Slashdot Log In
Swimming Cockroach Robot Developed
Posted by
simoniker
on Thu Jun 12, 2003 06:10 AM
from the vermin-no-more dept.
from the vermin-no-more dept.
Onnimikki writes "The Ambulatory Robotics Lab at McGill University has made a six-legged swimming cockroach robot as part of Project Aqua. The robot is a waterproof version of the RHex robot, whose inspiration is the biomimetic work by Bob Full of Gecko glue fame. Other cool stuff from the ARL page includes a waddling bipedal RHex, and the world's first galloping robot."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Swimming Cockroach Robot Developed
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 113 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Fun (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Thursday May 22 2003, @06:59AM)
Re:Fun (Score:5, Funny)
The scary thing is, you're talking about one woman
Sticky situation (Score:5, Funny)
Why is he full of Gecko glue?
Talk about getting stuck into your work...
It runs QNX (Score:5, Interesting)
It's nice to see that it runs a proper Real Time OS.
I have actually seen one case of someone trying to build a mini sub-aqua robot running Windows XP (yes XP not CE) on a powerful micro PC card.
Seriously, ... it sounds fscked up, but it's true.
WinXP and the newbie Roboticist trap (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.babe-test.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday September 17 2003, @11:59AM)
The problem with this is, it actually adds complexity.
Typically, it means adding a MAX232 with Charge ups, or the more expensive MAX233. This, just to convert the RS232 25Volts down to TTL 5volts. Then you need another component to translate the characters into logic. What a pain! Not to mention a tether.
Better to just learn a little assembly. It's really easy for these applications. Just turning things on and off is setting/clearing a bit in an output register.
Software, is really not that hard, in fact, possibly overrated in terms of the complexity of building one of these beasts. It's the electronics, and contruction. Getting things to actually move.
Re:WinXP and the newbie Roboticist trap (Score:5, Informative)
Buoyancy (Score:5, Insightful)
How did they do that ? Depending on the density of the water you immerse the thing it, they might approach neutral buoyancy by adjusting the amount of ballast manually, but they'll never achieve true static buoyancy without some kind of active process controlling the amount of water in a ballast tank. Otherwise the object would sink to the bottom or bob up to the surface eventually. Or do they maintain the thing's depth in the water with dynamic buyoancy using the robot's forward movement ? I don't see depth control planes on the robot, could they use its legs to achieve this ?
Re:Buoyancy (Score:5, Informative)
And unless you fill the tank with salt water or, perhaps, lime jello, the density of water is pretty much the same everywhere
Re:Buoyancy (Score:4, Insightful)
But I digress, I doubt there's much call for a deep-sea robot cockroach.
I'll make a mint (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.babe-test.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday September 17 2003, @11:59AM)
Come on Justin! [pgatour.com]
Bill G's cunning pest control plan (Score:3, Funny)
Not first (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Not first (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~jasmith)
You may be 2000% positive, but the assertion that no galloping robots had ever been made (until now, by MIT or anyone else) is backed up by Schmiedeler and Waldron's IJRR paper entitled "The Mechanics of Quadrupedal Galloping and the Future of Legged Vehicles". In it they state "To the best of the authors' knowledge, however, no artificial legged system has ever been operated in a true gallop. Raibert's (1986) quadruped used its legs in pairs, employing trot, pace and bound gaits." The MIT work that you are referring to is that done by Marc Raibert.
Eeaaaargh!!!! (Score:5, Funny)
*hits cockroach with shoe*
What? Why is everyone looking at me like that?
build your own (Score:1, Informative)
original rhex is equally impressive (Score:4, Interesting)
Waiter! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://terbidium.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday August 18 2001, @09:34AM)
"The...um...backstroke?"
What The World Needs Now (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.wilcoxon.org/~sewilco | Last Journal: Monday November 26, @11:31PM)
Already done better (Score:3, Interesting)
Complicated much? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Complicated much? (Score:4, Interesting)
The second is a potential energy savings. Imagine a wheeled vehicle traveling over rough terrain. It's constantly climbing over obstacles which takes energy that is just lost when it falls down the other side. Meanwhile, a legged robot can keep its body above the height of most obstacles and just step over the top of them -- more of its energy goes towards its forward motion instead of the up-and-down motion of the wheeled vehicle.
