DoE-Sponsored Project Readies Human Trial For Artificial Retinas

An anonymous reader writes "'The blind will see again,' could be the motto of the Artificial Retina Project, which is getting ready to implant a 60-pixel artificial retina chip into 10 blind patients later this year. 60-pixels doesn't sound like much, but the 1st gen artificial retina brought tears to the eyes of its six recipients, who claim they can now count large objects with just 16-pixels. If all goes well, a 200-pixel retina will be ready in three years; the chip used is of a 1.2-micron CMOS process, with both power and video supplied wirelessly." (And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?)

In other news,

[pwnies (1034518)]

"...wirelessly transmits images to a belt pack containing a microprocessor that processes the video signal" In other news, the encryption scheme for these devices was broken. The only side effect is the blind with these implants have reported seeing a smiley face with the words, "I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" circling around the face.

Re:In other news,

[Amouth (879122)]

+1 for perfect refrence

i was thinking the same thing when i read that

Re:

[EdIII (1114411)]

Ummm, you misspelled the word reference. It has 4 e's in it :P

Hey, look everybody a Spelling Nazi that had the balls to post non-anonymously! :)

BTW: I was actually thinking of a blind guy sitting on a bench grabbing the air in front of him with a goofy smile on his face.

Re:

[Bloater (12932)]

Isn't "anonymously" already a negation composed as an- (without) onymus (name, latin from greek "onoma") -ly (having the qualities of).

So the negation would be "onymously".

How's that for language trolling :)

Actually, English is supposed to be a fun language (since modern leyman's English is mostly created by poets), so ananonymously would also be correct as was your non-anonmyously :) I'm just playing with ya.

Re:

[dunnius (1298159)]

Yeah, I was laughing, man!

Re:

[Amouth (879122)]

i know - i just don't have any mod points.. so i give the best version of them i had at the time

Re:

[SunTzuWarmaster (930093)]

If you do not see the possible good (crazy awesome!) implications of this, then you are, indeed, blind to progress.

Still a long way from sci-fi

[kiehlster (844523)]

This is nearing the equivalent of Jordi LaForge's visor. In fact, we could probably create a cheap version of it with a little product design. From what I saw of the 1st-gen, it makes the patient look like a total geek with a web cam over their eye. Not much better than a kid wearing a gauze eye-patch. Even MIT's newer wearable computer enthusiasts are more attractive. But to really match sci-fi, we need to approach the idea of detaching the eye and replacing it with a fully functional robotic implant. At least we're seeing some progress. It's amazing how far it is in comparison to paralysis treatment.

Re:Still a long way from sci-fi

[Chris Burke (6130)]

Even MIT's newer wearable computer enthusiasts are more attractive.

Why on earth would anyone want to wear a computer enthusiast? Is this some extreme form of on-demand tech support? Also, I'm highly skeptical of the claim that computer enthusiasts coming out of MIT, no matter how new, are attractive.

Re:

[drinkypoo (153816)]

Well, I usually pick them up where I get my Edible Arts Graduates.

Re:Still a long way from sci-fi

[neokushan (932374)]

I don't care how geeky I look, if I lose my eyesight I'll wear whatever is required to see again.

Re:Still a long way from sci-fi

[Chris Burke (6130)]

I don't care how geeky I look, if I lose my eyesight I'll wear whatever is required to see again.

On a serious note, I completely agree, yet at the same time would be very leery of doing so. The main reason? Upgrade paths. They've got a 60-pixel retina they're trying now. Much better than being blind, but much worse than the next gen which will have 4,000 pixels, then there'll be a 64k pixel one, and then the multi-megapixel eyes after that. And then they'll come out with one that not only approximates full human vision, but gives you Geordi LaForge-like super-vision as well. But alas, I can't get that one, because the upgrade to the 64k pixel eye required splicing directly into my optic nerve and now they don't have enough to work with.

So basically I wouldn't be completely comfortable with it until it reached the nearly-normal stage (and I'll just live without the super-vision upgrade), but realistically, it very well may not be at that point when I actually need it. This would make an otherwise no-brainer (see vs not see) a lot tougher.

Not that I'm complaining. This is fantastic news.

Re:

[42forty-two42 (532340)]

You could always do one eye at a time :)

Re:Still a long way from sci-fi

[Alsee (515537)]

You could always do one eye at a time :)

Oh yeah smarty pants?
Ok, so you get your first generation 60 pixels, and you get your second generation unit, and your third generation unit, but then what the hell do you do about the fourth generation unit then? Huh? Huh smarty pants?

Re:Still a long way from sci-fi

[Alsee (515537)]

.: )

-

+(funniest thing this year)

[SunTzuWarmaster (930093)]

That is the funniest thing I've read all day. However, I don't think that you see where this is going:

::::)

Re:

[Alsee (515537)]

I don't think that you see where this is going

I'm not blind to the possibilities.

