Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

For Those Long Coding Sessions: The Food Patch

Posted by timothy on Sat Jan 11, 2003 12:34 AM
from the ask-your-doctor-if-it's-right-for-you dept.
rtphokie writes "The U.S. Army has created a Transdermal Nutrient Delivery System which works similarly to to nicotine or birth control patches but delivers vitamins and other micronutrients. It was developed to help "warfighters sustain their physical and mental performance" during high intensity conflict. Is this what ./'ers need during those long coding sessions."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • ok, sign me up to be a dotslasher by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:36AM
  • What flavors? (Score:5, Funny)

    by tinrobot (314936) on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:36AM (#5061001)
    I'd really like tandoori chicken with mint sauce, please. Oh yeah, my arm has no taste buds. Dang.
  • No vits, please (Score:5, Funny)

    by Alien54 (180860) on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:37AM (#5061007) Journal
    I don't need no stinking vitamins

    I just want a caffeine patch. - Well, maybe a junk food patch. I can see this.

  • I suppose it makes sense... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Ironica (124657) <pixel&distantshore,com> on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:40AM (#5061020) Homepage Journal
    Clinical studies show that, while only about 20% (less now, I'm thinking) of Americans are addicted to cigarettes, 100% are addicted to food.

    Hopefully, this patch will help people with a food abuse problem to combat it and overcome it. In moderation, food is a good and healthy thing, but as with so many things, there is such a thing as too much.

    I wonder how long it's going to take them to come up with the Sleep patch? Now that's an addiction I'd like to kick...
  • by havaloc (50551) on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:42AM (#5061027) Homepage
    Not sure if it would be a wise idea to slashdot a military server these days. You might be considered a terrorist.
  • No. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kaosrain (543532) <root@NosPaM.kaosrain.com> on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:43AM (#5061029) Homepage
    Is this what ./'ers need during those long coding sessions.

    This may have been said jokingly, but it definately isn't what we need. Not only do TNDS' not give you a delicious taste in your mouth, they don't tell your body that you are full either. If we want fatter geeks, this is the way to go. Otherwise, I'll just stick to my perishable food.
  • Interesting, by Danielle Gatton (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:43AM
  • Sez the Army by Syncdata (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:43AM
    • Re:Sez the Army by TheAntiCrust (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:12AM
  • oh great by jon787 (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:45AM
  • No calories? by Sirion (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:45AM
    • Re:No calories? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Raffaello (230287) on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:14AM (#5061147)
      Yes, carbohydrates, protein, and fatty acids are macronutrients, that is, nutrients your body needs in fairly large amounts (protein 30g/day, carbohydrates 250g/day, fatty acids 100g/day or thereabouts). These patches only contain micronutrients, that is, nutrients we only need in sub gram amounts (e.g., vitamin C 65mg/day - 500mg/day depending on which authotity you believe, and what stresses you're under).
      So I really don't see how these patches could be a complete solution, although they might be useful for replacing lost electrolytes like potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium. When you're engaged in physical exertion for long periods of time though, you really need macronutrients. This is why marathon runners and triathletes drink sports beverages and/or eat power bars. In addition to the electrolyes in, lets say gatorade, you also get a load of sugar (carbohydrates) for energy. These patches would only help with half the problem, and the smaller half at that.
      Maybe they just expect that with the right micronutrient balance and some hormones the field soldiers will burn their own body fat for energy. Then when they do get some down time, they eat a meal rich in protein (for muscle/tissue repair), carbohydrate (to replace muscle and liver glycogen stores), and fatty acids (to replenish body fat stores, for repair and growth of nerves/neurons, and for various hormone precursors, etc.)
      [ Parent ]
    • This will NOT work (Score:5, Informative)

      by The Tyro (247333) on Saturday January 11 2003, @02:09AM (#5061300)
      Going long-term without eating cannot happen... big problems if you don't feed the gut.

      Critically ill hospitalized patients with long-term abdominal pathology that prevent them from eating (severe Pancreatitis, shotgun wound to the abdomen, Gastric Outlet Obstruction from cancer, Crohns Disease, etc) are at high risk for all kinds of problems. It can even happen with anorexics. They often end up on TPN (total parenteral nutrition)... AKA Intravenous feedings. Long term TPN puts you at risk for some nasty complications (see below), even aside from the risk of TPN itself (you have to have the electrolytes, osmolality, etc just right).

