Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Mars Soil Appears To Be Able To Sustain Life

Posted by timothy on Thu Jun 26, 2008 04:58 PM
from the expensive-way-to-replenish-topsoil dept.
beckerist writes "Scientists working on the Phoenix Mars Lander mission, which has already found ice on the planet, said preliminary analysis by the lander's instruments on a sample of soil scooped up by the spacecraft's robotic arm had shown it to be much more alkaline than expected. Sam Kounaves, the lead investigator for the wet chemistry laboratory on Phoenix, told journalists: 'It is the type of soil you would probably have in your back yard, you know, alkaline. You might be able to grow asparagus in it really well. ... It is very exciting for us.'"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Could There Be Life On Titan? 122 comments
Adam Korbitz writes "Astrobiology Magazine reports on new research indicating extremophile microbes may be able to live on Titan, the sixth and largest moon of Saturn — in spite of the fact that the moon is largely ice and covered with lakes of liquid methane. Titan joins Mars, Venus, Europa and Enceladus as a potential home to extremophile life in our solar system."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by ForestGrump (644805) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:00PM (#23958127) Homepage Journal

    It would probably lead to a very smelly planet.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:01PM (#23958135)

    Let's hope the lander doesn't break down before next year's asparagus season.

  • FTA: (Score:5, Funny)

    by Farmer Tim (530755) <roundfile@@@mindless...com> on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:03PM (#23958183) Journal

    You might be able to grow asparagus in it really well. ... It is very exciting for us.

    And I thought I didn't get out much.

    • Re:FTA: (Score:5, Funny)

      by __NR_kill (1018116) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:17PM (#23958411)

      growing weed should be more interesting, over there it's nobody's jurisdiction :)

      • Re:FTA: (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:19PM (#23958453)

        They went to great lengths to avoid contamination of the Mars environment with life from Earth. One of their objectives is to see if there's life on Mars, remember?

      • Re:FTA: (Score:5, Interesting)

        by v1 (525388) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:29PM (#23958625) Homepage Journal

        they go to great lengths NOT to bring life to mars. Read up on "bio-barrier". If the spacecraft get contaminated during construction or prep they have to re-sterilize it. They want to find life, not spread it.

        If you accidentally bring life to Mars, that makes it about impossible to discover it and know for sure it's Martian life and not something you brought, or that mutated from something you brought.

        Although I agree that if we determine there is NO life on mars, I say our next probe is sent with a well-planned variety of "colonizer" lifeforms to begin teraforming of the planet so it's at least borderline useful by the time we can send people out there.

        • Re:FTA: (Score:5, Funny)

          by NewbieProgrammerMan (558327) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:41PM (#23958809) Homepage

          Although I agree that if we determine there is NO life on mars, I say our next probe is sent with a well-planned variety of "colonizer" lifeforms to begin teraforming of the planet so it's at least borderline useful by the time we can send people out there.
          Wow, I hope we send people there much sooner than that. I seem to recall that it would take many, many centuries to make Mars borderline useful.

          That is, unless somebody's done us the favor of leaving a giant insta-terraforming machine lying around there, in which case we just need to send Ahhnold to staht de reactor.

        • Re:FTA: (Score:5, Insightful)

          by jimmux (1096839) on Thursday June 26 2008, @06:51PM (#23959823)

          Can we ever conclusively determine that there is no life on Mars?

          Given that we are still uncovering life in the most unlikely places on Earth, who knows where it could be found on Mars. Do we need to look under every rock, and take a billion core samples before we are satisfied that the introduction of terrestrial life will not destroy any chance of finding native life?

          • I'm perpetually amused that folks whine how we can't replace an old-growth forest or rainforest but terraforming a planet, hey, no problem there. All you need to do is sprinkle a little spores and fairy dust and boom you have Earth II, except without all the people mucking it up...

            You asked the question and answered it at the same time. Life is very resilient to most anything short of more aggressive life. The old growth forests actually require less effort to fix than to kick-start mars. All you have to do is leave them alone for awhile and they would recover on their own. Keeping people from continuing to drag them down further is the trick. Mars has the edge here in that it's very hard for US to screw it up.

            It's more economical to spend $500mil to start an ecosystem that will maintain and develop itself without further interaction, fertilized only with time, than to spend $100mil every few years trying to keep fixing up what people keep breaking, and still continue to lose ground.

