Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

3 Ton Meteorite Stolen

Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:53 AM
from the now-in-frat-boys-basement dept.
morpheus83 writes "Russian news agency Interfax is reporting that thieves have stolen a three-ton meteorite from the yard of the Tunguska Space Event foundation, whose director said it was the part of meteor that caused a massive explosion in Siberia in 1908. The massive three tonne rock was bought to Krasnoyarsk after an 2004 expedition to the site of the so-called Tunguska event- a mysterious mid air explosion over Siberia in 1908 was 1,000 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. The foundation's director Yury Lavbin claimed to have discovered the wreckage of an alien spacecraft during the expedition."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by spookymonster (238226) on Monday August 13 2007, @11:55AM (#20213611)
    ....vas Moose and Squirrel?
  • How? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by lanceleader (1050398) on Monday August 13 2007, @11:56AM (#20213641)
    How could someone steal a 3 tonne meteorite? I don't really see how the theft happened unnoticed.
    • Re:How? (Score:5, Funny)

      by shotgunefx (239460) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:29PM (#20214069) Journal
      I dunno, I remember a Cajun restaurant around the corner had a really cool giant wood alligator sculpture crawling out of the side of the building.

      About 15 ft up, It was about 7 to 8ft long and weighed probably near 1000 pounds with the mount. Steel cables attaching it to the building amongst other things.

      One Sunday, a few guys showed up with a cherry picker and somehow detached, lowered it and carted it off. More than a few people saw it, but people just assumed they must be ok to cart it off, because who would steal a giant wooden alligator in the middle of the day?
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      If someone can steal a swimming pool full of water [cnn.com] out of a backyard, one big rock out of a mostly ignored storage yard should be pretty easy.
    • Re:How? (Score:5, Funny)

      by wumpus188 (657540) on Monday August 13 2007, @01:21PM (#20214719)
      Dude... this is Russia we're talking about. The meteorite probably just stole the thieves.
  • Wreckage (Score:5, Insightful)

    by necro81 (917438) on Monday August 13 2007, @11:56AM (#20213645) Journal
    If they were able to bring a 3-ton meteorite out of the tundra to the foundation headquarters, why couldn't they have managed to bring back even a scrap of the supposed alien wreckage?
  • No more "in Soviet Russia" jokes. They're not funny.

    Well, except maybe "I, for one, welcome our new asteroid stealing overlords from Soviet Russia."
  • what (Score:4, Funny)

    by JamesRose (1062530) on Monday August 13 2007, @11:57AM (#20213657)
    the aliens have turned up to take it back claiming we store it?!!?! Liers!
    • Maybe it's Alien DRM? Like the wreckage pieces decided they spent enough time on earth and went flying to outer space?
  • Unsolved? (Score:5, Funny)

    by moehoward (668736) on Monday August 13 2007, @11:59AM (#20213679)

    My current understanding of the Tunguska event was that there were still at least three really good potential theories and that they were still researching. Asteroid, meteorite, etc.

    Anyway, glad to see the Aliens got their rock back. No tin-foil-hat-wearing clown should own Alien property. If my car parks on an ant hill, the ants suddenly don't own my car. And this guy had no right to "own" that rock. This guy has got to get a clue regarding species relations.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Yeah, I have to call BS on their claim it was part of the big explosion, since it is currently commonly thought that it was an air-burst event which would not leave a 3-ton object behind. If this rock was really from the event, I'm pretty sure the mystery would be solved, which it isn't.
      • Re:Unsolved? (Score:4, Informative)

        by jafiwam (310805) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:53PM (#20214373) Homepage Journal
        Well, there IS a group that has picked out a "potential crater" that went previously unrecognized that has done some expeditions and drilling in the lake to see if they can establish this for sure.
        Apparently their idea is a large stony or iron object was the cause of the blast, but part of it made a big divot in the landscape downrange. Because of the nature of the ground, it didn't look like a crater, more like someone sticking a broom handle in the mud. (Cracks and a hole, not ejecta, rim and round hole.) I think the link came from Slashdot or Fark.

        But, based on surveys of the rest of the area looking for stony or iron debris have not found much.

        So I call "Typical Russian BS" on this as well.

        It would be a HUGE discovery to have pegged the event with some physical remains, that's a popular subject amongst science-geeks, conspiracy theorists and Slashdot.

        For something to have been sitting in a museum (not studied?!) for three years and not noticed makes this look like insurance fraud more than anything else.
      • Re:Unsolved? (Score:4, Informative)

        by MobyDisk (75490) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:14PM (#20213901) Homepage
        Depends how fast it is moving. There's been research into using ballistics instead of nuclear because you can do more damage while leaving no fallout. You just have to accelerate something really really fast.
  • by Knara (9377) on Monday August 13 2007, @11:59AM (#20213685)
    "Uh, what?"
  • by Alzheimers (467217) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:01PM (#20213719)
    Sought for questioning: Bald White Man, Tall, with typical evil genius features. Last heard uttering the phrase "I know how to stop Superman!"
  • How do you have a 6000 pound rock stolen?

