Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Electrode Implant Gives Mute Man a (Synthesized) Voice

Posted by timothy on Thu Dec 04, 2008 06:12 PM
from the paradoxically-enough dept.
Iddo Genuth writes with an excerpt from The Future of Things: "A surgical procedure performed by a team from Boston University, Massachusetts led by Professor Frank Guenther, has enabled a mute man to speak again. An electrode implanted in the patient's brain made it possible for the patient to produce vowels by thinking them, using a speech synthesizer. In the future, this breakthrough may help patients with similar injuries produce entire sentences, using signals from their brains."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by zindorsky (710179) <zindorsky@gmail.com> on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:13PM (#25996069)
    Using your brain to talk ... just imagine what that would mean for Slashdot! Total upheaval.
  • Keep going (Score:5, Interesting)

    by QuantumG (50515) * <qg@biodome.org> on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:15PM (#25996095) Homepage Journal

    Eventually you might get to a direct brain-computer interface that healthy people (like me) will want to get installed.

    • I'm hoping so! I for one can't wait to get a new set of corneas, ones that give me normal or better vision without contacts and that I can use to check my email while I'm driving to work... ok maybe that last bit isn't such a good plan.
      • I've asked this question of many people, and I usually get about the same response:

        At what risk factor would you be willing to undertake replacement of your eye(s) with cybernetic equivalent(s)? Even with improved capabilities in the new eye(s) such as information display, some minor microscope/telescope functionality, etc, how much risk would you be willing to accept, if the risk included never being able to see again?

        For most people to whom I pose this question, the odds of failure have to be extraordina

        • I was more thinking of having extra senses added. No need to remove my healthy eyes, just give me a piggyback link to the visual cortex and I can hook into any camera on the market.. or virtual world. Same for output.

        • I am technically blind in my right eye due to a congenital defect in my lens. I lack sterioscopic vision. My right eye is extremely long sigted, so my brain ignores the input. If i close my left eye input is recieved but it of very poor quality. My left eye is better than 20/20. I would be willing to try out any cybernetic implants that would restore funtionality to my right eye. I would also have perfect vision with which to compare the effectivness with.

          I would like low light and infrared vision, as well

          • There is always the risk of the doctor installing the device to your good eye and failing.

        • At the level where they can do cyber-eyes, likely they could redo a flub. So I think for me it's really a price point, not a risk point. I'd spring for thermal at about $200 today.

          Yeah...

          I'm going to be waiting a LONG time.

  • by duckInferno (1275100) on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:24PM (#25996215) Journal
    Losing your voice would suck.

    But having a synthesised voice on the other hand, is way cool.

    You could go around quoting robotic things like "would-you-like-to-play-a-game-[?]", or configure yourself to sound like GLADDoS or that machine thing from robo cop.

    Or Microsoft Sam.

    Of all the disabilities this would be the most "Ohhh... well.. huh. Guess that's kind of cool".
    I'm serious.
    • Losing your voice would suck. But having a synthesised voice on the other hand, is way cool. You could go around quoting robotic things like "would-you-like-to-play-a-game-[?]"

      or you could start a career as a stephen Hawking impersonator.

    • by mikael (484) on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:32PM (#25996309)

      Modern voice synthesizers have very realistic sounding voices now . That was one problem Steven Hawking found out - his voice synthesizer wore out after a good few years. Much to his annoyance, the modern synthesizers were too human-like and really took away part of his character. I believe he had to go to one of the electronic components surplus stores to get his voice "repaired".

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      I dunno. Losing an eye and having it replaced (in the future) with a bionic implant having telescoping vision and infrared would beat a synthesized voice... although I'd imagine that if you could tweak your own software to produce any voice you want it could be fun.

      Of course, at this point neither of these technologies are quite so well developed yet.

    • by SirLurksAlot (1169039) on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:47PM (#25996523)

      You could go around quoting robotic things like "would-you-like-to-play-a-game-[?]", or configure yourself to sound like GLADDoS or that machine thing from robo cop.

      Oh yeah, I can't wait to make myself sound like a [growling tiger|squealing pig] when I do fall down or aim at someone!

