Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

World's Oldest Puzzle Solved

Posted by Cliff on Mon Nov 17, '03 11:20 PM
from the lasting-longer-than-rubik's-cube dept.
An anonymous reader observes: "The Loculus of Archimedes, the world's oldest puzzle, has been solved. It has 536 solutions. You can find the details here."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Eureka!

    (Score:2, Funny)
    by shfted! (600189) <shiftedMPAA@RIAAshifted.ca minus evil> on Monday November 17, @11:25PM (#7499539)
    (Last Journal: Thursday March 11, @12:40AM)
    Is this the part where Ed Pegg gets to run through the streets naked?
  • Thank you, Bill Cutler...

    (Score:2, Funny)
    by kommakazi (610098) on Monday November 17, @11:26PM (#7499549)
    (http://www.uwm.edu/~par)
    My life is complete. I may now die in peace.
  • I thought

    (Score:1)
    by lordmoose (696738) * on Monday November 17, @11:28PM (#7499558)
    (Last Journal: Sunday August 14, @08:02PM)
    that the world's oldest puzzle was how they got that filling inside of Combo's.
    • I thought by kommakazi (Score:1) Monday November 17, @11:31PM
      • Re:I thought by squiggleslash (Score:3) Tuesday November 18, @08:25AM
        • Re:I thought by Mr. Moose (Score:1) Wednesday November 19, @08:13AM
        • Re:I thought by mrdogi (Score:1) Wednesday November 19, @11:56AM
  • is it just me ?

    (Score:1)
    by kayen_telva (676872) on Monday November 17, @11:32PM (#7499583)
    i dont even understand the goal, much less how to go about "solving it". this is some seriously arcane shit. any geniuses out there care to bring it down to sub-dumb level for me ?
  • Wrong...this is older

    (Score:5, Funny)
    by Spoing (152917) on Monday November 17, @11:38PM (#7499612)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    1. Billy Og:
    2. "So, Mr. Pterodactyl, how many licks does it take to get to the center of a -- " *CRUNCH*.
  • Computation

    (Score:5, Interesting)
    by GrahamMastaFlash (724929) on Monday November 17, @11:50PM (#7499679)
    Isn't it amazing that a computer could compute in minutes what has taken humans thousands of years to solve? We're in a time in which the sheer calculating power of computers can predict stress and failure in complex structures (FEA), lift and drag of fluid flows (CFD), and even the way a polypeptide will fold into a protein.

    If computers can do all this and solve puzzles that have plagued our minds for centuries, where will the limit be? Perhaps one day the effect of a drug in a patient or the release of software into a market will be fully simulated through computation.

    We will soon be replacing our market analysits and physicians with programmers!

  • "solve" it?

    (Score:1)
    by ph43thon (619990) on Tuesday November 18, @12:33AM (#7499935)
    (Last Journal: Monday November 17, @07:10PM)
    I couldn't be less interested in the notion that a computer barfed out all possible solutions. Somehow I imagine we are being denied the real interesting part of this. What seems interesting is the parts mentioned about how certain pieces were always found in a pair. I'd also be interested in how one solution maps into another solution. What clumps and individual parts can be interchanged. Also, someone should do one that fits on the surface of a sphere. (though, probably already been done)
  • WRONG

    (Score:5, Funny)
    by Izanagi (466436) on Tuesday November 18, @01:07AM (#7500102)
    (Last Journal: Thursday August 14, @02:44PM)
    Every one knows the world's oldest unsolved puzzle involves women!!
    • Re:WRONG by CCIEwannabe (Score:2) Tuesday November 18, @07:13AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Thanks for nothing!

