Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Astronaut to Attempt Spacewalk Record

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Feb 21, 2007 08:33 AM
from the moonwalk-record-still-strong dept.
MattSparkes writes "Two residents of the International Space Station will take a spacewalk tomorrow to try to jam a stuck antenna on a docked cargo ship back into place. The spacewalk will set a US record of over 65 hours spacewalk experience. During the spacewalk, the astronauts will "use a hammer and a chisel to try to pound the antenna into place". Precision engineering at its very best I'm sure you'll agree."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • A Hammer? (Score:3, Funny)

    by Architect_sasyr (938685) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:35AM (#18094914)
    They're going to use a Hammer and a Chisel... I thought these pieces of equipment were highly delicate...

    Apparantly they're more like IBM computers...
    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward
      well, at least it is not a hammer and a sickle, now that the MIR has gone the way of the dodo...

      besides, it would be unamerican.
    • Well they cant be that delicate being in space where objects could hit them at hundreds of miles per hour. A persision hammer strike is probably nothing to it. (perhaps just enough to put the chizle in place.)
    • They're going to use a Hammer and a Chisel... I thought these pieces of equipment were highly delicate...

      From what I understood of TFA, they're simply trying to get the antenna back into place before they can destroy the whole cargo ship by letting it burn in the atmosphere. Therefore, I guess they don't really care whether they break anything in the process.

      Makes me wonder how much cheaper it really is to constantly build single-use cargo ships than to try and have them land intact and reuse the same

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        From what I understood of TFA, they're simply trying to get the antenna back into place before they can destroy the whole cargo ship by letting it burn in the atmosphere.

        does anyone else think it odd that an antenna must be put back in place so it can burn up in the atmosphere? Reminds me about the guy on death row in California that got a heart transplant. Except at least I can see the astronauts wanting to get the "most spacewalking hours" record. I can't imagine the surgeon wanting the "most pointless and morally wasteful surgery ever"* award.
        -nB

        *While the merits of the death penalty are debatable, that's not the point. This guy failed his appeals and will be (was?)

  • Houston... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Kalendraf (830012) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:37AM (#18094938)
    ...we need a bigger hammer!
    • Please... (Score:5, Funny)

      by FlyByPC (841016) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:44AM (#18094998) Homepage
      It's not a hammer.
      It's a highly specialized kinetic-energy inertial impartion implement.

      After all, it cost far more than a mere hammer...
      • Of course it costs more! It has to be radiation hardened! *groan*
        • Of course it costs more! It has to be radiation hardened! *groan*


                Not to mention the Inertialess Tethering Point and Coupling (ie a hole drilled in the handle and a bit of string, to tie it to the suit) and the Point Acceleration Minimization Device (velcro on the handle). Those technological leaps alone are worth at least $25k.
            • Can you really use a standard hammer in outer space? Won't our poor astronauts be flung back, courtesy of Newton Airlines?
              the hammer is a much smaller mas than the astronout but yes hitting something will push them away and they will need to have some way to counter that (i'm guessing the ISS has handholds or something for this)

            • Re:Please... (Score:4, Interesting)

              by Nf1nk (443791) <`moc.oohay' `ta' `kn1fn'> on Wednesday February 21 2007, @10:45AM (#18096384) Homepage
              I know you are joking, but try to use a dead blow hammer sometime. its kind of creepy to have the hammer just sort of die on impact. It wouldn't surprise me if they were using dead blows for this job to minimize the bounceback.
      • After all, it cost far more than a mere hammer...

        Of course it did - it's ambidextrous! Can't be sending left-handed hammers into space with right-handed astronauts...
      • When you're paying about $20,000 to lift that hammer into orbit, I sure as hell hope that they'll splurge, instead of going for the $5 Walmart model. Ditto for their food. When each meal costs that much to lift to orbit, they may as well eat caviar, lobster, and Dom Perignon. The added cost is insignificant.
    • This just reinforces an old mechanical engineering maxim:

            "If you have a large enough hammer, anything can be made to fit."
      • exactly.

        That's how I got the CB antenna onto my 4X4! The inner fender had a funky little jog that prevented me from closing the hood if I just used a right angle mounting bracket.

        All these comments about using a hammer on a space station makes me wonder how many people here (obviously not everyone) have ever worked on a car or anything.

        I remember once working on a yacht with a price tag of about $65 million Euro's and seeing a tradesman use a hammer and chisel to cut a hole in the dash to fit my equipment.
        • me wonder how many people here (obviously not everyone) have ever worked on a car or anything

          Been there, done that. The hammer is the easy bit. Especially if you have the right variety and size. Now, filling it, sanding it, painting it and polishing it are the parts that are really hard and are getting harder and harder as the car paints (and panels) get more advanced.

          By the way, it is interesting what kind of hammer are they using (and what is the actual content of a space station toolkit).

