Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Newly Discovered Fungus Threatens World Wheat Crop

Posted by Zonk on Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:19 PM
from the swarm-of-hungry-hungry-hippos-not-helping dept.
RickRussellTX writes "The UN reports that a variety of the rust fungus originally detected in Uganda in 1999 has already spread as far north as Iran, threatening wheat production across its range. The fungus infects wheat stems and affects 80% of wheat varieties, putting crops at risk and threatening the food sources for billions of people across central Asia. Although scientists believe they can develop resistant hybrids, the fungus is moving much faster than anticipated and resistant hybrids may still be years away. Meanwhile, national governments in the path of the fungus are telling folks that there is nothing to worry about."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Boom! (Score:5, Funny)

    by BadAnalogyGuy (945258) <BadAnalogyGuy@gmail.com> on Sunday March 16 2008, @10:24PM (#22769950)
    The question isn't whether we need to send John Madden in with some Boom! Fast Actin' Tinactin!, but can we eat this new fungus?

    Some fungi are delicious.
  • i'm so sick of being told of what i need to be afraid of. no wonder the world is full of pill popping zombies, i just wish these people would fuck off with their end of the world nonesense.
    • by Jane Q. Public (1010737) on Sunday March 16 2008, @10:36PM (#22770018)
      Think about it. Right now, one of the major breadbaskets of the Unites States, the Palouse region, is in perfect shape weather-wise for a bumper crop of wheat this year. We do not exactly have a shortage. But overseas they might... AND the dollar is low...

      Sound to me like U.S. wheat farmers are going to clean up this year.

      Just send everything one way, okay, guys? We don't want that fungus over here!



      But since the apocalyptic scenario has been brought up: what a great illustration of the fact that we have WAY too much of our food crops being grown as huge tracts of monoculture, often all the same crop and all the same species. What a great target for famine-causing organisms.
      • what a great illustration of the fact that we have WAY too much of our food crops being grown as huge tracts of monoculture, often all the same crop and all the same species. What a great target for famine-causing organisms.

        While I generally agree with your sentiment, I was surprised to read (in this article [newscientist.com]) that:

        Black stem rust itself is nothing new. It has been a major blight on heat production since the rise of agriculture, and the Romans even prayed to a stem rust god, Robigus. It can reduce a field of ripening grain to a dead, tangled mass, and vast outbreaks egularly used to rip through wheat regions. The last to hit the North American breadbasket, in 1954, wiped out 40 per cent of the crop. In the cold war both the US and the Soviet Union stockpiled stem rust spores as a biological weapon.
        So... rust fungus has been less of a problem in recent years, when we've been less diverse. Quite interesting.

        (oh, and I now have a new favorite God - Robigus.)
        • by odoketa (1040340) on Sunday March 16 2008, @11:26PM (#22770238) Homepage
          According to the NPR interview I heard with some science-type person on this, the monoculture we've bred was resistant to rust, so you would expect to see numbers going down... until a version of the fungus able to overcome that resistance comes along. Which is what has happened here.

          I just finished a book on phylloxera [wikipedia.org], and I find it interesting to see some of the parallels. Apparently 100 years is not enough time to learn from mistakes....
          • Apparently 100 years is not enough time to learn from mistakes...

            100 years is too long. Hardly anyone lives that long, and nobody has time to read about all that has gone on before, and even if they did, they wouldn't be doing anything, they'd be reading about it. Nobody listens to people who just read about stuff, they're just a bunch of nerds.

            You need good old politics to get stuff done. We'll ignore the wheat blight and grow corn to burn in our cars, and when the wheat crop fails, maybe we'll remember we can eat corn instead!

            Then politicians can take credit for staving off the famine by encouraging corn farmers.

