Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Spirit Takes Snapshot of Earth

Posted by michael on Fri Mar 12, 2004 09:01 AM
from the all-the-way-back dept.
ControlFreal writes "On its 66th Sol on Mars, Mars Exploration Rover Spirit has obtained its first full view of crater Bonneville. In doing so, Spirit achieved its primary travel destination, as set out in its initial itinerary. Furthermore, Spirit has now travelled more than 300 meters, thereby fulfilling its minimum mission success criteria. With this, and Opportunity halfway through its primary mission, and having discovered very strong indications of a wet Martian past, NASA has truly many an astonishing interplanetary succes story! See the overview at the Mars Rover site for more details." Another reader writes "Among the 'money-shots' from the Mars rovers would have to rank the 'pale blue dot' image released today--a view looking back towards Earth. The larger image also includes the horizon and Sun, which because the Earth is seen as an inner planet closer in towards the Sun from a martian perspective, is difficult to photograph without saturation by solar glare."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Spirit Takes Snapshot of Earth | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 257 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Congratulations! (Score:5, Insightful)

    From all of us out here that dreamed of stepping on the Martian surface at one time or another, thanks for taking me there--at least in spirit.

    Good job all!
  • YAY (Score:4, Funny)

    by Killjoy_NL (719667) <palli.stc-r@nl> on Friday March 12 2004, @09:04AM (#8542586)
    I CAN SEE MY HOUSE FROM HERE :D

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
    • Yes, but... by Wun Hung Lo (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:26AM
    • Re:YAY by zangdesign (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @11:22AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • hmmm (Score:5, Insightful)

    by bbowers (596225) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:04AM (#8542589)
    (http://www.tyrantanic.net/)
    Feels a little bit humbling... I feel so small and insignificant :-\
    • Re:hmmm (Score:5, Funny)

      by BillFarber (641417) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:29AM (#8542756)
      Based on your slashdot Friends list, I'd say that's about right. ;)
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:hmmm by GoofyBoy (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:38AM
    • Very humbling indeed (Score:5, Interesting)

      by GillBates0 (664202) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:38AM (#8542832)
      (http://slashdot.org/~GillBates0 | Last Journal: Tuesday July 10, @04:36PM)
      The last image with the earth showing as a small star in the sky made me feel very small indeed.

      Consider that the human life span of about 80 years is but an instant compared to the lifecycle of the stars/galaxies/etc.

      And we spend a significant amount of that time destructively (fighting/quarreling/warring/killing/spiting). Feels kinda weird...even destruction is bad only from our point of view....who knows what's actually "good" or "bad". Our knowledge and lives are just insignificant specks in the vastness of the Universe.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:hmmm by dalamarian (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:39AM
    • ObPython: (Score:4, Informative)

      by squiggleslash (241428) on Friday March 12 2004, @11:00AM (#8543515)
      (Last Journal: Wednesday November 28, @05:59AM)
      (With thanks to Eric Idle)

      Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving
      And revolving at nine hundred miles an hour,
      That's orbiting at nineteen miles a second, so it's reckoned,
      A sun that is the source of all our power.
      The sun and you and me and all the stars that we can see
      Are moving at a million miles a day
      In an outer spiral arm, at forty thousand miles an hour,
      Of the galaxy we call the 'Milky Way'.

      Our galaxy itself contains a hundred billion stars.
      It's a hundred thousand light years side to side.
      It bulges in the middle, sixteen thousand light years thick,
      But out by us, it's just three thousand light years wide.
      We're thirty thousand light years from galactic central point.
      We go 'round every two hundred million years,
      And our galaxy is only one of millions of billions
      In this amazing and expanding universe.

      The universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding
      In all of the directions it can whizz
      As fast as it can go, at the speed of light, you know,
      Twelve million miles a minute, and that's the fastest speed there is.
      So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure,
      How amazingly unlikely is your birth,
      And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space,
      'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:hmmm by clarkcox3 (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @11:32AM
    • Re:hmmm by mav[LAG] (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @01:12PM
    • You and Hubble... by mahler3 (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @01:41PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • They're not fooling anyone... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:05AM
  • Check it out... (Score:5, Funny)

    by loserbert (697119) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:06AM (#8542603)
    (http://www.rootsec.net/)
    If you turn down your screen resolution so everything is bigger, you can see yourself waving.
  • Infinite perspective vortex? by CoolVibe (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:06AM
  • Important missions on Mars (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 12 2004, @09:09AM (#8542622)
    The news coverage of the exciting explots of these plucky extra-terrestrial rovers seems to have diminished. No pictures (well no original pictures) of aliens in the foreground of the Megabytes of images, no puddles, no golf-balls. Not very inspiring viewing.

