Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Researchers Modify T-Cells, Make Them HIV Resistant

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Jul 02, 2008 04:26 PM
from the changing-the-locks dept.
DieNadel writes to share that naturally occurring proteins called "zinc fingers" are being used in a new approach to AIDS treatment. Using modified T-Cells with the zinc fingers, researchers at the Pennsylvania School of Medicine have shown a reduction in viral load in mice. "'By inducing mutations in the CCR5 gene using zinc finger proteins, we've reduced the expression of CCR5 surface proteins on T cells, which is necessary for the AIDS virus to enter these immune system cells,' explains first author Elena Perez, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at Penn. 'This approach stops the AIDS virus from entering the T cells because it now has an introduced error into the CCR5 gene.'"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Researchers Create a Protein Map of Human Spit 110 comments
Ant writes "United States researchers have identified all 1,116 unique proteins found in human saliva glands. It was a discovery they said on Tuesday that could usher in a wave of convenient, spit-based diagnostic tests that could be done without the need for a single drop of blood. As many as 20 percent of the proteins found in saliva are also found in blood, said Fred Hagen, a researcher at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York who worked on the study."
[+] Cancer Resistance Technique Moves To Human Trials 168 comments
TaeKwonDood tips us to news that a new cancer resistance treatment is going into clinical trials after being quite successful at eradicating cancer in mice. Researchers discovered that certain white blood cells called granulocytes from cancer-immune mice were able to cure cancer in other mice. Now, doctors are putting out the call for healthy granulocyte donors in order to test how well it works on humans. The article quotes lead researcher Zheng Cui saying, "In mice, we've been able to eradicate even highly aggressive forms of malignancy with extremely large tumors. Hopefully, we will see the same results in humans. Our laboratory studies indicate that this cancer-fighting ability is even stronger in healthy humans."
[+] German Doctor Cures an HIV Patient With a Bone Marrow Transplant 639 comments
reporter writes "HIV is the virus that causes Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Until now, HIV has no cure and has led to the deaths of over 25 million people. However, a possible cure has appeared. Dr. Gero Hutter, a brilliant physician in Germany, replaced the bone marrow of an HIV patient with the bone marrow of a donor who has natural immunity to HIV. The new bone marrow in the patient then produced immune-system cells that are immune to HIV. Being unable to hijack any immune cell, the HIV has simply disappeared. The patient has been free of HIV for about 2 years. Some physicians at UCLA have developed a similar therapy and plan to commercialize it."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by nekdut (74793) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:30PM (#24036617) Journal

    Aren't we having a zinc shortage [slashdot.org]? Get it from these fingers!!

  • OMGZombies! (Score:5, Funny)

    by gorckat (960852) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:32PM (#24036641)
    Oh wait...T-cells. I thought it said T-Virus.
    • You're probably American, but you might be glad to know that there's a place in England where people could quite literally say "t' t-cells attack t' virus". Not quite what you're looking for, but close enough!

      Now, put t' kettle on!

  • by conspirator57 (1123519) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:40PM (#24036723)

    what *else* do these surface proteins on the T cell do?

    maybe there is something those altered structures do that we will miss when they stop performing their function...

    not everything in the body is superfluous like the appendix or wisdom teeth.

    • by troybob (1178331) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:46PM (#24036805)
      OMG you had better try to get in touch with these researchers, because this probably did not occur to them at all!
    • Considering AIDS eventually leads to painful death, what function would this hinder that would make things worse?

      • by DarkOx (621550) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @06:30PM (#24037941)

        Well, I am no AIDS expert but from what I understand is HIV does not really kill anybody. AIDS the resulting condition of HIV, is Auto Immune Difficency Sydrome. Basically you immune system stops working and all the other little virus out there take over start to take over all your other cells and with nothing to stop them; that kills you.

        So if you screw-up someones immune system in the name of HIV proofing and that causes it to not work then they will have AIDS anyway even if you do manage to kill off the HIV infection. So yea if it turns out these things are "important" you might destroy the immune system faster then HIV would have.

    • by Gat0r30y (957941) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @05:01PM (#24036985) Homepage Journal
      FTFA -

      Some people are born with a mutation on their CCR5 gene and therefore do not have a working CCR5 receptor on the surface of their T cells. These rare individuals are immune to HIV infection and seemingly are not affected by the non-functional CCR5 protein. The zinc finger approach aims to mimic this natural immunity.

