Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

DARPA Sponsoring Limb Regeneration Research

Posted by Zonk on Sun Sep 24, 2006 04:27 PM
from the regrow-the-ungrowable dept.
fragmentate writes "Wired News is reporting: 'In response to the hundreds of soldiers coming home from war with missing arms or legs, Darpa is spending millions of dollars to help scientists learn how people might one day regenerate their own limbs. Prosthetics are getting better all the time, but they will never be as good as the limbs we were born with. So two teams of scientists at 10 institutions across the country are competing to regrow the first mammalian limb ... The researchers' first milestone is to generate a blastema — a mass of cells able to develop into various organs or body parts — in a mammal.' Apparently this is a relatively new area of research, even Wikipedia's stub on blastemas is very terse."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Bionic Arm Provides Hope for Amputees 138 comments
Static-MT writes to mention a CNN article about what doctors are referring to as the first thought-controlled artificial limb. Arm owner Jesse Sullivan has two prosthetic limbs, and the left one is an advanced prototype in development by the folks at DARPA. From the article: "Sullivan's bionic arm represents an advance over typical artificial arms, like the right-arm prosthesis he uses, which has a hook and operates with sequential motions. There is no perceivable delay in the motions of Sullivan's flesh-colored, plastic-like left arm. Until now, it has been nearly impossible to recreate the subtle and complex motion of a human arm."
[+] Hardware: Open-Source Prosthetics 51 comments
D H NG writes "Wired News has a story about the non-profit Open Prosthetics Project. The organization was founded last year by Jonathan Kuniholm, a graduate student in biomedical engineering at Duke University who lost his arm below the elbow in Iraq. Open Prosthetics Project applies the ethical and intellectual property foundation of open-source software to the task of building better artificial limbs. So far, the project has produced a 'handful' of useful homebrew prosthetic hacks, and is closing in on a solution that would dramatically improve the functionality of the common hook device."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Stub. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Wordsmith (183749) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:30PM (#16178099) Homepage
    Wikipedia's stub. I get it. Hah.
    • Re:Stub. (Score:5, Funny)

      by Darkman, Walkin Dude (707389) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:47PM (#16178237) Homepage

      Jokes aside, if they can regenerate limbs, surely its just a hop skip and a jump to regenerate organs? If we can do that, immortality is just around the corner...

      • Re:Stub. (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Stile 65 (722451) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:58PM (#16178331) Homepage Journal
        First of all, TFA says that one of the two teams of scientists working on this is basing their work on the MRL mouse, which can and does regenerate internal organs, including severed spinal cords.

        Second of all, this may increase lifespan, but would not provide immortality. Human cells stop reproducing after a certain number of reproductions. The cell chromosomes have end-cap like things called telomeres which are shortened with each mitotic cycle. When they get too short, the cell stops reproducing. This is to prevent too many mutations from accumulating after a while. Generally, if cells divide without shortening the telomeres, they're usually malignant tumor cells. So to get immortality, you'd have to augment the mitotic cycle to a) "spellcheck" the chromosome copying, and b) prevent the telomeres from being shortened.
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          The chromosome copying is already spellchecked.

          Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have copy verification and repair machinery which drastically reduce replication errors.
          • Re:Stub. (Score:5, Interesting)

            by izomiac (815208) on Sunday September 24 2006, @05:33PM (#16178581) Homepage
            Drastically reduce but not eliminate. IIRC mutations tend to occur once every 600,000 base pairs, so that would mean that replication is about 99.99983% accurate. After 100 divisions the genome of a cell would only be 99.983% accurate, so it'd have about 1 error every 500 base pairs. Given the size of most genes/proteins, that cell should have some serious problems or be cancerous. (I don't know the "maximum" number of divisions, it could be more or less, but you can see the problem.) Not to mention, mutation accumulation is just one part of aging. Now, if we could take our genome and add some parity base pairs and some redundancy checking proteins we might be able to address that problem. But that's far beyond our level of genetic engineering (AFAIK).
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              The actual engineering involved isn't that important. What's important is that researchers no longer consider aging to be just something we have to live with, and consider it their goal to increase the human lifespan. Note, this isn't all researchers. Many people still believe that humans should always grow old and die and to perform research into indefinitely extending human lifetimes is wrong.
              • Re:Stub. (Score:4, Insightful)

                by mrogers (85392) on Monday September 25 2006, @06:34AM (#16183269) Homepage
                If a person lives for 1000 years and their personality continues to evolve, to what extent can the 1000-year-old individual be regarded as "the same person" as, say, the 30-year-old individual? Are you the same person you were 10 years ago, or 20? What would 1000 years of experience, combined with 1000 years of cultural, political and technological change, do to the human personality?
        • Re:Stub. (Score:5, Informative)

          by javilon (99157) on Sunday September 24 2006, @05:11PM (#16178425) Homepage
          a) "spellcheck" the chromosome copying, and b) prevent the telomeres

          b) is easy, you can shut off telomerase for a while(http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerend er.fcgi?artid=14711&tools=bot [nih.gov])
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        If they can regenerate organs, will they be able to regenerate the largest organ, skin? This would help burn victims immeasurably.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        As I understand it, the ability of cells in a human body to regenerate themselves (heal) diminishes over time due to "programming" in our genes. This causes aging, but is also a cancer fighting mechanism.

