Slashdot Log In
World's Oldest Puzzle Solved
Posted by
Cliff
on Mon Nov 17, '03 11:20 PM
from the lasting-longer-than-rubik's-cube dept.
from the lasting-longer-than-rubik's-cube dept.
An anonymous reader observes: "The Loculus of Archimedes, the world's oldest puzzle, has been solved. It has 536 solutions. You can find the details here."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Eureka!
(Score:2, Funny)(Last Journal: Thursday March 11, @12:40AM)
Thank you, Bill Cutler...
(Score:2, Funny)(http://www.uwm.edu/~par)
I thought
(Score:1)(Last Journal: Sunday August 14, @08:02PM)
is it just me ?
(Score:1)Wrong...this is older
(Score:5, Funny)(http://slashdot.org/)
Computation
(Score:5, Interesting)If computers can do all this and solve puzzles that have plagued our minds for centuries, where will the limit be? Perhaps one day the effect of a drug in a patient or the release of software into a market will be fully simulated through computation.
We will soon be replacing our market analysits and physicians with programmers!
Re:Computation
(Score:4, Interesting)Computers are good at doing mechanical computations, but we have yet to perfect computation of organic systems...as a matter of fact, some would say it's impossible.
Re:Computation
(Score:5, Insightful)(http://en.mcfly.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 26, @05:46PM)
Isn't it amazing that a computer could compute in minutes what has taken humans thousands of years to solve?
And yet humans can solve in minutes some things which a computer couldn't solve in a thousand years.
"solve" it?
(Score:1)(Last Journal: Monday November 17, @07:10PM)
WRONG
(Score:5, Funny)(Last Journal: Thursday August 14, @02:44PM)
Thanks for nothing!
(Score:5, Funny)Thanks for ruining it for me! I'd only made it to the 535th solution! =p
so this is basically...
(Score:1)(http://blog.heavymachines.net/)
Where the hell did all the geeks go?
(Score:1, Offtopic)(http://users.sedona.net/~klh/ | Last Journal: Friday August 30, @04:11AM)
hmmm
(Score:1)On to the next challenge
(Score:1)Wait -- I've just been informed that it's actually Locutus (with a t) and definitely not a puzzle. Never mind then. We'll not even concern ourselves with that.
Can we guess the original cuts?
(Score:3, Insightful)For example the fact that the vast majority of 536 solutions are bilaterally symmetric suggests that the first cut in the creation of the puzzle was right down the middle. I'd also wager that cuts that bisect fragments are more likely than cuts that nick a fragment. Such straight-line, bisecting cutting behaviors are more likely than cutting polygons out of the middle of the whole square.
It may be a math puzzle solved by a computer, but I wonder if we can learn something about how people think from it.
Puzzle list/book
(Score:2)The other day I wrote a complete (and I think optimal) word-search puzzle solver (final solution relied on standard iteration interface with different iteration strategies for each 45 degree rotation of the grid), and that was quite a fun few days as I rotated matrices and thought about things in different dimensions. In all, not a gigantic accomplishment, but enough to amuse, and better than playing mind-numbing shootemups.
Oh...
(Score:1)Serious Question:
(Score:2)What, exactly, am I supposed to learn from solving a puzzle like this?
Actually...
(Score:2)(http://www.martin-studio.com/ | Last Journal: Monday February 09, @08:06PM)
Including mirror and rotation, there are 666 distinct solutions. I think we've found or anti-christ.
There are older puzzles
(Score:2)(Last Journal: Monday January 06, @10:36PM)