Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Canadian Researchers Say Hard Thinking Leads To Big Meals

Posted by timothy on Sun Sep 07, 2008 03:36 AM
from the we-only-use-10-percent-of-our-stomach dept.
Anti-Globalism writes with an excerpt from a story at Ars Technica, according to which "a preliminary study from a group of researchers in Quebec suggest that working on a computer may have an additional impact on our waistlines: taxing mental effort appears to cause people to eat significantly more food, even though it doesn't burn many more calories than sitting around and relaxing. The publication, published in a journal called Psychosomatic Medicine, arose from a pilot study that the researchers were performing in order to determine whether a potential connection between mental effort and eating was worth following up on."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Vindication (Score:5, Insightful)

    by AKAImBatman (238306) * <(akaimbatman) (at) (gmail.com)> on Sunday September 07 2008, @03:37AM (#24908449) Homepage Journal

    First to clear up a small matter. Merely reading the summary is somewhat misleading. While the brain's actual energy usage stays consistent, the study shows that blood sugar and insulin levels varied radically during the tests. Furthermore, the subjects in the tests showed marked signs of stress, including heightened levels of cortisol in their bloodstream. Here's the relevant section:

    The authors provide two potential explanations for their findings, both of which may be accurate to varying degrees. The first involves sugar metabolism. The brain is especially reliant on glucose, and the blood tests revealed that both glucose and insulin levels changed during the KBW tasks, while they gently sloped off during the relaxation. The differences weren't consistent--the two KBW tasks sent the levels in opposite directions--but the instability of the levels was large for both of them. The authors suggest that the eating may simply be an attempt to give the body the chance to stabilize blood glucose.

    Their other suggestion is that people find KBW stressful. Both the survey results and blood levels of cortisol (a hormone associated with stress) indicated that the KBW tasks took a mental toll. High stress has been associated with increased eating in a variety of contexts, so the upped food intake in this study may simply reflect that.

    What's particularly interesting about these results is that two things have been known for a while now. The first is that the brain's energy usage is relatively constant regardless of the task. However, it has also been clear that severe mental activity can result in signs of fatigue, exhaustion, and greater energy consumption. I personally can attest to these symptoms after several extremely challenging programming tasks. (Ever tried cobbling together an emergency replacement JSP engine inside 3 hours? That was... interesting.) Yet this is simply at odds with the scientific evidence on hand.

    This study finally offers evidence to break the impasse. It is the first evidence to clearly show that there is a physiological and not merely a psychological effect from extreme mental work. I look forward to hearing the results of future studies. Perhaps a more effective diet or lifestyle can be devised to make knowledge workers more effective.

    • Re:Vindication (Score:5, Insightful)

      by blahplusplus (757119) * on Sunday September 07 2008, @03:59AM (#24908497)

      Sedentary work + stress = overeating, who would have thunk it?

      The real problem is the desire for money outweighs (pardon the pun) the desire for a sane society, i.e. exercise, etc. Having a certain amount of hours off a week for exercise/relaxation and whatnot, I was just reading something about how americans have near the least vacaton time a year compared to other industrialized nations.

      I'm not surprised given the nature of our stupidity when it comes to taking care of ourselves, money first, health later.

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        Although I don't disagree with the desire for money being a real problem, it has nothing to do with the study.
        Whether it's one day, or 5 days in the week, when I'm at work solving whatever problems show up on network/server/client side, I feel more hungry and eat something several times a day.
        I'm much less hungry when I can relax during the day and don't have to sort out a chaos. In the past 3 weeks vacation I've eaten mostly 1 or 2 times a day and lost about 5 kgs. And I'm definitely eating a lot more he
          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            >Or maybe current ideas about "healthy eating" are incorrect in some ways.

            Probably not... the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet [nih.gov] which forms the basis of current National Institutes of Health dietary guidelines has been shown to lower blood pressure, cut the risk of having a stroke by 18% and the risk of a heart attack by 24% over a period of 24 years.

            The diet consists of lots of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and up to 2 servings of meat a day; dairy should be low-fat or non-fat. In

      • The real problem is the desire for money outweighs (pardon the pun) the desire for a sane society, i.e. exercise, etc. Having a certain amount of hours off a week for exercise/relaxation and whatnot, I was just reading something about how americans have near the least vacaton time a year compared to other industrialized nations.

