Slashdot Log In
NASA Exploring 8 New Space Expeditions
Posted by
samzenpus
on Thu Nov 20, 2008 01:06 AM
from the a-whole-lot-of-exploring-going-on dept.
from the a-whole-lot-of-exploring-going-on dept.
coondoggie writes "NASA is trying to decide among eight space exploration missions that include further exploring Venus and comet composition as well landing on an asteroid or examining the space around Jupiter. The space agency today began accepting solicitations for these space exploration opportunities and will ultimately pick one of them to begin perusing in 2009 with a launch date targeted at 2018. The solicitations and ultimate expedition are part of NASA's New Frontiers program, which has as its main objective to explore the solar system with medium-class spacecraft missions that will conduct high-quality, focused scientific investigations, NASA said. The first New Frontiers mission was selected in 2003 and will result in the launch of Juno, a Jupiter polar orbiter mission set to blast off in 2011."
Related Stories
[+]
New "Juno" Mission To Jupiter Announced 71 comments
Riding with Robots writes "Today NASA announced it is officially proceeding with the Juno robotic mission to Jupiter. Scheduled to launch in August 2011 and reach the largest planet in 2016, the spacecraft will orbit the planet 32 times, skimming about 4,800 kilometers over the planet's cloud tops for about a year. The mission will focus on Jupiter's structure and evolution, and not on Europa or the other icy moons that may hide oceans under their surfaces — a disappointment if you ask me. Then again, all planetary missions so far have turned up amazing images and surprising scientific discoveries, and I doubt this expedition will be any different." We discussed NASA's deliberation of its short list a few days back.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Left off the list.... (Score:5, Funny)
#9 Locate and retrieve the lost toolset
Re:Left off the list.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
They would except some giant black box told them not to do that.... Perhaps it was an IBM Blade server.
Re: (Score:2)
(I heard it really contained a grue that could survive reentry in its container)
Re: (Score:2)
Ya know, that may not be such a bad idea. Basically, NASA could be the grounds keeper at the Cape, and Private Businesses could "Rent" Pad Time. Lets face it, if NASA had been in charge of the expansion of humanity, we would be still on the Serengeti.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
50 Billion dollars (Score:5, Insightful)
That's what Detroit wants this year. If we gave it to NASA instead I would consider the money better spent.
And if they threw in the rest of the 350 Billion they haven't stolen yet in the TARP, I could go for that too.
I bet with 400B NASA could come up with an electric car. I doubt Detroit could.
Re:50 Billion dollars (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Hmmm... There needs to be a "sad but true" mod option because I don't really find this funny at all--insightful if anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
When India manages to do more than crash a camera into the moon then we can talk. Don't get me wrong, it is great what India just pulled off...but it pales in comparison to things that NASA has done and is currently doing. NASA's robotic missions are simply amazing. Or does India have an orbiting robot ready to go to Saturn that I am not aware of?
Re: (Score:2)
Without taxpayers, you have no space program. Without jobs, you have no taxpayers. Just another interesting thought!
Re: (Score:2)
I bet with 400B NASA could come up with an electric car. I doubt Detroit could.
I bet with 400B, NASA could properly develop the Nuclear Light bulb engine, solving many of our launch issues in the process. Wouldn't it be nice to get 20000 tons into space at a time?
Re:50 Billion dollars (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re:50 Billion dollars (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
One vote for trojans (Score:3, Interesting)
The possibility of humanity being able to stop a killer asteroid rises with more study on such bodies.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Give it a really big nuke power plant (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Give it a really big nuke power plant (Score:4, Interesting)
Actually, let's get a really big nuke power plant and a bunch of parallel next-gen ion drives. I bet we could push the ISS into Mars orbit. It would be more useful there than as as fireworks display, which is the current plan.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
I take it you succeded!
My Gratitude ! (Score:3, Insightful)
Thank you NASA!! You guys are one of the few things that make me very proud of the human race!
bureaucracy and other badness aside, exploration is pretty damn cool.
Posed this question... (Score:5, Informative)
Some things never change.
Blimps, please? (Score:5, Interesting)
I want to see balloons dropped into the atmosphere of planets. Particularly giant planets. Best pick would probably be Saturn, but I'm sure we could learn interesting about Uranus if we sent a balloon there. And Neptune too, although I'm afraid the winds are a bit too violent there. Jupiter would also be great but I'm afraid the superior "surface" gravity there would make it harder.
I wonder if you could also do that on Venus (too hot maybe?) or Titan.
Oh and to clarify my idea : the balloons/blimps would stay aloft for months on end, going up and down in the atmosphere on command to study different altitudes, drifting off the winds, telling us more about them, performing all the analyses possible, and not just about the atmosphere but also (why not) the magnetic field and whatever else might be interesting. And of course a good colour camera, so we can see what it looks like from there, see the clouds, thunderstorms, the moons through the coloured atmosphere, boreal auroras, and so on.. That would be pretty exciting.