      • Re:FTA: (Score:5, Insightful)

        by 93 Escort Wagon (326346) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:31PM (#23958667)

        Well, while the soil may very well be conducive to growing asparagus, the temperatures most certainly are not. Asparagus is fairly hardy (depending on the cultivar), relatively speaking; but surviving -70C (or even -70F) is too much to ask of the plant.

        I must say this is the first time my knowledge of vegetable gardening has ever come in handy on Slashdot!

      • Re:FTA: (Score:5, Funny)

        by zappepcs (820751) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:52PM (#23958975) Journal

        Well, that's easy, Monsanto has a patent on growing produce in off-world ecologies. Clearly NASA does not have the budget to pay Monsanto royalties

  • 1 cubic meter? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bob_herrick (784633) <bob,herrick&gmail,com> on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:04PM (#23958199)
    TFA refers to a 1 cubic meter sample (35 cubic feet). That is one sweet lander...
    • Re:1 cubic meter? (Score:4, Informative)

      by Vectronic (1221470) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:28PM (#23958601)

      I found that to be rather large as well, but according to Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]:

      The lander has a mass of 350 kg, and measures 2.2 m tall by 5.5 m long with its solar panels deployed. The science deck is about 1.5 m in diameter. ...

      The Robotic Arm (RA) is designed to extend 2.35 m from its base on the lander, and have the ability to dig down to 0.5 m below the surface.

      And from the Wiki picture [wikipedia.org] and the article picture [reuters.com] the bucket looks like it may be about 6 inches wide...

      However, I still doubt that they actually scooped up 1^3 meter of soil, but rather parts of an area that is 1^3 meter...

        • Re:1 cubic meter? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by pushing-robot (1037830) on Thursday June 26 2008, @06:35PM (#23959619)

          In a related martian breakthrough [spaceflightnow.com], apparently an asteroid hit Mars with an energy of "1029 joules, which is equivalent to 100 billion gigatons of TNT."

          I assume they meant 10^29 J. But still, the inability of most scientific journalist's to even check the plausibility of their figures is astounding.

          The original text was probably a word/rtf/odf document with the "29" in superscript, but the superscripting got stripped out during conversion. Happens all the time.
  • So nothing originally from Earth, then...
  • Martian Red (Score:5, Funny)

    by JustOK (667959) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:16PM (#23958383) Journal

    Martian pot is what I'm waiting for. I'm sure it would be outta this world.

  • NEWS FLASH! (Score:5, Funny)

    by ROMRIX (912502) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:17PM (#23958413) Homepage

    You might be able to grow asparagus in it really well. ...

    I can see the headlines now in all the papers, when this quote goes mainstream;

    TOP SCIENTIST CLAIM MARS SOIL SUPPORTS ASPARAGUS LIKE LIFE FORMS!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:18PM (#23958429)

    Just more evidence that Big Asparagus has co-opted our national science agenda.

  • by Azuma Hazuki (955769) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:28PM (#23958607)
    Has everyone forgotten Mars has no ozone layer? The soil may contain the necessary minerals and other nutrients, but it's baked under UV rays and (last I heard) full of peroxides and other unfriendly chemicals as a result. Starting with plants is putting the cart before the horse; we should be thinking about extremophiles if we're serious about this. And would it be ethical?
  • by joshtheitguy (1205998) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:34PM (#23958693)
    Fry: Back in the 20th century we had no idea there was a university on Mars.

    Farnsworth: Well, in those days, Mars was just a dreary uninhabitable wasteland. Much like Utah. But unlike Utah, it was eventually made livable.

  • by Xelios (822510) on Thursday June 26 2008, @06:45PM (#23959749)
    To Mars, Again!

    WASHINGTON -- NASA has submitted funding proposals for a new Mars mission, scheduled to launch in 2012. The mission will entail a new Mars lander called the Advanced Series Polymorphic Asparagus Research Automated Growing Unit Seedfarm, or ASPARAGUS, and is expected to grow several varieties of asparagus in martian soil.

    "[We] might be able to grow asparagus in it really well... It is very exciting for us" says Sam Kounaves, mission planner for the new endevour.

    The lander will be expected to gather soil and deposit it into a 'grow-op' like container, where asparagus seeds will be added to the mix. "We just don't know what will happen after that, it will be very exciting to watch the developments unfold over subsequent weeks." he adds.

