Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

First Controllable Solar Sail Launched Today

Posted by timothy on Tue Jun 21, 2005 07:16 PM
from the now-for-obedience-school dept.
clustermonkey writes "The first controllable solar sail was launched earlier today from a Russian sub in the Barents Sea. The Planetary Society, founded by Carl Sagan, organized the project and were funded by Cosmos Studios, founded by Sagan's widow. There have been 2 other solar sail deployments by others, but this will be the first to attempt controlled flight. The sail is scheduled to deploy June 25." All may not be well, though: Snot Locker writes "The Cosmos 1 Weblog is showing that, although the launch initially looked successful, they can't seem to find it or hear it. Bummer. Previous Slashdot coverage on the Cosmos 1 Solar Sail mission can be found here."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Finnish Electric Solar Sail Nears Implementation 66 comments
eldavojohn writes "A recent meeting held by the Finnish Meteorological Institute has resulted in plans to build an electric solar sail that will circle the Earth, gaining speed to test its acceleration. The purpose? 'A flight out of the solar system to measure the gas, dust, plasma and magnetic field in the undisturbed interstellar space would perhaps be the "flagship" thing to do,' said Pekka Janhunen, a researcher developing the sail at the FMI. The details and papers of this project (over two years in the making) are also available. I certainly hope it will show more success than the launch of the similar U.S.-Russian venture and its subsequent complete failure."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • "Bummer" (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:17PM (#12877354)

    It's a bit more than a "Bummer":

    Engineer #1: Yessiree, that solar sail is up there! This calls for a celebration!
    Engineer #2: Um. Where is it?
    Engineer #1: [points] Up there!
    Engineer #2: Where up there?
    Engineer #1: Way, way up there.
    Engineer #2: You have no idea, right?
    Engineer #1: [weak laugh] Nah.
    Engineer #1: [shrug] Bummer.
  • Deja Vu (Score:5, Informative)

    by rufusdufus (450462) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:21PM (#12877374)
    I swear I remember this happening before. [spaceflightnow.com]
  • uh oh (Score:5, Funny)

    by MrDoh! (71235) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:21PM (#12877375) Homepage Journal
    I'm just waiting for when it comes back as a near omnipotent being and starts demanding to see it's creator.
  • Always the risk. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by reality-bytes (119275) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:23PM (#12877390) Homepage
    I really rather hope this project is okay and only suffering from a 'glitch'. (ie: unexpected orbit)

    The trouble is, every time you take what is essentially a robotically controlled device and send it into space giving it a good *shake* in the process (rockets really do vibrate a lot), you run the risk of breaking something.

    Of course, you combat this by duplicating as much of the systems as you can but when your experiment requires a very low mass (ala solar sail controller) I wonder how much redundancy is possible?

    Still. I hope Cosmos sparks back to life /is found and they get a sucessful experiment. I would be good to prove that solar-sailing is a viable solar-locomotion concept rather than just proving that electronics packages are fragile things.
    • Re:Always the risk. (Score:5, Informative)

      by Rei (128717) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:45PM (#12877529) Homepage
      If you want to know what the people organizing the mission are thinking, the Planetary Society's Latest Update [planetary.org] section is a good spot to go. As it stands, the following has been stated:

      * The signal didn't dissapear suddenly when the kick fired - it became irregular, and then dissapeared after three minutes.

      * The signal was received clearly after launch for six minutes.

      * There were irregular readings coming from the Volna; however, clearly the craft detached, or there wouldn't have been six minutes of signal.

      * STRATCOM can't find the satellite. That doesn't mean that it's gone - only that it's not where they told them to look. Likewise, the lack of ground station reception could mean the same thing. It could be in the wrong orbit, which is actually a more common phenominon than a total craft loss.

      * The chance of signal acquisition at the early two stations was only considered marginal to begin with. The big test will be at the permanent stations in Paska Ves, and especially the Tarusa and Bear lakes.

      * Not receiving a signal from a spacecraft during the first few orbits is "not extremely unusual". Nonetheless, they do sound a bit nervous.
  • Presumably... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Otter (3800) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:24PM (#12877394) Journal
    ...if the craft suffered "failure to enter orbit at all", presumably that means it hit space and kept going, right? I'd imagine someone would have noticed a Russian ICBM falling randomly out of the sky.
    • by Tackhead (54550) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:34PM (#12877475)
      >...if the craft suffered "failure to enter orbit at all", presumably that means it hit space and kept going, right? I'd imagine someone would have noticed a Russian ICBM falling randomly out of the sky.