  )

-

Re:

[Bandman (86149)]

Look, don't try to out-weird me, three-eyes. I've eaten stranger things than you for breakfast.

I LOL'd at your post. Just thought you should know.

Re:

[TooMuchToDo (882796)]

Honestly, depending on the tech available at the time, I would be glad to donate one of my good eyes to someone wealthier than I in exchange for enough cash to purchase an eye that could see at multiple wavelengths. Bonus points if I can wirelessly transmit the output from the eye to hardware and it can run off the glucose in my body.

Re:

[moosesocks (264553)]

If you lose your eyesight, the "vision centers" in your brain will begin to atrophy, and you'll lose the mental capacity to process images.

Best to "exercise" those areas as much as possible. Once those nerves die, they're gone for good. Figure out how to grow those back, and you'll nearly have achieved the holy grail of medicine.

Re:

[ceoyoyo (59147)]

I doubt there's enough optic nerve to process a multi megapixel image. The eye works by sweeping a relatively small sensitive area over the scene, not by taking it all in at full resolution at once. A few thousand closely spaced pixels may well be pretty close to "normal."

Re:

[Chris Burke (6130)]

No, it's not difficult at all to say that I would not be completely comfortable with a partial eye replacement, and that it would be a difficult decision to commit to any particular type of implant.

Re:

[Nikker (749551)]

it is a difficult decision but now that you know about this upgrade path concept would the question is do you want these guys to fuck with your eye sight until it is the way you want it or get one and leave the carrot alone until it gets perfect?

If you start going for that carrot they are only going to let you have a taste of it anyway, never the whole thing.

Re:

[hairyfeet (841228)]

Which is why it is being sponsored by DoE. Imagine the battlefield of tomorrow,where our soldiers can rule the theatre because their advanced optics allow them to see at night,see in heat,and lets them pick off their enemies at 500 yards as easily as a soldier can do at 20 today,thanks to the advanced micro circuitry connected to those optics automatically adjusting for wind speed,elevation,etc. While I know that the chip being talked about won't do anything like that,these are the baby steps along that roa

DOE

[dietlein (191439)]

And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?

For the same reason the Department of Commerce is responsible for our atomic clocks?

Seriously though, the DOC, DOE, etc., each have a variety of national labs, each of which have many areas of research. I'd suppose the DOE's expertise in high-reliability sensors (for light and all other wavelengths of radiation) is one reason why they mesh well with this project.

Re:

[Alsee (515537)]

And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?

Well duhhhhh....
The Slashdot blurb says with both power and video supplied wirelessly.
It's high technomalogical beaming-energy-through-space thingymadoodle.

-

Re:

[Mr. Slippery (47854)]

For the same reason the Department of Commerce is responsible for our atomic clocks?

Standard weights and measures are vital for commerce. It's logical that the Department of Commerce is responsible for our official measurements of time.

Re:

[moosesocks (264553)]

And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?

For the same reason the Department of Commerce is responsible for our atomic clocks?

Actually, NIST takes care of all of that stuff.

Even the staunchest small-government conservative should be able to readily admit that a country as large as the US needs an organization like NIST to keep weights and measures standardized.

As far as I know, they do a pretty good job of it too.

(Oh, and lots of research falls under the DoE, because they have lots of money, due to the fact that their core mission is quite important, and because they're the most "famous" of the federally-funded science agencies, w

One person who could really have used this

[techno-vampire (666512)]

I wish this had been developed in time for Dan Alderson [wikipedia.org] to have gotten one. The last two years he was at JPL, I was his "seeing eye person" because diabetic retinopathy had ruined his vision. Jerry Pournelle [jerrypournelle.com] once dedicated a book to him, calling him "the sane genius." Among other things, Dan wrote the navigation software that was used by Project Voyager, and he was still doing things that most programmers would have sworn were impossible when his health failed completely and he was forced to retire.

Re:

[techno-vampire (666512)]

You: I was a seeing eye dog...

No! I was a seeing eye person! Dan didn't need me to lead him around, he still had enough sight for that. He needed me to read monitors, type, and do other things that needed sharp sight.

Re:

[Elrond, Duke of URL (2657)]

Doesn't exactly seem like the most glamorous lab job, but the potential for learning seems amazing.

"So, what did you do after college?

"I personally helped a genius for two years."

Heck, even if he told you to not ask questions, you could probably absorb a surprising amount just being close by.

Re:

[techno-vampire (666512)]

Heck, even if he told you to not ask questions, you could probably absorb a surprising amount just being close by.

Dan would never have done that. He was always willing to explain, and even take suggestions. And yes, I did learn a lot about good programming from him. We were working on a subroutine package for others to use. In it, he used a number of functions and subroutines he created with five or six arguments, and never had trouble keeping them in the right order. This is because he had a patter

Why the DOE?

