NASA Preps Mars Underground Mole 88
Roland Piquepaille writes "People at NASA never cease to surprise me. Searching for water or presence of past life of Mars obviously needs drilling beneath the surface. So NASA is developing the Mars Underground Mole (MUM), based on a previous device used for the European Beagle 2 mission. But here is the twist. MUM will include sensors which were previously used to collect spectral imagery of Earth from pilotless aircrafts, especially Hawaii, according to NASA. While the Mole will stay on the surface on Mars and drill up to 5 meters deep, it will transmit data via a fiber optic cable to a digital array scanning interferometer (DASI). And the spectral images produced by the DASI will enable researchers to identify possible water, ice, organics and minerals under the surface on Mars. And this MUM will be a small one, weighing less than a kilogram for a length of only 50 centimeters. For more details and pictures about MUM, please read this overview."
Reminds me of... (Score:4, Interesting)
Come to think of it, some of the guys right down the hall have been working on the airborne hyperspectral imager mentioned in the article; maybe I'll go ask them about this.
Call me cynical . . . (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Call me cynical . . . (Score:4, Insightful)
So get out of your hole - there is no haven on earth
Any evolution in medicine would make us whis we invested more in space eploration. You'll cry for space in 30 years from now. Overcrowd -> lack of resources -> war. So cure more people to wipe them out with bombs.
Any way you have it, we need space exploration more than an instant cure for all desises.
So stop listening to what your grandmother says, and start thinking for youself.
Think about weather forcast, internet, teflon, n's thousand of tv channels, asteroids, aliens and mostly about space.
And what the hell would you do with 1.000 billions you save in 40 years?
Trust me you don't want to know. You have no assurance that the money would be used in a better way.
Re:Call me cynical . . . (Score:5, Insightful)
Presumably, once we have achieved all that we will finally be allowed to explore the heavens. Can your grandmother provide some sort of timescale? I'm asking, because I want to *see* that first man on Mars. Right now I think the chances of that are about fifty/fifty, but if she has her way I doubt there will ever be a generation that does.
Finally, look up how much money your country spends on defence, how much it spends on healthcare, and finally how much it spends on space exploration. I'm sure there will be readers who can provide these numbers, but I can already tell you that space exploration will be less than a percent of any of the other two.
Re:Call me cynical . . . (Score:2)
What she really says is, "What, they're spending $15 billion on that when $2,000 would clear up all my outstanding debt?!" And she's against it for that reason. So people are always going to be against spending any amount of money unless it addresses their own immediate needs.
Re:Call me cynical . . . (Score:5, Insightful)
Space exploration is a perfect example of the "give a man a fish..." paradigm.
The problems of humanity are endless. And frankly, we've solved most of them. Now it's a question of distribution and dissemination.
But does anyone doubt that in 1000 years we're going to be colonizing other planets and spreading the human race across the galaxy? We'll STILL have the same human problems of violence, greed, selfishness, etc. - I think they are endemic to the human animal.
I can see your grandma saying 80 years ago "why are we funding these silly things called airplanes? They are unsafe and barely can stay up in the air - what use are they? Use that money for something important, like feeding the starving."
And she'd be wrong.
Why start being perfectionists there? (Score:2)
In case of Slashdotting... (Score:2, Funny)
NASA Preps Mars Underground Mole
Posted by michael on Friday July 16, @08:45PM
from the better-hope-they-don't-strike-oil dept.
Roland Piquepaille writes "People at NASA never cease to surprise me. Searching for water or presence of past life of Mars obviously needs drilling beneath the surface. So NASA is developing the Mars Underground Mole (MUM), based on a previous device used for the European Beagle 2 mission. But here is the twist. MUM will include se
OMFG Insightful? (Score:4, Insightful)
I think the moderators themselves need a systems upgrade.
Re:OMFG Insightful? (Score:1)
Re:In case of Slashdotting... (Score:1)
A small MUM (Score:2, Funny)
Indeed, that is even shorter than my MUM, and quite a bit lighter too!
Prediction (Score:5, Funny)
Finally, Beagle II will appear from out of nowhere, disable the Mole, negotiate a peace treaty with the new life, and usher in a new era of human-alien cooperation.
Re:Prediction (Score:1)
Re:Prediction (Score:2)
I for one welcome our new crystalline overlords.
Re:Prediction (Score:1)
Happy Martians (Score:5, Funny)
Today Martians sighed in relief as their underground civilization is 6 meters beneath Mars' surface.
Not Cool Enough (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Not Cool Enough (Score:2)
Underground Mole (Score:1, Redundant)
hmm (Score:4, Funny)
Re:hmm (Score:2, Funny)
Some things are just too easy.
(In Soviet Russia, example.com points to slashdot.org)
Dental Drilling Technology (Score:4, Interesting)
How Many Moles? (Score:5, Insightful)
I wonder how many of these little robo-critters they could deploy in a single landing? Sure seems like a swarm of the little buggers spreading out for not only redundancy but increased geographical coverage would be a big plus.
Looks like that base station each is tethered to would put a kink in that idea though.
And of course if the subterranean residents interpret the swarm as an invasion, Lucy's gonna have some 'splainin to do...
interferometer (Score:1)
5-4-3-2-1 NASA are GO! (Score:1)
http://www.martinbowersmodelworld.com/the%20mole.
Re:5-4-3-2-1 NASA are GO! (Score:2)
Don't you mean that this is a job for Molier, and his niece Moleen [lizardlounge.com]?
.
For those not on the in on this one, Molier and Moleen are two mole like creatures involved in the archaeological dig of an ancient underground city (they team up with Dr. TJ Taroo). Listen to the radio play at the link. You won't regret it!
A _real_ mission?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Is that implying that the Mars exploration mission of Spirit and Opportunity was NOT a REAL mission? Spirit and Opportunity has been one of the most successful missions that NASA has ever undertaken, those rovers have surpassed their use-by-date by more than 3 months!
If that wasn't a real Mars mission, then what exactly is considered to be a real Mars mission?
Re:A _real_ mission?? (Score:2)
obligatory stupid joke (Score:5, Funny)
What Roland Piquepaille really means & REAL LI (Score:5, Informative)
"...please read this overview."
TRANSLATION:
...please support and increase Roland Piquepaille spam and advertising [weblogs.com] clickthrough rates.
If you really want more details and pictures about the Mars Underground Mole [nasa.gov] then you can
It's much better than supporting craven self-interested people who are just after advertising like Roland Piquepaille, blog spammer [slashdot.org].
I volunteer.. (Score:3, Funny)
Similar to failed mission (Score:4, Interesting)
Similar, But Completely Different. (Score:3, Informative)
It fails it..? (Score:5, Funny)
NASA is planning on using drilling technology similar to Beagle 2.
What technology is that -- running headlong into the planet at high speed? Seeing as how we never heard whimper one out of Beagle, I don't think that's such a good plan...
Look out martians (Score:1)
Should send it with something else (Score:1)
"from the better-hope-they-don't-strike-oil dept." (Score:2, Funny)
Thats some neat stuff (Score:1)
From the article (Score:2)
Sense of humor at NASA (Score:3, Funny)
Weight? (Score:1)
Just being picky... Is that its weight on Earth or on Mars?
premature waste of money (Score:3, Interesting)
Underground Moles and... (Score:1, Funny)
As opposed to what kind of moles exactly? Flying moles?
PS. I didn't RTFA and I'm sorry if this has already been answered in the article.