    I think the realisation that the missions were not going to be highly inspirational came when it occurred to me that the first rover landed on a plain and the chosen mission was to drive over to a crater and look in while the second rover landed in a crater and its chosen mission is to take a picture of the plain just over the rim.

    Seems that getting there was the easy bit, achieving something meaningful has been a bit harder.
    • Re:Important missions on Mars by PhxBlue (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:54AM
    • Re:Important missions on Mars (Score:4, Informative)

      by l0wland (463243) <l0wlandNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Friday March 12 2004, @10:05AM (#8543055)
      (Last Journal: Tuesday January 27 2004, @06:25AM)
      " The news coverage of the exciting explots of these plucky extra-terrestrial rovers seems to have diminished."

      When the press-conference of NASA was given about their revolutionairy findings, CNN was the only channel (at least here in The Netherlands) that paid attention to it. But as soon as it became clear that they had found indications for water, and NOT little green man, they immediately switched to other news. I think they only showed about 4 minutes of the press-conference. That shows how much (or lack of) interest the press and most of the public have in this mission. And I think it's sad, looking at the importance of it all.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Important missions on Mars (Score:4, Insightful)

      by danila (69889) on Friday March 12 2004, @11:07AM (#8543562)
      (http://future.wikicities.com/)
      Seems that getting there was the easy bit, achieving something meaningful has been a bit harder.
      Like having Janet Jackson show a breast or what? The definition of "meaningful" that general public (and mass media) uses differs a lot from what intelligent people consider meaningful. Most people are idiots and sheeps, that's a fact of life. They want big explosions, deaths and sex. If NASA manages to crash their next spaceship into Paris, destroying the Eiffel Tower, I guarantee it will be a hot topic longer than anything related to the twin rovers. If a senior NASA officer (female) poses for Hustler, this will drive more traffic to nasa.gov than any photo they can shoot on Mars. That's a sad reality, but to stand on the position of the public and claim that rover missions were not really meaningful is totally wrong.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Important missions on Mars by myowntrueself (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @03:01PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Insignificance by xneilj (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:09AM
  • by zzztkf (574953) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:09AM (#8542626)
    As I has seen masr last summer, it looked so big and red. I wonder when looked back from Mars, what color is earth.

    I have seen pitcure from interplanetory orbit to take Earth and Moon in a single pitcture. Color contrast between them has impressed me a lot.
  • I am surprised by UltimaGuy (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:11AM
  • by Jase_000 (761604) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:12AM (#8542647)
    (http://www.henegan.co.uk/)
    Here's the image in ASCII representation:

    . <-- You are here
  • Pic of Earth. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 12 2004, @09:12AM (#8542648)
    Dang. They could have told us when to say cheese.
  • But the cultural impact... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by meringuoid (568297) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:13AM (#8542651)
    ... I don't think this will be very important. It's a dot in the sky like any other, with just an arrow pointing to it to say that it's Earth. There's no real visceral connection there.

    I doubt any image returned by space exploration in the next few thousand years will change our perspective on things as much as the Earthrise photographs from Apollo 8. Our first view of Earth from the Moon, and it showed so much. It was large and clear enough to connect with, it was plainly Earth with oceans and continents and clouds, and it was tiny - all of human history and culture, all our achievements, in that small spot. Now that's quite a culture shock.

    But 'pale blue dot' images? It's just a dot. It might just as well be Venus for all the emotional impact I get from it. Maybe if we could see _two_ dots from Mars - Earth and Moon - then we'd get the same sense of smallness we got from the Apollo views, because that would establish identity at the gut level.

    • Re:But the cultural impact... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by oneiron (716313) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:26AM (#8542731)
      (http://www.outofbalance.net/)
      I think that's the bigger impact... Earth as a small dot can help to show humans just exactly how insignificant our planet can be in the grand scale of the universe. Sounds like the small dot doesn't feed your ego in quite the same way as the pictures from Apollo 8 did. Well good... If you want a big emotional impact, take a look at the recent "deepest space picture ever" taken by hubble. Then count the galaxies you can see in a picture that shows an area about the size of what you would see if you looked at the sky through a drinking straw.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:But the cultural impact... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by meringuoid (568297) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:32AM (#8542779)
        Sounds like the small dot doesn't feed your ego in quite the same way as the pictures from Apollo 8 did.

        It's not quite that. With Apollo 8's images, you look at it and it's Earth, obviously and plainly Earth. With the images from Mars, it's a dot. I know intellectually that it's Earth, but that's just not the same. If the picture was detailed enough that I could _see_ that it was Earth - as I mentioned, maybe if we could see the Moon beside it - then I might feel something for it.

