A Dolphin By Any Other Name 248
SloppyElvis writes "CNN is reporting that scientists have proven that Dolphins can communicate with each other by name. From the article: 'researchers synthesized signature whistles with the caller's voice features removed and played them to dolphins through an underwater speaker' to which the mammals responded. This form of identification in language was previously only known to exist in the human world." Thankfully they still haven't evolved opposable thumbs.
yeah but the downside is (Score:3, Funny)
-Sj53
Re:yeah but the downside is (Score:2)
Obligatory Monty Python reference (Score:3, Funny)
"G'day, Flipper... Hello Flipper... how are you, Flipper? Gentlemen, I'd like to introduce a chap from pommie land... Michael Baldwin - this is Flipper. Michael Baldwin - this is Flipper... and Michael Baldwin - this is Flipper."
"Is your name not Flipper, then?"
"No, it's Michael."
"That's going to cause a little confusion. Mind if we call you 'Flipper' to keep it clear?"
Flipper (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Flipper (Score:2)
My aquatic friend (Score:2, Funny)
Re:My aquatic friend (Score:4, Funny)
My cow-orkers all say "Hey! AC...let's take a break" or "AC, please come over here and help debug this code"
But, when I leave the toilet seat up, I get the full "Anonymous Robert Coward...you come here RIGHT NOW"
Capitalization? (Score:5, Funny)
Football players have names? (Score:3, Funny)
Who knew?
Re:Capitalization? (Score:5, Funny)
Or maybe it's just a reference to Ricky Williams finally clearing through his smoky haze and recognizing teammates.
Not that astounding.... (Score:3, Funny)
The true dolphin story (Score:5, Funny)
"Who's been eating my sardines?!!" she squeaks.
Daddy Dolphin arrives at the table and sits on his big seashell. He looks into his big bowl and it is also empty.
"Who's been eating my sardines?!!" he roars.
Mummy Dolphin puts her head through the serving hatch from the kitchen and yells
"How many times do we have to go through this with you idiots? It was Mummy Dolphin who got up first, it was Mummy Dolphin who woke everyone in the house, it was Mummy Dolphin who made the coffee, it was Mummy Dolphin who unloaded the dishwasher from last night, and put everything away, it was Mummy Dolphin who went out in the cold early morning water to fetch the newspaper, it was Mummy Dolphin who set the damn table, it was Mummy Dolphin who put the friggin catfish out, cleaned the litter box and filled the catfish's water and food dish, and now that you've decided to drag your sorry dolphin-asses downstairs and grace Mummy Dolphin's kitchen with your grumpy presence, listen good, cause I'm only going to say this one more time...
I HAVEN'T MADE THE DAMN SARDINES YET !!"
windering.. (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re:windering.. Off topic MY ASS! TWITS! (Score:2)
"KWaaaaaa Kwa-kaaaaa-kaaaaa"
Re:windering.. (Score:2)
That's not a name (Score:5, Funny)
Personally, I find it far more likely that the dolphins are referring to each other by their slashdot IDs.
Re:That's not a name (Score:2)
Re:That's not a name (Score:5, Funny)
Re:That's not a name (Score:2, Funny)
Re:That's not a name (Score:2)
2 Things You Don't Know About Dolphins (Score:5, Funny)
2) They love NASCAR
Re:2 Things You Don't Know About Dolphins (Score:2)
And in related news.... [theonion.com]
Re:2 Things You Don't Know About Dolphins (Score:2, Funny)
5)Profit!
Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:2)
Fill us in. I've only heard parrots say simple, seemingly random things to people or just utterances out loud. I've never heard of them talking to each other.
What do they ask for, and how? Give us a little dialog please....
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:2)
"Polly! I wanna cracker!"
"Fly off your perch and get it yourself!"
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:2)
She's at University of Arizona last I heard.
Parrots can recognize and name multiple objects, colors, numbers, and materials and use the words correctly.
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:2)
In a pet shop... (Score:2)
When this bird was invited onto someone's arm, it would climb toward the head, and then proclaim 'lookout!' before proceeding to preen. It obviously had learned this should be said by someone before clamping down on their hair and pulling.
But generally speaking, this behavior isn't quite the same as the parrots are not creating the names themselves, but rather recognizing the meaning of a word and imitating
parrots context-correct utterances (Score:5, Interesting)
Most of what my macaw and my parents' african grey falls into this catagory. Obviously, they learned "Hello" and "good morning" because those things are said to them. It is even clear that their understanding of these sounds is different from the literal meaning; our birds will use these comments any time they want to greet you or initiate contact.
What is more interesting is the novel constructions and novel useage; i.e. the new uses they find for an existing word or phrase and the entirely new phrases make by combining words in new ways. Examples:
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:2)
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:3, Interesting)
The funny thing is they use only one of my par
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:4, Insightful)
Further, if you isolated a group of humans from other humans ("in the wild") do you think they would come up with names for one another?
