Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Mini Satellites Could Revolutionize Space Industry

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Aug 31, 2005 03:33 AM
from the smaller-cheaper-space-junk dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Space Daily reports that University of Toronto researchers are working on a project that could replace conventional satellites with a miniature version no larger than a milk carton. From the article: "At only 3.5 kilograms, the Canadian Advanced Nanospace eXperiment 2 (CanX-2) will test small, low-power devices that could lay the groundwork for flying formations of small satellites that could eventually replace larger, more expensive satellites."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] NASA To Develop Small Satellites 85 comments
coondoggie brings news that NASA has announced it will team with Machine-to-Machine Intelligence Corp. to produce small satellites, called 'nanosats,' weighing between 11 and 110 pounds. The satellites will work together in 'constellations' and facilitate networking in space. According to NASA's press release, it will 'develop a fifth generation telecommunications and networking system for Internet protocol-based and related services.' We've discussed miniature satellites in the past.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:36AM (#13443889)
    Is John Carmack building this gigantic hydrogen-powered trebuchet and launching milk cartons full of electronics into space
     
    ... I think this is a sign I should be sleeping at 3:35 AM and not reading slashdot
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:36AM (#13443890)
    To bad other electronics didn't follow suit. I predict that within 100 years computers and hand held electronics will be twice as powerful, 10000 times larger and so expensive that only the 5 richest kings of Europe will own one.
  • And now... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:38AM (#13443895)
    If only we had an elevator to lift all those milk cartons.
  • by Biomechanical (829805) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:39AM (#13443897) Homepage

    "Clusters in Space-ace-ace-ace."

  • by Pipedings (839384) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:43AM (#13443907) Journal
    Sure, smaller satellites, smaller payload => cheaper.

    I fail to see why formations of smaller satellites should be a new development. If smaller types could accomplish the mission of bigger ones, the big ones wouldn't be up there (carrying large antennae, big lenses or whatever).
  • by Compaq_Hater (911468) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:45AM (#13443912)
    How is this going to work i wonder ?, what with all the junk already floating around out there since the late 60's and with the space station how are they going to keep other junk from junking their new baby satallites ?. just a a thought. CH
  • by Saggi (462624) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:51AM (#13443935) Homepage
    Denmark has all ready send two micro satellites. They measure only 10x10x10 cm!

    They were send up 30. June 2003, along with some commercial satellites and were created as student experiments from "Danmarks Tekniske Universitet" (DTU) and "Aalborg Universitet" (AAU). The goal was to see if you could bring them up there and communicate with them.

    You can read more about the two satellites here:

    http://dtusat.dtu.dk/ [dtusat.dtu.dk]
    http://www.cubesat.auc.dk/ [cubesat.auc.dk]
  • by Pecisk (688001) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:57AM (#13443957)
    One of biggest problems about orbit that there is already too much garbage round around the globe. It is creating significant danger to any rocket with men going up there. So collecting of this garbage sure will be next big enterprise after opening civilian space flight.
      • by WindBourne (631190) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @04:29AM (#13444060) Journal
        It is not the huge stuff that is a problem. It is the small stuff, such as the stage bolts that are exploded. These yield numerous small parts (.5-2 centimers), that are literally untrackable. Yeah, they are small, but then again 17000 Miles per hour is a LOT of energy. As to needing a garbage collector, well, a space laser can probably be put into space and used to start pushing small stuff down into the atmosphere. Friction is a wonderful tool.
  • Hey, where is the milk!
  • by zardo (829127) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @04:07AM (#13443990)
    I think somebody needs to develop an ion engine for micro-satellites, then universities may be able to afford rockets like the spacex falcon1 [spacex.com] which puts their satellite into low-earth orbit, where it uses the ion engine to build up its speed for escape velocity. Perhaps this is the next "killer app" for these private space enthusiasts. So far JPL is the only place to find a highly efficient ion engine. They just came up with a high efficiency, high-power design for project prometheus. Ion engine micro-satellite, watch for them.
  • Mars (Score:4, Interesting)

    by WindBourne (631190) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @04:09AM (#13443994) Journal
    It would be nice to be able so send a number of these system so that a small communication network can be set-up. Basically create a small commuication mesh. Each of the sats could have common capabilities (GPS sender, local comm antena, solar, batteries, etc), with each having a unique capability (camera, surface to sat. comm, etc). No doubt somebody will point out that these do not have enough energy (or space) to run a real science device. Yet, the ability to have redundant uplink/downlink comm, a GPS, and eve multiple cameras would be useful to future missions. If one mission to mars could put 100 of these in orbit, then it could be used by other missions.
      • Re:Mars (Score:3, Interesting)

