Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Two Women Found With HIV-Immune Mutant Gene

Posted by samzenpus on Wed Oct 06, 2004 09:10 PM
from the super-soldier dept.
Trokair writes "China Daily reports that researcher Tuofu Zhu has discovered two women in an HIV Research program that are immune to the disorder via a mutant gene."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Two Women Found With HIV-Immune Mutant Gene 25 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • If they were male (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:14PM (#10456339)
    That would be a great pick up line. "Hey baby, want your kids to be immune?"
  • Genetics at work? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by enforcer999 (733591) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:18PM (#10456365) Journal
    Well, we are a very capable species. We will not die off easily. Aids/HIV are dangerous and deadly to us. It was just a matter of time before our own bodies figured out how to survive this virus. We have a good package to work with.

    Just my first thoughts on the subject. I would like to know more about the study.

    • Re:Genetics at work? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by jm92956n (758515) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:32PM (#10456419) Journal
      It was just a matter of time before our own bodies figured out how to survive this virus.

      I don't think that's exactly the case. HIV is only twenty-five years old, which certainly isn't enough time for genetic evolution to take place (especially considering the relatively slow reporductive rate of humans).

      It's more likely they've an odd mutant gene that by coincadence makes them immune to the virus.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Genetics at work? (Score:5, Informative)

        by ashridah (72567) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:02PM (#10456464)
        "I don't think that's exactly the case. HIV is only twenty-five years old, which certainly isn't enough time for genetic evolution to take place (especially considering the relatively slow reporductive rate of humans)."

        HIV is most certainly NOT only 25 years old.
        It's extremely old, they have preserved tissue samples from almost 50 years ago or so that have been found to contain the virus (the subject died in exactly the same way as the first cases presented here)
        (an english sailor died of a oppertunistic diseases, and after he died, tissue was preserved for later study.)

        The event that has made HIV into a new epidemic is massive changes in social morality. Originally, HIV was called the Gay-Related immuno-deficiency syndrome or somesuch, because it was primarily affecting people who were outwardly gay.

        Of course, it turned out that these people were just starting to be very broad in their choice of partners, and of course, people were starting to share needles for drug use.

        ashridah
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Genetics at work? (Score:5, Informative)

        by Raul654 (453029) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:07PM (#10456483) Homepage
        HIV is only twenty-five years old, which certainly isn't enough time for genetic evolution to take place.

        Mutations happen all the time - 0.0000000000000214/nucleotide/generation according to these guys [nih.gov]. Now multiply that by 3 billion nucleotides in a human, and 70(?) days to replace all the cells in your body. Most of the time, the mtuation is fatal and the cell dies. Most of the rest of the time, it does nothing at all. Once in a while, you get a mutation that is actually beneficial. And once in a while, that mutation happens to occur in gamates, so it actually gets passed on to children. That's clearly what happened in this case.

        [ Parent ]
  • Virtual Light (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Mark_MF-WN (678030) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:19PM (#10456370)
    Didn't they do this in William Gibson's "Virtual Light"? Yet another Gibson prophecy fulfilled.
  • Not really news (Score:5, Informative)

    by ajna (151852) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:23PM (#10456396) Homepage Journal
    HIV immunity has been reported in various sources in the past:

    • a group of Kenyan prostitutes [bbc.co.uk] believed to be HIV immune but no longer
    • the case of David Crohn [pbs.org] and others who lack secondary CCR5 (for macrophages) or CXCR4 (for T-cells) receptors and are thus resistant to HIV infection. NB: CCR5 and CXCR4 are believed to be secondary to the CD4 receptor, found on both cell types, in the HIV binding process.