              • Actually, today is a pretty appropriate day to talk about crop failures. I seem to remember a certain society that was plagued by repeated wheat crop failures and so switched to potatoes as a source of starch. I don't think that worked out too well for them either, however.
      • by owenc67202 (901889) on Sunday March 16 2008, @11:05PM (#22770140)
        > Sound to me like U.S. wheat farmers are going to clean up this year. Actually most US wheat farmers sold their crop for this year long ago. That's one of the reasons wheat prices are already through the roof. Most of the sales out there are people fighting over the small amount of wheat that is still available. Farmers saw $7 wheat prices and sold as fast as they could. Never did they imagine that wheat would go over $10.
      • by Deagol (323173) on Monday March 17 2008, @11:34AM (#22774282) Homepage
        The wheat (and other non corn farmers) are going to clean up for the next few years, until market forces tilt the scales back to a more normal situation.

        Firstly, the US national "wheat stores" (the supply of wheat the country has on-hand at any given time) is at its near lowest point since records began. I'll be damned if I can find the official source now, but I actually browsed a quarterly report from whatever organization that tracks this (USDA perhaps) and read this a few months back. This food storage site [survivalacres.com] (and blog) has been aware of the trends for a while, as his prices have gone through the roof.

        On the anecdotal side: 1) Having livestock, I've witnessed the prices of non-corn 50-pound feeds nearly double in the past 6 months -- all were about $7/bag, and last time I bought them, wheat, oats, & barley were $15. Corn even went from about $7 to $9 over the same time; 2) The prices of food-grade wheat have gone from about $10/bag to over $20 (witnessed both on the Wheat Montanna [wheatmontanna.com] site and a local Macey's store, which sells 50-pound bags of Walton Feed [waltonfeed.com] wheat; 3) While recently at a wine store, I witnessed a farmer talking about converting over to hops, because hop crops are being converted to corn for the ethanol subsidies.

        This, of course, is also a general trend of the prices of food (and everything else) going up to reflect higher fuel costs. We normally buy whole wheat and grind it fresh -- it's much healthier, and is normally much chepaer. Howeverm due to large mills buying advanced contracts at a set price, the prices of wheat flour haven't caught up with that of whole wheat yet. Right now, it's cheaper to buy 2 25-pound bags of flour than it is to buy a 50-pound sack of whole wheat berries, which is the first time I've witnessed this imbalance in the 10 years my family has been buying whole wheat. (These are typical retail prices -- price club prices may be different.)

        Oh, and I found this post [reliefmine.com] while trying to find my link to US wheat stores numbers. Not proof positive of a coming "crisis", but when the the topic of wheat prices starts popping up on mainstream sites, it's worth taking note of. It's quite conceivable that this year we will see a doubling of prices for all wheat-based staples (flour, bread, pasta, etc.) and products which use wheat products will follow shortly thereafter. Even those of us who don't buy processed, pre-made stuff will be feeling the pinch. I really feel sorry for those who buy Eggo Waffles and frozen garlic bread in a box.

    • Nobody (Score:3, Interesting)

      Can tell you what to be afraid of, they can only tell you what they are afraid of. Personally, I favour the approach of knowing more about a subject before dismissing it, and I regard this new problem as potentially very significant. However, there is a huge difference between what is possible and what actually happens. H5N1 is a possible threat (and can therefore be prevented before it becomes actual). AIDS is an actual disaster and, no matter what is ever achieved, the best that can be done is preventing
        • Immunity is fiction. (Score:5, Informative)

          by jd (1658) <imipak@@@yahoo...com> on Monday March 17 2008, @12:03AM (#22770408) Homepage Journal
          There is no resistance to it. Not a single person has survived exposure to the virus. The few supposed exceptions turned out not to be. The body cannot adjust to it. HIV is a polymorphic virus that mutates almost every replication. There is no evolutionary pressure to be resistant to it, because there is no survival rate. Same as there's no build-up in antibiotic-resistant bacteria when medication is taken correctly and appropriately. Resistant people in Africa or anywhere else is a nice fiction but should be left in Neuromancer.
          • by Urkki (668283) on Monday March 17 2008, @03:11AM (#22770984)
            Even if AIDS itself were 100% lethal, there's still difference between being HIV positive and developing AIDS. There definitely is evolutionary pressure for supressing AIDS as long as possibe in HIV positive humans. The longer am HIV positive person stays "just infected", the more they can breed, and also the more they can spread the virus. So actually there is a two-way pressure both on humans and on HI virus to develop so that actual AIDS never starts. So there is an evolutionary pressure for evolving AIDS resistance and immunity.