      The current theory is that the intestinal wall needs to be "fed" by absorbing food. Like many things in the body, the gut needs exercise. If it doesn't get it, you get atrophy of the viscera, and bacterial translocation across the gut wall. This results in severe gram-negative sepsis from enteric organisms (think about intravenously injecting feces... it's about the same effect). Overwhelming gram-negative sepsis has a tremendous mortality rate... most don't survive.

      Even without the above complication of not eating, the amount of material (think in terms of simple mass of nutrients) you could get from a transdermal patch is miniscule. There is no way you could absorb enough nutrients to stay alive. Even TPN requires that huge volumes be infused, since it can only be concentrated so much. Some components are not even water soluble (lipids), and have to be given as a suspension. Even worse, TPN has to be given through a central IV line (subclavian, jugular, femoral, PICC), since peripheral veins quickly become unusable from the irritation and osmotic load.

      Honestly, I can't see this satisfying anyone's caloric needs.

      I suspect this will be used primarily to deliver drugs... something we already do.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:This will NOT work by Rolo Tomasi (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:07AM
      • RTFA by abhinavnath (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:40PM
        • Hmph. by The Tyro (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @11:52PM
      • Re:This will NOT work by ChaoticLimbs (Score:1) Sunday January 12 2003, @07:45PM
    • Re:No calories? by ChaoticLimbs (Score:1) Sunday January 12 2003, @07:40PM
  • No food! by jordie (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:45AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I'm not anorexic... by Flarelocke (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:46AM
  • The logical extension (Score:3, Funny)

    by Qwaniton (166432) on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:46AM (#5061044)
    "This processor might activate a microelectrical mechanical system that transmits the micronutrients -- either through skin pores or pumped directly into blood capillaries."

    I am warfighter of Borg.
    You will be assimilated.
    Resistance is futile.
  • I Don't Have Security Hole by robbyjo (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:47AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Sean Clifford (322444) on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:48AM (#5061050) Journal
    Glad to see some sci-fi turning real-world. Kinda freaky too; guess I know how my grandparents felt about landing on the moon and TV.

    Anyway, it's nice to see this kind of technology being developed out of the military budget instead of another variation on the bullet, bomb, etc. It has a lot of potential and I imagine it's not long before we see folks using pharmecutical patches soon - probably tailored for their specific needs/doses.

    It would be pretty nice if I could take ALL of my daily meds via a single patch rather than gulp down 10+ "easy-to-swallow if you're a horse" caplets.

    Good show, GI Joe.

  • Nutraceuticals? by Kevin Murakoshi (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:48AM
  • Will they come in Flintstone shapes? by SSeth (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:48AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Need to use a different icon for this one... by $$$$$exyGal (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:49AM
  • This is a... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:49AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • good idea for coders by zephc (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:49AM
  • Nutrients?? by Woogiemonger (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:53AM
    • Re:Nutrients?? by DarthWiggle (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:12AM
      • Re:Nutrients?? by silentbozo (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:18AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Beer (Score:4, Funny)

    by evilroot (156363) on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:54AM (#5061075)
    Forget food. I want one that pumps BEER straight into my veins!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • what about oral stimulation ... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by HealYourChurchWebSit (615198) on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:56AM (#5061080) Homepage


    I'm sorry, but when I'm wading through breakpoints, I want something cruncy. When I'm hacking out a killer regular expression, something sweet. While I'm sure the patch is nice and chewy, there's nothing like an ice cold Jolt Cola at about 1a.m. when you've finally inherited and overloaded your native hash object to recursively enumerate its own members.

    Point is, some of the fun of eating while coding isn't just the stinking vitamins, more full tummy for that matter. So while I see it as an effective way to feed someone who'd rather starve than gag on MRE's in the middle of a minefield, I'll stick to my pretzels and mint-conditioned coffe thank you very much.

  • I wonder what is (Score:3, Interesting)

    by doubtless (267357) on Saturday January 11 2003, @12:58AM (#5061083) Homepage
    the implications of this to long endurance sports, such as 24 hr LeMans car racing, ironman triathlon, long range cycling, and so on.

    I think currently athletes drink some sort of soups or something to get their calories... just a semi wild guess.
    • Re:I wonder what is (Score:5, Informative)

      by nochops (522181) on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:07AM (#5061115)
      I am an avid cyclist, and I can tell you this:
      It takes more than just nutrients to get the job done. They don't say exactly what chemicals will be delivered by this system, but a cyclist would need:

      Carbohydrates, and lots of them. This is the body's main source of fuel during aerobic exercise.

