Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Drug Deletes Fearful Memories

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon Feb 16, 2009 07:26 PM
from the also-the-memory-that-you-paid-your-bill-already dept.
Al writes "Technology Review has an article about a common drug that seems to 'delete' painful memories related to a fearful experience. Experiments carried out by neuro-scientists at Emory University show that propranolol, a drug commonly used to treat high blood pressure, can suppress the emotional part of a fearful memory. The results, published in Nature Neuroscience, suggest a new way to treat anxiety disorders. In recent years, scientists have discovered that the simple act of remembering a past experience requires that the memory be consolidated once again. And both animal research and some human studies have shown that during re consolidation, long-term memories — once thought to be fairly stable — can be more easily meddled with."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by mbstone (457308) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:27PM (#26880081) Homepage

    Now they can make money re-educating the same students they educated before! Think of the student loan debt!

  • PropranoLOL (Score:5, Funny)

    by HTH NE1 (675604) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:28PM (#26880089)

    Any relation to propofol, a.k.a. milk of amnesia?

    • Re:PropranoLOL (Score:5, Informative)

      by reverseengineer (580922) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:24PM (#26880729)
      Nope, propofol (2,6-diisopropyl phenol) likely works by increasing the response to inhibitory neurotransmitters, and acts as an anesthetic. Propanolol is a non-selective beta-blocker, which blocks the beta-adrenergic receptors (receptors for epinephrine and norepinephrine). As the summary notes, the most common pharmaceutical use for this is to lower blood pressure, which it does by preventing the release of renin. Its effects on memory are completely coincidental to those on blood pressure.

      In the brain, a part of the brainstem known as the locus ceruleus is the site of norepinephrine synthesis, and it is activated by stress to send norepinephrine to the amygdalae, the brain's "emotional memory association" centers. It is in the amygdalae that memories are associated with emotions, with the ultimate result being that it is easier to form long term memories of experiences that associated with strong emotions. In blocking norepinephrine transmission to the amygdala, beta-blockers most likely are acting to uncouple the connection between a stressor and its associated memory, such that the brain no longer considers it important enough to keep in long term memory.
        • Re:PropranoLOL (Score:5, Informative)

          by reverseengineer (580922) on Monday February 16 2009, @09:52PM (#26881589)
          Oh, most definitely- it's still an off-label use of the drug in the US, but people are certainly taking beta-blockers to treat performance anxiety, as well as to prevent nervous fine motor tics. At the most recent Summer Olympics, one of the medalists in pistol shooting had his medals taken away after testing positive for propranolol.
  • Drugs (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @07:29PM (#26880091)

    propranolol

    So this will turn your fearful memories into hilarious ones?

    • by jonaskoelker (922170) <jonaskoelker.gnu@org> on Tuesday February 17 2009, @01:41AM (#26883403) Homepage

      So this will turn your fearful memories into hilarious ones?

      Just wait when it goes off-patent. You'll see knock-offs like propanorofl, propanolmao, propanolulz and propanocheezburgar.

    • Propranolol.

      Lol your nightmares away.

      With propranolol you'll be LOLing so hard you'll be ROTFLYAO.

      Sides effects may include: dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, water retention, painful rectal itch, hallucination, dementia, psychosis, coma, death, and halitosis. Propranolol is not for everyone. Consult your doctor before use.

  • Bush/Cheney (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward
    So I can forget the past eight years?
  • Ahh... (Score:3, Funny)

    by XPeter (1429763) * on Monday February 16 2009, @07:30PM (#26880101) Homepage

    Now I can finally forget the day that ruined my life. It took me away from schoolwork, friends, family...it was horrible.

    Now I can finally forget the day I joined Slashdot.

  • by sjvn (11568) <sjvn.vna1@com> on Monday February 16 2009, @07:30PM (#26880111) Homepage

    You know one does learn to avoid making many mistakes in life--I really cant fly, fire is pretty but it does hurt--by pain.

    Besides just the idea of tampering with memory being a *bad* thing, the notion of fooling with one of the fundamental ways we learn strikes me as a really bad idea.

    Soma anyone?