[jeffmeden (135043)]

Perhaps because the DOE has a dedicated Office of Science, of which the Office of Biological & Environmental Research is a member? Gosh, that was hard to pick out of the very first link you posted.
Or, in a more snide retort: (And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?)
Because the US Department of Fucked Up Eyeballs was out to lunch the day of the planning meeting.

16 pixels? 60 pixels? What?

[Yvan256 (722131)]

Forgive me for asking, but even simple webcams are now 0.3 megapixels... so why are these artificial retinas so low on the pixel count?

Re:

[VeNoM0619 (1058216)]

Oh I don't know, maybe cause its NEW technology? Where attaching anything to your retina is still considered a dark art unheard of? Sure we can manipulate the lens, but actually attaching a device and sending signals through is very ground breaking IMO.

Re:16 pixels? 60 pixels? What?

[MindStalker (22827)]

its 16 neural brain connections, not necessarily 16 pixel camera.

Re:16 pixels? 60 pixels? What?

[PieSquared (867490)]

My guess is because of the difficulty in connecting 300,000+ (how exactly is color encoded for the brain?) wires/electrodes to the optical nerve (or directly to the brain?) accurately in a confined space.

Re:

[kiehlster (844523)]

because of the difficulty in connecting 300,000+ (how exactly is color encoded for the brain?) wires/electrodes to the optical nerve

That is precisely the reason, but I wonder why they don't mix in some stem cell research with their bio-informatics to essentially grow the connections in place. We can grow flesh, so it might be possible to manipulate it to bond with the electrodes. Perhaps the electrodes are just too big to fit a small fortune in the eye.

Re:

[icegreentea (974342)]

Maybe it's because they want to have a working model NOW and not in 10/20 years. I believe what you're describing is what we call feature creep. Better to get the core idea down first. As for why its only 60 pixels. Part of it certainly is power and size. They had enough trouble fitting 60 pixels worth of sensors and processing and power in. Getting more in is going to be hard.

Re:

[badboy_tw2002 (524611)]

You know, it would be really great if /. armchair scientists were really in an armchair watching science reports like it was a football game. Then you could see how ridiculous you're being:

Announcer: Dr. Hausinsphincter steps back, takes the chip, and inserts it into the eye of the patient.

Announcer #2: That's an equivalent 60 pixel chip I believe he's trying there Bob. /. Know It All: 60 pixels! Awww what? Come on Hausinsphincter grow a pair! That's fucking rediculous! Get some of those stem cell's in

Which DOE?

[ultraexactzz (546422)]

And Here I am thinking it was the Department of Eyesight. Seemed rather logical, actually.

There's no cure for blindness

[Thelasko (1196535)]

If you go to a doctor and tell him that you're blind, they say, "Hey, why don't you get this dog to drag your blind ass around?" What kind of cure is that?

Chris Rock

I for one welcome our cyborg overlords!

artificial retina brought tears to the eyes of 6..

[objekt (232270)]

...thereby causing a short circuit in their newly implanted retinas.

Moores law..

[greywire (78262)]

Am I missing something, or is true to say that now the only barrier to perfect (or better) vision restoration is moore's law?

Or in other words, approximately every 18 months, artificial vision will double in quality?

Ok, I guess the other limitation is FDA approval on each generation..

Re:

[denzacar (181829)]

Or in other words, approximately every 18 months, artificial vision will double in quality?

Not quite.

The artificial retina has an array of electrodes that stimulates optic nerve cells, sending an image to the brain's vision centers. The plasticity of the brain's vision processing capabilities enable it to adapt to the artificially generated signals.

You get higher resolution up to a point where your brain input maxes out.
But, what you MIGHT get as a bonus are things like infra-red vision, zoom-vision or data input.
You are getting a piece of wiring installed in your head - why not make the most of it?

Just think of the military applications. :D

What? No Star Trek references?

[denzacar (181829)]

Nobody mentioned Geordi La Forge yet?

_Real_ news after it hits the _3rd_ generation

[smchris (464899)]

Darn glad I'm not blind because this would be a frustrating theme. It seems like a difficult technology scientists have been diddling with in the lab for several decades now. The really significant tidbit of this story is that they are hoping to submit the results of the generation _after_ this second generation for actual FDA approval. Finally, we can start to guesstimate a time line for this technology to make it to the patient population.

Re:

[ArsonSmith (13997)]

They are wind powered. Didn't you see the propeller hat?

Re:

[AKAImBatman (238306)]

Because the devices are Nuclear Powered

Now that you mention it, that's not a bad idea... [chestjournal.org]

Re:

[m-kirkcaldie (979966)]

Unless it has developed recently, that sounds more like standard red-green colour blindness - which is a genetic defect and not a progressive degeneration.