      Heck, if we're talking about giving ourselves robotic voices I want to shout "EXTERMINATE!" in a shrill voice whenever I see a British man with bad teeth, a brown coat, and an outlandishly long and colorful scarf. :-D

    • Or Clippy!
  • by Culture20 (968837) on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:29PM (#25996265)
    <robotvoice>Damn she's got a nice pair of...</robotvoice>
    "Pig!" *SLAP*
  • Now what about.... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward

    if you have a fear of public speaking? I'm not a doctor, but what happens first, the thought of what you want to say or the fear of saying it in front of people? Along the same lines, what about thoughts becoming verbalized?

    • by ITEric (1392795) on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:43PM (#25996455)

      ...what about thoughts becoming verbalized?

      I would imagine it would depend on the part of the brain being used by the device...one would hope that they tap into the part of the brain that has already decided what sounds it would like to make rather than picking up random unfiltered thoughts.

  • Oh dear (Score:5, Funny)

    by Roland Piquepaille (780675) on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:38PM (#25996379)

    [...] made it possible for the patient to produce vowels by thinking them

    I hope the guy isn't welsh...

  • In the future, this breakthrough may help patients with similar injuries produce entire sentences, using signals from their brains."

    Or give rise to the Strogg [wikipedia.org]. I, for one, welcome our new cybernetic overlords.

  • by psnyder (1326089) on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:41PM (#25996431)
    There's a very small jump from a working version of this to transmitting words from one brain to another, or at least an earpiece.

    Put that in a grant application.

    I'd imagine a number of places (DARPA for example) would certainly be interested in seeing how this research progressed.
    • by icegreentea (974342) on Thursday December 04 2008, @07:31PM (#25997035)
      Or you can make it even more insane and transmit not just to an earpiece but to a cochlear implants. And not just any cochlear implants, but one of those newer experimental ones which are totally internal. No external pieces at all. Upon a casual examination, it really would seem like telepathy.

      On another note, does anyone know if the speech production areas of the brain overlap with those with sub vocalization, or mouthing words? Just curious.
    • The limitation here is interpreted accentuations and generally being restricted to having words come out, but having no control over how they come out. Don't even think about singing. Interfacing with the vagus nerve through a laryngeal simulator would translate muscle intentions into sound rather than words into sound. I saw a fairly impressive simulator of the human vocal tract a while back, and a demonstration of EEG devices on the neck. This is the holy grail of voice restoration/synthesis.
  • by devotedlhasa (1298843) on Thursday December 04 2008, @06:41PM (#25996433)
    Easier to sing those Peter Frampton songs...
  • Interesting (Score:4, Interesting)

    by d3l33t (1106803) on Thursday December 04 2008, @07:21PM (#25996927)
    Is it possible this technology could be applied in reverse? Using electrode implants to imprint the sound of a vowel in a persons mind?
  • Steven hawking should get one so he can talk faster

  • ...the group "Daft Punk" announced today that they had hired on a lead singer. That and the weather at 10.
  • BAUD.

    Imagine being a one-throat Paul Hardcastle, being 25 instruments at once. That could almost be the Borq Queen, except the vocal cords could span space, time, and reach out to beings such as dogs.

    If he goes hunting, he could "talk dog" while on the move. "Rrrrr... Cut 'em off to the left, Tigger!"

    "RRRR-Roger That. Roof!"

    But, Christmas carolling could be quite interesting if an ensemble of such-equipped singers got "jacked" into morphing the Little Drummer Boy to the Little Humpmer Boy "I want you to Hum

  • Vowels are worth nothing.

    Consonants are worth $500.

    • No kidding... "enabled a mute man to speak again"? TFA has a very generous idea of "speaking".

      A, A, E, I. O U, E I O U. E I E I O.

      Hmm, I think I have a talent for this. I should write a novel.

  • When asked for comment, Gunther's patient responded simply, "AAAIIEIIEUUUOOOEEEEIIIAAAAEEEE!!!"

  • Am I the only one thinking about possible use in monkeys?