Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Forgetting May be Part of the Remembering Process

Posted by samzenpus on Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:11 PM
from the what-was-I-talking-about dept.
CFTM writes "The New York Times is running an interesting article about how human memory works and the theorized adaptive nature of forgetfulness". From the article, "Whether drawing a mental blank on a new A.T.M. password, a favorite recipe or an old boyfriend, people have ample opportunity every day to curse their own forgetfulness. But forgetting is also a blessing, and researchers reported on Sunday that the ability to block certain memories reduces the demands on the brain when it is trying to recall something important. The study, appearing in the journal Nature Neuroscience, is the first to record visual images of people's brains as they suppress distracting memories. The more efficiently that study participants were tuning out irrelevant words during a word-memorization test, the sharper the drop in activity in areas of their brains involved in recollection. Accurate remembering became easier, in terms of the energy required."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:16PM (#19419841)
    I hope I remember to smoke more pot.
    • If you can remember where your bong is, wait I can't remeber where my lighter is.
    • We really don't need to remember everything..

      Danger, Will Robinson! You didn't log in! You apparently put in the wrong password, or the wrong nickname. Either try again, or have your password mailed to you if you forgot your password. Logging in will allow you to post comments as yourself. If you don't log in, you will only be able to post as Anonymous Coward.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:16PM (#19419847)
    Stop making excuses for dupes.
  • by Scoth (879800) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:18PM (#19419851)
    The question I've always had is more along the lines of the filing system - there are times that I can't remember any part of something until someone reminds me of some small part, and it all comes flooding back. That means it was all in there somewhere, I just couldn't find it. I'm wondering what might cause that, and what might be done to improve it. Or, as the article is saying, perhaps we're not meant to?
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      there are times that I can't remember any part of something until someone reminds me of some small part, and it all comes flooding back.

      You needed the value of the index column, then you were able to retrieve the entire row. Simple as that.
      • by Timesprout (579035) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:38PM (#19419971)
        Yeah but usally when I do a

        SELECT what_happened FROM drunken_weekend_haze WHERE night = 'saturday';

        It's followed immediately by OMG I did what!!!!!! Followed in turn by

        DELETE FROM drunken_weekend_haze WHERE embarrassing_episode = True;

        Then when people say "Good weekend?" I can almost truthfully respond "Yeah but I got pissed and I can't remember a whole lot of it"
      • I don't think it's as simple as searching a database along one dimension. It's more of a SELECT * WHERE a=b AND c=d AND e=f ... and you have to know enough parameters to narrow it down to one specific memory. When you get a reminder of a small part, it gives enough reference points that your brain can track down the whole memory.
      • Only on /. does a joke comparing the brain to an Array, or anything in programming, get modding insightful...
          • which is like saying that most software states are caused by an imbalance of 1s and 0s

            As a computer technician, I welcome our vaguely interpreted and rather imaginary methodology of fixing computers... err.... overlords.
      • by replicant108 (690832) on Thursday June 07 2007, @04:46AM (#19421447) Journal
        In any mnemonic system, linking is a key component.

        The assumption is that any given item of information can only be reliably retrieved if it is linked to something already known.

        In computer science, the concept of the linked mist is probably most analogous.

        Clearly an index plays a vital role in such a system.
        • In computer science, the concept of the linked mist is probably most analogous.

          Ah yes... the good ol' linked mist!
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward
      perhaps we're not meant to?

      Meant to by whom? God?

      Personally, I prefer intelligent adaptation. This discovery (though it hardly sounds modern, I remember reading a summary of a hypothesis along these lines written by Freud) suggests that the problem isn't one if reducing a limitation or pushing a boundary so much as more intelligently directing a heuristic. The brain suppresses memories that it deems irrelevant to the task at hand, which is a good thing. The problem comes when it mis-assesses the relevan
    • by buswolley (591500) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @11:05PM (#19420171) Journal
      I happen to be a memory researcher at a major University. I also happen to be on a project very similar to the one in the article. However, we are doing the fMRI imaging with children of different ages, as a developmental study. We also piloted adults, and replicating results similar to the ones in the article. Interesting. Of course, I cannot speak about the research in much detail. Journals don't like that much.

      As to your question, I could tell you a lot about why this is so. 1st, cued recall is much easier than free recall. The cue helps stimulate the appropriate associative networks facilitating recall. In particular, a primary focus of mine is cued recall, or recognition. I use the dual process model of recognition: Recollection and Familiarity.

      Familiarity, as experienced, is the feeling of familiarity we get when we see something that we've seen before, aside from actually remembering anything about it, which is recollection.

      I highly recommend the seminal: Yonelinas. A.P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.