            And then of course there is pressure for being immune to HIV itself. Wether it has developed in any human yet or not, that's unknown I guess, but if it does (by random mutation) happend, then definitely it's an evolutionary advantage and is likely to spread over generations.
          • by PMBjornerud (947233) on Monday March 17 2008, @03:17AM (#22771006)

            The few supposed exceptions turned out not to be. The body cannot adjust to it. HIV is a polymorphic virus that mutates almost every replication. There is no evolutionary pressure to be resistant to it, because there is no survival rate.
            Which "exceptions that turned out not to be" are these? I'd appreciate some links to read more about this.

            The latest information I had, was that there were some connection between the bubonic plague (Black Death) and AIDS resistance:
            http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2005/01/66198 [wired.com] :

            An estimated 1 percent of people descended from Northern Europeans are virtually immune to AIDS infection, with Swedes the most likely to be protected.
        • Re:Nobody (Score:4, Interesting)

          by FrostedChaos (231468) on Monday March 17 2008, @01:47AM (#22770728) Homepage
          If you look at the example of malaria, sleeping sickness, and yellow fever-- all of which are scourges in Africa-- I think you'll see that 100 years is far too short for humans to evolve a way around AIDS. Anyway, up until scientific medicine came on the scene, cholera, smallpox, and whooping cough routinely decimated Europe. So it's not even clear that people would become immune naturally, even in thousands of years.
    • i'm so sick of being told of what i need to be afraid of. no wonder the world is full of pill popping zombies, i just wish these people would fuck off with their end of the world nonesense.

      Crap, now I'm afraid of pill-popping zombies...

  • just eat it

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corn_smut [wikipedia.org]

    Considered a pest in most of the United States, smut feeds off the corn plant and decreases the yield. Usually smut-infected crops are destroyed. However, in Mexico corn smut is called huitlacoche (IPA: [witakote], sometimes spelled cuitlacoche), a Nahuatl word reportedly meaning raven's excrement [1]. It is considered a delicacy, even being preserved and sold for a higher price than corn. For culinary use, the galls are harvested while still immature -- fully mature galls are dry and almost entirely spore-filled. The immature galls, gathered two to three weeks after an ear of corn is infected, still retain moisture and, when cooked, have a flavor described as mushroom-like, sweet, savory, woody, and earthy. Flavor compounds include sotolon and vanillin, as well as the sugar glucose.


    uh... never mind

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergot [wikipedia.org]

    Ergotism is the name for sometimes severe pathological syndromes affecting humans or animals that have ingested ergot alkaloid-containing plant material, such as ergot-contaminated grains. The common name for ergotism is "St. Anthony's fire", in reference to the symptoms, such as severe burning sensations in the limbs.[3] These are caused by effects of ergot alkaloids on the vascular system due to vasoconstriction of blood vessels, sometimes leading to gangrene and loss of limbs due to severely restricted blood circulation. The neurotropic activities of the ergot alkaloids may also cause hallucinations and attendant irrational behaviour, convulsions, and even death.[1][2] Other symptoms include strong uterine contractions, nausea, seizures, and unconsciousness. Historically, controlled doses of ergot were used to induce abortions and to stop maternal bleeding after childbirth. Ergot alkaloids are also used in products such as Cafergot (containing caffeine and ergotamine or ergoline) to treat migraine headaches. Simple ergot extract is no longer used as a pharmaceutical preparation.[citation needed] Monks of the order of St. Anthony the Great specialized in treating ergotism victims with balms containing tranquilizing and circulation-stimulating plant extracts; they were also skilled in amputations.[citation needed]
  • I think it's too soon to worry about a rust that only eats wheat. If you look here: www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/afcm/triticale.html You will see that there is a Wheat form that people have been using for a long time and with no problems. They might be complaining that beer production might go down!
  • Strains (Score:4, Interesting)