    Included in the lander will be a CD filled with asparagus recipies for future astronauts of the first manned Mars mission, planned for 2050. "The CD will contain dozens of recipies all featuring asparagus as the main ingredient. Things like boiled asparagus, steamed asparagus, steam boiled asparagus, fried asparagus, and even just plain asparagus!" says Angela Schmidt, the mission's asparagus habilitation expert.

    The $480 million project is expected to be greenlit later this year.


    • by Rogerborg (306625) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:07PM (#23958235) Homepage
      Lichen [wikipedia.org], although don't beat yourself up about being unable to find that information despite having the totality of human knowledge at your fingertips. Your mother probably drank a lot during pregnancy.
      • Re:send seeds (Score:5, Interesting)

        by NoobixCube (1133473) on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:19PM (#23958435) Journal
        The problem with having the totality of human knowledge at one's fingertips is the necessary base knowledge. I know nothing about plant life, beyond that I need to mow the lawn every so often. I wouldn't have known to look up lichen as a possible candidate for growing on Mars. I thought lichen was like moss, and needed darkness and damp conditions.
      • Re:send seeds (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Original Replica (908688) on Thursday June 26 2008, @06:11PM (#23959243) Journal
        Lichen and high altitude soil bacteria were my first thoughts as well.
        Knowing the right questions to ask has always been more valuable than a large amount of rote knowledge when it comes to problem solving. Failing to teach this kind of skill is one of the great weaknesses of our modern school system. Rote memory is dropping into an even less important role as the information age progresses, even as public schools face more and more standardized tests as their educational benchmark. All that said, in a social world, grace and courtesy can play almost as much of a role in getting your ideas heard as having the right answer.
    • Re:Life? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2008, @05:27PM (#23958591)

      as opposed to coming from Earth as contamination during any of our Mars missions?
      Great pains are taken to make sure any and all things landing on Mars from Earth are completely serile. The concern you mention was a pretty big one - when scientists first figured out how to solve it decades ago.
    • Re:So... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by camperdave (969942) on Thursday June 26 2008, @06:00PM (#23959079) Journal
      Ok so how many asteroids do we need to crash into Mars to give it some greenhouse gases and an atmosphere similar to Earth's?

      You'll want to be crashing comets into Mars, not asteriods. After all, what is crashing a rock into Mars going to do, apart from adding a new crater? Crashing a couple of megatons of CO2, H2O, and other gasses into Mars, well that's a different story. Not only do you get your brand new crater, but you add a couple of megatons of C02, H2O, and other gasses to the atmosphere.
    • by kevintron (1024817) on Thursday June 26 2008, @06:42PM (#23959717)

      You get excited about this? My friend, you should try taking some LSD, or having sex with a beautiful woman, or skydiving, or skiing down a 3000 meter mountain or anything else that adults do for excitement.

      The entertainments you call fitting for adults strike me as juvenile pursuits. I would never seek to make it illegal for you to pursue them, but please clearly understand, I will never accept your claim that these interests make you a more mature adult human being.

      Bringing about the birth of living worlds from previously dead worlds may be an impossible dream, as you claim, but the beauty of its potential is stirring enough to make it a worthy goal for a mature intelligent species.

      If we fail to achieve this goal on Mars, we can and should find other planets where it can succeed. If we also fail to do that, it will be because we allowed ourselves to be distracted by short term pleasures such as those you describe, or because we followed your siren call to pour all our resources into repeatedly failing "solutions" for perennial problems such as poverty or disease. By all means, let us continue trying to solve humanity's problems on this planet. But don't use that as an excuse to shut down all space exploration efforts.

      I care about humanity more deeply than you seem to be able to imagine. I care enough to want a future for humanity that extends beyond the lifespan of any single planet, beyond the lifespan of any single star system, and if possible, beyond the lifespan of any single galaxy. How is this any less mature than the desire of parents to hope their children and grandchildren might continue to prosper for many future generations?

      If we fail to secure such a future for our descendants, the end result might very well be a sterile, dead universe, where nobody else will ever again have the chance to enjoy sex, skydiving, skiing or anything else adults do for excitement.

      Bringing Mars to life may be so difficult it approaches the impossible. But it may be the best place to take the first step toward opening up the universe for humankind, and that makes it worth the effort.