      You can get it here: http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/labs/Yonelinas/index _files/page0003.htm [ucdavis.edu]

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        Are you aware of any research in this area concerning memory and ADD? It could be (from personal experience) that ADD is actually failure to prune enough memories.
      • by syousef (465911) on Thursday June 07 2007, @12:48AM (#19420623) Journal
        Of course, I cannot speak about the research in much detail. Journals don't like that much

        You're a scientist and a researcher working at a (public??) university but can't speak about what you do. What's wrong with this picture? Rampant unchecked capitalism is little better than rampant unchecked communism.
        • by buswolley (591500) on Thursday June 07 2007, @01:11AM (#19420713) Journal
          Of course, I agree wholeheartedly. Researchers could speak of it all they want, but doing so may jeopardize their chances of being published. Journals like to have the first press release.
        • by yali (209015) on Thursday June 07 2007, @01:26AM (#19420793)

          You're a scientist and a researcher working at a (public??) university but can't speak about what you do.

          That's an overstatement. The poster was referring to a specific study that has been submitted to a journal. Journals consider their mission to publish original data and findings, and won't accept stuff that has been previously published. Some interpret "prior publication" quite broadly to include many forms of dissemination of findings, including stuff posted on the web. (This is prevalent in psychology [apa.org], where there is no equivalent to arXiv.org [arxiv.org] for preprints.) It's not right, and it's changing slowly, but until it gets better researchers have to play along.

          Moreover, there are potential ethical issues with disseminating findings that have not yet been subjected to peer review. Many scientists consider peer review to be an integral part of the scientific process, because it provides a form of quality control and ensures a minimum standard for findings and conclusions that the scientific community will communicate the the public. Some publicity-hungry researchers violate this, but many others do care about it.

          Once the study in question has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication, I'm sure the poster will be happy to tell you all about it.

          • by smallfries (601545) on Thursday June 07 2007, @02:35AM (#19421015) Homepage
            Although it also depends on the subject. In CS it is common to publish work three times, firstly at a workshop, then at a conference, and finally at a journal. Each level of the pyramid is happy as long as the work hasn't been that high before. Even before any of these it is common to release a tech report or an eprint to "get a flag in the ground". Part of the difference in culture comes from the turn around time on research.

            The ethical issues are still the same though. Most "blind" review is not blind after a little googling, although preprints of the work do make that a little easier. Work in CS doesn't have such a binary quality control. There is an ordering between the different types of publications, but it isn't as important as the quality of the venue. I can think of some really prestigious workshops with 60:1 acceptance ratios against some pretty crappy journals that are 3:1.
    • by SeekerDarksteel (896422) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @11:21PM (#19420289)
      In artificial neural networks, there are structures called auto-associative memory networks. The networks are "trained" on certain patterns, then when it receives one of those patterns as input, it outputs a pattern closer to the pattern it was trained on. If you make it recursive (and your network is good enough), you can take as input a pattern that contains only a fragment of one of the patterns it was trained on and get as output the pattern you trained on. It's quite likely that something like that is going on inside our brains to store memories in some fashion, but on a far more complex scale than we can describe at this point.
  • by Timesprout (579035) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:18PM (#19419855)
    I'm sure I will have remembered by the time the dupe gets here though
  • by CrazyJim1 (809850) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:25PM (#19419889) Journal
    This is all stuff I figured out. Despite the fact I thought it up, it could still be wrong.

    If you spend processes on thinking, you can lose your process of memory. Ie: You can get distracted if something comes up and you forget what you were doing. Or you walk into a room thinking about the football game, and forget why you came into the room to begin with. I think smart people who are in a constant line of thought as such they sacrifice less important parts of their memory and only remember big things. Now this article makes me even happier because I always think and hardly take time to remember.

    Want to hear the funny part? I don't remember what the article actually says. I think it said that if you forget trivial stuff that the more important stuff will be easier to remember. I'll go re-read it now.
  • how that mushy grey matter in the skull can "record" memories.. the brain is just a bunch of nerve cells right? can a slice of the brain be put under a microscope and analyzed to see what memories it holds? My instinct says no.. all you'll see is a bunch of dead cells. What the fuck is a memory anyways? Shit, I gotta lay off the ganja for the night.
    • i don't know if they have verified it, but one thing i heard was that memories are encoded in RNA by the neurons
    • how that mushy grey matter in the skull can "record" memories..

      not too dissimilarly from how that magnetic dust on your HDD "records" a movie.

      Imagine an OS that can edit its own hardware, and that continually customizes its own file allotment system. that's the brain.
    • I read of a researcher who spent his entire career trying to find out where memories were stored in mice brains. He'd teach the mouse to run a maze, then cut out a portion of the mouse brain, with the assumption that the mouse's mental map of the maze was stored in some specific location, and by removing the mouse's maze map, it would be unable to navigate the passages. But after having chopped every region of the brain out, the mice always remembered how to run the maze.