    It's not like you can stick it in your pocket and walk away, even if you are that Russian boxer dude that killed Apollo Creed......

    The foundation's director Yury Lavbin claimed to have discovered the wreckage of an alien spacecraft during the expedition.

    And the article goes on to say that it just disappeared. (I'm not clear if it was the spaceship or the rock..... or maybe the rock was the spaceship....) Damn, and we were so close to proving the Tommy Lee Jones and Will Smith are real.......

  • Tunguska Event (Score:3, Informative)

    by karlmiller (470975) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:03PM (#20213757)
    Wikipedia: Tunguska Event [wikipedia.org]
  • Obvious (Score:3, Funny)

    by SydShamino (547793) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:03PM (#20213759)
    The US military used their stealth helicopter technology (enhanced with alien technology) to airlift the meteor out in the middle of the night. Otherwise, someone would have eventually discovered the alien artifacts embedded deep within the meteor.

    I can't believe such an obvious answer hasn't been expressed yet.

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    (This is funny, I promise.)
  • by Cyberax (705495) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:06PM (#20213797)
    In short, this news is bullshit. Not a single meteorite remain from Tunguska event has been found.

    http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/08/12/thie ves-steal-giant-rock/ [badastronomy.com]
    • by Al Al Cool J (234559) on Monday August 13 2007, @01:14PM (#20214639)

      Covered? The "coverage" consists of:

      • the claim that no meteorite remain from Tunguska has ever been found (proof by bold assertion)
      • a comment that the writer couldn't find the foundation's website. Gee, I wonder if the writer was searching for websites in Russian?
      • mockery and sarcasm as soon as the subject of aliens arises. After all, scientists know that aliens can't be visisting the earth, because the Fermi Paradox says so.

      I don't think that's particularly good coverage

      Anyway, here is a 2004 story from what looks to be a reputable science website [physorg.com] on the discovery of the meteorite, with photo

      • by Cyberax (705495) on Monday August 13 2007, @02:09PM (#20215315)
        1. That's a well known-fact. Several expeditions conducted by USSR have not found any remains except for small spheres of molten glass and rock (consistent with aerial explosion).

        2. Ok, Russian is my native language, so I searched for this 'foundation'. Here is the original news: http://www.radiomayak.ru/tvp.html?id=87757&cid= [radiomayak.ru]

        This foundation is called 'Fond Tungusskogo Kosmicheskogo Fenomena' in Russian. So I've searched information about it in the most popular Russian search engine (it understands Russian morphology and works much better than Google): http://www.yandex.ru/yandsearch?text=%D2%F3%ED%E3% F3%F1%F1%EA%E8%E9+%EA%EE%F1%EC%E8%F7%E5%F1%EA%E8%E 9+%F4%E5%ED%EE%EC%E5%ED+%F4%EE%ED%E4 [yandex.ru]

        This is the report about the initial "discovery" of this stone: http://www.membrana.ru/articles/misinterpretation/ 2004/08/10/223900.html [membrana.ru]

        One of the first entries: http://www.newslab.ru/news/174070/print [newslab.ru] - basically, this "foundation" was being kicked out of a museum.

        After that, there was exactly ZERO publications in reliable magazines about this discovery. For me, this smells of pseudoscience.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          See, already we've got more coverage than this badastronomy site. Good stuff.

          And as for this well known "fact", it's a fact provided you discount this 2004 supposed meteorite find. So using this "fact" to in turn discredit the find is circular.

      • by Enigma2175 (179646) on Monday August 13 2007, @03:09PM (#20216089) Homepage Journal

        Covered? The "coverage" consists of:



        • the claim that no meteorite remain from Tunguska has ever been found (proof by bold assertion)
        • a comment that the writer couldn't find the foundation's website. Gee, I wonder if the writer was searching for websites in Russian?
        • mockery and sarcasm as soon as the subject of aliens arises. After all, scientists know that aliens can't be visisting the earth, because the Fermi Paradox says so.

        I don't think that's particularly good coverage


        Anyway, here is a 2004 story from what looks to be a reputable science website [physorg.com] on the discovery of the meteorite, with photo

        Hmm, the PhysOrg story is just a press release by the foundation, there is an official statement in the comments below the story stating "this new theory was announced at the press conference on results of the recent expedition to the crash site. It is not our own conclusion, but theory made by scientists who claim they found some proving evidences. As scientists, we truly believe that even some irrational theories have the right to be announced."