    Steven

    • by woolpert (1442969) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:01PM (#26880457)

      You speak as if our brain's software is without bugs. If you had seen the suffering and disablement that intense, often unreasonable, emotional pain can inflict on some people even years after the traumatic event, perhaps you would be less dismissive of an attempt to patch this particular bug.
      Expose X people to a horrific event and a high percentage of them will show the ability to get over it. There is that outlying group, however, who (despite honest effort and therapy) seem to have an overactive emotional memory system which prevents them from ever coming to terms with what happened.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward

        Wrong. No one just "get[s] over it." Every individual, based on their prior experiences will take a given situation and either adapt to it to the best of their abilities, perhaps by adding it to their experience or by "moving on" and ignoring it even though the effect is still with them at a subconscious level. And the really poorly off people break; they have something happen to them so traumatic that it shatters their emotions. While they are the most obvious "victims" of an event, if they can't find help

            • by woolpert (1442969) on Monday February 16 2009, @10:39PM (#26882157)

              So in an attempt to create a "quick fix" you are advocating the permission for people to bury their heads in the sand and let life pass them by because they got hurt and don't want to feel bad?

              As I previously said, there is a group of people who, despite honest effort and therapy, do not recover from traumatic events. There is no support for a quick fix anywhere in my earlier comments. Stop attempting to straw-man this.

              I think you ought to either drop the programming analogy or realize that there are no "bugs" in our "software." Humans can't "upgrade their firmware" to overcome "short-sighted design" or development. They either adapt at a conscious level or a subconscious level; the former has a much more obvious affect on their abilities, while the latter is harder to actualize, but can be just as potent

              Bullshit. There are clearly innate and instinctual functions of our brain our higher processes wish they could override. We have an onion of a brain with layer upon layer of functionality, but also layer upon layer of cruft.
              Flinching when you know the person isn't going to hit you. Accelerated heartbeat when you know it is only a movie. Goosebumps when you know you have no hair to fluff. Even the annoying sensation of cold when you know you are able to maintain core temperature. All of these are examples of where, despite conscious will, our base programming still rules.

              It sounds to me that you are letting people suffer through ignorance and allow them to experience the same things later, which they will then also need to be treated for.

              You're assuming these people can learn. I'm arguing there is a class of case where normal brain function has been so disrupted by an overactive response to an emotional event that learning from the event is impossible. Despite your insistent wish to believe that isn't so.

              Do I think that emotionally damaged people deserve a second chance? Sure, but with the proper tools and in the proper environment, not through the use of a one-size-fits-all memory supplement (or otherwise)...

              Who says this is a one-size-fits-all solution? Not I. It appears to me that there is either a reading comprehension problem or a desire to straw-man again.

              ...that doesn't solve the victimization problem of the event from reoccurring.

              A non-functional personality can solve no problems. Either we do what we can to restore advanced functionality (and maybe this will prove an effective tool to do so) or we accept the person as a loss. Many really are just that far gone.

    • by bipbop (1144919) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:06PM (#26880513)

      You're right, to an extent. Living without pain is very hard--some individuals born without the ability have hellish lives as a result. But sometimes, pain teaches us lessons that aren't so good, like "I should never touch anyone for the rest of my life," because touching is so strongly associated with pain. How people with this sort of thing varies from one individual to the next, but for someone with a deeply ingrained irrational fear based on some painful experience, maybe removing the memory could be a good thing.

      Another way of looking at it is this: if you are raped, and the idea of sex is permanently distorted in your mind by the memory, then this memory is a punishment for something that isn't your fault, haunting you and messing up your life to this day. Wouldn't it be a good thing to allow the *option* of removing this weight from one's shoulders?

    • Hmmm you can record you life on a carry-on camera you carry around. A knowbot indexes it for you and after you agree with the indexing you swallow this drug. After that use google desktop to search you memories.

    • by flyingsquid (813711) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:19PM (#26880667)
      On the other hand, previous experiences suggest this might not be such a bad thing. It didn't actually do much damage last year when a secret biowarfare lab accidentally released the Mnemonivirus and we had a global Amnesia Plague. Remember that?
    • by jamesh (87723) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:45PM (#26880939)

      Besides just the idea of tampering with memory being a *bad* thing, the notion of fooling with one of the fundamental ways we learn strikes me as a really bad idea.

      Now suppose that you and your family were kidnapped from your home at gun point, and you had to watch while unspeakable things were done to them and to you.

      One thing you would 'learn' (and have a terrifying anxiety attack in response to) is that sitting around in your own home with your family is an unsafe thing to be doing, because something really bad happened one day when you were doing that. That response would be completely useless and would make your life an absolute misery.

