Slashdot Log In
Router Tested On Satellite In Space
Posted by
timothy
on Thu Jul 01, 2004 10:33 AM
from the ping-times dept.
from the ping-times dept.
The Cisco router launched into orbit in September onboard a satellite built by SSTL (and on a Russian rocket) has now been successfully tested in space, and there's a video describing this and putting routers in space. A neat twenty-year coincidence here: an early Surrey satellite has been operating for twenty years, and Cisco launched its fastest router on its twentieth birthday. What do the next twenty years hold for fast routers in space?
Related Stories
[+]
IPv6 Tested in Space 207 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Remember the Cisco router orbiting on a satellite in space? Well, it's now also the first to run IPv6 in space. Since no-one is choosing to run IPv6 on the ground, isn't this a bit pointless?"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Router Tested On Satellite In Space
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 21 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Latency (Score:2, Funny)
(http://thijs.dalhuijsen.com/ | Last Journal: Friday December 03 2004, @06:44AM)
You need ping to play Quake from space!
What do the next 20 years hold for space routers? (Score:2, Funny)
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.livejournal.com/users/k4_pacific | Last Journal: Tuesday May 25 2004, @10:16PM)
It's all fun and games until... (Score:4, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Thursday March 13 2003, @09:00PM)
Solution? Disconnect your LAN/WAN interfaces so the rotuer frees up enough memory to create the shell. Oh, better be local when you do this...
Next headline: (Score:2)
(http://www.ubasics.com/adam | Last Journal: Wednesday August 06 2003, @01:01PM)
"Virus tested on router on satellite in space"
-Adam
Details? (Score:2)
The articles were a bit lacking details, but a few things struck me.
It didn't say what they were routing between. In most instances, merchant satellites are just used for point to point connections, so they are just bent-pipes. I am assuming that they are routing between different spot-beams or transponders. Or maybe the router is actually a bridge?
One of the articles said that the satellite in question was a LEO. This means that it is in a non-stationary orbit, so ground terminals will have periodic outages, and also need to track the satellite. This complicates persistent connections.
Why would it fail? (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Monday January 06 2003, @10:36PM)
Interplanetary Internet (Score:3, Interesting)
Prior art? (Score:2)
(http://www.informationr.us/ | Last Journal: Monday November 05, @09:38AM)
Ping Times (Score:1, Insightful)
Preparation for Independance Day (Score:1)
Fortunately, the Cisco IOS vulnerabilities will remain intact to accommodate the breach of security that will save the planet Earth!
Only 2 more days to go!
Re:Just great (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/~mhesseltine/journal/ | Last Journal: Monday April 19 2004, @06:37PM)
You might have been first had you not pointed your default route to the orbiting router. The latency killed you.