Slashdot Log In
USA National Memory Championships
Posted by
timothy
on Sat Mar 19, 2005 06:48 PM
from the pretty-faces-are-easy-to-recall dept.
from the pretty-faces-are-easy-to-recall dept.
bigtallmofo writes "Could you memorize 1,000 digits in under an hour? How about remember the exact order of 10 shuffled decks of playing cards in under an hour as well as one shuffled deck in less than two minutes? If so, you could be counted among 36 grand masters of memory worldwide. Slate is reporting that other spectacular memory feats were performed at the 2005 USA National Memory Championship. Congratulations to Ram Kolli, a graduate student in computer science at Virginia Tech, and this year's champ."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championships (Score:5, Funny)
WASHINGTON -- Senator John McCain (R-AZ) announced Friday afternoon that the Senate would be opening hearings on the USA National Memory Championships after allegations of illegal memory augmentation surfaced. "These allegations of illegal computer implants are very frightening, and we owe it to the American people to investigate this matter fully. Our children are looking up to these men and women as role models, and if they're not actually memorizing things on their own with their God given abilities, we need to put an end to it. There are long term dangers to brain function many of these people are either unaware of or simply ignoring for short-sighted goals."
This year's champion Ram Kolli was among the first to be subpoenaed in the matter, and was expected to testify this week. "I've never illegaly used a computer to assist my memory in my life" said Kolli, noting that he had used computer storage in the past but only in legal ways, such as for class notes and assignments. "I've trained too long and too hard for these championships to throw it all away by using illegal implants. When I memorized pages 73 through 82 of the New York City phonebook, that was all me, and Jorge Benwalt of 212-555-2934 knows it."
Several Google executives have also been called on to testify following claims that they've produced a blackmarket implant that allows people to search Google with their brain. Sources close to Google acknowledged they've done research on such devices, but claim none have been produced or used outside of the lab environment. Google could not be reached for official comment at press time.
Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Congress To Open Hearings On Memory Championshi (Score:5, Informative)
AFAIK, this was not always the case though.
Parent
Car Keys (Score:5, Funny)
The visual memory technique really works... (Score:5, Interesting)
- Imagine you're going to send an email to everyone in your department.
- Imagine, now, that email lists are somehow unavailable.
- Starting with yourself, identify all the people in your row.
- Go one row over, and identify all those people.
Do the same for the rest of the rows.
For those of you who sit in circles in the office, just work your way around from right to left (or left to right).
You'll be surprised at how many people you can remember!
It works with restaurants, too, but since you're not likely to know those people, faces and habits will most likely stick out, rather than names.
The guy has it easy (Score:5, Funny)
A guy named "Ram" who's a memory champion? come on...
Re:The guy has it easy (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The guy has it easy (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
DUPE DUPE !!!!!oneleven!! (Score:4, Funny)
Imagine if... (Score:5, Funny)
More practically.. (Score:5, Insightful)
In this context such methods are fairly controversial, since the mnemonics are rather time-consuming to learn and recall is slower than brute force (on the order of 5-10 seconds instead of instantaneous), but it has some quite dedicated followers.
A game these guys would pwn at... (Score:5, Interesting)
Take a deck of cards, shuffled. Remove 1 card randomly and place it face down on the side of the table. All of the players sit in a semi-circle in front of the dealer.
The dealer than plays 1 card face up in the center of the table. ~1 second later, he plays another on top of the card. Repeat 51 times, showing the players 1 card in the deck at a time. When the last card is played, cover the deck up in the middle of the table.
The players (and dealer if he didnt cheat) has seen all cards - save one. The pur-chance-guessing-game ensues: what is that card that is face-down on the side of the table?
Re:A game these guys would pwn at... (Score:5, Interesting)
Just assign all the cards a numerical value from 1 to 13. Now, assign the suits a letter, eg. S=Spades, C=Clubs, H=Hearts, D=Diamonds.
Now as long as you can add, you only have 4 numbers to keep track of
At the end of the dealing, you should have three numbers that are equal to 91 (the sum of 1 through to 13), and one number that is less,
eg. S91, C91, H91, D80.
This tells you that the initial card was the Jack of Diamonds (11 count for D). Simple
I'm sure there is an easier way, but this was the first thing that immediately popped into my head when I read you post.
Have fun the next time you play!
Parent
mounted? (Score:5, Funny)
Ok, this is just a little wierd... (Score:5, Interesting)
It's that much easier to remember something like that than just three cards? I guess it's like they actually translate the entire deck into a sort of language. Then they just translate it using the same language every time.
I'd settle for... (Score:5, Funny)
Ed Cooke (Score:5, Interesting)
Casinos! (Score:4, Interesting)
The private "agency", that Casinos use to scope these potential card counters, probably compile a dossier of these mentats.
Don't bother, just rip the casino off while you can.
Re:Casinos! (Score:5, Interesting)
If you want to make money at a casino, don't try to beat the casino at their own game. Play against chumps who are bad at poker.
Parent
Re:Casinos! (Score:4, Informative)
Actually, you don't need a good memory to card count.
Card counting consists of determining the ratio of high cards (tens, aces) to low cards (2-6). To find this you simply add one for each low card that appears and subtract one for each high card.
This gives the running count, which you can divide by the number of decks remaining to find the True Count, which is used to make decisions - how much to bet, or whether to deviate from Basic Strategy in playing a hand.
So, at any given time you're only actually remembering one number.
The hardest part about modern card counting is actually maintaining a good cover, that is, pretending to be rich and careless when you throw out black chips, or drunk and stupid, or talking incessantly to convince the dealer or pit boss that you can't possibly be counting with all that distraction.
There are quite a few professional card counters around, but they're more likely to have honed their skills by taking acting lessons rather than memory courses...
Parent
memorized zip codes (Score:5, Interesting)
As I recall, he calls himself "the zip code guy".
Re:The Human Brain (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:The Human Brain (Score:4, Insightful)
Likely, not that much better. Read the article. These people use an assortment of mnemonic devices to remember these large chunks of data. If you tried to remember a series of cards, you would get lost in the volume of data. But if you remember each three cards in order as "person action object", then you can remember the sequence of cards as a story, and that is orders of magnitude easier to remember, because it has real meaning, whereas a sequence of cards is essentially meaningless. The brain sucks at remembering things without meaning, and excels at things that have meaning. That seems to be because our memory is inherently associative. We remember things by associating them to other things. That way the more associations you can make between a new factoid and existing concepts in your brain, the more easily you'll remember it.
Parent
Re:The Human Brain (Score:3, Funny)
Re:1000 digits in an hour not particularly impress (Score:5, Informative)
0=s or z,
1=t or d
2=n
3=m
4=r
5=l
6=j, sh, ch
7=hard c, k
8=f, ph
9=p or b
Called the Major System [wikipedia.org], it's been around for hundreds of years (as I recall, haha).
In college I could memorize a deck of cards on clock-ticks. 52 seconds for a deck.
A more impressive trick (to most people) is to have the person shuffle the deck, take out 5 cards and put them in their pocket.
I flip through the remaining 47 card for 30 seconds, and tell them what's in their pocket. (Loraine / Lucas explain how to do this one in the memory book). It's not hard, but takes practice.
After that, I found girls, and quit doing the geek memory thing. You don't want girls to know that you have a good memory - then you lose all your excuses for forgetting to call them, forgetting anniversaries, etc.
Parent