        Then how do you explain the study "Unemployment, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and body weight in young British men" by SCOTT M. MONTGOMERY1, DEREK G. COOK2, MEL J. BART

        • Then how do you explain the study "Unemployment, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and body weight in young British men" by SCOTT M. MONTGOMERY1, DEREK G. COOK2, MEL J. BARTLEY3 and MICHAEL E.J. WADSWORTH3? They found when british men become unemployed they get fat. Seems to me they have plenty of time to exercise.

          Maybe they are depressed and that working isn't so stressful over there. I have something anecdotal. Even though I myself haven't had any adverse effects to my own health, I do work in a very

      • Auto financing, credit card bills etc.

        Oh wait...

        A debt based monetary system may have an adverse effect on those living within it?

         

        • A debt based monetary system may have an adverse effect on those living within it?

          The other day I was looking for investment opportunities and came across Prosper.com [prosper.com] which is a P2P lending company which you give to micro invest in people's loans. Reading some of the stories of why these people need loans started to make me laugh and then start to die inside a little bit after realizing that America is full of these people who just don't know how to deal with financial responsibility. One guy on there was a

          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            The system here isn't perfect by any means

            First, I want to say that I hope your brother made a full return to health and is doing well, and secondly, that I assume you are very proud of your father. Working people have been the backbone of all civilizations that ever amounted to anything.

            But, you know, there are some 'cracks' in our system. I acquired a disease in Canada, from tainted blood, 15 years ago, and now that I have been back home in the States for 7 years, the virus went deadly on me. Through a ba

    • by Venik (915777) on Sunday September 07 2008, @04:38AM (#24908609)
      Perhaps this also explains my lack of appetite :)
    • I propose a third explanation. When you are thinking hard, you are exhausting neurotransmitters at a greater rate, even if you are not using more energy. Several of these require sodium to produce, which needs therefore to be consumed from food. I find that low fat crisps or rice crackers are an excellent accompaniment to thinking hard about something - this gets rid of the hunger very quickly without providing much other than salt. In contrast, high-sugar foods seem to have little effect on reducing t
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        When you are thinking hard, you are exhausting neurotransmitters at a greater rate, even if you are not using more energy. Several of these require sodium to produce, which needs therefore to be consumed from food. I find that low fat crisps or rice crackers are an excellent accompaniment to thinking hard about something - this gets rid of the hunger very quickly without providing much other than salt.

        Remember it's currently fashionably to regard sodium as "bad". With KCl or even more exotic salts being u
    • However, it has also been clear that severe mental activity can result in signs of fatigue, exhaustion, and greater energy consumption. [...] It is the first evidence to clearly show that there is a physiological and not merely a psychological effect from extreme mental work. I look forward to hearing the results of future studies. Perhaps a more effective diet or lifestyle can be devised to make knowledge workers more effective.

      On the other hand, putting only low-cal food in reach of course, it should be tested whether an unforeseen weight loss program might be "if you can't make them exercise, make them think!"
      E.g. whether one will become less of a couch potato if a games console with some sort of "brain trainer" is added to the TV...

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        > I happen to believe that thinking hard- programming- writing- puzzle-solving for hours on end burns way more energy as opposed to sitting on your ass watching a sitcom. It just has to, right?

        Depends. Maybe the difference in energy-consumption between a programming brain and a sitcom-watching brain is very small, or even insignificant. Note that while you may not feel like you're thinking much while watching that sitcom, your brain is doing all kinds of (difficult) stuff like facial recognition and spee

      • Slashdot readers should know that corrupt.org is affiliated with nazi.org, hitler.org, nsbm.org and generally promotes fascist and nationalist politics.

        No, they're not.

        We're on a free speech ISP that is able to host us by hosting others, including a raft of porn and extreme political sites of both leftist and rightist stripe.

        You fail at internet pathology 101 ;)

  • I am an exception (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Slur (61510) on Sunday September 07 2008, @03:49AM (#24908477) Homepage Journal

    Long hours computing causes me to forget food... and sleep... and water... and stretching... but interestingly, not sex! Perhaps there's a study I could take part in?

    On the other hand, I'm a vegan, so maybe I'm immune. I don't ever crave cheese or animal fats, having not eaten any of either for many years.

    • by EdZ (755139) on Sunday September 07 2008, @03:59AM (#24908499)
      I eat mainly meat-based meals ("Vegetables? that's not food, that's what food EATS!"), but I can honestly say I've never craved animal fats.
    • by the_womble (580291) on Sunday September 07 2008, @04:03AM (#24908517) Homepage Journal

      Long hours computing causes me to forget food... and sleep... and water... and stretching... but interestingly, not sex!

