spent on other serious diseases.

    Are there any organizations that you can donate to, that just tackle critical diseases at large, rather than having tunnel-vision on one single issue?
  • by reifman (786887) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:12PM (#16270051) Homepage
    Jeanne Sather, a breast cancer survivor, at Assertive Cancer Patient [assertivepatient.com] says "Gag me with a pink ribbon: Where pink marketing really runs wild is in the for-profit sector. Retailers offer pink-themed merchandise, then donate only a tiny share of the profits to cancer research. I'm tripping over these products everywhere I go this month. At the pet store, a pink dog collar printed with pink ribbons sells for $9.99; the tag says 30 cents (30 cents!) from the sale of this product will be donated to the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, the 800-pound gorilla of cause marketing." and more.
  • This is dumb. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by prescor (204357) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:14PM (#16270057) Homepage
    I'm a guy who three years ago had a lump-ectomy. (Mammograms are NOT fun, y'all. The girls can KEEP 'em!) Fortunately, it was benign.

    That said, "pink sites" is a dumb idea. Or sites of any OTHER color to support a cause. Still, I support freedom of speech and all that. Anyone who wants their site pink because of breast cancer or panther fetishes or whatever, well, more power to 'em.

    I still think it's stupid.
  • Its NOT just sites - its CITIES! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nighty5 (615965) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:22PM (#16270133)
    I noticed this last week while walking home from work, passing the Opera House (Sydney) down to the park it was illumiated in completely pink. It looks really cool.

    This effort is global, cities around the world are getting involved in the cause.

    I'm suprised nobody else has seen this, maybe most stay in underground server rooms not to notice?

    http://www.globalillumination.org.au/ [globalillu...ion.org.au]

    For Australia, "Porches in Pink will begin a day after the Global Illumination on Sunrise, with Australian porches remaining pink for the duration of October to show Australians' support for breast cancer research." ::

    http://www.porchesinpink.org/ [porchesinpink.org]
  • Just another.. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by kbox (980541) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:31PM (#16270207) Homepage
    ....Temporarily pretend you give a shit about something month/week/day.
  • I have a solution (Score:3, Funny)

    by GodfatherofSoul (174979) on Sunday October 01 2006, @06:51PM (#16270367)
    Early detection wouldn't even be a problem if women weren't so damned sensitive about strangers groping their breasts. Every time I try to diagnose a girl at the local bar I get smacked and treated like a pervert.
  • Will google have a logo? (Score:5, Funny)

    by cvd6262 (180823) on Sunday October 01 2006, @08:35PM (#16271301)
    I wonder what the creative artists at gOOgle could come up with for their logo for October....
  • pink my butt (Score:4, Insightful)

    by cdn-programmer (468978) <[terr] [at] [terralogic.net]> on Sunday October 01 2006, @09:05PM (#16271555)
    While I definately want to keep breasts where they belong, it occurs to me this is an opportunity for wee geeks to show how insensitive we can be.

    A common joke in engineering circles is that engineers tend to use their personalities for birth control.

    I expect programmers and web masters have this technique refined somewhat.

    So if we are to support breasts and the idea of keeping them where they belong, then perhaps it behooves the primary beneficiaries to share the benefits with wee geeks rather than the jocks (jokes anyone?) in the crowd which urban lore would suggest are questionably more desireable?
  • by SetupWeasel (54062) on Monday October 02 2006, @12:40AM (#16273399) Homepage
    This shit must infuriate people with Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Actually, men can not only get breast cancer, but they can also produce milk. Google for "witch's milk" [google.com] for some descriptions of this in newborns. This happens in around 5% of newborns of both sexes, and normally stops within a week or two. But most of us
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        I never knew guys could get breast cancer until a few years ago when I met someone who not only had it but had hasd a masectome (sp?). One nipple was kind of weird when he had his shirt off and yeah he had some scarring. He got lucky in that it was caught
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      You can go pink, but don't be surprised if someone thinks it's for National Coming Out Day.

      This comment makes more sense if you know that in much of the industrialised world, colours do not have the same symbolism as in the US:

      US: pink = breast cancer,