What I'm saying here is that I think a human separated from its herd/pack/society will be just as uninclined to name things as a bird would be. When integrated into society however, whether human or bird, the ability to learn enables higher-level functions like naming, understanding, counting, storytelling, and so on. That's probably the most amazing thing of all, that a bird can become "socialized" the same way a child can.
What does it matter if they do or don't have names that they speak in the wild? What if they don't? Wouldn't that make this all the more interesting?
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:5, Interesting)
To answer your second question, the answer is probably yes. Not only that, they will develop their own language [columbia.edu].
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:3, Funny)
I'd certainly like to know the answer to that question... we have flocks of wild parrots living around here (Southern California) and they are very noisy: it's hard to miss them when they fly by, it sounds like several dozen 300 baud modems all transmitting at once. Which makes me wonder if the modem-like audio might not actually contain a fair amount of encoded data in it...
Close encounters of the third kind. (Score:2)
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Ever heard of parrots ? (Score:2, Interesting)
My friend observed this a number of times and was able to replicate the individual miaows to call individual kittens.
So it seems even cats can have
Sure they might sound smart (Score:4, Informative)
Why did I hear about this 5 years ago? (Score:2)
for the record (Score:4, Funny)
Translation: I for one welcome our dolphin overlords.
Certainly not unheard of in captivity... (Score:5, Interesting)
Intelligence and symbol identification/use definitely seems to me to be a general phenomenon larger than mammalian life.
It would be interesting to repeat similar experiments with intelligent species of wild birds to see if they generate unique sound identification that they may use to identify third-"persons" non-visually in some way. Most likely birds would use such ability to immitate eachother for social manipulation - but the conclusions of the use of such symbolic proto-language would still be meaningful.
Ryan Fenton
Re:Certainly not unheard of in captivity... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Certainly not unheard of in captivity... (Score:3, Interesting)
It was amazing how much that bird knew though.
Re:Certainly not unheard of in captivity... (Score:2)
So he would over-qualified to work as a /. editor?
Gary Larson would be proud... (Score:4, Funny)
In other words, your dogs have accepted their African Grey Parrot overlords.
Gary Larson would proud of them all.
Re:Certainly not unheard of in captivity... (Score:2, Interesting)
Parrots are mimickers- and not much more; they lack the brain capacity to do most of the things that people claim they can do. Names aren't sounds; they have a lot more meaning if they are truly names. A couple of days ago when this story hit the AP (yes, a few days ago), I read that the researchers went to extensive lengths to see if it was the exact sound, inflection, etc. that dolphins responded to.
My cat comes running (usually) when you call his name (Tucker). When we call him, we all generally do
Re:Certainly not unheard of in captivity... (Score:4, Interesting)
To make an example, as far as I know in languages like Chinese intonation plays a tremendous role - two completely different words might sound exactly the same to us - one might be our name, the other someting else, but that doesn't mean that we don't know our names.
I have had many pets and have came to the conclusion that animals are much closer to us than we are used to assuming. They can think (albeit very primitively), they have memory, they make plans, etc - to say that it is all instinct and mimicking would be a vast oversimplification. This is a dangerous line of thinking though - a pig is as smart as a cat, but I do love eating pork chop.
Re:Certainly not unheard of in captivity... (Score:2)
This is due to the way humans learn language, the human brain learns the sounds that are peculiar to the language spoken, extra sounds are meaningless and the brain actually filters them out so you don't "hear" them in the first place. This is the reason asian speakers consistently get "L" and "R" mixed up (to asians they sound similar!!!). I would guess the same is true for the cat, ie: it just hears the two "intonations" and recognises
I wonder what else they're saying... (Score:5, Funny)
A Dolphin By Any Other Name... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: A Dolphin By Any Other Name... (Score:2)
A Dolphin By Any Other Name (Score:2)
Thank You I'm here all week. Tip your servers.
Here goes.. (Score:2)
Oversold? (Score:3, Insightful)
To support a claim of using names, I'd want evidence of dolphin Alice vocalizing dolphin Bob's signature call to gain Bob's attention.
I suppose it comes down to an argument about what constitutes a "name". But the small step from the reacting to signature calls to the reacting to sythesized signature calls seems a strange place to draw the line between "name" and "not name".
flipper ~ modified hand (Score:2, Interesting)
It is interesting to note that whales/dophin have hand bone structure. These mammals evolved from those that were once land animals. As a result the flipper is actually a modified hand structure.
/
Re:flipper ~ modified hand (Score:2)
Re:flipper ~ modified hand (Score:2)
The other dolphin's other name... (Score:2)
And man do they ever taste good, if you know how to cook 'em [activeangler.com].
Obligitory Jack Handy (Score:2, Funny)
think liked dolphins the most? I'd say Flippy, wouldn't you? You'd be
wrong, though. It's Hambone.
-Jack Handy
psychokenetics (Score:3, Funny)
there is no human.
Suspected Whales did this Too (Score:4, Informative)
While whale-watching in the North Pacific ocean around San Juan Island, the whale expert explained how whales make a unique sound before and after their other phrases, and that these sounds are often accompanied by a reply for a different whale. The unique sounds were most often unique to the whale that responded. As such, experts believed these to be used like names.