      1. So at least you get some exercise
      2. Are your long hours computing surfing for porn?
    • by thhamm (764787) on Sunday September 07 2008, @04:16AM (#24908557)
      On the other hand, I'm a vegan, so maybe I'm immune.

      I'm a level 5 vegan [urbandictionary.com] -- I won't eat anything that casts a shadow!
    • Does lack of sleep actually energize you? Makes you more lucid with a hit on judgement? The less you eat, the more energy you have? Have you been very sad more than 3 times in the last year? Be very careful, and if you find yourself running down the street naked as the Son of God, try Lithium or any of the new mood stablisers.

    • Re:I am an exception (Score:5, Interesting)

      by TeknoHog (164938) on Sunday September 07 2008, @05:05AM (#24908685) Homepage Journal
      Me too... I don't think we are unique snowflakes here. The traditional geek stereotype for decades has been skin and bones, with the fat pizza-and-coke eating kind a relatively new phenomenon.
      • Same here. I eat a ridiculous amount of food, but am disproportionally skinny.

        Basically, if geeking out requires brainpower which requires food, a well adjusted metabolism burns what you need..That's the whole point of food, it's either being used or being stored. This study only seems to validate this, not justify why people are fat?

        Diet, and a bit of exercise too, of course. A human can't cruise through life a junk eaingt sloth without severe health problems, obesity being one of many.

      • Really? Have you ever seen portraits of Ben Franklin? Now, _there_ is an archetypal geek. The man _invented_ public libraries, and bi-focal glasses for us older geeks.
      • Re:I am an exception (Score:4, Interesting)

        by Onan (25162) on Sunday September 07 2008, @01:05PM (#24912011)

        The traditional geek stereotype for decades has been skin and bones, with the fat pizza-and-coke eating kind a relatively new phenomenon.

        That's because being moderately fat used to be a healthy and attractive trait. So the geek stereotype was the opposite of that: the scrawny weakling.

        These days being thin is suddenly fashionable, so the stereotype of the geek changed to be the converse of the new desirable trait.

        Neither of these has anything to do with actual changes in geeks' or non-geeks' bodies. Just the whims of fashion.

  • perhaps (Score:4, Interesting)

    by n3tcat (664243) on Sunday September 07 2008, @03:53AM (#24908481) Homepage
    ... the body thinks that due to the mental taxation, that the overall body has been taxed in the same way, and therefore is tricked into expecting that the body will require food. maybe when the body exercises or performs physically intensive tasks, it creates the same signals in the brain that thinking hard does. I didn't have time to RTFA so maybe they said that already.
  • Weight a minute! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Wowsers (1151731) on Sunday September 07 2008, @03:59AM (#24908501) Journal

    I am a _little_ from ideal weight because sometimes coding is mentally exhaustive that I don't feel like doing exercise. However, when stuck into a particular computer task which I want to get out of the way, I don't feel like eating and don't miss food, just need to have a (non soft drink) drink.

  • consistent (Score:5, Interesting)

    by leomekenkamp (566309) on Sunday September 07 2008, @04:03AM (#24908515)

    Seems consistent with what I found happened to my body when I changed my eating habits. I now eat only fruit in the morning and after that I eat bread, but only when I feel a bit hungry. As soon as the hunger is over I stop eating. I do not get my 3 meals a day, it is more like 5 or 6 very small meals and one regular one for diner. I now fit the same jeans as 19 years ago (501, 31" / 34") and I feel better during the day; no more cravings.

    I have got a hunch that eating small meals keeps one's insulin and glucose levels more constant than eating big meals.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      "I have got a hunch that eating small meals keeps one's insulin and glucose levels more constant than eating big meals."

      Not to state that you have it, but it sounds like the eating pattern (many small vs. fewer big meals) is fairly similar to what is recommended for people who have hypoglycemia.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        That diet is actually the eating pattern that doctors recommend to most patients in general if they can possibly do it. By eating many small meals, you will generally eat the same amount of calories (give or take) but your metabolism will be much higher. If you eat 20% more calories with that kind of diet, you will probably still lose weight.

        It is just hard to get in to the habit without over eating.

  • I always knew I was brighter than everybody else. Now my love of between-meal snacks is explained, as well. Truly, this is a banner day in Canadian research!

