Slashdot Log In
Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Found In Omega Centauri
Posted by
kdawson
on Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:07 AM
from the big-fleas-have-little-fleas dept.
from the big-fleas-have-little-fleas dept.
esocid sends us to the European Space Agency's site for news of a new discovery that appears to resolve the long-standing mystery surrounding Omega Centauri, the largest and brightest globular cluster in the sky. The object is 17,000 light-years distant and is located just above the plane of the Milky Way. Seen from a dark rural area in the southern hemisphere, Omega Centauri appears almost as large as the full moon. What the researchers discovered is a black hole of 40,000 solar masses in the cluster's center. From the press release: "Images obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys onboard the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope and data obtained by the GMOS spectrograph on the Gemini South telescope in Chile show that Omega Centauri appears to harbor an elusive intermediate-mass black hole in its center... Exactly how Omega Centauri should be classified has always been a contentious topic. It was first listed in Ptolemy's catalog nearly two thousand years ago as a single star. Edmond Halley reported it as a nebula in 1677. In the 1830s the English astronomer John Herschel was the first to recognize it as a globular cluster. Now, more than a century later, this new result suggests Omega Centauri is not a globular cluster at all, but a dwarf galaxy stripped of its outer stars. According to scientists, these intermediate-mass black holes could turn out to be baby supermassive black holes."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Black Holes are like buses... (Score:4, Funny)
Uh, surprise! Ugliness! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, this new style is pretty bad.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Baby black hole (Score:2)
Re:Baby black hole (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Baby black hole (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
What will they name it? (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Wow! Goldilocks it is. (Score:5, Funny)
Now that we've found the most average, space bears will come and blast us into porridge.
Astronomy kicks ass.
Especially when the universe works like my mind wants it to [slashdot.org].
Re:Wow! Goldilocks it is. (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Wow! Goldilocks it is. (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Woah
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Did you read ... anything? Intermediate-Mass black hole seems to indicate its neither stellar sized (small) nor galactic-center super-massive (large) in size.
Exactly. That is why this is the goldilocks black hole, unlike the previous two that were too big [slashdot.org] and too small [slashdot.org]. Please google for "goldilocks" to understand the cultural reference. It's a fairy tale and Wikipedia has a summary.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Stun, Kill and Porridge.
They'll hunt them down and find them, of course. In Ursa Major. When they open them up, they'll find that inside, they're full of people.
'Cause you know, sometimes you eat the space bear, sometimes the space bear eats you.
How dare they (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks (Score:3, Informative)
What distinguishes the Milky Way globular clusters is the the are all about the same, very old, almost as old as the Universe age. If there is reason to believe this is gravitationally bound to the Milky Way instead of some interloper, and if it has the same HR diagram turnoff point of other Milky Way globulars, there is no reason to think it is anything other than one of the bigger and fatter and closer of the globulars.
"baby supermassive black holes.." (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
to clarify... (Score:5, Funny)
So, instead of medium-size, they might actually be small big?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why does the universe DO this? (Score:3, Funny)
OMyGod its going to swallow us! (Score:1, Offtopic)
No, thats my dog I forgot feed breakfast.
What Happens To Other Civilizations? (Score:3, Insightful)
Any civilization without space flight capability - much more advanced than our own - would have no way to escape, and would be wiped out.
It seems like catastrophes on an astronomical scale are fairly common; how many intelligent beings have perished as a result?
Re: (Score:2)
what others have said (Score:2, Informative)
Sometimes I find myself wondering if there are alien civilizations close enough to supernovae, or black holes (which emit intense x-rays),
A near-by supernova explosion would be absolutely catastrophic, as would straying into the particle stream ejected by a black hole. No good way around that without interstellar flight, so you're pretty much right. Using statistical arguments combined with the known movement of the solar system throug
Omega Centauri appears almost as large... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe because it is a galaxy (arguably).
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Voilà [wikipedia.org]. It looks that large, apparently, because it's about 100 light years across.
Original paper in arxiv (Score:2)
http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+noyola/0/1/0/all/0/1 [arxiv.org]
If that doesn't work type "Noyola" without quotes into the "Search or Article-Id" field at the top right
http://arxiv.org/ [arxiv.org]
Vocabulary lesson (Score:1, Offtopic)
"Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 2.0)." Oh please. OK, here's some random garbage to satisfy the input nanny. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. Mare eat oats; does eat oats; little lambs eat ivy. A kid will eat ivy too (wouldn't you?). Xenu (also Xemu), pronounced
Re: (Score:2)
I was about to say that your quote from the CDE just represents usage, as all dictionaries and other language references do. Being cited in a reference doesn't make a lame usage non-lame.
But then I looked at your quote and realized that it actuall
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
BWAHAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! That's a good one. work...