      Electrolytes, to maintain the proper chemical balances in your body. This helps muscles perform at peak efficiency and staves off cramps.

      Water, because buckets of it are lost from sweating. Dehydration is perhaps the easiest way to ensure a poor performance.

      IANAN (nutritionist), but I've been cycling in both recreation and competition for about 10 years, and the things mentioned above are common knowledge to most cyclists.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I wonder what is by dirkdidit (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:27AM
  • Long Coding Sessions? (Score:5, Funny)

    by bahwi (43111) <incoming AT josephguhlin DOT com> on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:00AM (#5061088) Homepage
    "Is this what ./'ers need during those long coding sessions."

    Is that anything like the much needed Sex Patch?

    Uh, erm, not that I need it. =)
    • you clod by rainman31415 (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:28AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Long Coding Sessions? by SensitiveMale (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:40AM
    • Re:Long Coding Sessions? (Score:4, Funny)

      by SensitiveMale (155605) on Saturday January 11 2003, @02:43AM (#5061380)
      "Is this what ./'ers need during those long coding sessions."

      Is that anything like the much needed Sex Patch?


      And by the pr0n usage of the readers, would they make those in both right-handed and left-handed varieties?
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Long Coding Sessions? by XNormal (Score:3) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:15AM
  • Is this what ./'ers need during those long coding by 56ker (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:00AM
  • Been using it for 6 months. by Black Copter Control (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:03AM
  • Warfighting by 0x7F (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:05AM
  • Care and Feeding of Programmers by sakusha (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:08AM
  • All it needs is WiFi by bahwi (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:08AM
  • They never learn by Mannerism (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:09AM
  • by core plexus (599119) on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:09AM (#5061126) Homepage
    When I was in the Army (uh-oh), we'd sometimes not eat but once a day, especially in Ranger school. And a part of that reason was because the meals were so terrible. Oh I hope you never have to eat "Pork, Processed, with Juices" or scrambled eggs and ham that are 5 years old. Now they'll be having soldiers shaving their testicles to apply a food patch. I'll pass on the 're-up', thanks.

    Personal Strap-On Aircraft for Auction on eBay [xnewswire.com]

  • the inevitable question by grandmaster_spunk (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:09AM
  • Slashdotters don't need no stinking food patch. by roman_mir (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:09AM
  • Obligatory reference by TeknoHog (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:10AM
  • 67 posts in.. (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:16AM (#5061151)
    *mumbles*
    Cant be /.'d yet
    *mumbles* .mil site, should be able to handle the effect..
    *shakes monitor*
    Come on ya bitch, serve the page, serve the page!

    *frowns*
    too late! /. 1 .mil 0
  • This can't be good. by St. Vitus (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:16AM
  • Will towel delivery arrive soon? by CharlesDarwin (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:18AM
  • The first thing that comes to mind... by mark-t (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:23AM
  • Alterations by Shishio (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:23AM
  • Uhm no (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Iamthefallen (523816) <Gmail name: Iamthefallen> on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:27AM (#5061182) Homepage Journal

    What we geeks need is for those long coding sessions is: better chairs, better screens, workplace ergonomy in general, decent food, short breaks a couple times an hour and a short walk around the block or something now and then aswell as 8 hours of sleep. We do not need anything to keep us glued to our monitors.

    I know it's incredibly cool to keep up the pizza/coffee/dew image, I like all three of them too, but considering how bad a lof of geeks handle their eating and sleeping, combined with a bad workplace and little excercise... they're a burnedout zombie with bad back and wrist problems waiting to happen.

    Contrary to popular geek belief, our bodies are not made for such abuse, and no, you are not different, you too need nutrition and sleep.