      It would appear that these surface proteins are "superfluous", or at least not really necessary.

    • by wizardforce (1005805) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @05:07PM (#24037073) Journal
      whatever function they have, it's probably not as important as not dying of AIDS
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        whatever function they have, it's probably not as important as not dying of AIDS

        Upon what data do you base that assumption? Is not dying of AIDS more important than not dying in screaming agony? [naturalnews.com]

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Upon what data do you base that assumption?

          considering the kind of death that is in store for someone who is severely immuno-compromised, the adverse effects from this treatment would need to be pretty bad to be considered worse. that and there isn't any convincing evidence to my knowledge that this method is any worse than doing nothing to mitigate the effects of an HIV infection which doesn't mean that there can't be any that we don't know about, it means that we would need more testing- in any case, di

  • by geekmansworld (950281) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:40PM (#24036727) Homepage

    Haven't we learned not to modify T-Cells already?

  • Thats sick (Score:3, Funny)

    by Gat0r30y (957941) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:43PM (#24036761) Homepage Journal
    sorry. I had to.
  • by Whuffo (1043790) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:45PM (#24036793) Journal
    HIV is a polymorphic virus - it changes its "shape" often, making vaccines difficult / impossible to create. Sure, they can create a vaccine for variation 32b, but there's a bunch of variants and new ones show up from time to time. A nice simple AIDS vaccine that you can give to kids is - as far as we know at this time - impossible.


    But this technology may provide a way to defend against this virus. By changing the "shape" of our T-cells it will prevent the virus from recognizing its target. This would render it ineffective and be effective against the numerous variants.

    Of course, this is still early in the development cycle. There's always the chance of unintended consequences...

    • by Red Flayer (890720) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @05:02PM (#24036989) Journal

      But this technology may provide a way to defend against this virus. By changing the "shape" of our T-cells it will prevent the virus from recognizing its target. This would render it ineffective and be effective against the numerous variants

      This does not make the T-cell invisible to HIV, it sets a trap.

      T Cell (in sexy voice): How about it, Mr. HIV, do you want to come into my place?
      HIV: Om nom nom let me put my arms around you baby... wait, where the fuck do I put my left arm? I can't penetrate without both arms around you!
      T cell: All your binding proteins are belong to me.
      HIV: I'm going to go hit on someone else. Let go of my right arm, you bastard!
      T cell: Om nom nom

      Well ok, it's a stretch, the T cell doesn't eat the virus at the end.

      But the zinc fingers don't disguise the T-cell, they keep the T-cell from expressing one of the antigens on its surface. So instead of the two binding sites needed for the T-cell to be infected, it only shows one.

      • by GroeFaZ (850443) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @05:39PM (#24037441)
        Couldn't you have put it as an analogy that does not involve "making out"? Something slashdotters can understand, like, a car analogy?
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          It's not possible* for the HIV virus to adapt to this, as it requires two different binding sites. If you remove one of the sites, binding and insertion is impossible.

          As for changing the genetic code, that's not what you're doing. Instead you are putting out a honeypot to attract the virus. The virus can still infect normal cells, but the modified cells can't be infected -- if you have enough of them, then the normal cells can go about their business. Here's a very simplified model:

          Say each generation
    • How about a virus that binds only to cells that express both the T-cell receptor and whatever HIV uses to connect to the T-cell receptor? Presumably, only infected cells would express both - the former because that's how HIV got in there, and the latter because HIV is being produced and HIV itself uses the cell's surface as a coat when budding.

      Now, HIV may mutate so that the virus wouldn't recognize the "T-cell inverse", but there's a limit to how much it can mutate before the receptor fails to connect t
    • I'm skeptical.

      HIV is known to evolve affinity for new binding sites: http://endogenousretrovirus.blogspot.com/2008/02/how-just-so-story-turns-into-just-so.html [blogspot.com]

      Can it evolve around this change? I don't know, but it's very probable.

  • by JDevers (83155) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:49PM (#24036829)

    Talk about completely misreading even the one paragraph blurb. Zinc fingers are a large group of protein sub-structures which are used to interact with DNA. This group used them to induce a specific mutation which now seems to be HIV resistant How long this will last is really up in the air though, HIV and all other RNA viruses evolve very quickly.

  • Who wrote that summary? They can't even get the name of the school right - it's the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

    Man, them's some shitty editorial standards you've got there.

  • Anyone else read this as a CRC error?