        If you could use a given adult's body to grow a blastema or whatever it is and then use it to grow a limb or organ, the cells would remember their "age" and would still not be as resilient as a child's organ or limb. Therefore, you could replace your heart at the age of 75 but it would still be a 75 year
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        hmmm - I bet it is possible to regenerate the body indefinitely, (eventually), but I am doubtful that this is possible with the mind. Even if the brain-tissue could be replaced, could a useful structure be preserved? How would a human mind cope with the increased memory requirements? - It would distort the psychology somewhat to have centuries or millennia of experience.
        Perhaps the brain could drop its oldest memories in favour of new ones, but would this seem like immortality to mind of that person?
      • Immortality may be just not that far off, but all that would lead to is an increase in over population and wealth stratifacation. I'm all for improving the quality of life for amputees but I think a century or so is long enough for any one person.
  • Since this is Slashdot, which is not exactly known to be a bastion of maturity, I bet that Wikipedia won't be very terse for long...
    • it's the spammers I fear: get your Penis Enlargement Blastima now!
    • Funny, that was my thought, except I had a bit more optimistic expectation. I was hoping that it would get filled out in record time with quality info. :)
  • by bhunachchicken (834243) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:32PM (#16178113) Homepage

    (WARNING - SPOILERS)

    When William Mandella lost his leg in an accident he was under the impression that he would simply be given an artificial one and would then be free to persue a semi-normal life. To his horror he discovers they'll simply grow him a new leg and chuck him right back in to active duty... :)

  • Wasn't the Lizard created from a scientist who was trying to do this very thing?
  • by Chandon Seldon (43083) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:35PM (#16178145) Homepage

    Prosthetics are getting better all the time, but they will never be as good as the limbs we were born with.

    Why not? I see no good reason why competent engineering can't eventually beat a chunk of meat.

    It's not like we were intelligently designed... we evolved. Evolution will tend to produce good solutions to problems, but it will hardly ever produce the best possible solution. Once we get nerve-circuit interfaces down, we should have no problem outengineering most of the human body.

    • In 2 or 3 centuries maybe.

      Sure, the human body is a result of evolution, but that doesnt mean that its not sophisticated at all. Its the result of a billion years of "everything thats not good enough died", starting from the level of cellular chemistry up to the general layout.

    • by Darkman, Walkin Dude (707389) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:43PM (#16178213) Homepage

      we should have no problem outengineering most of the human body.

      Yes and then the batteries in your cyberleg run down and you have to haul the entire 40 kilo hunk of metal across town in the rain... on one leg. Besides that you are forgetting that the limbs aren't seperate components of the body; its all interlinked. Its no good having an arm able to flip over a truck, your torso would compact and tear itself apart if you didn't just rip the thing off, nerve circuits and all. The only real option for enhanced performance cybernetics would be a Ghost in the Shell effort, with full body replacement except for the brain. If you can manage that, without regular maintenance and some sort of 50 year power source, I'll admit you have a point.

      • by Chandon Seldon (43083) on Sunday September 24 2006, @06:22PM (#16178935) Homepage

        Consider that cyberleg. We can build it to run off glucose in order to avoid it running out of batteries. We can easily give it the performance characteristics of an athlete - we know the human body can take that. It will never get out of shape. Assuming it has sufficient glucose (which is easy to introduce to your body, especially if you deal with the insulin thing right), it will never get tired.

        Now, that's no car-tossing cyberarm, but it's definately an improvement on the stock equipment. The downside is maintnence, but anyone who's paid too much attention to cyberpunk settings knows that - and that can be reduced with better engineering.

    • by daeg (828071) on Sunday September 24 2006, @05:23PM (#16178503)
      Just because we may eventually out-tnature doesn't mean the thousands of injured soliders and civilians want part of their body replaced with robotics if they could have the option of a new, real limb.

      There is also no reason both areas of research can't operate simultaneously, nor anything that is restricting them from working coopoeratively.
    • I get your point, but:

      1. It will take a while! I think it is more a matter of centuries than decades.

      2. It will be too expensive for most people. Look at the moon landings. They would never have happened if not the richest nation on earth would have poured so much money into it. Even now it is still too expensive to put people into near orbit. The few exeptions only go there, because the governments still spend A LOT of money on it. The few tourists (that still pay more than some thousand people in Africa s
      • Arrogance is a virtue. Without it, we would give up without even trying.