    by esocid (946821) on Sunday March 16 2008, @10:38PM (#22770020) Journal
    I wish the article would have mentioned how related the African and Asian wheat strains were to European and American strains. Since US corn crops are about 85% genetically similar doesn't make the situation in the US good at all. If it does hit the US pretty hard we may be seeing wheat coming from Mexico most likely.
    • Re:Strains (Score:5, Funny)

      by CSMatt (1175471) on Sunday March 16 2008, @10:50PM (#22770076)
      Great. Among everything else we now have to worry about illegal wheat crossing the border.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      This is real scary. According to National Association of Wheat Growers, "The United State would also be highly vulnerable to Ug99, with recent assessments suggesting that more than 50% of hard winter wheat and more than 75% of hard spring wheat acreage are currently planted to varieties that are susceptible to Ug99". (I'd post the reference link, but the filter complained about the length!)
      According to this page [suite101.com], world wheat reserves are the lowest in 25 years. I would not trust trying to buy one's food
    • Re:Strains (Score:5, Informative)

      by MAXOMENOS (9802) <maxomai&gmail,com> on Monday March 17 2008, @12:17AM (#22770462) Homepage
      My understanding is that the USDA has a plan to combat this fungus. This involves planting highly resistant wheat in the south during the winter while the northern regions get too cold for the fungus to survive. With no place to take hold in the south and a death zone in the north, the fungus should go away. (source [sciencedaily.com])
  • Oh, no! (Score:5, Funny)

    by techno-vampire (666512) on Sunday March 16 2008, @10:41PM (#22770036) Homepage
    There's a fungus amongus!
  • This is bad (Score:5, Informative)

    by whitehatlurker (867714) on Sunday March 16 2008, @10:41PM (#22770040) Journal
    The USDA reports [usda.gov] that the virus can infect wheat which has the (previously) most effective rust resistant genes.

    Work is being done [newscientist.com] to protect crops, but Norman Borlaug [wikipedia.org] says "This thing has immense potential for social and human destruction." Oh yes, and you can say goodbye to cheap white bread [coldclimategardening.com].

  • Meanwhile, national governments in the path of the fungus are telling folks that there is nothing to worry about.
    You heard them. Move along people, nothing to see here.
  • Hey, since when does a loaf of bread cost $15? Or a pack of ramen cost $4.99?

    or..

    "This is the FBI. You're under arrest for posessing ergot or ergot-derived chemicals!"
  • I have been waiting for this day since I was diagnosed with C(o)eliac Disease [wikipedia.org]
    Now everyone has to use rice flour! ;) (well, it feeds half the world anyway)

    jdb2
  • Why shouldn't governments run on the basis of faith lie when the truth is too much to bear?

    And I'm not just talking theocracies. What else would we expect to hear in the US, except yet another chorus after the catastrophe hits saying "No one could have anticipated [this catastrophe people had warned would happen would happen]"?

    Anyone else remember Katrina, 9/11/2001, the mortgage collapse, Iraq?
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      I have it on good authority [wikipedia.org] that we could have avoided all of those if we, as a nation, would turn back to God and expel those nasty gays, pagans, and so forth.
  • Amaranth (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bitspotter (455598) on Monday March 17 2008, @12:19AM (#22770468) Journal
    I hear buzz growing about amaranth [dailykos.com] as a grain contender. Better protein, restores soil nutrients, etc.
    • by ArcherB (796902) * on Sunday March 16 2008, @11:17PM (#22770208) Journal

      are moaning about wheat production and asia sucking up production capacity at the moment as well. How ironic would it be after all the billions spent on security if we suffer catastrophic population denudation due to the simple fact we can't feed ourselves. Go mother nature, lets have some balance restored.
      Really? You are hoping for famine that could cause billions of innocent people to starve just to teach us a lesson? Seriously?

        • You do know that, if the US chose to - we could grow enough food to feed every single person on this earth. And provide them all with hundreds of gallons of fresh water every day. And not need a single extra acre of farmland.

