Slashdot Log In
Top Ten Scientific Discoveries of 2007
Posted by
Zonk
on Tue Dec 11, 2007 01:20 PM
from the flux-capacitor-is-what-makes-time-travel-possible dept.
from the flux-capacitor-is-what-makes-time-travel-possible dept.
Josh Fink writes "Time Magazine has a piece about the top 10 scientific discoveries of 2007. '#1. Stem Cell Breakthroughs - In November, Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University and molecular biologist James Thomson of the University of Wisconsin reported that they had reprogrammed regular skin cells to behave just like embryonic stem cells. The breakthrough may someday allow scientists to create stem cells without destroying embryos -- sidestepping the sticky ethical issues and opposition from the U.S. government that surround embryonic stem-cell research -- but that day is still a ways off. ' Also included in the top 10 editorial are pieces on the top 10 medical breakthroughs, the top 10 man made disasters and the top 10 green 'ideas'."
Related Stories
[+]
Science Magazine's Top Stories of 2007 36 comments
ahab_2001 writes "The journal Science has put up its annual Breakthrough of the Year list. They're looking at the top-ten scientific accomplishments for 2007. Leading the list are studies of human genetic variation, and a flood of new discoveries that point toward a future of genomic medicine and even "personal genomics" — with all of the potential issues of ethics and privacy that entails. Runners-up include advances in cellular and structural biology, astrophysics, physics, immunology, synthetic chemistry, neuroscience, and computer science. In addition to the articles from the journal, there's a video on human genetic variation and a podcast as well." Some similarities here to Time magazine's list on the same subject.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
And on Slashdot (Score:4, Funny)
Re:And on Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Why should posters be exempt from the silliness they accuse Slashdot of?
Re: (Score:3)
I'd like a +1 underrated, please.
Strange (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
htmlslideshow (Score:5, Interesting)
I hope Time gets paid per impression because that's the only way they'll get ad revenue from me. (And viewing all of those forty pages seems like a good way to punish the advertizers who enable articles like these.)
Re:htmlslideshow - 2008? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I hope Time gets paid per impression because that's the only way they'll get ad revenue from me. (And viewing all of those forty pages seems like a good way to punish the advertizers who enable articles like these.)
Dissapointing (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Discovering the brightest supernova or the oldest living animal have their merit, but really they're just interesting things that people found.
The oldest animal is important. There's a huge debate in medicine about whether ageing is a disease process or a biological inevitability for animals. Finding really old animals supports the 'disease' argument, since the evidence is increasing those clams at least don't seem to age.
You could argue that this is a real scientific advance, whereas others like the photon storage you cite are just a technological advances of no real scientific merit.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Lost in the "oh goody non embrionic stem cells..." (Score:2, Funny)
I want my clone damnit!
Re:Lost in the "oh goody non embrionic stem cells. (Score:2)
Re:Lost in the "oh goody non embrionic stem cells. (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Lost in the "oh goody non embrionic stem cells. (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Completely avoiding the issue of whether an embryo is a "baby" or not, we do lots of medical research on cadavers. We don't go around killing people in order to obtain cadavers for that research, any more than people go around creating and destroying embryos solely to perform research on. I find it strange that learning about human biology is perfectly okay with the remains of a 90 year old man, but not with the remains of
heh, and they missed the most important part (Score:5, Interesting)
And more importantly, since these stem cells will have the exact genetic material (slightly shorter telomeres, but theres so much junk at the end it would take a total of about 500 no-telomerase activity years of life before that cause any genetic difference that would impact organsim traits) of an organizm that can be examined and studied, a lot more use experimentation can be performed with them, with a lot less effort.
In other news, top 10 things I've procrastinated. (Score:3, Funny)
2. Coming up with a good critique of why there isn't really a top "10"
3. extend that with how it belittles the rest of the work that has been done
4. complain about not gettin
5. Change sig
6.
Interesting combos (Score:4, Funny)
Discovery #0... (Score:4, Funny)
(I hate these "top X of this year" before the year has even ended, though at least this one is less than a month early)
Re:Discovery #0... (Score:5, Funny)
"If I make a significant scientific breakthrough, I will postpone its announcement, to the best of my ability, until December 20th of that year, so as to screw over moronic publishers who do 'year-in-review' specials before that year is over."
Parent
Top 10 Destroyed Discoveries (Score:5, Insightful)
Aren't we just a great at discovering?
Re:Top 10 Destroyed Discoveries (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Scientist 2: Let's kill it.
I don't think that's quite the sequence of events -- the clam didn't come up with an "Oldest Known Living Creature On Earth!" sign on its back! They dredged up some samples, examined them and found this one to be remarkably old.