    If only they could somehow tie in above-average masculine endowment (if you get my drift), good looks and, of course, modest demeanor, my presence on Earth would finally be explained.

    I await the expected shower of acclaim with my usual blend of aplomb and unpretentious good grace. And appropriate willingness to seek cover from a shower of more t

  • by bugeaterr (836984) on Sunday September 07 2008, @04:37AM (#24908607)

    "I think, therefore I'm fat."

    And whenever I'm at a restaurant, I order a la Descartes.

  • I knew it (Score:5, Funny)

    by dancingmad (128588) on Sunday September 07 2008, @04:40AM (#24908615)

    I'm not fat, I'm just smart.

  • of an American Gladiators viewer. Its the show that really does make you think!
  • by ignavus (213578) on Sunday September 07 2008, @05:38AM (#24908777)

    So if I understand this right and thinking people put on weight, then thoughtless people should lose weight.

    I'll go around being rude to other people and when they complain, I will tell them it is my special thoughtless diet.

    The good news is, I didn't have to think very hard to work this one out. I can feel those pounds coming off already!

  • I'm a thinker!
  • So, FDA estimates that soon 40% of US will be thinking hard?! (http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/trend/maps/ )
  • by GrahamCox (741991) on Sunday September 07 2008, @07:37AM (#24909281) Homepage
    I know then when I'm really working on challenging programming, I get hungry - very hungry. But when I'm just doing routine stuff that isn't all that taxing I don't. So that would tend to suggest that "hard thinking" requires more fuel. I snack a lot when I'm coding - calorie-wise it must be heading for the 3000-4000 a day mark and some of it's non-too healthy. Yeah, yeah, just another morbidly obese coder you may be thinking. Well, no. I weigh 70kg and always have and probably always will. No matter what I do my weight is a constant. At 6ft tall that makes me pretty skinny. I seem to have a gene for some sort of metabolic homoeostasis - if I eat a lot more, it just speeds up to compensate and vice versa, so my weight stays pinned at 70kg. I have no idea if that's really what's going on but my siblings are the same.
  • That's what sucks about being too smart, there's hardly anything that makes you think hard.
  • I noticed myself doing this a few years ago. I feel it's not hunger so much as a craving for distraction. Like my brain saying a queue is full and needs to process. It happens when I'm thinking hard and don't want to be -- in a jam, not on a roll.

    I've caught myself muttering and pacing with a bag of chips. There's a Pavlovian absurdity to it. Haven't managed "hear bell: prove lemma" yet.

    It's not the sort of thing people can research, but it seems directly analogous to smoking cannabis and getting t
  • by Alomex (148003) on Sunday September 07 2008, @09:42AM (#24910229) Homepage

    taxing mental effort appears to cause people to eat significantly more food, even though it doesn't burn many more calories than sitting around and relaxing.

    For the average person mental tasks do not significantly increase the consumption of energy, however there is a correlation between IQ and amount of energy that can be brought to bear. Moreover, thinking dramatically increases the consumption of glucose by the brain, so feeling hungry after thinking might be a reasonable response from the body to request replenishment of basic sugars.

  • by Abies Bracteata (317438) on Sunday September 07 2008, @01:02PM (#24911983)

    ...sells more junk food than your average supermarket!

    • Um. I'm sorry. Having just RTFA, it's just just working on a computer, they specifically used a mentally challenging task which just happened to be on a computer. Still, not your fault. Just another case of, somewhat bad summary. Title and conclusion is spot on, though.
    • but I call total bullshit. How do you correlate "working on a computer" with "mental effort"? Absolute rubbish.

      Ok, I'm fairly certain that you're just trolling here, but I'll bite.

      First, I'm guessing that you probably don't work in IT. I do, and I can attest that when I'm sitting in front of the computer at work I'm not just doing nothing (95% of the time, the other 5% is spent here or checking my mail or RSS feeds), I'm busy working on whatever problem is at hand. Despite what you might believe, writin

    • Since when IT became "knowledge based work"???

      In our company IT is engaged in three major activities: spilling coffee on servers, checking cables and answering "NO" to all questions. None of that requires any "knowledge".

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        answering "NO" to all questions.

        You do realize that IT encompasses more than just Dell 'technical' support, do you not?

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      With n = 14 there's just no meaningful conclusion you can reach.

      Wrong. You can state that "more research is needed". Then you write a new grant with n=20. In a decade or so, after a dozen papers, you might approach something like statistical significance. Then you can retire.