      In other words, what you're trying to say is that somewhere downrange of post-Soviet Russia, solar sail will eventually find yo*CRUNCH*
      NO CARRIER

    • by TheKidWho (705796) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:46PM (#12877532)
      I know what really happened

      You see, the Russians never launched Cosmos 1, they realized that these guys would be a bunch of suckers so what they did, is they got them to pay for the launch, and then launched their own new spy satellite In the same orbit that Cosmos 1 was supposed to be in. And now they are going to tell them "tough luck, you must have out bad communications equipment on her or something". So the Americans pay the money, and the Russians get to launch their spy satellite.

      Next Week on Conspiracy Theory 101
      Sony and Microsoft are really in bed against Nintendo!
  • Bummer indeed (Score:5, Interesting)

    by J05H (5625) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:24PM (#12877396) Homepage
    There is a chance that it will succeed in deploying. If it's lost, it's double the downer: I helped pay for it as a Planetary Society member. PS also developed a Mars Microphone for the MPL (lost), DVD and sundial for current rovers and a balloon-borne "snake" of sensors that never flew. Dammit, I want this one to work, finally.

    ad astra!
    • So umm, why can't all space research be paid for this way? Or at least, why don't US citizens have the option to pay some percentage of their tax to NASA when they file their tax returns?
  • by NardofDoom (821951) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:27PM (#12877416)
    "...atop a converted ICBM..."

    Just like some other craft we happen to know [startrek.com].

  • by centauri (217890) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:36PM (#12877489) Homepage
    ... it must be halfway to Coruscant by now.
  • Not looking good! (Score:3, Informative)

    by Brett Buck (811747) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @08:04PM (#12877620)
    The report of data suddenly looking "noisy" about the time the final stage fired is a pretty classic bad news situation. The sequence is usually: "looking good!" "clean separation!" "5-4-3-2-1,kick motor ignition" data lost followed by, a short time later "radar indicates multiple targets..." Not that I am hoping, but it's a really bad sign. Brett
  • by fname (199759) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @08:04PM (#12877621) Journal
    Spaceflight Now has posted a story [spaceflightnow.com] about the launch. The 1st stage failed after 83 seconds.
  • by multipart/mixed (163409) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @08:04PM (#12877624)
    ...hanging out with the Vikings.
  • by ZSpade (812879) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @08:07PM (#12877639) Homepage
    It's in space!
    • Re:Interstellar (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Council (514577) <rmunroe @ g m a i l . c om> on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:27PM (#12877424) Homepage
      I wonder how well this kind of propulsion will work in interestellar space where there is no solar wind, let alone enough protons from one direction.

      I think the theory is you get up to a pretty high speed by the time you leave the solar system, then coast. You'd better be sure you can stop at the right place, though.

      I'm sure people have figured that out. Obviously you run the process in reverse to slow down when you approach the star. But what if you can only shed half your speed by the time you get to the planet? (that is, if the other star is smaller, the planet further out, etc)?

      Anyone?
    • Re:Interstellar (Score:5, Informative)

      by cahiha (873942) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @08:00PM (#12877597)
      Solar sails aren't driven by solar wind or protons, they are driven by light (photons).

      An interstellar voyage might be possible, but would probably require a laser or microwave system aimed at the sail for much of its journey (a brief "push" like that is also being tested as part of this experiment).
        • Read up on "interstellar space". There is a low density of hydrogen gas out there - it wasn't pulled in by the gravitational pull of the stars when they formed, and it wasn't pushed out by the solar wind when the star achieved fusion.

          So when you're craft is going at 200,000 mph, every little hydrogen atom is going to blow a chunk out of your craft and slow down your velocity. So it would make sense to reduce the surface area of your craft, in the direction that it is travelling.
    • You made up an issue, just so you can rant about imperial measurement.
      what an ass.

      also, it's Reagans fault.
    • by Rei (128717) on Tuesday June 21 2005, @07:37PM (#12877493) Homepage
      Actually, I'm betting that this time it was due to a spelling error. The sub that launched the Volna rocket was the Borisoglebsk, The first receiving station was at Petropavlovsk on the Kamchatka penninsula. The temporary ground station to pick it up next was on Majuro. Then it will next contact Panska Ves in the Czech republic. It's not until the ground stations at the Tarusa and Bear Lakes that the spelling becomes sufferable. :)
    • by Anonymous Coward
      Engineer #1: A few hundred kilometers that way or this way wouldn't matter...
      Engineer #2: Miles
      Engineer #1: What do you mean "miles"?

      pwnd!

    • You forgot one step:

      Lastly, the solar wind will shred the sails of this craft, as we have not yet developed a material light enough for solar sails, yet robust enough to withstand long-term exposure to the solar wind.

      Still perfectly valid for proof-of-concept, but a good long way from practical application.