        If I only know that it's Earth because it's in the position in the Martian sky where Earth is calculated to be, then it's just another manifestation of mathematics.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:But the cultural impact... by hetairoi (Score:3) Friday March 12 2004, @10:19AM
        • Blame it on light pollution (Score:4, Insightful)

          by hey! (33014) on Friday March 12 2004, @11:14AM (#8543623)
          (http://kamthaka.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday March 30 2005, @03:18PM)
          People just don't spend the amount of time they used to looking up at the sky's wonder and glory.

          It takes a bit of experience to be able see what is dramatic. People are usually underwhelmed by what they see in a small telescope, they much less likely to be able to take in the magnificence of an unmagified image of the sky. I look at Alberio [astronomyphotos.com] through my little 90mm refractor, and it's absolutely stunning to me. However for most people it's a yawn. The only sky object that uniformly gets a "wow" is the Moon.

          If you're accustomed to looking at the sky quite a bit, you'll find that planets are dramatically different from stars: they look like little holes punched out of the sky. Once you've learned to really see planets, the idea of seeing Earth the same way will have more resonance for you.

          Mars also has kind of a creamy color when viewed from Earth; it's a bit too faint to look as dramaticall red as it is close up. Earth is a larger planet and might be a bit brighter. I wonder if the picture were in color, whether Earth might be a pale blue. A tiny sapphire glowing in a reddish dawn might be a bit more dramatic. However, the delights of naked eye and low magnification sky viewing are subtle, sometimes in hints of color, or tiny but striking arrangements. It takes a certain number of hours to be able to even perceive them.
          [ Parent ]
      • Re:But the cultural impact... by jaxdahl (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @10:38AM
    • Re:But the cultural impact... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by altairmaine (317424) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:27AM (#8542743)
      You make a very interesting point here, one that sent me running to look up some numbers and find a calculator. My fast crappy math seems to suggest that we could very plausibly see the moon from Mars with a decent camera.

      When the rovers were launched, Mars was about 78 million km from Earth. The average distance from Earth to the moon is roughly 400000 km. So assuming the angles are right, there would be a maximum angular separation of about s/r = 0.005 radians or 0.3 degrees - more than enough to distinguish with the naked eye. The moon is fairly large; its diameter is about 3/4 that of Mercury. Although it is not as brightly illuminated due to greater distance from the sun, my intuition is that it ought to be visible to the naked eye.

      I don't know if the Spirit or the Opportunity cameras are up to it, or if the orbital configurations are so convenient right now, but a photo of the Earth and moon like that you suggest seems entirely plausible.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:But the cultural impact... by DataCannibal (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:47AM
    • "All of you on the Good Earth" by dpilot (Score:3) Friday March 12 2004, @10:16AM
    • Re:But the cultural impact... by TrackerChamp (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @10:26AM
    • Re:But the cultural impact... by Target Practice (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @10:29AM
    • Re:But the cultural impact... by Fedallah (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @10:50AM
    • Re:But the cultural impact... by AndroidCat (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @11:32AM
    • Re:But the cultural impact... by SmackCrackandPot (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @07:37PM
    • Re:But the cultural impact... by avisolo (Score:1) Saturday March 13 2004, @07:36AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Appropriate advert by larien (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:15AM
  • It's a breath taking picture by emo boy (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:15AM
  • Zooming in... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Punk Walrus (582794) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:18AM (#8542676)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday September 23 2003, @01:46PM)
    ... you can see the Great Wall of China! No, really! Just use the zooming software used in shows like CSI or movies like Blade Runner.

    Before I get mail... [straightdope.com]

  • Ahhh Great by AbbyNormal (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:19AM
  • Amazing... by Monoliath (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:20AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • The Little Dot in The Sky (Score:4, Insightful)

    by ashitaka (27544) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:21AM (#8542698)
    Many of us have looked up at the night sky all our lives, some have bought or made telescopes to see even more. We've beheld some amazing and beautiful things as we gazed at the heavens. We've seen the bright stars in our sky that turned out to be separate worlds, but they still remained just little points of light as we rested comfortably on our unimaginably huge earth.

    But now we see another little dot hovering above a brightening horizon.

    That's our planet.

    Our home.

    Seen from the surface of another world.

    We are now just the little dot in the sky.
  • Shiny! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by FrostedWheat (172733) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:24AM (#8542717)
    I've noticed in some of the images of Spirit there is what seems to be a very shiny object at the opposite end of the crater:

    Here [nasa.gov] (top right), here [nasa.gov] (top left) and here [nasa.gov] (middle).