    The only novel thing about this discovery is that it was in Asians, vs. the Caucasian populations in which immunity had previously been reported (and I suppose African as well, even though the Kenyan prostitutes as referenced above turned out to not be immune). The article is pretty worthless, not even listing what the "mutant genes" are, but it's a pretty good guess that CCR5 and/or CXCR4 is involved.
  • by taxman_10m (41083) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:32PM (#10456416)
    Lots of people immune from STDs here.
  • Glad to know (Score:5, Funny)

    by Teahouse (267087) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:02PM (#10456460)
    I'm just glad to know SOMEONE will survive if this thing ever becomes airborne. LOL! Three Chinese chicks and a guy in Aboriginal Australia will recreate the human race. Boy, is our species in for a ride!
  • seen this immunity before... (Score:5, Informative)

    by ezonme (671218) <ez@tab a c udos.com.br> on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:13PM (#10456521) Homepage
    ... in a different way. Check these "news" from July 2, 1998:

    Geneva - Researchers have uncovered unusual behaviors of human immune systems that seem to have protected certain babies in Canada [aegis.com], prostitutes in Thailand [aegis.com] and Africa, and gay men in San Francisco from HIV, despite exposure to the AIDS virus.

    The protections do not appear to be genetic, and may offer some critical clues to those hoping to make a vaccine against HIV.

    At Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Dr. Kelly MacDonald and a team of pediatricians noticed something odd earlier this year: HIV-positive mothers did not pass the virus to babies who were born with immunologically incompatible blood. In cases of incompatibility, the mother has one genetic type of immune system markers, and the baby a different set. This can put the baby at risk of being attacked by the mother's immune system.

    But, in the case of HIV-infected mothers, this immunological incompatibility saved the babies from HIV, MacDonald reported yesterday. The finding was based on a study of 111 mother / child pairs.

    MacDonald believes that a key factor in the babies' genetic makeup - called A2/A6802 supertype - by fortunate coincidence prevents HIV from infecting the child. When the mother and child share the same genetic makeup in their immune system, MacDonald discovered, the child is 2.63 times more likely to get infected with HIV.

    Since approximately 40 percent of the population worldwide has the A2/A6802 supertype, it makes it an attractive target for vaccine design, MacDonald said.

    The U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied 280 prostitutes in Thailand who had worked in brothels for three years or more, and a group of non-prostitute Thai women. Not surprisingly, the prostitutes were far more likely to be infected with the virus, and 47 percent were HIV-positive, the CDC reported yesterday.

    Remarkably, however, nine of the prostitutes were negative for HIV, even though they had genital herpes [aegis.com] and syphilis - clear indications of unsafe sexual behavior. The women did not have any of the genetic mutations that have been shown to protect some Caucasians from HIV. But they did apparently have complete immunity. Cells of their immune systems were killing every HIV to which they were exposed, the CDC team discovered. And laboratory studies revealed that their CD8 T-cells, a type of white blood cell, were secreting a factor which, when mixed in a petri dish with human cells and HIV, stimulated immune cells to destroy the virus.

    Dr. Jay Levy of the University of California in San Francisco has presented evidence of a CD8-produced factor that stops HIV, as well. For years he has tried to isolate the mysterious substance, to no avail. But it could result, he said in a speech, in a way to maintain control of the virus without the need for antiviral drugs.

    Sharon Stranford, a researcher in Levy's laboratory, examined the immune system cells of gay San Francisco men who have been exposed repeatedly to HIV and never become infected. She said that the CD8 cells in these men make a mysterious factor that protects against HIV. But it is not the same as the one discovered in Thai prostitutes, Stranford said, because it blocks HIV without prompting immune system cells to kill the virus. It works by blocking the ability of HIV to make copies of itself, Levy said.

    Finally, a CDC team working in Abijan, Ivory Coast [aegis.com], has also found a group of uninfected prostitutes. They, too, lack any genetic protection. And their ability to fight off HIV is also immunological. The team hasn't yet worked out the details, researchers said, but it is clear that immune system cells in the African prostitutes are highly activate

  • Immunity? (Score:5, Informative)

    by FiReaNGeL (312636) <fireang3l@noSpAm.hotmail.com> on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:17PM (#10456537) Homepage
    First, it's been know for ages, so it's not a new mutation.

    The specific 'mutation' involve CCR5, a coreceptor of HIV-1. An uncommun deletion called CCR5delta32 make it so that M-tropic HIV-1 can't enter CCR5+ cells in homozygote individuals (2 copies of the mutant gene). Heterozygotes (having a functional CCR5 and a mutated one) show less resistance to infection (70% resistance, estimated).