      That's the sort of thing this drug could be useful in 'editing out'. 'editing out' the sort of 'that hurt me last time I did that so I won't do it again' memories is a stupid idea and I don't know why anyone would bring it up.

      The nature of most people on Slashdot appears to be to figure out a way that a certain product could be used badly, assume that that is the only way it could be used, and then post a whole lot of comments to that effect.

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        The nature of most people on Slashdot appears to be to figure out a way that a certain product could be used badly

        The first thing I thought of when I first heard about the research on trauma-amnesia, despite all the articles talking about treating post traumatic stress, was "oh great, they'll be able to torture people and make them forget that it happened".

        It's a post-modern thing. All the wonders of the 50s that ended up biting us in the ass. We're cynics now... until they treat us with this stuff, so we can get back to loving the petrochemical industry, in blissful forgetfulness of all the cancers and deformed babies

    • Ever heard of phobias? PTSD? How does a person benefit from remembering their "mistakes" in those cases? Sometimes the mistake is remembering something when you don't need it.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      There would be a difference between using this on someone who encountered stressful things and had a hard time getting over it, versus someone who has PTSD or PTSD-e and is virtually incapacitated by the affliction.

      Having bad days and dealing with depression is one thing. Having recurring nightmares of terror and constantly reliving every bad encounter in your life is another.

  • Interestingly, it turns out that the test subjects are actually ghosts who are dreaming the future.

  • Eternal Sunshine (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sexybomber (740588) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:32PM (#26880139)

    Admittedly I didn't RTFA, but is this specific to just painful memories? I mean, I'd love to delete some memories I have, but I wouldn't want to run the risk of overwriting, say, my acceptance to law school, or memories of particularly good sex, for example. (Yes, strangely enough for a Slashdotter, I have had some.)

    How can the drug possibly discriminate between good and bad memories, or for that matter, any memories at all?

    • by guyminuslife (1349809) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:35PM (#26880185)

      The headline is somewhat misleading. The memory is not erased. Rather, the emotions associated it are dampened. As in, "I saw my mother hacked to pieces with a chainsaw. Meh."

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          The dampening is a temporary one while you are on the drug. Come off of it, and things return as they were before. This is going to be worthless unless they intend to keep the PTSD folks on it the rest of their lives. I've been on it.

          On that note - as you point out, it only works when you're on it. Does that emotion-suppression while you're taking the drug allow a better success rate of more normal therapies, so it is possible to stop taking it and not undo the therapy? Or should I RTFA?

          /~Rockwolf

      • Easy, the drug is racist.

        Ahhhh, of course, of course, I should have realized that, considering it's white powder, contained in a white pill, packaged in white packaging.

  • Dupe? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Hognoxious (631665) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:32PM (#26880143) Homepage Journal

    I've seen this story before. I think.

  • by tyroneking (258793) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:35PM (#26880183)

    "SIDE EFFECTS: Propranolol is generally well tolerated, and side effects are mild and transient. Rare side effects include abdominal cramps, diarrhea, constipation, fatigue, insomnia, nausea, depression, dreaming, memory loss, fever, impotence, lightheadedness, slow heart rate, low blood pressure, numbness, tingling, cold extremities, sore throat, and shortness of breath or wheezing. "

    Lot of patients who I've dealt with who took this drug suffered from impotence and had to be changed to alternative medication - wonder if in fact all that happened is that they forgot what do with it :)

    I vaguely remember being told by a gynae doc that Pethidine had some memory loss effects too

    The article linked above also goes on to say:
    "Kindt's team has already tested whether the propranolol effect lasts longer than three days--a key requirement for therapeutic use--but she declined to give the results because they have been submitted for publication."

    So continuous treatment might be required? Side effects of prop. can be worse than the memories maybe?

    Really, what's wrong with spending money on counselling instead?

    (IANAD - but IWAP)

    • Don't care... after the drug strips the emotional content of the memory of having suffering all of those side effects, it will just dont matter anymore.
    • So continuous treatment might be required? Side effects of prop. can be worse than the memories maybe?

      Really, what's wrong with spending money on counselling instead?

      Sometimes counseling doesn't or won't work. 10+ years is enough for me to say that another 10 years won't work. And those side effects that you listed? I'd consider them minor, others might not, but that's their decision to make.