        Skip the medium size. These are micros. they fit in your hand. One complication with all this, is that:
        1. Need a craft to contain them until mars, and them realease them. That is dead weight, but it should be able to be minimized.
        2. These systems will have waste. The total weight in batteries ad cells is somewhat high. But that is the price of redudancies.

        Interestingly eough, we could send these to the moon first and use these to set up the mesh network for working on the back side of the moon. In addition,

  • Satellite arrays (Score:5, Interesting)

    by FirienFirien (857374) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @04:27AM (#13444056) Homepage
    The arrays mentioned here are a nifty piece of lateral thinking. Compare them to the giant detector arrays on earth; if you have two detectors a large distance apart, you effectively increase the aperture size to that large.

    There's similar projects widely spread around the globe; by combining information from a wide array of detectors, you can eliminate significant swathes of atmospheric noise, and since you know which direction the arrays are pointing in, you can correct for depth errors electronically (ie if one detector is 90 round the earth from another, any signal that comes from that sector of sky will reach the two detectors at slightly different times (unless they happen to be at 45 either side of the signal) and the two signals can be shifted correspondingly to align the actual signal, whether it be emission from a star or the next wow signal.)

    On the other hand, a satellite array would probably be non-directional - can't figure off the top of my head how a signal would currently directed from a satellite, since they'd be serving multiple devices at once.... hmm. Seems like with an array you'd have better scope for having a bigger aperture; though you'd get more chance for errors if the signal was coming from a direction further away from the vertical. Comments?
    • Ooh, unless you gave it depth. Depth would allow you to work out the direction of the wave, which would allow you to work out how much to shift it by. There's a bit of a paradox here in that you need to know the direction of a signal to be able to correspond one bit to another, but presumably starting a communication with a standard byte/word for triangulation would make that easier.
  • could you imagine... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Deitheres (98368) <(brutalentropy) (at) (gmail.com)> on Wednesday August 31 2005, @04:30AM (#13444067)
    a beowulf cluster of these?!

    Sorry, had to be said ;-)

    Seriously though... this would provide for something that is pretty lacking in current satellites: successful redundancy.

    If a satellite gets hit with debris or something, it's normally down for the count. You get a cluster of these mini satellites... all sharing the workload... if one gets hit, the rest just pick up the slack.

    Plus this could open up all sorts of possibilities for amateur space exploration...
  • Picosats (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Planetes (6649) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @04:35AM (#13444084)
    There are actually many satellite projects for stuff this small. The space industry in Florida holds an annual competition for college students to design picosats called Funsat [ucf.edu] that uses the Cubesat [calpoly.edu] format.
  • by commodoresloat (172735) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @05:13AM (#13444174) Homepage
    If Mini satellites could revolutionize the space industry, think what big ones could do!
    • Re:Great but.... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by eddy (18759) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @03:56AM (#13443952) Homepage Journal

      Don't know about these, but Sweden is doing research on micro-satellites and those can be deployed within an hour or two using a normal jet-fighter (Viggen/JAS)

    • Re:Great but.... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by MoralHazard (447833) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @05:01AM (#13444148)
      I think you miss the point. Big satellites are insanely expensive to design, build, and launch. If your one Big Bird blows up on the launch pad, or gets hit by the aforementioned space junk, or is shot down by the North Koreans, you've just wasted the entire expenditure.

      IF, on the other hand, you spend an approximately equal amount of money to build a swarm of tiny, cheap, simple birds, that together can do the same job as a big satellite (and have some redundency amongst themselves), you can afford to lose a few from time to time. There are less catastrophes that will deny your orbital presence entirely.