    HIV-1 can exhibit a tropism (T-tropic) for another coreceptor, CXCR4, for which no mutation is known, so total immunity isn't exact; we can talk about resistance at best. M-tropic viruses are associated with de novo infection, and a switch to T-tropism is thought to be a turning point in the degeneration to AIDS (but not always).

    Even CCR5delta32 individuals can be infected (althought have far less risk than you and me). Even then, the infection progress far more slowly than in normal individuals... they're called long term non-progressors. Won't develop AIDS in their lifetime, but still infectious, which can be dangerous...
    • Re:Spontaneous mutation? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by allism (457899) <alice,harrison&gmail,com> on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:18PM (#10456360) Journal
      About ten years ago, I did volunteer work for an HIV-testing clinic. I met two men while I was there who were convinced that they were both HIV-immune. One had been very sexually active during the late 70s and early 80s and had had most of his friends and sexual partners die of AIDS-related causes, and the other had repeatedly had sex with multiple HIV-positive partners out of survivors guilt. Talk was just beginning around then of people who seemed to be immune to HIV.

      It's not something I'd especially want to gamble on, though - HIV mutates nearly every time it infects, and at some point I think these people who are now immune won't be immune any longer.
      [ Parent ]
      • Delta 32 (Score:5, Interesting)

        by song-of-the-pogo (631676) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:51PM (#10456424) Homepage
        The main story and your post put me in mind of a particular episode of "Secrets of the Dead" that I saw, exploring the plague and its survivors.

        I wonder if either of those fellows could have been carriers of the delta 32 gene, a mutated form of the gene CCR5:

        "In 1996, research showed that delta 32 prevents HIV from entering human cells and infecting the body"

        http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/case_plague/

        I didn't see in the article anywhere where it mentioned which gene was affected in the Chinese women, but it seems like to be a different one, based on the information presented in the "Secrets" show:

        "O'Brien assembled an international team of scientists to test for the presence of delta 32 around the world. "Native Africans did not have delta 32 at all," O'Brien says, "and when we looked at East Asians and Indians, they were also flat zero." In fact, the levels of delta 32 found in Eyam were only matched in regions of Europe that had been affected by the plague and in America, which was, for the most part, settled by European plague survivors and their descendents."

        It was a really good show and if you get the opportunity to watch it, I highly recommend that you do.
        [ Parent ]
    • Re:Lucky ladies! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Mr.Sharpy (472377) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:19PM (#10456366)
      Now they can mess around all they want, au natural, and not worry about dying!

      Indeed! Now all they have to worry about is...
      Gohnorrea
      Herpes
      Chlamydia
      Syphillis
      Ge nital Warts
      HPV
      Hepatitus
      Trichomoniasis
      and more! Lucky bitches...
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Lucky ladies! (Score:5, Informative)

        by Lord Kano (13027) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:02PM (#10456463) Homepage Journal
        Indeed! Now all they have to worry about is...
        Gohnorrea
        Herpes
        Chlamydia
        Syphillis
        Ge nital Warts
        HPV
        Hepatitus
        Trichomoniasis
        and more! Lucky bitches...


        In order....

        Curable.
        Nasty stuff, but not fatal.
        Curable.
        Curable.
        Nasty stuff, once again not fatal.
        Nasty stuff, not fatal unless it causes cancer.
        Possibly fatal.
        Nasty stuff, but curable.

        HIV is the queen mother of STDs, once that is out of the way, there will be a lot more au naturale love happening in the world.

        LK
        [ Parent ]
    • Re:Lucky ladies! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:22PM (#10456383)
      Unfortunately, there's still this particular virus called "pregnancy" that continues to cause abrupt stoppage of sex when performed au natural.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Lucky ladies! (Score:5, Informative)

        by lucabrasi999 (585141) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:28PM (#10456404) Journal
        there's still this particular virus called "pregnancy" that continues to cause abrupt stoppage of sex when performed au natural.

        Trust me, that abrupt "stoppage" usually lasts much, much longer than nine months...

