Slashdot Log In
Light Echoes Solve Mystery of Tycho's Supernova
Posted by
timothy
on Fri Dec 05, 2008 09:00 AM
from the bouncy-bouncy dept.
from the bouncy-bouncy dept.
Ponca City, We love you writes "Powerful telescopes in Hawaii and Spain are using 'light echoes' from the original supernova explosion that have bounced off dust in the surrounding interstellar clouds to identify the precise type of supernova that Tycho Brahe saw 436 years ago. Although the echoed light from Tycho's supernova is around 20 billion times fainter than the original light observed in 1572, the team took identical images of the sky a few months apart and then digitally subtracted one from the other to find evidence for several sets of light echoes rippling across patches of dust in the northern Milky Way. 'Using light echoes in supernova remnants is time-travelling in a way, in that it allows us to go back hundreds of years to observe the first light from a supernova event. We got to relive a significant historical moment and see it as the famed astronomer Tycho Brahe did hundreds of years ago,' said Tomonori Usuda, of the Subaru Telescope in Hawaii. Tycho's original observations were particularly important as he immediately concluded that the new star, visible even by day, could not be closer than the Moon challenging the Aristotelian view of the cosmos, widely accepted since ancient times, which held that the sky beyond the Moon never changed."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
I want to play. (Score:5, Funny)
That is really cool. Like some kind of galactic diff.
Re: (Score:2)
Wikipedia links just for the sake of completeness (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
And his friend had copper knickers.
Re: (Score:2)
Tycho Brahe had a nose [wikipedia.org] made of silver and gold. And his friend had copper knickers.
And he got a moose drunk.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And he died from trying to hold in his piss during a drinking game.
The moose won.
A galactic yardstick? (Score:5, Interesting)
This could be used to determine distances very precisely. If we know when that light was emitted and we know the speed of light, then we can calculate with great precision the distance from the star to the reflecting dust cloud.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This could be used to determine distances very precisely. If we know when that light was emitted and we know the speed of light, then we can calculate with great precision the distance from the star to the reflecting dust cloud.
You also have to account for any differences between the earth-star distance and the earth-cloud distance, but it's still the largest ever radar system.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
One could start by assuming that the points which are being illuminated now and have the biggest angular separation from the star are at the same distance from earth as the star. Those points form a circle with a 436 light-year radius. The size of that circle as seen from earth will give you the distance to the star.
I'm assuming that there is enough dust everywhere in space to return a detectable reflect
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Although... if we know when that light was emitted, then we know the distance to the supernova already. There's four pieces of information that could be known. If we know two of them, we can map out the Earth/Supernova/Cloud system:
Reverse Ray Tracing (Score:5, Funny)
When can we point our telescopes at an object hundreds or thousands of lightyears distant, and pick up the light reflected back at us that previously traveled from Earth to that object, then reassemble it into images? Images of the Earth's past, twice as old as the lightyear distance of the object?
We could look at an object 1000 lightyears distant for reflections of Jesus being crucified. Search among objects 250-600 lightyears distant for reflections of people arriving in the "Americas" on ships before Columbus. 176ly distant objects could show us images of Newton getting hit by a falling apple.
Finally a use for the combined computing power of all Earth's computers.
Re:Reverse Ray Tracing (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Reverse Ray Tracing (Score:5, Interesting)
A telescope array [wikipedia.org] acting as an interferometer doesn't need to be a single large sensor like that. We can orbit the array with separations of 1E13, just beyond Neptune. That would give us resolution of something like 5.8E-20 arcseconds. The radius of that regular polygon with 10cm sides is about 7E21m, or about 740,000 light years. Which would show light that left Earth about 1.48 million years ago. Orbital arrays much closer to Earth are sufficient for looking for apples only 175ly away.
The signal to noise is of course extremely high ("astronomical"). That's why I mentioned the combined computing power of all the world's computers. We're gonna need a bigger boat, but that's a good sea to sail her on, to catch this shark :).
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
My question is, why does separating two telescopes by distance gre
Re: (Score:2)
You can look into aperature synthesis [wikipedia.org], which is the technique at work.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's not just computing power. We'd actually need to catch enough reflected photons that originated from the Earth, so we'd have anything at all to process.
I think it would be a problem even if there was no other light except what we want to observe, ie. there would be no external noise.
Also, the "mirror" isn't a flat plane, so we'd get a bunch of "Earth photons" that originatead at different times, reflected at different times, and then arrive at our telescope at the same time.
To get anything useful, we'd
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't know about McDevitt's version of this idea. I thought of it when thinking through "faster than light travel" applications, when I realized that reflected light "bends space" back to the source, which is effectively time travel. I was helping build a digital camera out of a lot of cutting edge DSP for noise reduction and feature enhancement, including some efforts at reversing the effects of air turbulence confusing light paths to the sensor. It occurred to me that similar processing, but more advan
Tycho Brahe - Amazing (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm amazed that he was able to observe that and figure out that the common concept of the sky was wrong at the time. I can't imagine how much thought must have gone into something like that.
Re:Tycho Brahe - Amazing (Score:4, Informative)
Well he had already done a lot of work on parallax measurements for astronomical objects. So when the supernova appeared, and showed no parallax against the moon . . . he was on pretty firm ground stating that the moon was closer to earth than the supernova.
More details in Wikipedia.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The 'common concept' I refer to is that the night sky's background is static, as was mentioned in the summary. I'd have been even more impressed if he'd figured out the Earth wasn't the center of the universe at the same time.
Doubting Thomas (Score:2, Funny)
Scientific community: We don't believe you until we can see it ourselves. Neh!
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Actually, the scientific community of the time (such that it was) was mostly convinced by Tycho's observations.