    • Re:Uhm no -- Quite far OT by DarthWiggle (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:39AM
    • Re:Uhm no by bigberk (Score:3) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:46AM
      • Re:Uhm no by DarkKnightRadick (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:54AM
        • Re:Uhm no by DarkKnightRadick (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:51PM
      • Re:Uhm no by seanadams.com (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:58AM
        • Re:Uhm no by nycbrujah (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:37AM
          • Re:Uhm no by seanadams.com (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:44AM
            • Re:Uhm no by nycbrujah (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:48AM
          • Re:Uhm no by Zauss (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:27AM
          • Re:Uhm no by Buck2 (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @05:07AM
            • Re:Uhm no by dWhisper (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @06:48AM
            • Re:Uhm no by greenrd (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @08:15AM
              • Re:Uhm no by Buck2 (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:14PM
            • Re:Uhm no by Buck2 (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:11PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Actually they haven't by Valgar (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:31AM
  • Unneccessary! by Publicus (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:35AM
  • by Sean Clifford (322444) on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:35AM (#5061206) Journal
    Man, when I played Army we didn't have this cool stuff. Sure, I got to blow shit up and that was a lot of fun. We had MREs, but that was before they started putting M&Ms and tabasco sauce in them. Patches? Hmmm, I'll hang on to 'em, but I'd rather have my freeze-dried peaches.

    Imagine you'll get pretty hungry, though.

    GI Joe: Trade you my patch for your peanut butter and crackers.

    GI Ethnic: [bitch slaps GI Joe]

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I can see it now.. by MegaHamsterX (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:40AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • will it suppress an appitite? by gyratedotorg (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:43AM
  • Absolutely not by The Bungi (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:43AM
  • We don't need no steenkin vitamins by stor (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:45AM
  • patch by rawshark (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:47AM
    • Re:patch by The Creator (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @07:54AM
  • by joeflies (529536) on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:48AM (#5061241)
    Seems like there are so many restrictions in so many religions in what foods that can be eaten on a given day, then using something like this makes it easy for the army to focus on the task at hand without having to worry about keeping pork/milk/dairy/penuts, etc out of a batch of rations.

    This is army food that even the Atkins diet could love!

  • by jshare (6557) on Saturday January 11 2003, @01:51AM (#5061248) Homepage
    It seems (from reading the article, madness, i know) that this is more of a "we need this" than a "we built this" kind of thing.

    What gives?

    -Jordan

  • Nutrition Patches by reverseengineer (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:06AM
  • I'm confused... (Score:3, Funny)

    by AyeRoxor! (471669) on Saturday January 11 2003, @02:08AM (#5061297) Homepage Journal
    "Is this what ./'ers need during those long coding sessions[?]"

    What's a dot-slasher? :-P
  • As a . / 'er by Shant3030 (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:08AM
  • slashdotted... by mwm158 (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:11AM
  • Food patch? Need sleep patch!! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by SuperKendall (25149) on Saturday January 11 2003, @02:16AM (#5061325)
    I don't need a sticky wafer feeding me fancy "nutraceuticals". That's why they make vending machines, I imagine the pork rinds are chock full of them (not that I could ever bring myself to eat them, mind you. I'm in for the sweet rolls).

    No, what I need is a patch to feed me lots of "nutrazzzzzicals", giving me a full nights sleep while I do whatever. If that means lucid dreams overlaying normal vision, fine (I'll just be really careful who or what I look at), just give me real sleep I don't have to catch up on later.
  • Why? by kavau (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:23AM
  • I'm probably rather late for this one by TekReggard (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:33AM
  • The Food Patch (Score:5, Funny)

    by farnsworth (558449) on Saturday January 11 2003, @02:49AM (#5061393)
    here's the actual patch:
    Index: human/nerd/coder/employed/on_the_job.h
    ========== ============
    RCS file:
    / universe/ solar_system/ earth/ mamal/ human/ nerd/ coder/ employed/ on_the_job.h,v
    retrieving revision 1.0
    diff -u -r1.0 on_the_job.h

    #include <wake_up.h>
    #include "../../common/move_to_workstation.h"
    -#include "../nutrition/check_slashdot.h"
    +#include <eat_a_bagel.h>
    #include <guzzle_coffee.h>
  • Yes, but... by salimma (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:51AM
  • Hmmm by plaxion (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:53AM
    • Re:Hmmm by The Creator (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @07:59AM
  • Work Requirement by mrmaster (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:57AM
  • Boost, Ensure, etc. by long_john_stewart_mi (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:15AM
  • Lazy! by Evil Adrian (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:29AM
  • Why a patch? by Adam J. Richter (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:33AM
    • Re:Why a patch? by TracerJPN_USMC (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:57AM
  • warfighters by maxpublic (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:51AM
    • Re:warfighters by HalfFlat (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @07:26AM
      • Re:warfighters by Planesdragon (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:55PM
    • Re:warfighters by Planesdragon (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:51PM
      • Re:warfighters by maxpublic (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @03:57PM
        • Re:warfighters by Planesdragon (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @08:15PM
          • Re:warfighters by maxpublic (Score:2) Sunday January 12 2003, @01:05AM
            • Re:warfighters by Planesdragon (Score:1) Sunday January 12 2003, @09:59AM
              • Re:warfighters by maxpublic (Score:2) Sunday January 12 2003, @03:57PM
  • More useful for something else? by c1tk (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @04:08AM
  • When they will start to... by sdukaric (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @04:13AM
  • Huh? by kraf (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @04:33AM
  • by tlambert (566799) on Saturday January 11 2003, @05:47AM (#5061739)
    ..."works similarly to to nicotine or birth control patches"...