        If the Bad Astronomer is not good enough for you, how about articles from Space.com [space.com] and MSNBC [msn.com] which were written in August 2004, when the foundation claimed to have found the alien spacecraft parts. Neither article gives much credence to the claim that the team's claimed dicovery. The foundation said at the time that they would be providing evidence (the recovered "spacecraft parts") but 3 years later they have yet to do so. The Bad Astronomer did not write a lengthy article because any rational being already knows that this foundation is full of shit. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and they have provided none.
    • by srmalloy (263556) on Monday August 13 2007, @01:52PM (#20215133) Homepage
      Actually, there is some conjecture that the meteorite may have been found, but not obtained. See this BBC science [bbc.co.uk] article; the premise is that Lake Cheko near the center of the region displays an unusual bottom formation with an anomalous feature about 10m down that might be a meteorite fragment. A fair degree of controversy exists, and an expedition is planned in 2008 to drill down to the anomaly to determine whether it is meteoritic in nature, which would settle the question.
  • Useless (Score:5, Funny)

    by The-Bus (138060) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:08PM (#20213823) Homepage
    Someone tell the thieves that no matter how many walls they cross with it in England, the rock won't turn into Claire Danes, er, Yvaine.
  • Yeah right. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by dtml-try MyNick (453562) <litheran.gmail@com> on Monday August 13 2007, @12:09PM (#20213843)
    To my best knowledge it was never cleared up what exactly caused the accident in the first place..

    And now, almost a 100 years later, we suddenly get to hear that they lost a 3 ton meteor (how the hell do you lose a 3 ton rock?) and oh yeah, btw, that was the meteor that caused the incident!....
    No worries, we had it lying in our backyard all the time, never felt a urge or saw the reason to let the rest of the world know....

    Yeah, right.
  • by krou (1027572) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:16PM (#20213919)

    Wait a second, it's all so much clearer now.

    Obviously, Yury didn't bring the alien ship back because he himself is possessed, and the alien-Yury decided it would be much smarter to bring the meteorite back and tell a few oligarchs that it was filled with oil! Yes! So they go and steal it for their own ends, but they'll all get possessed, and the black ooze will be walking in the corridors of Russian power. And all this when there is talk of a new Cold War developing with the West.

    Coincidence? I think not.

  • by Blobule (913778) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:17PM (#20213933)
    I think someone is Putin us on!!
  • The problem is (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Bryan Bytehead (9631) <bytehead AT technologist DOT com> on Monday August 13 2007, @12:18PM (#20213941) Homepage
    the whole thing is fake.

    They haven't recovered anything from that blast, let alone a 3 ton meteorite.
  • Despite prevailing suspicions that a group of mutant little girls whizzed off with the rock to build their Help-the-Town-and-Make-It-a-Better-Place machine, don't forget that meteorite rock is pretty scarce, and can fetch a pretty penny/ounce.

    Martian Meteorites have sold for $85k/ounce [spacetoday.org], and this source [redsofts.com] claims $3600/troy ounce for more garden variety space rocks. This is more valuable than gold, platinum, maybe comparable to Rhodium.

    So, (3tonnes = 128,602.986troy ounces)*$3600/ounce = $467 Million, just sitting around in your backyard. No chain, or Kryptonite lock, or even post-it note saying "please don't steal." Just asking for trouble from the neighbor kids, they were.
  • by chill (34294) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:37PM (#20214163) Homepage Journal
    Ebay has a whole section [ebay.com] dedicated to just meteorites.
    • I did. Nothing yet. Chopped up into little ebay sized pieces, that would be a lot of lots of Tunguska meteorite. Perhaps they're hacking it up even now. Though the question would be how would one know it was authentic? I guess it would be one of those things where they provide a 'certificate of authenticity' to guarantee it...

      Just had an idea. Time to fire up the old printer.

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      I was going to bid on this 3 ton Tunguska rock, but the shipping charges were astronomical.

      -
  • HOW? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Absolut187 (816431) on Monday August 13 2007, @12:39PM (#20214189) Homepage
    How does a 3-ton rock go missing?
    You have to understand Russian culture.

    The expedition was under pressure from the government to produce its quota of evidence.
    When they could only find a few kilograms of meteor material, they forged a report stating that they had a 3-ton meteor (step 1). Then they bribed the right inspectors to confirm the existance of said meteor (step 2). Later, they realized that they could purchase property theft insurance from U.S. insurance companies (step 3). They then reported the meteor missing and filed a claim with Travelers (step 4).

    Step 5? PROFIT!
  • by Cheefachi (970662) on Monday August 13 2007, @01:39PM (#20214953)
    It hatched!
  • According to this [spacedaily.com] article, the meteorite went missing last June, but they only reported it now. HELLO? It's still on Lavbin's desk, right where he left it, but his desk is actually MORE MESSY than mine.

  • Mirror! (Score:4, Informative)

    by antdude (79039) on Monday August 13 2007, @02:35PM (#20215625) Homepage Journal
    The link is showing errors. Here is a mirror [dotcache.com].
    • and sharp too.

      Not to be picky, but its probably fairly smooth, due to the melting going through the atmosphere. Admittedly I haven't seen a picture of the thing, since the site is not responding.
      • and sharp too. Not to be picky, but its probably fairly smooth, due to the melting going through the atmosphere. Admittedly I haven't seen a picture of the thing, since the site is not responding.
        Not to be picky back, but if you were to take a smooth thing and slam it on the ground realy hard, there is a reasonable change of getting sharp bits...

    • Or - 4. A viral marketing campaign for the soon-to-be-announced "Super Mario Brothers: Meteorite Mania!" game. Unfortunately, Adam and Morgan will only give it 2 1/2 stars, and it will disappear into well-deserved obscurity soon after.