      The book offered that memories are
  • The theory of the "antibrain" was first articulated in the 1980s by lazy, tripping Deadheads in LI, NY. It says that bad habits, wrong ideas, stupidity is incarnated in braincells/connections just like the brain stuff we think is better. So selective brain damage of the brain material that makes us dumb is worth an equal amount in brain growth. Destroying the antibrain is as good as growing the brain.

    Now we're seeing some confirmation by actual scientists.

    Antibrain theorists also believed that abusing drugs
      • Re:State recall (Score:5, Informative)

        by dabraun (626287) on Thursday June 07 2007, @02:16AM (#19420957)

        I am(not officially) a subject for memory studies having to do with alcholol. The wierd thing is that when I am completely sober I cannot remember many things from when I was previously drunk off my ass, but, if that drunk off my ass state is re-introduced, I can remember everthing.

        It's called state dependent learning and it's a widely known concept.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-dependent_learn ing [wikipedia.org]

        I believe you can, in fact, learn to be a better drunk driver.
  • by grub (11606) <slashdot@grub.net> on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:29PM (#19419911) Homepage Journal

    An old couple both have Alzheimer's. One day they're watching TV and an ad for a burger place comes on.
    Man says: "Hey, want to make some burgers?"
    Woman says: "Sure, what to you want on yours?
    Man: "I want lettuce, tomatoes and onions. Don't forget; lettuce, tomatoes and onions."
    Woman: "Got it. Lettuce, tomatoes and onions."
    A good hour goes by and she finally comes from the kitchen and hands her husband a plate of bacon and eggs. He says "You idiot! You forgot the toast!"

  • I have hundreds of Yodabytes of data stored in BRAIN format. However, the media tends to crash giving me a huge headache! Next comes bouts of depression.

    Maybe I should forget more often on purpose, then I would have less to worry about when I lose my data on purpose.

    Now that I think about it, I should apply this lesson to my computer data too :)
  • Simpsons (Score:4, Funny)

    by _pi-away (308135) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:30PM (#19419917) Homepage
    "Remember when I took that home wine-making course and forgot how to drive?"

    "That's because you were drunk!"

    "And how!"
  • Man I must've "fogotten" one very different time in my life. My fiancee will be very upset.

  • An interesting article [journaloftheoretics.com] on the role sleep plays in saving/discarding memories. Even if it seems like you've forgotten an event during the day, it isn't really gone until your next period of REM sleep.
  • by rlp (11898) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:51PM (#19420091)
    Personally, I think that ...

    Exception in thread "Surf" java.lang.NullPointerException
    at Slashdot.Post(Slashdot.java:1061)
    at Slashdot.Read(Slashdot.java:75)
    at MyBrain.main(MyBrain.java:4038)

  • by Nutty_Irishman (729030) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:54PM (#19420105)
    Learning to forget is probably more beneficial to humanity in the long run. How many times have you sat around and wasted time thinking about things you wish you could forget (ex's, deceased family members, disturbing conversations, etc.). At times, learning to forget is exactly what we need to move on with our lives.
    • Ah, not having to forget about ex's. I'm going to add that to my list of rationalizations for not having a girlfriend. :(
    • I wish that those were the worst problems in the world. War, hunger and diseases are imho far worse.
    • How many times have you sat around and wasted time thinking about things you wish you could forget (ex's, deceased family members, disturbing conversations, etc.).

      Goatse
           
  • Contradiction (Score:4, Informative)

    by DynaSoar (714234) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @10:58PM (#19420125) Journal
    The primary study quoted supposedly shows less brain activity (in reality it shows less oxy/CO2 swapping, which is frequently mistaken for a measure of brain activity) when some memories are suppressed. Then they quote Anderson (U. of Oregon) who more properly identifies such suppression as active inhibition. Active inhibition is a form of activity. It should show up as a "lighting up" on the fMRI scan. In light of this, what the primary study shows is nothing. It's a failure to find active inhibition. Some results are notable by their absence. Saying your results show something when they in fact fail to is entirely different.

    "Recall" itself is a misleading term. We don't recall anything. We reconstruct. All memories are in some part false because they're generally fast-as-possible good-enough guesses by the brain. Keeping that in mind helps one understand that the creation of memories requires both active agglomeration of relevant components and active inhibition of the irrelevant. Once you grasp that, then you can try to figure out how the hell that lump of meat knows what's relevant and what's irrelevant when it's trying to put together what we perceive as memories before we get to perceive them, and you can then be as woefully ignorant about what's really going on as the people in the article as well as myself.
  • Not for me! (Score:4, Funny)

    by frrrrrspl (1112559) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @11:07PM (#19420197)
    I cannot remember that I have ever forgotten anything.
  • by syphoon (619506) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @11:58PM (#19420453)

    Jorge Luis Borges wrote this story about a man who had an accident that left him unable to forget anything. He ended up living the rest of his life in a darkened room, unable to cope with the deluge of detail the outside world had for him, and unable to file the memories he had accumulated and put them in a context in his mind.