    Could it be a piece of Spirits entry/descent stage? In that last image it looks like an oddly shaped rock. If it is a rock, what could have made it so reflective?
  • Kairos by Hungus (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:26AM
  • Well.. (Score:5, Funny)

    by hookedup (630460) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:27AM (#8542738)
    You have to love the "You are here" caption on that image of earth from mars.

    Who says nasa scientists dont have a sense of humor.
  • How about those rabbit ears pics? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by BigGerman (541312) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:27AM (#8542741)
    bunny [nasa.gov]
    Some reports said this thing was actually moving ;-)
  • Seriously... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Phidoux (705500) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:28AM (#8542753)
    (http://www.wizzcomputers.com/)
    Sorry about the silly offtopic 1st post but I just couldn't resist.

    More seriously, I have been following the twin rover missions with great interest and I think it's absolutely amazing what they (And the JPL team of course) have achieved. I looked with great interest at the pic of our "pale blue (Even though the pic is monochrome) dot"

    Even on the relatively tiny (In relation to astronomical standards) scale of a view from our nearest neighbour, it is truly humbling to realise just how insignificant our rock, in the greater scheme of things, really is.

    Some of you might be interested in visiting a site that I visit on a daily basis to get and update on the latest images from Mars - photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov [nasa.gov]

  • Link if the site is /. by UltimaGuy (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:31AM
  • But After Alexander Lavrynov has his way.... by amigoro (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:31AM
  • Why link to astrobio.net by psychofox (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:32AM
  • I hope I'm not the only one (Score:5, Insightful)

    by IamGarageGuy 2 (687655) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:32AM (#8542783)
    (Last Journal: Sunday November 21 2004, @01:09AM)
    I am still astounded at the pictures that are sent back from Mars. I think the world is a little jaded at the monumentous task that was accomplished with this mission. This is historic stuff that should be in the press every day! If landing on the moon was big this should be justa as big if not bigger!!!
  • Heatshield by brownpau (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:33AM
  • But where... by jcoleman (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @09:37AM
  • Mars Wiggles (Score:4, Interesting)

    by brownpau (639342) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:37AM (#8542823)
    (http://hownow.brownpau.com/)
    Inspired by danielroot's [danielroot.com] and kokogiak's [kokogiak.com] Martian stereo wiggles I've made a few Mars Wiggles of my own. [brownpau.com] No funny colored glasses required.
  • by l0wland (463243) <l0wlandNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Friday March 12 2004, @09:39AM (#8542839)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday January 27 2004, @06:25AM)
    Scroll down on todays Press Release Images-page [nasa.gov], and check this picture [nasa.gov] (400kb).

    I think that's even more interesting, and might draw people's interest as well.

  • by Koyaanisqatsi (581196) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:39AM (#8542842)
    Reminds one of Carl Sagan's words:

    Pale Blue Dot [planetary.org] ... Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

    The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors, so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.

    The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.

    It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
  • Time will tell? by bbowers (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:40AM
    • Re:Time will tell? (Score:5, Funny)

      by OwlWhacker (758974) on Friday March 12 2004, @10:04AM (#8543050)
      (http://www.drydeadfish.co.uk/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 02 2005, @09:09AM)
      That would depend on how long it takes them to edit out the Martians laughing at our puny attempts to look at their planet.

      You can imagine them all standing around spirit and saying stuff like:

      Martian 1: "Look! It's moving!"

      Martian 2: "Where? I can't see anything..."

      Martian 1: "It's slow, but it is moving, can't you see?"

      Martian 3: "Geez! Haven't you guys got anything better to do than poke around with that thing?"
      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Ugh. by Sheepdot (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @09:55AM
  • Picture is obviously a fake! by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @10:04AM
  • What?! by rafael_es_son (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @10:14AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Indications, schmindications... by bojanb (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @10:19AM
  • Martian Money Shots by mykepredko (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @10:23AM
  • dotty by kyw (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @10:26AM
  • I feel so insignificant (Score:3, Funny)

    by Woogiemonger (628172) on Friday March 12 2004, @10:27AM (#8543229)
    We are infinitesimal specks on an infinitesimal dot amongst the infinite expanse of our universe. How ever did Zaphod Beeblebrox cope with such a horrific concept?
  • They should have announced when the pic... by Trikenstein (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @10:46AM
  • Can they see... by darkfus (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @10:47AM
  • NASA is misguided (IMHO) by PsiPsiStar (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @10:52AM
    • Correction by PsiPsiStar (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @11:36AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • How far we've come by b-baggins (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @11:06AM
  • DNA by FrostedWheat (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @11:08AM
  • Stars (Score:3, Interesting)

    by wideBlueSkies (618979) on Friday March 12 2004, @11:09AM (#8543578)
    (Last Journal: Sunday April 16 2006, @09:28PM)
    Just out of curiosity, is Mars far away from us that the constelations look different?