        That's not to say that you're not right. We have a ton of stuff to learn from biological systems - we've barely begun to scratch the surface on all the useful stuff that evolution has come up with.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:38PM (#16178165)
    I think it would be more accurate to say Wikipedia's stub on blastemas is embryonic.
  • In response to the hundreds of soldiers coming home from war with missing arms or legs, Darpa is spending millions of dollars to help scientists learn how people might one day regenerate their own limbs.

    You *know* the Army's thinking behind this is to regenerate their limbs so they can just send them back to war.
  • by porky_pig_jr (129948) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:42PM (#16178197)
    so, say, if one hand is blown off, I still have a few more left, no need to rush to hospital. an extra head won't hurt either. (with a possibility of starring in Hitchhiker).
  • by Anonymous Coward
    If they can give soldiers the ability to grow amputated limbs, any possibility this technology can be used to produce 100% real enlarged breasts? Forget silicone and saline implants, in ten years time we'll have women who can inject themselves with this serum and grow from a B-cup to DD. I imagine the government will find a way to outlaw that, too, just like they did for silicone "for the saftey of women".
    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      If they can give soldiers the ability to grow amputated limbs, any possibility this technology can be used to produce 100% real enlarged breasts?

      Yes, but don't be surprised if people look at you funny -- or maybe that should be funnier.

      KFG
  • by GungaDan (195739) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:45PM (#16178219) Homepage
    as if a million stumpfuckers suddenly cried out in protest.

  • by QuantumFTL (197300) * <justin...wick@@@gmail...com> on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:47PM (#16178235) Homepage
    This is one step closer to the invincible zombie army that the government is working on. Maybe it will help us defeat the robots in the future?

    Why yes, my hat ismade out of tin. How did you know?
  • Millions ? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by OpenSourced (323149) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:56PM (#16178311) Journal
    The two groups are sharing $7.6 million in grants for a year to find a way to give humans salamander-like abilities.

    Am I out of whack or it's $7.6m like peanuts for this kind of research? I'd guess any serious effort on that would need to be in the billions level, and that likely for many years.

  • by glrotate (300695) on Sunday September 24 2006, @04:58PM (#16178335) Homepage
    Let's focus our efforts on something a little more important.

    Thanks.
    • Go read your Polya.... Hair regeneration is simple and, I'd like to think, something we learned from doing something small and simple first helped us understand the larger puzzle.
  • some more info for anyone interested:

    Timelines for Manipulating and Greatly Enhancing Human Regeneration
    http://www.fightaging.org/archives/000929.php [fightaging.org]

    Transhumanism: Regenerative Medicine
    http://digitalcrusader.ca/archives/2006/05/regener ative_me.html [digitalcrusader.ca]
  • Dismissing prosthetics as being less than natural ignores that the technology is always improving. It's not that hard to envision a time when the prosthetic limb is better than the natural one. For example, at best, we'll be able to grow back a natural limb. If a prosthetic limb breaks, it will probably be a lot easier to replace. OTOH, it's reasonable to assume that a considerable fraction of people are going to want like replaced with like. Ie, they will often want a natural limb replaced by a natural one
  • by Colgate2003 (735182) on Sunday September 24 2006, @05:14PM (#16178445) Homepage
    they will never be as good as the limbs we were born with

    Not quite as good, but I just interviewed [mos.org] someone about new research into interfacing neurons with electronics that could lead to Luke Skywalker-like replacement limbs. Harvard researchers have figured out a way to directly read and write to a neuron with digital electronics.

    • Harvard researchers have figured out a way to directly read and write to a neuron with digital electronics.

      It gives new meaning to the BSOD.
  • The researchers' first milestone is to generate a blastema -- a mass of cells able to develop into various organs or body parts -- in a mammal.

    Cue out-of-control flesh monster, Akira-style.
  • Look up 'charles becker', he did things like this in his research 20 years ago. Was regrowing rat legs right and left from what i remember.

    And isnt a rat pretty close to a human? Thats what they keep saying anyway.
  • by r00t (33219) on Sunday September 24 2006, @05:57PM (#16178729) Journal
    6 million dollar man
    Inspector Gadget
    Luke Skywalker

    Fake limbs can resist bullets. They can have powerful weapons and other tools. If you buy the Dr. Strangelove model, you get to blame the arm's buggy software when it grabs a woman's butt.
  • A member of each tem gets one limb sawn off and the first one to regrow it to appropriate size wins the prize!