    • ...we need a porta-potty. oh...wait...
  • Bah! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Masa (74401) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:39AM (#18094950) Journal
    64 hours should be enough for anyone.
  • by kaysan (972266) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:41AM (#18094964)
    I can understand the practical applications of, and use for, packing a hammer aboard a space cargo flight, but i can't for the life of me imagine what they would do with a chisel?.. maybe they hid it inside of a cake?
  • by Zeek40 (1017978) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:49AM (#18095034)
    Did they forget about the BB gun, pepper spray, 6" knife and rubber tubing? Oh... Wrong astronaut...
  • by Centurix (249778) <.ua.moc.tensutpo. .ta. .yllojrm.> on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:51AM (#18095052) Homepage
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

    Imagine spending 65 hours playing whack-a-mole.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:53AM (#18095072)
    Stuck Antenna? It's not the AE-35 unit that's failed, by any chance?
  • by EveryNickIsTaken (1054794) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @08:57AM (#18095094)
    Now if he was breaking the moonwalking record, that'd be more newsworthy.
  • A US record? Yawn (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Kell Bengal (711123) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @09:00AM (#18095126)
    Oh, a record for US astronaut spacewalks? Yawn. That Russian has 80+, you know? US triumphs are not so special as to be noteworthy compared to the superior exploits of other nations. This mind-set isn't new - I recall learning about the space race in grade school and god help you if you remembered who Yuri Gagarin was but forgot that first American guy in space, whoever he was.
    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      This mind-set isn't new - I recall learning about the space race in grade school and god help you if you remembered who Yuri Gagarin was but forgot that first American guy in space, whoever he was.

      Of course. Because he went on to other things. His name was "Alan Shepard", which should ring a bell in most Americans. He also walked on the moon.
    • US triumphs are not so special as to be noteworthy compared to the superior exploits of other nations.

      Oh yeah? Well at least we knew to bring a chisel instead of a sickle!
    • by DNS-and-BIND (461968) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @10:03AM (#18095796) Homepage
      Yes, because PR has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the continuance of manned spaceflight.

      You're right, the mind-set isn't new, sports records are also kept by country. In my high school, we even had state and local records! But God forbid that anyone else than America be chastised for it. I'm sure that my principal should have looked up the times of that Kenyan fellow who was faster than any of our track team.

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      Of course the Russians had more space walk experience. They had to keep in shape because there was always a pretty good chance they were going to have to walk home from the Mir.
      • The next person to pull that one out is going to be taking a space-walk of their own.

        Sans the suit.
  • by arthurpaliden (939626) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @09:02AM (#18095142)
    When the Russian cosmonaught takes a hammer to the fuel systems saying "this is how we fix things in Russia". Or something to that effect.
  • But you need to read up on the reality of fixing things to, from and on orbit and beyond - and the engineering that goes into a lot of it. Chariots for Apollo comes to mind, most of what happened on certain Gemini flights, lots of Skylab, and the ups and downs of cold and hot soaks to make things behave. So how do you make sure the radioactive thermocouple generators on board Galileo don't get cracked in manufacturing? They're plutonium ceramic encased in iridium - good luck x-raying that for defects.
  • Hammer Time (Score:3, Insightful)

    by rodney dill (631059) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @09:18AM (#18095296) Journal
    If it doesn't work, hit it with a Hammer.
    If you break it, it didn't work anyway.
    (usually as applied to delicate electronic equipment)
  • We call that "percussive maintenance" (i.e. hit computer to fix).
  • well... (Score:3, Informative)

    by jemminger (914046) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @09:52AM (#18095660)
    if anyone actually RTFA, you'd know that the ship with the faulty antenna is a trash barge that's going to burn up in the atmosphere as soon as they can hammer the antenna out of the way, or cut it off. i'm sure they wouldn't try to fix the ISS's communications antennae with a hammer and chisel.

    • Bravo. I'm glad someone finally said something sensible in this discussion. I'm tired of all of the backseat-astronauts who don't know anything about the mission but go on and on about the million dollar space hammer or how the mission would have been better performed by the private sector (nevermind the total lack of manned orbital ability in the private sector). Look, if you don't work at NASA, in the manned flight group, you don't know the full details of the mission. Therefore, you should question wheth
  • by slasho81 (455509) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @09:57AM (#18095708)
    It's not a continuous spacewalk record. And it's also not an accumulative spacewalk record. From the article:

    Lopez-Alegria has already spent more than 61 hours spacewalking during his astronaut career. This spacewalk, his 10th, should add about six more hours to his total - making him the US astronaut with the most spacewalks performed and the most total time spent walking in space. Only Russian cosmonaut Anatoly Solovyov has spent more time outside the hatch, racking up 82 hours of spacewalking time.
  • When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a nail. Or some such.
  • I'm not a metalworker, so I'll ask a stupid question here...

    If you're chiselling a piece of metal, aren't pieces of the metal going to flake off? I'm just thinking of the orbiting debris issue - would the specks be too small to worry about?
    • That depends on how you use the chisel.

      If you use it to flake bits of metal off, then yes, there will be flakes. But chances are, they're just going to use the chisel as an impromtu guillotine to cut through the antenna legs. Chiselling away at them would serve no purpose.
  • Over kill (Score:5, Funny)

    by GigG (887839) on Wednesday February 21 2007, @10:10AM (#18095892) Homepage
    The chisel is over kill. You only need to tools in aerospace. A hammer and a roll of duct tape. If it moves and it isn't supposed to use the duct tape, if it doesn't move and is supposed to use the hammer.
  • Whoa there, Dave, hold on a minute!

    I once read about an American astronaut going outside his spacecraft to fix an antenna alignment problem, something happened and he didn't come back in again. I seem to recall some other stuff happened, too. I think they even made a movie about it.

    When was that, anyway? About six years ago?
      • We all know that [t]hey wear diapers.

        How do they dispose of the diapers afterwards? Do they send them out the airlock?