Humankinds' endless fascination with the sky... (Score:3, Insightful)
...continues to bring surprises like this. I'm just wondering if this is the same method we astronomers use to detect local masses such as transneptunian planets (or "Plutoids", if you will) or asteroids or -gulp!- Near Earth Objects such as the Saturn V Stage discovered and misidentified as a natural coorbiting body a couple years ago? Could light ripples be detected and identified on a pair of plates of the same patch of sky taken a year apart?
20 billion times fainter? (Score:2)
Re:20 billion times fainter? (Score:5, Interesting)
xxx times less than yyy == yyy/xxx.
It's common language these days, learn it!
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
xxx times less than yyy == yyy/xxx.
It's common language these days, learn it!
He wasn't asking how to express it, he was asking them to include YYY if you are going to call something XXX times fainter than YYY so that he has some clue as to the starting point.
This object is 100 times lighter than object B. That doesn't tell you much since object B could be a gnat, a basketball, or a galaxy.
Re: (Score:2)
I got a +5 already, so it doesn't matter :) /joking
But seriously, if something is 20 billion times fainter it's going to be barely visible, regardless of how bright the original is.
It's also more impressive journalism to use "20 billion times fainter" than "1.3 candles" or some other actual measurement.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Our sun is ~20 billion times fainter than it will be when it supernovas. And seems to be bright enough to light up the world nicely. OP is right, it would be nice to know how bright the original was.
Re: (Score:2)
sorry, pal, Sol is just too small to supernova. It's short by about 1.4 solar masses. What'll likely happen is it'll burn out of hydrogen, start burning helium and contract, then when it starts to burn heavier elements (lithium, beryllium, through carbon, nitrogen, oxygen...) the outer shell of helium will cool and expand out to the orbit of Venus and possibly Earth. By this time the core'll be burning even heavier elements, but due to the size of the sun it won't even reach the iron cycle - the photosphere
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Hey, don't sugar-coat it, OK?
Re: (Score:2)
The article that line is a link to (and that the line was extracted from) states (in the first paragraph no less): "as bright as the planet Venus".
Which considering the time frame of the original observation is as precise as you are going to get.
I'm going to take a punt that 99.9% of people get a more accurate idea from "as bright as the planet Venus" (provided they know which dot in the night sky you are referring to by that name) than "an apparent magnitude of -4.5".
More substantial link (Score:2, Interesting)
http://www.naoj.org/Pressrelease/2008/12/03/index.html [naoj.org]
As the article suggests, the biggest benefit of using light echoes is that the SPECTRUM of the original supernova can be obtained. In other words, while today we mostly see the direct-path light emitted by the supernova's gas remnant, light echoes let us see all the wavelengths of the light emitted at the time of the explosion.
Alejo
Re: (Score:2)
wow... that brings up a whole mess of possibilities! For instance, we can tell from the amount of light reflected and the intensity of reflection, what a local mass is made of (by the absorption spectrum) and extrapolate how dense it is. In the same manner, we can tell what a star is made of (hydrogen and helium, usually, with a mess of other elements up to iron - after which nuclear reactions are endothermic) by its emission spectrum, and if we can be sure that these light echoes are of the same wavelength
Tycho Brahe? (Score:2)
Re:Light echoes? (Score:5, Insightful)
Is there something wrong with the word "reflections" now?
In human experience, a reflection is instantaneous, where an echo appears after a period of time. Thus echo is more descriptive to layman (remember them?). You know and I know that a reflection isn't instantaneous, it's just not generally perceptible to our eyes like an echo is perceptible to our ears.
Parent
Re:Light echoes? (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Light echoes? (Score:5, Funny)
HA-ha! You like semantics! /Nelson Muntz
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Thats why he said "are colloquially assumed to be instantaneous" instead of "are instantaneous"
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That's alright, I'm still trying to figure out which way is 'North' in space... Does North always point to the magnetic pole of Earth even on Mars? Has someone studied the Milky Way and determined that there's a magnetic ring perpendicular to the dish?
Re:Light echoes? (Score:5, Informative)
North in the sky is defined to be the point directly above the Earth North Pole of rotation. The northern half of the sky is the part of the sky between the celestial equator and the north celestial pole. For a planet north is defined using the right hand rule of rotation. Curl the fingers of your right hand. That is the direction of the planet's rotation. Stick out your right thumb. That is the direction of the planet's north pole. The same rule applies to Galactic north. Just apply the rotation rule to the Galaxy. Once you get outside the Galaxy supergalactic coordinates are used, which are defined here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supergalactic_plane [wikipedia.org].
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Hmm... I made a mistake. I should have said that supergalactic coordinates are described here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supergalactic_plane [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
That's alright, I'm still trying to figure out which way is 'North' in space... Does North always point to the magnetic pole of Earth even on Mars? Has someone studied the Milky Way and determined that there's a magnetic ring perpendicular to the dish?
Don't forget that geographic North and magnetic North aren't the same thing. The concept of North predates any knowledge of magnetism, that just turned out to be a convenient way to figure out which direction North was once the lodestone was discovered (but n
He DID know how to party! (Score:2)
Tycho's elk and dwarf
Tycho was said to own one percent of the entire wealth of Denmark at one point in the 1580s and he often held large social gatherings in his castle. He kept a dwarf named Jepp (whom Tycho believed to be clairvoyant) as a court jester who sat under the table during dinner. Pierre Gassendi wrote[6] that Tycho also had a tame elk, and that his mentor the Landgrave Wilhelm of Hesse-Kassel (Hesse-Cassel) asked whether there was an animal faster than a deer. Tycho replied, writing that there