Re: (Score:2)
learn interesting things about Uranus
Crap, so much for proof-reading.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
So much for proofreading crap.
There, fixed that for you.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Blimps, please? (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re:Blimps, please? (Score:5, Insightful)
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the idea of that would be hard to accomplish in the first place. Your talking about something like a weather balloon correct? I was watching some science channel show where they were talking about that idea, but it would be hard because a large portion of Saturn or Jupiter is made up of hydrogen and helium gas, and to get a gas lighter than that is kind hard.
Unless you were to heat hydrogen or helium in order to make it lighter than the hydrogen or helium that is currently in the atmosphere. Other than that you would have to create a new element that had an atomic mass smaller than hydrogen which I'm not sure if it is possible to even do. Atomic mass of 0 would be an interesting element for sure.
Then again I could be wrong, and if so let me know because that would be interesting.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Good point. I don't know, maybe you can make a transparent blimp with a greenhouse effect that warms the inside of it? Considered how cold these atmospheres are it would maybe be a trivial problem, I don't know.
As for an "atomic mass of 0" well it's called vacuum. However we don't use it in blimps because in order to keep a balloon "filled with vacuum" inflated, you need something pretty damn rigid, which most of the time (I think) means too heavy. I'm far too unqualified to "call" any of these ideas, i.e.
Re:Blimps, please? (Score:4, Informative)
Not enough solar energy to warm a blimp that way, but radioactive heat sources do nicely, and yes people have studied hot hydrogen balloons / blimps on Jupiter, Saturn, etc. They seem to work ok, if you stay out of the regions with high wind shear (flying a blimp into a hurricane is a bad life path choice...)
Reactors are better, but little radioactive heater units will work in a pinch.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
atomic mass 0 exists (Score:3, Interesting)
Positronium is it. The mass is roughly 2x the
electron mass, which is essentially nothing.
The half-life is a tad short though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium [wikipedia.org]
There are other choices as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_atom [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Other than that you would have to create a new element that had an atomic mass smaller than hydrogen which I'm not sure if it is possible to even do. Atomic mass of 0 would be an interesting element for sure.
Hmmmm... an atomic mass smaller than hydrogen, possibly an atomic mass of zero. What, just what I say, has an atomic mass of zero!?
Why, nothing!
How about we make a weather balloon filled with nothing?
Re: (Score:2)
And how long before you think we'll have the technology to produce such devices (much less have them actually 'float'), given the 'environmental [metacafe.com]' hostilities, that we know of so far?
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if you could also do that on Venus (too hot maybe?)
50-60km up, the atmosphere of Venus is roughly at Earth-normal temperature and pressure. Bog standard air is a lifting gas there too, being less dense.
Venus Balloon Mission (Score:5, Insightful)
Should be relatively cheap and reliable hardware. While the surface is the definition of a hellish landscape, the cloud tops of Venus are the only place in the solar system (other than Earth of course) with temperatures and pressures that humans could survive in. Not only is that interesting from a human habitation standpoint, but the mild conditions should also improve the lifespan of the balloon probe itself. Sure, you can't dig in the dirt like the Mars rovers can, but you will see a heck of a lot more of the planet from the air than on the ground.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Just remember, there is no such thing as a "soft landing" on Venus.
Protect our ass (Score:3, Informative)
We'll be fine (Score:5, Funny)
If we discover a large meteor heading straight towards Earth, we might only have a few months to get a rocket up and detonate the target off its course. All other missions pale in comparison to one that could save humanity. I don't think we should focus on particular missions within our solar system, so much as the ability to launch a successful ground-to-asteroid mission within weeks, if need be...
Don't fret so much. There's always Bruce Willis.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
he is getting old. we either need a back up plan or a remake with someone younger.
Re: (Score:2)
If we discover a large meteor heading straight towards Earth and detonate it, we are thoroughly fucked anyway because instead one meteor we will be showered by several fragments.
What I'd like (Score:5, Funny)
Hellow fellow humans,
I want the humans to send a ship with lots of titanium and plutonium to a spot behind mars where no alien fleet is hidden.
Thank you.
Gahrull the devastator.
Ministry of Discovery and Invasion.
All hail the Imperial Queen.
Re: (Score:2)
Not that it matters (Score:2)
Obama is planning on cutting NASA's budget to give to education initiatives.
Floating Cities. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Almost Jetsons Style
ALMOST
L2readIMO
Europa (Score:2)
A lander on Europa to search for life. We already have a mission to Mars planned for the same thing but it appears Europa has been overlooked.
Since I have to pick one from the list given, let's go back to Venus.
I really don't see the point of a Lunar sample return mission since we're sending humans back there in a few years anyway (I hope - are you listening congress?)