Oh, another thing is the ability to tolerate loss of an actuator. If one of the wheels were to stop working on a wheeled vehicle, the rest of the wheels would have to drag that one along. Meanwhile, there's been some neat work showing the robustness of legged robots to such problems by groups such as the Biorobotics Lab [cwru.edu] at Case Western.
In the end though, it depends on your application as to which is best. I just can't see that one approach could be better than the other in all cases. Just as one example, I think legged robots have really cool potential for planetary exploration for the reasons given above, but certainly anything spending most of its time on flat ground (agricultural equipment, anything on-road, etc) would perform better with wheels.
I've been slashdotted! YEAH! I'm so proud! (Score:5, Funny)
Came in this morning, tried to login to squirrelmail.... Hmmmm... very slow... Get to the web server.... Hummmm... Lotsa httpd processes... Hummmmm...
tcpdump -i eth0 -n port 80...
Hmmmm... The console scrolls non-stop! Arrrgh! Am I being DOS'ed!?!?!?!?
Thanks slashdot, you made me panic for a while. Hope somebody mirrored the pages cuz' I can't handle this load without being prepared for it.
Please check again in a few days if you're really intereseted.
--
Danny, McGill CIM SysAdmin.
Re:I've been slashdotted! YEAH! I'm so proud! (Score:5, Informative)
I'd have prepared for this by mirroring the images and videos and redirected to them. Ain't so hard if you know in advance.
I didn't post the story, somebody else here at McGill did without telling me.
Anyways, anybody want to host 'em?
A galloping robot? (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Sunday October 27 2002, @04:19PM)
Great, More Pests (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.zog.net/ | Last Journal: Friday December 12 2003, @07:21AM)
Just great. Now I have to keep a portable EMP generator next to my cans of RAID under the kitchen sink. Do you know how much power those f***n things use?
Let's hope they don't teach the little bastards to breed. What will they do, lay their eggs in my box of spare PC parts? Although I assume there'll be a nice satisfying mechanical *crunch* when you step on them.
Gives new meaning to cockroaches carrying diseases. Maybe they'll find one that transmits W95/Klez@mm. Norton Antivirus will now cost three times as much to ship, because it comes with a large hammer. Don't download files, don't open mail attachments, and put a ring of flea powder around your PC. "Dr. Solomon..." *WHAM WHAM WHAM* *crunch* "...has detected and isolated a virus."
On the other hand, it'd make for a nice way to smuggle an X10 cam into a cute girl's bedroom--assuming they ever make the transmitter units weigh less than 5 pounds. Blattidae Elegans Electronicus indeed.
Movie mirror (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~jasmith)
I've posted the smaller movie [14MB] on the .Mac servers: the cockroach robot movie [mac.com].
Quick, Henry- the Flit!!! (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.solemndragon.org/ | Last Journal: Monday April 16 2007, @10:17AM)
I do not want them near my boat...
It's bad enough on Land and Beach-
Keep that insect out of reach!!!
I do not want electric roach,
Nor the real thing to approach!
Don Marquis, entombed, is spinning-
And now, you say, the roachbot's... swimming?
My house is currently invaded-
I didn't want this thing created!
Why not start with robot ants,
or with spiders, tech advance-
I do Not LIKE the cockroach breed!
I do not want them close to me!
I'm scared of those alive and well-
and these
not even Flit can Kill!
My morning tribute to Dr. Suess and his earliy career, and Mr. Marquis, whose cockroach vers libre poet would have had quite a bit to say on this one. Those were the first things to leap to the forefront of my mind- Quick, henry- the flit! and oh lordy what would archy say.
I'll have to develop... (Score:2)
(http://www.dentar.com | Last Journal: Tuesday February 11 2003, @11:00PM)
At the End of the World (Score:3, Funny)
Ahh now i can sleep at long last (Score:1)
here it is: bittorrent file (Score:4, Informative)
If you want the full version movie, go here for the torrent file.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~gch/Aqua.mpg.torrent [cmu.edu]
This is Slahdot... (Score:1)
Backwards (Score:2)
(http://nuintari.net/)
And waterproof, next it will be squishy proof. I find these anywhere near my house, your gonna pay to have em exterminated.
Robot video page. Wooo! (Score:2)
(http://web.mac.com/zav | Last Journal: Wednesday May 28 2003, @04:24PM)
A "pronking robot"
http://kesisleme.eecs.umich.edu/filedispl
The rest of the vids
http://kesisleme.eecs.umich.edu/media.php
Has anyone made a joke about a RAID array yet? (Score:1)
hmmm (Score:1)