    (Score:5, Funny)
    by breon.halling (235909) on Tuesday November 18, @01:11AM (#7500124)

    Thanks for ruining it for me! I'd only made it to the 535th solution! =p

  • by ansleybean (618941) on Tuesday November 18, @01:13AM (#7500137)
    (http://blog.heavymachines.net/)
    like the three-color problem. we replace patience and time with a computer. nifty, perhaps even useful, but not very interesting, from a mathematical or even an artificial intelligence perspective.
  • by extrasolar (28341) on Tuesday November 18, @01:49AM (#7500277)
    (http://users.sedona.net/~klh/ | Last Journal: Friday August 30, @04:11AM)
    The actually interesting articles like this one and the other science/engineering ones get like a dozen comments with most of them by drunk slashdot addicts who post for the sake of posting, while MicroGates-"look, I'm Neo" and fucking software pseudo-politics seems to catch all the interest on this site with two, three, even five hundred comments a piece (not to mention all of the "OMG! I just saw Gates/RIAA/Darth Vades smiling at me in my monitor" fucking panic-attack YRO claptrap). Where did all the geeks go and who let the FoxNews fans in?
  • hmmm

    (Score:1)
    by frink_exp (647091) on Tuesday November 18, @04:10AM (#7500660)
    I think a more interesting tangram/tessellation problem would be the following. How should one divide a square into N pieces to maximize the number of unique solutions in which to arrange the pieces to reform the square? You could restrict the problem in various ways, like prohibiting annulus-like pieces. Anyone know if this has been done?
  • by ksdd (634242) on Tuesday November 18, @06:11AM (#7500890)
    It will apparently take close to 400 more years before someone solves the Loculus of Borg.

    Wait -- I've just been informed that it's actually Locutus (with a t) and definitely not a puzzle. Never mind then. We'll not even concern ourselves with that.

  • Can we guess the original cuts?

    (Score:3, Insightful)
    by G4from128k (686170) on Tuesday November 18, @08:18AM (#7501216)
    There may be 536 solutions, but the original creator started with a single solution in the form of the original pattern and order of cuts. We may never know the exact order and pattern of cuts that created the puzzle, but I'd bet we can guess how most people would attempt to create such a puzzle.

    For example the fact that the vast majority of 536 solutions are bilaterally symmetric suggests that the first cut in the creation of the puzzle was right down the middle. I'd also wager that cuts that bisect fragments are more likely than cuts that nick a fragment. Such straight-line, bisecting cutting behaviors are more likely than cutting polygons out of the middle of the whole square.

    It may be a math puzzle solved by a computer, but I wonder if we can learn something about how people think from it.
  • Puzzle list/book

    (Score:2)
    by Hard_Code (49548) on Tuesday November 18, @08:32AM (#7501292)
    Ok, so does anybody have a suggestion for a book or list of "classic" puzzles like this that might be fun to solve with computers/programming (doesn't matter if they have already been solved), that don't require more than basic high school math. I'm basically looking for something fun to do when I'm bored, but that will also keep my programming and problem solving skills up.

    The other day I wrote a complete (and I think optimal) word-search puzzle solver (final solution relied on standard iteration interface with different iteration strategies for each 45 degree rotation of the grid), and that was quite a fun few days as I rotated matrices and thought about things in different dimensions. In all, not a gigantic accomplishment, but enough to amuse, and better than playing mind-numbing shootemups.
  • Oh...

    (Score:1)
    by asdrtyjkl (720368) on Tuesday November 18, @09:20AM (#7501556)
    I thought it was the one about the man going to saint Ives. Man I still cant figure that one out. Any idea when it will be solved?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Serious Question:

    (Score:2)
    by mr.nobody (113509) on Tuesday November 18, @11:36AM (#7502682)

    What, exactly, am I supposed to learn from solving a puzzle like this?

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Actually...

    (Score:2)
    by inertia@yahoo.com (156602) * on Tuesday November 18, @01:58PM (#7504050)
    (http://www.martin-studio.com/ | Last Journal: Monday February 09, @08:06PM)
    536 distinct solutions

    Including mirror and rotation, there are 666 distinct solutions. I think we've found or anti-christ.
  • by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) (613870) on Thursday November 20, @08:27PM (#7524994)
    (Last Journal: Monday January 06, @10:36PM)
    Has anyone solved the Stonehenge puzzle? I bet most people don't even realise it's a puzzle.
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.