Slashdot Log In
New Stephen Hawking Movie in the Works
Posted by
timothy
on Sun Oct 15, 2006 03:38 PM
from the reinvention-to-best-bono-or-tom-jones dept.
from the reinvention-to-best-bono-or-tom-jones dept.
Simon Behler writes "The Sunday Times is reporting that Stephen Hawking is making a new movie. FTA: 'Professor Stephen Hawking, Britain's world-renowned physicist, is to switch from theories of multidimensional space to the three dimensions of the Imax cinema by starring in a film that sets out his ideas on the origins and fate of the universe. The film, Beyond the Horizon, will tackle some of the most daunting theories espoused by Hawking and other cosmologists, from the idea that space has up to 11 dimensions to the cause of the big bang itself.'"
Related Stories
[+]
Is String Theory Really a Scientific Theory? 397 comments
vk38 writes, "The New Yorker is running a story on whether String Theory is really a scientific theory or just an abstract exercise in math designed to churn out papers and Ph.Ds for the established academics. The article reviews two current books, by Lee Smolin and Peter Woit, laying out the case against string theory."
From the article: "Dozens of string-theory conferences have been held, hundreds of new Ph.D.s have been minted, and thousands of papers have been written. Yet... not a single new testable prediction has been made, not a single theoretical puzzle has been solved. In fact, there is no theory so far — just a set of hunches and calculations suggesting that a theory might exist. And, even if it does, this theory will come in such a bewildering number of versions that it will be of no practical use: a Theory of Nothing... String theory has always had a few vocal skeptics... Sheldon Glashow, who won a Nobel Prize for making one of the last great advances in physics before the beginning of the string-theory era, has likened string theory to a 'new version of medieval theology,' and campaigned to keep string theorists out of his own department at Harvard. (He failed.)"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
3D Imax? (Score:5, Interesting)
So, is the third dimension apparent depth? If Imax shows are still displayed on flat screens...
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Excellent (Score:2)
But more important (Score:4, Funny)
http://www.mchawking.com/ [mchawking.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The real question is.. (Score:5, Funny)
Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Real Physics? (Score:2, Insightful)
theorist recently, he did not seem at all impressed with
Hawking.
Anything that sparks the interest of a student or anyone
to enter science is a fine thing. I'm looking forward to
it even though the artists rendition of 11 dimensions will
likely be more psycadelic than mathematically accurate.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Real Physics? - string theory? (Score:2)
Umm... Don't you read? The phrase "real string theory theorist" is an oxymoron :-)
Is String Theory Really a Scientific Theory? [slashdot.org]
British?? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm disappointed... (Score:2)
Unfortunately... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds more like a movie about goatse to me...
meh (Score:5, Funny)
String Theory? (Score:2, Informative)
Does this mean the movie will cover String Theory? I wasn't aware that Stephen Hawking worked in this area. Does anyone know what his position is on String Theory? I remember reading recently that some people thought it was all rubbish.
If you're interested in learning a little about string theory, "The Elegant Universe" by Briane Greene is a great place to start. Its more of a popular-science type book, using simple and interesting example. NO
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I should be careful, though: it's a pretty large field. By some reckonings strings are everything in theoretical high-energy physics *except* the theories that are explicitly not string theory (loop gravity, the field of recent Slashdot-ee Lee Smoli
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I would love to see Hawking's reply to String Theory.
After trying to read the "Elegant Universe", I became more convinced than ever that String Theory as really grasping at straws, but when surrounded by darkness, a straw is better than empty space.
I haven't the foggiest idea where the truth really lies. Maybe Hawking does. In any event, there are not many more illustrative ways of communicating one's ideas than a good animated presentation.
Dont ya know Eins
Ultimate Force (Score:2)
Promotional video and music clip available here (Score:2)
Wait! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Plot Summary (Score:2)
Alternate Theory of the Universe (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm still waiting for my buddy's theory of the universe to be disproven:
"Matter [and energy] is nothing more than carefully arranged empty space."
Cause of Big Bang? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Still, it's good that such a smart man is getting all of this media attention. The world could use more role models in movies, instead of relying on the ones that take steroids to break sports records.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Why single out Hawking? He isn't the only person in the world with ALS. Nor is he the only person who has contributed to our scientific knowledge to suffer or die from an incurable disease.
It's not like the medical technology we have today is miraculous. Advanced, yes, but medicine is still a work in progress, and probably always will be. People still die of
Re:Oh god (Score:5, Insightful)
You know, just because technology doesn't give Hawking the body of Arnold Schwarzeneger doesn't mean it didn't help: without technology, Hawking would probably have ended up in a rocking chair, his family taking his motionless, speechless body for that of a gibbering imbecile. Instead of that, his power wheelchair give him a semblance of mobility, and his speech box give him the ability to express himself. So in reality, technology gave us one of the greatest mind in the world.
As for movies, Stephen hawking did play in Star Trek TNG. Granted, it wasn't a Jackie Chan role, but still...
Parent
Re:Oh god (Score:5, Funny)
Well with a little more CG FX, he COULD have had a Jackie Chan role, and I think the world is ready for the full on Stephen Hawking / Jackie Chan experience in "RoadHouse 2, Quantum leaps of fury". "Entropy takes a beating in the summer of 2007"
Parent
my mod points ran out yesterday! (Score:2)
Re:Oh god... Oh God deux? (Score:2)
"Purina Cat CHOW, CHOW! CHOW!! Purina Cat CHOW, CHOW!!! CHOW!!!! Chhh-chhh-chhh chow-chi-chi-chow-chow-cheowwww!!!" (yes, they have to do it real gay-like, too, but then Hawkings m
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
One step ahead of you (Score:2)
Some time ago Dr. Robert J. White http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/06/29fe aturea.html [salon.com]>proposed exactly that. Since non-nerve stuff is mostly mechanical, perhaps Futurama is closer than we think...
Xix.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Top 10 Facts about Stephen Hawking (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Going to lower dimensions can't be too hard though
--------------
^^^ There's a 1D screensaver.
:D
Re: (Score:2)
"Spit in my mouth."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)