Such a conversation would go something like this:
Re:Suspected Whales did this Too (Score:5, Funny)
Those aren't names, they are packet headers.
statistically insignificant (Score:3, Insightful)
7 out of 14 would be expected if it were random...9 out of 14 is nothing more than a statistical fluke. They should have done more tests...this study sounds like nothing more than a coincidence.
Re:statistically insignificant (Score:2)
Everybody already knows this (Score:2, Interesting)
Dolphins can ALSO create rings using their blowhole. They create what is essentially a vortex with perfect buyoncy (sp?). They can be tossed around like toys without "popping" due to the physics of the rings. I've tried to do this with my nose, and I fail every time. This is not
Just don't free the Dolphin Queen (Score:2, Funny)
Carl Sagan and Dolphins (Score:2, Interesting)
Makes you wonder how many times they tried before they gave up.
And also why the chimps don't have it yet.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Re:*sigh* (Score:5, Informative)
"reasonable doubt" is a legal term, not a scientific one.
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
The farmer comes and feeds the turkey every day so the turkey knows that when the farmer comes at thanksgiving it's going to get fed.
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Very true, but also proofs are for math, not science.
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Re:*sigh* (Score:5, Informative)
It usually means that a randomized clinical trial was performed and the null hypothesis was rejected. If you haven't had any statistics yet, that means that you hypothesize two treatments have the same effect and run a trial. If the results observed would be highly improbable under the equal effect hypothesis (and this probability is very clearly defined), then you have 'clinically proven' treatment A superior, for instance. Statistical hypothesis testing is basically applying the same principle as a reductio ad absurdum from logic. In general, you usually don't 'prove' things in science like you do in math, but that's another topic.
Re:*sigh* (Score:2, Informative)
Generally it is considered bad form and logically incorrect. Statistical hypothesis testing has its own pitfalls (see Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p
Re:*sigh* (Score:4, Funny)
A statistician could never really agree 100%. :-)
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
At least before they choked on the gum and floated away.
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
At least before they choked on the gum and floated away.
The dolphins, or the dentists?
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
It means "clinically tested". For more information, consult the nearest dictionary.
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
It means that its thermogenic fat-blasting power can help you drop those pounds fast while purging toxins, straightening your hair, and whitening your teeth.
And also that they know a double-blind trial won't show the same thing, so they're throwing around BS terms to confuse suckers^Wcustomers.
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Hypothesis can't be proved, but only disproved.
SCIENCE is the progression of hypotheses getting more and more accurate as tests rule out the ones that are not the case. Saying "science can prove" or "science can't prove" totally misses what science is in the first place.
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Hypothesis can't be proved, but only disproved.
SCIENCE is the progression of hypotheses getting more and more accurate as tests rule out the ones that are not the case.
Ruling out all existing hypotheses except for one is not a sufficient condition to claim that the remaining hypothesis must be true. There may be other hypotheses that have not yet been formed.
Saying "science can prove" or "science can't prove" totally misses wh
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
That doesn't make any sense. If something is proven then it must by definition be *the* true explanation for the behavior of a phenomena. You can't disprove anything that is unequivocably true.
The way I've always been told that it actually works is that many theories may
Re:*sigh* (Score:2)
Re:dolphins: unleashed (Score:2)
Re:Weird Slashdot... (Score:2)
Re:I wonder... (Score:2)
Re:I wonder... (Score:5, Insightful)
Hunh? What biological science supports the position that dolphins are not self-aware? They seem to be as self-aware as apes, and are certainly much more self-aware than even human infants.
"Nevertheless, the equation that dolphins make noise + response to that noise = names, then any animal that makes a noise to communicate to other like animals probably is using names."
No, you missed the point. The point is that the noises are NOT the same. They can be reproduced back in all sorts of different tones and inflections that makes them different "noises," but there is a core structure of sorts, that apparently defines the meaning apart from the noise. That's not proof of any sort complex grammatical structure, sure, but it's far more like language than cats, dogs, parrots, and so forth, which respond to and repeat noises, without any particular regard to some subtle, abstract structure.
Furthermore, I'm not sure I know of any other social animal that acts like this: individuals called specifically as individuals by other members of the same species in the wild. That's pretty amazing.
Re:I wonder... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I wonder... (Score:3, Informative)
There's evidence that dolphins ARE actually self-aware; this is easily proven by putting a mirror in front of them. If the
Re:I wonder... (Score:2)
Re:Other Intellegences (Score:2)
Obligatory Douglas Adams quote follows:
It's an important and popular fact that things are not always what they seem. For instance, on the planet Earth, Man had always assumed that he was the most intelligent species occupying the planet, instead of the *third* most intelligent. The second most intelligent were of course dolphins. Dolphins had long known of the impending destruction of earth and had on many occasio
Re:Other Intellegences (Score:2)
Oh yeah? What do you do all day? What do they do all day? Now who do you think is smarter?