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Lucky ladies! (Score:5, Funny)

        by bumski (308461) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:19PM (#10456554)
        In my experience, a related condition, "marriage", seems to have a similar effect in reducing the frequency of sexual activity. So much so, in fact, that I begin to believe that those who oppose homosexual activity would be well served to endorse gay marriage as a preventative measure.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Lucky ladies! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by YOU LIKEWISE FAIL IT (651184) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:17PM (#10456541) Homepage Journal

        I think it would be totally awesome if some kind of imaginary god did try and punish it's creation through the use of a cruel, life destroying virus - only to have his divine will deflected by something so simple as a tiny thicknesses of latex, education, testing and screening, as well as the hard work of doctors and scientists around the globe.

        Would me wonder who should be quaking in fear from who.

        [ Parent ]
    • Re:Immune (Score:5, Informative)

      by theparanoidcynic (705438) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:20PM (#10456372)
      I think that the existance of this mutation has been known for some time. The key is that it was only thought to exist in the caucasian population until now.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Immune (Score:5, Informative)

      by lucabrasi999 (585141) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:22PM (#10456384) Journal

      From the article

      "Before, such mutant genes were only found in Caucasians. The finding has encouraged us to do further research in China, with the aim of developing medicines to prevent and cure HIV/AIDS for different races,"said Zhu.

      Sounds like some mutant genes have been found previously, so I am not sure if this will add any new information to the fight against AIDS.

      China is now at a key moment in adopting effective measures to control and prevent HIV/AIDS as the disease moves from high risk populations to the general population, in most cases though sexual transmission, Zhu pointed out.

      China had better be prepared for a potential disaster. Even if the presense of this "mutant" gene does lead to some sort of cure, it will probably take years to develop and test. In the meantime, China, along with most Middle Eastern and Asian countries, has a high risk of having an AIDS related disaster of a scope way beyond what we now see in Africa. We're talking tens of millions of people infected and/or dying all across the Middle East and Asia.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Immune (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Frogbert (589961) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:05PM (#10456474)
        Yes there have been numerious cases of prostitutes in South Africa being imune to the disease.
        [ Parent ]
    • by craXORjack (726120) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @09:49PM (#10456421)
      I swear I saw a documentary on PBS about how a tiny percentage of mostly european descendants are immune and it was because of the Black Death (or Bubonic plague, I'm not sure that those are the same thing.) But googling for answers lead me to this article [healthfinder.gov] which says that 10-15 percent of northern europeans have limited immunity due to inheriting 1 resistant gene and 1% inherited the gene from both parents giving them full immunity. And Swedes have the highest percentage. Also it says the Plague is debunked and suggests the everpresent Smallpox as the culprit.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I hope this is true (Score:5, Interesting)

      by TykeClone (668449) <TykeClone@gmail.com> on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:09PM (#10456497) Homepage Journal
      Not to be harsh, but you can get the same thing with heart problems. I mowed lawns in high school - one afternoon I mowed the lawn of a little old lady. That night, my dad came home and said that she had just died of a heart attack. She looked fine that afternoon, but that night she was dead.

      Same goes for any kind of cancer - it can insidiously grow in you until there's nothing you can do about it but waste away and die.

      Probably going to burn some karma with those comments, but it's a terrible disease that they're working on. I hope they find a cure and kick its ass - same for cancer - but it's just another way to die.

      [ Parent ]
    • otherwise completely normal (Score:5, Interesting)

      by jeif1k (809151) on Wednesday October 06 2004, @10:20PM (#10456557)
      In other words, you must have a pathetically weak immune system (or none at all), and your body's cells must be so fragile that any abnormality of any kind will destroy them instantly.

      A small fraction of people seems to be resistant to HIV infection because they carry idiosyncratic mutations that interfere with the way the HIV virus works. That doesn't mean they have a "pathetically weak immune system"; in fact, such mutations generally have no known effects at all other than conferring HIV resistance. Furthermore, resistance of some fraction of the population to specific viruses is a common occurrence.

      But, hey, if that's what these two women want for their life, that's their problem.

      WTF is that supposed to mean? One of the women in question was exposed to HIV from her husband, who was infected through a blood transfusion. It's bad enough that bigoted right wingers confuse stupidity and carelessness (unprotected sex) with immorality, but now people like you even consider accidentally getting a tainted blood transfusion a lifestyle choice and a moral failing?

      I think you demonstrate just how absurd your kinds of views are, and the blithering nonsense that preceded it showed how uninformed you are.
      [ Parent ]