    Funes, the Memorious

    By Jorge Luis Borges

    I remember him (I scarcely have the right to use this ghostly verb; only one man on earth deserved the right, and he is dead), I remember him with a dark passionflower in his hand, looking at it as no one has ever looked at such a flower, though they might look from the twilight of day until the twilight of night, for a whole life long. I remember him, his face immobile and Indian-like, and singularly remote, behind his cigarette. I remember (I believe) the strong delicate fingers of the plainsman who can braid leather. I remember, near those hands, a vessel in which to make maté tea, bearing the arms of the Banda Oriental; I remember, in the window of the house, a yellow rush mat, and beyond, a vague marshy landscape. I remember clearly his voice, the deliberate, resentful nasal voice of the old Eastern Shore man, without the Italianate syllables of today. I did not see him more than three times; the last time, in 1887. . . .

    That all those who knew him should write something about him seems to me a very felicitous idea; my testimony may perhaps be the briefest and without doubt the poorest, and it will not be the least impartial. The deplorable fact of my being an Argentinian will hinder me from falling into a dithyramb - an obligatory form in the Uruguay, when the theme is an Uruguayan.

    Littérateur, slicker, Buenos Airean: Funes did not use these insulting phrases, but I am sufficiently aware that for him I represented these unfortunate categories. Pedro Leandro Ipuche has written that Funes was a precursor of the superman, "an untamed and vernacular Zarathustra"; I do not doubt it, but one must not forget, either, that he was a countryman from the town of Fray Bentos, with certain incurable limitations.

    My first recollection of Funes is quite clear: I see him at dusk, sometime in March or February of the year '84. That year, my father had taken me to spend the summer at Fray Bentos. I was on my way back from the farm at San Francisco with my cousin Bernardo Haedo. We came back singing, on horseback; and this last fact was not the only reason for my joy. After a sultry day, an enormous slate-grey-storm had obscured the sky. It was driven on by a wind from the south; the trees were already tossing like madmen; and I had the apprehension (the secret hope) that the elemental downpour would catch us out in the open. We were running a kind of race with the tempest. We rode into a narrow lane which wound down between two enormously high brick footpaths. It had grown black of a sudden; I now heard rapid almost secret steps above; I raised my eyes and saw a boy running along the narrow, cracked path as if he were running along a narrow, broken wall. I remember the loose trousers, tight at the bottom, the hemp sandals; I remember the cigarette in the hard visage, standing out against the by now limitless darkness. Bernardo unexpectedly yelled to him: "What's the time, Ireneo?" Without looking up, without stopping, Ireneo replied: "In ten minutes it will be eight o'clock, child Bernardo Juan Francisco." The voice was sharp, mocking.

    I am so absentminded that the dialogue which I have just cited would not have penetrated my attention if it had not been repeated by my cousin, who was stimulated, I think, by a certain local pride and by a desire to show himself indifferent to the other's three-sided reply.

    He told me that the boy above us in the pass was a certain Ireneo Funes, renowned for a number of eccentricities, such as that of having nothing to do with people and of always knowing the time, like a watch. He added that Ireneo was the son of Maria Clementina Funes, an ironi

    • ...do forget, deluges of information do occur. People on the Autistic Spectrum suffer from massive sensory overload. The "lower" the functioning, the less able they are to filter information out. Slowing down the information flow does not wholly or even mostly mitigate the problem, but it does reduce it quite considerably nonetheless. Much of the perceived "slowness" of someone who is autistic is a product of their brain working overtime to deal with the volume of data. If you liken the brain to a computer,
  • by MarkWatson (189759) on Wednesday June 06 2007, @11:58PM (#19420455) Homepage
    In the late 1980s, I participated for about a year on the DARPA neural network tools panel. If I remember correctly (ha :-) it was Francis Crick who suggested that REM sleep was like simulated annealing; that is, serving the function of adding some randomness to a neural network so that we could forget meaningless things that happened to us during the day.
  • by Bellum Aeternus (891584) on Thursday June 07 2007, @02:35AM (#19421017)
    Finally, a good excuse for forgetting my girlfriend's birthday: I'm remembering something "more important". Wait... that won't work.

    Yes, I post on slashdot. Yes, I have a real, live, breathing girlfriend. :-P
    • Remembering is the opposite of dismembering. It's just that sometimes you forget that you left one of the legs in the freezer.