  • by ShooterNeo (555040) on Monday February 16 2009, @07:56PM (#26880401)

    If everything that you think you are (your memories) gets gradually shifted and rewritten from day to day, who are we? Never minding the fact that it appears our conscious existence ends when we die, it's almost as if we die a tiny bit every day. While I think I remember who I was 10, 20 years ago, if these memories are faulty and always being revised, perhaps I am that person no longer.

            Some days, I look around and find it remarkable that I even exist. But, sadly, that appears to be a temporary state of being. Not only will I not exist in the future, it appears that I will not even be able to know I don't exist. And now, with these discoveries on memory, it appears that this gradual process of death happens even when we are still alive.

  • by psnyder (1326089) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:02PM (#26880465)
    I'll keep my alcohol. Years of private studies show loss of fear and suppression of bad memories.
  • Such a drug could be enormously helpful for soldiers suffering from PTSD.

  • by blakedev (1397081) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:11PM (#26880559)
    "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself, and now we have a drug for it."
  • I guess using this technique you could torture someone, then make it "all better."

    Lovely.

  • Pipe it into the U.S. water supply, and maybe we can all forget the last eight painful years...

  • by rayd75 (258138) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:45PM (#26880937) Homepage

    The drug in the study is a beta blocker. They are used heavily to treat high blood pressure, heart rhythm issues, and specific aspects of heart failure. The study indicates that they MAY be useful in helping to dampen the negative feelings associated with traumatic memories when combined with specifically designed therapy. There's no claim that they can actually cause a memory to be forgotten. It's not a potential lifestyle drug poised for widespread abuse. Most links I've seen to this article and others covering the study seem to suggest that simply popping one of these pills will make you forget an entire event at will. It's nowhere near that simple. If it were, I'd be a lot more laid-back than I actually am.

  • by straponego (521991) on Monday February 16 2009, @08:52PM (#26880997)

    After all, if you can't remember being tortured, and there's no permanent physical damage, where's the harm?

    Also, with this or roofie-type drugs, I wouldn't be surprised if some people were willing to pay to be tortured, as long as they couldn't remember it.

    Lastly, quit referencing Eternal Sunshine. Yeah, it was okay. The original PKD story, We Can Remember it For You Wholesale, was pretty good too. Of course, they never gave credit, just like Idiocracy never credited Kornbluth's Marching Morons, despite being a verbatim copy. Pretty sure Harlan Ellison had a similar story, but I... can't remember right now.

    Oh look, the coffee just hit.

  • by margaret (79092) on Monday February 16 2009, @09:23PM (#26881233)

    I'm sick of these stupid "propranolol deletes memory" headlines. There was even an episode of boston legal or law & order perpetuating this nonsense a year or so ago. The drug does not "delete" a specific memory. The only people who can that are on star trek. The drug simply reduces the emotional significance of the memory, uncoupling it from the autonomic/fear response associated with it. A HUGE difference.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 16 2009, @09:31PM (#26881319)

    I'll finally be able to wipe the image of Goatse from my mind.

  • Finally! (Score:3, Informative)

    by el3mentary (1349033) on Monday February 16 2009, @09:33PM (#26881335)

    I can win at the game!

  • Needless hype (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Bones3D_mac (324952) on Monday February 16 2009, @10:12PM (#26881833)

    This is a topic that has popped up on Slashdot several times in the last year alone... a beta-blocker somehow altering mind function to improve concentration, increase cognitive abilities, recreational "doping" of the brain, etc...

    It seems far more likely, that this isn't actually "removing" anything from the brain in terms of bad thoughts, but instead is making the brain better able to cope with a bad experience by improving it's ability to reason it's way through it using common sense and logic.

    Likewise, it could also be argued that people who can't normally focus on a simple task at will often end up going off on wild tangents at random instead, and will ultimately go insane trying to consciously resolve whatever scenario pops up in their mind at any given moment, only to shift the workload over to resolve a completely separate scenario brought on by attempting to resolve the previous one. Since this accomplish nothing but large amounts repetitive thinking on the same overall theme, while generating no useful information or solutions, it's not surprising that someone locked in such a state would be depressed and believe themselves to be "traumatized".

    I suppose a beta-blocker might help a case like this, but it seems like this is simply restating the obvious to make whichever drug company did this study seem more "profitable" through sensationalism.

    • Maybe, but if it can't, it can at least help you forget that you were ever in that cult in the first place!