  • by my_left_nut (1161359) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:54PM (#24036905)
    "Researchers Throw Finger at HIV"
  • Brilliant! (Score:5, Funny)

    by DeVilla (4563) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @05:06PM (#24037063)
    That sounds like a great plan. Insert errors into our genetic code until the virus leaves us alone. That's got to work.
    • As it happens errors in the CCR5 receptor occur naturally and with a significant frequency, mainly in European populations. This 'delta32' mutation results in a defective receptor, but the people with it are healthy. There is also a drugs on the market, maraviroc, that specifically inhibits CCR5. People with the CCR5-Delta32 mutation are 'long term non progressors', they carry the virus but don't develop AIDS, probably because the virus is incapable of destroying their immune system. HIV is actually found
    • They need to be good libs


      As opposed to what, being a good "con" and doing what?

      I would like some background to what I can only parse as a retarded attempt to politicize with a statement that must've taken a whole 5 braincells to parrot.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      These guys [idtechex.com] claim we have 20-30 years at the current rare we're using Zinc. It's the 23rd most abundant element in the earth's crust. I don't see this being an issue right now (2011), but will inevitably be one
      • Re:So what? (Score:5, Funny)

        by arthurpaliden (939626) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @04:41PM (#24036735)
        The world is going to end in 2012 anyway so why worry.
        • Re:So what? (Score:4, Funny)

          by cyphercell (843398) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @05:12PM (#24037129) Homepage Journal

          Because....

          We run out of zinc, jackass!!!

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by Anonymous Coward
          I know this is offtopic to the article, but ontopic to the parent post.

          Just because the Mayans calendar ended then means what exactly? They didn't even invent, let alone UTILIZE the wheel...

          I'm glad this was modded funny and not informative, every time someone says this I die a little inside...
          • Re:So what? (Score:5, Funny)

            by Dunbal (464142) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @05:59PM (#24037671)

            Just because the Mayans calendar ended then means what exactly? They didn't even invent, let alone UTILIZE the wheel...

                  Not only that but they were able to predict "the end of the world" and yet utterly failed to foresee the end of their own civilization?

            • Re:So what? (Score:5, Interesting)

              by saxoholic (992773) on Thursday July 03 2008, @02:50AM (#24040559)

              Just because the Mayans calendar ended then means what exactly? They didn't even invent, let alone UTILIZE the wheel...

              Not only that but they were able to predict "the end of the world" and yet utterly failed to foresee the end of their own civilization?

              This isn't actually true. The Mayan long count actually continues after 2012. The Mayans actually thought the world wouldn't end until sometime around 3000. The cause for the misinterpretation is in the way the Mayans wrote the date. There's a whole other digit that usually gets left out, because they saw no need to write the entire long count for things thousands of years in the future, but on a handful of totems you can actually see the entire long count for the end of the world date, and it's not until the 3000s, so we're good for a while.

          • I know this is offtopic to the article, but ontopic to the parent post.

            Don't apologize... it's the way discussions are supposed to work. Too bad that more mods don't realize it.

            This post is, sadly, only tangentally ontopic since I'm replying to something that wasn't the main point of your poost. Alas.

        • The world's gonna end on Diablo III's release date?

    • by TooMuchToDo (882796) on Wednesday July 02 2008, @05:40PM (#24037447)
      But what happens when one partner is unfaithful, contracts AIDS, and passes it on to the faithful partner?

      What happens when someone with AIDS rapes someone?

      What happens when someone with AIDS passes it along to their unborn child (a rare occasion now due to modern medicine)?

      Get off your high horse tool. Some people are infected not because of their behavior, but fate. A fix should be available for them, as well as everyone else infected.

    • I guess when Isaac Asimov was infected with HIV from a contaminated blood transfusion he deserved to get sick and die!

      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        I guess when Isaac Asimov was infected with HIV from a contaminated blood transfusion he deserved to get sick and die!

        Absolutely, according to the original poster he shouldn't have had a transfusion without a condom, so it was completely his fault. (details are left as an exercise to the reader).

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      That's pretty much what all AIDS drugs have attempted to do, thus far. Making fake cells seems problematic, since you would have to replace the patient's own cells with them until all the virus has been "cleaned up." But interrupting the life cycle of the virus is the main goal of therapy. Viruses typically use enzymes and proteins to move in and out of human cells. Influenza, for example, uses hemagglutinin to break its way into the cell, then later uses neuraminidase to break back out when it's ready to s