    I know that it's a relatively small distance, from a galactic perspective, but is it still enough to make some difference?

    Anyone?

    wbs.
    • Re:Stars by jswhitten (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @11:51AM
    • Re:Stars (Score:5, Informative)

      by Abcd1234 (188840) on Friday March 12 2004, @12:07PM (#8544325)
      (http://del.icio.us/Abcd1234/)
      Somehow, I doubt it. Just a little perspective. Based on the current position of Earth and Mars:

      Distance from Earth to the closest star in Orion (HD 30652): 26.176 lightyears

      Distance from Earth to Mars: 0.0000278306 lightyears.

      So, the distance from Earth or Mars is 0.00010632% the distance from Earth to 30652.

      Basically, we're so damned far from Orion that, no matter where you were in the *solar system*, it would probably look the same.

      Incidentally, if you want to check this out for yourself (ie, look at the constellations from orbit around Mars), and you have a hardware-accelerated 3D card, I would highly recommend trying out Celestia [shatters.net], a very impressive space simulator
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Stars by mpthompson (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @04:39PM
    • Try Celestia by core plexus (Score:3) Friday March 12 2004, @03:36PM
  • Bonneville by iminplaya (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @12:44PM
  • "Rover sees stars" by Tablizer (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @02:57PM
  • What phase is the Earth in? by crem_d_genes (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @03:04PM
  • Crater by TheBadger (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @03:18PM
  • uhmm... by newsdee (Score:2) Friday March 12 2004, @04:25PM
  • Re:Waste of Time and Money (Score:5, Funny)

    by meringuoid (568297) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:53AM (#8542959)
    Imagine the night sky on Titan!

    OK, I'm imagining it. I'm imagining sitting there on Titan and really kicking myself for going all that way for a closeup view of Saturn and then picking as my vantage point the one and only moon in the entire Solar System with a thick smoggy atmosphere so that I can't see a damn thing ;-)

    [ Parent ]
  • Titan drop (Score:3, Informative)

    by Hayzeus (596826) on Friday March 12 2004, @09:57AM (#8542997)
    (http://www.swampgas.com/)
    The ESA has piggy-backed a probe (Huygens) onto Cassini, due to drop into Titan's surface around Jan/2005. Assuming it makes it to the surface, the expected lifetime of the probe will only be around 3 minutes or so (on the surface) but it will be relaying pictures back. For more info see:

    The Huygens mission page at NASA [nasa.gov]

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Earth Photo by robertarctor (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @10:02AM
  • Re:Earth Photo by nucal (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @10:04AM
  • Re:Waste of Time and Money (Score:5, Insightful)

    by digitalhermit (113459) on Friday March 12 2004, @10:21AM (#8543178)
    (http://www.digitalhermit.com/)
    Really. Let's all admit it finally. Those pictures from mars are as boring as hell!

    Interesting attitude.

    I, for one, find the pictures fascinating and awe-inspiring on many levels.

    At first it was just an appreciation for the mere fact that NASA was able to get the rovers onto the Martian surface. When I think of how f***ing far away Mars is, and how they were able to hit the target, I'm pretty much in awe. Yeah, the physics are well understood and software exists to determine everything about the mission (I can download such software for my home PC), but actually doing it is still pretty amazing.

    Then there's the whole rover itself. It's a semi-autonomous machine, thousands of miles from home base, and it can send back some pretty detailed images of the surface, drill rocks, sample the environment. Hell, sometimes getting cams in the other room to work properly can be a task. That they could do this, troubleshoot and re-program the machine from that distance, and do it *twice* gives me a tremendous feeling of well-being.

    Then there are the pictures themselves. We're peering at a f***ing other planet, man! Never before in human history have we seen the Martian surface with this much detail and this much information. I know it doesn't mean much to many people, but this is the spirit of exploration, the pure f***ing joy of discovery that pushed our forefathers to new worlds, new medicines, new art. Pushing the bounds, ripping apart the g*ddamned envelope, reaching beyond our grasp, is what makes us human and differentiates us from some cockroach or mindless automaton.

    Mod me as a dork, but I am happy to be alive at this time.

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:I'm not a Conspiracy Theorist, but... by Karem Lore (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @10:37AM
  • Re:I'm not a Conspiracy Theorist, but... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @01:00PM
  • Re:Waste of Time and Money by Eccles (Score:1) Friday March 12 2004, @04:33PM
  • 21 replies beneath your current threshold.