I don't care what you say (Score:4, Funny)
But, this year? (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
What? You mean I've been using my hand for nothing?
discovery #9 (Score:2, Informative)
They discover a 405 year-old clam... until researchers had to kill it to determine the clam's age by studying rings on its shell.
Then they killed it.
more curiosities than discoveries (Score:5, Interesting)
All very nice in a "boys book of wonders" way, but very little in the way of actionable information. Maybe that's the way of pure science, but I was rather hoping that at least one of these discoveries would have a material effect on my life. (
(and no, I don't think mapping Craig Venter's gemone counts).
Without this press release, I would not... (Score:3, Funny)
Worst Disasters: Wheres the Mud Volcano (Score:4, Informative)
Considering its permanently displaced 11,000 people, over 10KM squared. I'd say thats a far larger disaster then for example, a bridge collapsing in the states, or a plane killing 300.
It's killed 200 people, and was probably caused by the gas drilling company cutting corners on its drilling.
http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn11025-indonesian-mud-volcano-caused-by-gas-drilling.html [newscientist.com]
I'd personally have that at #1 or #2, i also question having global warming as the #1 man made disaster, since i don't consider it being a disaster yet. The worst that comes to my mind is hurricane Katrina, and even then, there is no decisive link to the two.
Obligatory Global Warming nod (Score:4, Interesting)
I love that line. Can be taken as a claim that we cause the majority of it or just .00001% of it.
But it gets better. Basically Global Warming is at fault for all weather bad, specifically all weather events that costs us money. Regardless if the earth was warmer before, regarldess of the fact we don't know out own planet's ideal temperature, regardless of the fact we can't even forcast a year ahead, and finally - regardless of the fact that the people who win from all the Global Warming scare mongering are politicians and big business.
Then we have a plane wreck as #2? Followed by a retinue of things that more accidental than "purposely caused" With mining accidents it amazes me we still ignore the thousands who die in China in these accidents. We lose six or seven in America and it makes the top 10???
IPCC as the #1 green idea? That bunch of bad science and fraud? Using names without permission to bolster their claims and using the power of government to intimidate others? The second entry was not much better. All that GW and the green push accomplish at the government level is to give politicians new ways to spend money, new titles, and even more travel to exotic locations. Carbon Capping? Basically new embedded tax passed onto consumers so big dirty corporations can still pollute. Oh I know there is that part about "refund" to consumers from the government - but we know better don't we. It will come as targetted benefits to buy votes. Most of these green ideas reek of deperateness to find something to make a top ten list. I can think of ten better stories - top ten green developments - like improvements in solar cell manufacturing, CFLs, how many companies recycle their waste for fuel (McDs in England) and such.
Now the medical section was much better. At least here we had some real good entries. The difference here is that this is real science, where the green section isn't science half the time. The diabetes news from last year was great. We are well on our way to getting people off of needles.
Sorry but Time's top ten lists are more politically motivated and to curry favor with certain groups than to provide any real knowledge or laud accomplishmen. Notice how their top ten disasters are not in countries that might react badly towards their reporters in the future? Stick to areas like the medical advances, put in another for technological advances, and ditch the political spin crap ideas and we might have lists worth a damn, lists that tell people what really means something.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Now where does it say that?
Regardless if the earth was warmer before,
Thank you, this is known to everyone and accounted for. It is the rate of change that is scary.
regarldess of the fact we don't know out own planet's ideal temperature
There is no such thing as an ideal temperature, and no one has claimed that there is.
regardless of the fact we can't even forcast a year ahead
Climate is not the same thing as weather.
regardless of the
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Your lack of intelligence is shining very brightly. Yes, of course climate has changed in the past and people have migrated. The problem is not climate change in itself, i
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Top 20 (Score:5, Insightful)
#9 - World's Oldest Living Animal (Score:3, Informative)
Amazing. Absolutely amazing.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The shell in question "ming" was brought up during dredging for Global warming research. By the time they got to the specimen, it had died. Researchers didn't physically kill it to fin
What, no Influenza Study? (Score:3, Interesting)
IMO, the discover that may end up having the most impact will end up being the guys who discovered what atmospheric conditions are most condusive to the transmission of Influenza. [iht.com]
Don't want to get sick?, crank up the heat, and plug in that humidifier.
Re: (Score:2)
maybe Bush is worried that all the scientific research will discover he's the missing link in the fossil records?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Further correction.... (Score:4, Interesting)
I am living proof of this as my meds cost around 80k a month.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:'Discoveries' (Score:4, Informative)
And they didn't kill it to prove it was the oldest living animal. They brought up a bunch of clams, started measuring ages, and found one of the dead ones had been 405 years old.
Parent
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
A mineralologist discovered a white, powdery mineral that has the same properties - sodium lithium boron silicate hydroxide -- as the fictional kryptonite."
Who did they test it on? Christopher Reeve is dead alreadymmm