      Plus, if your birds are the size of milk cartons (with a mass to go with it), your launch options are a LOT more flexible: instead of commissioning your own launch, you can piggyback on other launches at a huge discount.

      Like with clusters of servers, disks, or whatever, flexibility opens up tons of opportunities to save money and be more robust.
    • IIRC, you can sent a mini-sat up with an old converted russian ICBM for a small fraction of the cost of a full-scale launch.

      Keep in mind this is a university project, and probably not people that would want/need to send 50 up.

      A mighty cool hack :)
    • Read before you mod up. Parent has inserted multiple typos and errors into the text. This is not 'interesting'.
    • by erbmjw (903229) on Wednesday August 31 2005, @04:30AM (#13444064)
      First story from : http://www.utias-sfl.net/nanosatellites/CanX2/ [utias-sfl.net]

      The CanX-2 Mission

      The CanX-2 Mission is the second "NanoSatellite" Mission at the University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies, Space Flight Laboratory (UTIAS/SFL). The Canadian Advanced Nanospace eXperiments (CanX) push the envelope of what can be achieved in space with small, low-power devices. With a focus on aggressive experimentation, CanX missions use the latest commercial technologies and manage moderate risks in exchange for low cost and quick turnaround. UTIAS/SFL is part of an international community of nanosatellite developers that share common launches to reduce costs.

      At 3.5 kilograms and the size of a carton of milk, CanX-2 will be a pathfinder mission in 2006 to evaluate novel technologies that will be used on the CanX-4 / CanX-5 dual satellite mission in 2008 to demonstrate controlled formation flying in space. Formation flying technology will open the door to larger missions for highresolution Earth observation and interferometric imaging that can also be used for space astronomy. The technologies to be tested include a novel propulsion system, custom radios, innovative attitude sensors and actuators, and a commercial GPS receiver.

      In addition to evaluating these miniature technologies, the satellite will also perform experiments for other university researchers across Canada. These include a GPS radio occultation experiment to characterize the upper atmosphere (Calgary), an atmospheric spectrometer to measure greenhouse gases (York), a network communications experiment (Carleton), and a space materials experiments (Toronto).





      Second story from : http://www.spacedaily.com/news/microsat-05j.html [spacedaily.com]

      Canadian Researchers To Showcase CanX-2 Nanosat August 31

      Toronto ON (SPX) Aug 30, 2005 University of Toronto researchers will demonstrate how a satellite the size of a milk carton that may revolutionize the space industry on Wednesday, Aug. 31, at 10 a.m. at University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies (UTIAS) Lecture Hall, 4925 Dufferin Street.

      At only 3.5 kilograms, the Canadian Advanced Nanospace eXperiment 2 (CanX-2) will test small, low-power devices that could lay the groundwork for flying formations of small satellites that could eventually replace larger, more expensive satellites.

      At the demonstration, researchers will control the CanX-2 nanosatellite through a wireless radio link and download real-time images and telemetry from on-board equipment including a GPS-based positioning system, a miniature propulsion system and tiny devices used for sensing and controlling the satellite's orientation in space.

      "The point of this mission is two-fold," says Professor Robert Zee, managing director of the UTIAS Space Flight Laboratory (SFL).

      "The first is to provide complete development cycle training for students through a real space mission that has to be completed in two years. The second is to launch a tiny research platform into space to test innovative, revolutionary technologies in a rapid, risk-taking manner and also to perform important science missions that are now benefiting from the availability of smaller and smaller instrumentation."

      CanX-2 is the second nanosatellite mission at UTIAS/SFL. CanX-1, Canada's first nanosatellite and one of the smallest satellites ever built, was launched with the MOST microsatellite in 2003 by Eurockot Launch Services from Plesetsk, Russia.

      Sidebar to Second story

      In collaboration with researchers from across Canada, the primary mission of CanX-2 will be a GPS radio occultation experiment to determine vertical profiles of atmospheric properties. It will also perform a number of additional experiments including mobile ad-hoc networking, autonomous control, advanced surface mate