    Oh yeah, there's a warehouse mixup waiting to happen.

    -- Terry
  • Chrono Trigger Reference - the Enertron by dermusikman (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @06:00AM
  • Chef by Kenshiro (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @06:28AM
  • Glucathione and Tyrosine by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @06:32AM
  • Coding and nutrition by ponos (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @07:02AM
  • Fancy vitamin pill (Score:4, Informative)

    by wowbagger (69688) on Saturday January 11 2003, @08:02AM (#5061891) Homepage Journal
    FOLKS!

    This patch is nothing but a fancy vitamin pill. It won't "feed" you any more than a vitamin pill would. RTFA!

    The only advantage this patch has is that it lasts many days - the idea being to prevent soldiers from coming down with beri-beri, scurvy, and other diseases due to lack of vitamins (which MREs are not exactly high in). If you can issue a soldier a patch every week,

    a) You can quickly determine if the soldier is using it - "INSPECTION - Pruuu-zent PATCH!" This is harder to do with a pill.
    b) You only need worry about it once a week - for guys on long range patrol this simplifies life. In combat, simple is good.

    For geeks driving a keyboard, just take your multivitamin every (virtual) morning, along with your coffee, and you will get the same effect.
  • Slippery Slope by limekiller4 (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @08:12AM
  • Great, more lawsuits... by Nameles (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @09:44AM
  • So... by lateralus (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @09:45AM
  • Very sci-fi like but raises interesting questions by theolein (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @09:48AM
  • Chicken-a-la-King anyone? (Score:3, Informative)

    by pvera (250260) <pedro.vera@gmail.com> on Saturday January 11 2003, @10:10AM (#5062128) Homepage Journal
    I am a US Army vet, but my only exposure to field food was MREs, I never got to see the next generation MREs used now or the older C-rations. When I was in the service the MREs came in diverse enough configurations that there was something for everyone, plus of course the little black market we had running using the M&Ms as a bargain tool.

    Still, MREs had a small problem, it took time to eat them. The MRE not only gave us a certain caloric load per bag, but it also kept us busy for up to 30 minutes (some of us looked forward to getting MREs instead of a chow truck because you would be literally guaranteed 30 minutes of peace from the cadre as long as you looked busy tearing open packets of food). If you are really in a hurry and you don't eat your MREs whole then over time in a long deployment you could start suffering vitamin deficiencies, which is where a patch like that would rock.

    Of course, we know the first three patches that are going to be issued will be:

    1. Caffeine
    2. Tylenol/Motrin
    3. Go pills

    The concept sounds great, but it is just too obvious that they are looking for a clean way to deliver chemicals without needles or pills (plus the patch allows a time release).

    If any of you has never tasted an MRE and has a chance to, go ahead and try it. I have always been picky about food but I never thought I would be so damn well pleased with cold food (the warming jackets were not widely distributed to non-deployed units). Chicken-a-la-King, Beef Stew and "Ham and Omelette" where the best :-)
  • The inverse of this patch may be more important... by vudufixit (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @10:40AM
  • Hmmm.... by Skulker (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @11:43AM
  • Blackheads anyone by eoinatstraylight (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:25PM
  • Yet another by MImeKillEr (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:26PM
  • stomach growling? by corvi42 (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @12:47PM
  • Perhaps I should make a point... by tvsjr (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @01:22PM
  • Too late for this guy - by DotComVictim (Score:2) Saturday January 11 2003, @07:23PM
  • Could someone explain to me... by cr0sh (Score:2) Sunday January 12 2003, @02:29PM
  • For those about to rock by ergo98 (Score:1) Saturday January 11 2003, @02:23AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 27 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2