          Starvation in Africa is a political - not resource - problem. Starvation ANYWHERE is a political problem. Food is there, it can be grown, it could be delivered. But some tyrants prefer to starve their population...

          • that use to be true, Back in the late 50's. We were the wealthiest nation on the earth, and more important, the earth's population was sustainable (2 billion). Not anymore.

            Now
            1. population is at 6 billion and growing fast.
            2. pollution levels are enormous; china is well beyond what the entire world had in the 50's.
            3. the strain on FRESH CLEAN water is well beyond our abilities to handle it (and about to get worse due to GW).

            No, we are LONG past the time when America COULD have handled things. As to tyrants

            • It's still true... Please see my other post [slashdot.org] about everyone living in Texas alone, and being fed AND provided with water from just the US.

              Starvation is NOT a resource issue - it is a purely political issue. And unless and until we're willing to solve that, throwing more resources into sh*tholes like Zimbabwe and Sudan is just flushing it down the the toilet.

              Ask Mugabe how, in 15 short years, he can turn Zimbabwe from a massive exporter of food to the pit of dispair it has become. Ask the Sudanese rebe

            • The US - directly from its government and directly from private charities - sends tens of billions of dollars to Africa every year. Africa used to grow tons of food; Zimbabwe used to be the breadbasket of Africa, being a major exporter of food to the rest of Africa.

              What happened? Dictators and murderers like Mugabe seized power. Farms were stolen from the farmers, and given to political cronies. Aid is taken from the masses and given to the elite.

              The solution? Go in, kill the bastards, and rebuild

      • by Rei (128717) on Monday March 17 2008, @12:16AM (#22770460) Homepage
        Of course hemp comes up! Hemp does everything! [abovetopsecret.com] With it, you can make rope, clothes, food, furnature, computer chips, gold, planets, the One Ring, you name it, hemp can do it!

        Q: I've heard hemp mills are awfully loud.
        A: They run as quiet as a cloud.

        Q: What if, perchance, hemp plastics should bend?
        A: Not on your life, my stoner friend.

        Q: What about us doped-up slobs?
        A: You'll be given cushy jobs!

        Q: The ring came off my pudding can!
        A: Use a hemp one, my good man.

        Q: Were you sent here by the devil?
        A: No, good sir, I'm on the level.

        You see, America, hemp's your only choice. Put down your bongs and raise your voice!
          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            I'll stop making fun of the "Hemp is a wonder crop" folks as soon as they start advocating for, say, kenaf (a largely superior fiber), or when 95% of the hemp advocacy sites online don't have words like "marijuana" in the URL.
              • Re:It's okay (Score:5, Insightful)

                by Rei (128717) on Monday March 17 2008, @02:01PM (#22776120) Homepage
                You get my point, though, don't you? The overwhelming majority of those touting hemp *virtually never* tout any other great fibers. Their sole reason they are concerned with hemp is made obvious by the sites where you see the advocacy, everywhere from "stopthedrugwar.org" to "nirvana-shop.co.uk" to "drugwarfacts.org" to "druglibrary.org" and so on. These people aren't into hemp because they've long had some sort of affection for quality fibers. Their sole interest is to try and show that the government went overboard with the drug war as part of a move to try and get the drug war repealed.

                Hemp is not some magical crop. It has many uses, but they're often way overstated, and other crops, like kenaf, are superior in most respects. It's just another crop, one that could be useful, but has unfortunately gotten caught up in politics. Yet every time the topic comes up, you get these druggies who treat it like it's the Second Coming of Christ, and then act all taken aback when you point out that it's not exactly the best choice in most applications. Even some very common products today are superior than their hemp equivalents -- for example, plain 'old manila rope, made from a type of banana leaf. Just as strong, but doesn't rot nearly as easily as hemp rope does (hemp rope is particularly insidious when it comes to rot, as it tends to rot from the inside out and wick water along so that the whole rope can rot). Or take the other "miracle" thing often mentioned, hemp oil. Yes, it also has many uses. It's also not a very thermally stable oil, and is somewhat prone to going rancid.

                Can you see how one can get sick of the politics-driven promotion of hemp as a cure-all?