Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Ask The Mythbusters

Posted by Zonk on Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:29 AM
from the she-blinded-me-with-science dept.
Who are the Mythbusters? Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman are the hosts of a unique and popular television show on the Discovery cable channel. Working from a background in the special effects industry and shooting on location at effects warehouse M5 Industries, Jamie and Adam attempt to shed light on hearsay, rumour, and myth. Along the way they usually run across a little bit of science, too. Today, you have a chance to put questions to them. We'll take the 15 best questions and pass them on to the gentlemen to be answered sometime soon after the Thanksgiving holiday. One question per comment, please, and keep things topical. We'll post their responses as soon as we get them back, so ask away.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Favorites (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MikesOnFire (324035) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:31AM (#14090541)
    Lets start simple -
    What is your favorite Busted Myth and your favorite Confirmed one?
  • Have you ever been completely blown away by what you've found? Has there been an experiment where you two just sit back and say "Huh...who woulda thought?" Most of the myths are pretty easy to debunk, but I'm just curious as to whether or not there was actually one that you guys did that totally shocked you in being true.
    • by neile (139369) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:47AM (#14090812)
      In last week's episode Adam was specifically saying how the myth they were testing (tailgate up or down for better fuel economy) was one of the experiments where the result totally surprised them.

      The same episode also had them surprised that a finger in the barrel of a gun, even though it couldn't stop the bullet, would actually cause enough pressure buildup to deform the gun barrel at the tip.

      Neil
    • Blows Me Away (Score:5, Interesting)

      by TubeSteak (669689) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:49AM (#14090844) Journal
      Have you ever been completely blown away by what you've found

      Well, there was that one show where they had they FBI hook them up with several TONS of high powered explosives.

      Then they used it to make a cement mixer truck dissappear.
      Here's the video [nyud.net] (CoralCDN to the rescue)

      That pretty much blew me away.
  • by richdun (672214) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:32AM (#14090570)
    With an unlimited budget, what "myth" would you most like to test? How about using 1960s technology to try and land on the moon?
  • by skywalker107 (220077) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:34AM (#14090589)
    What Myths have you tested that have never made it on the show? What about them made you and the producers decide they didn't qualify to go on the air?
  • by Winterblink (575267) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:34AM (#14090591) Homepage
    What has been your most challenging myth to bust? And is there a particular myth you feel would be a challenging one to try taking on?
      • by _xeno_ (155264) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @11:01AM (#14091013) Homepage Journal

        Given that you often refer to getting "lots of angry emails" based on the show, why would you agree to do an interview with one of the websites that's frequented by the type of people that generate most of that angry email? Are you hoping that they'll waste time posting comments and that you can let the moderators get rid of them as opposed to your staff?

        Oh, and can you get Discovery to show the show at some time other than 9:00PM EST on Wednesdays? I have a commitment then and always have to miss it. (Silly family.)

  • Injuries (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jacksonai (604950) <taladon@gmail.com> on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:34AM (#14090592)
    What is the worst injury anyone sustained while trying to bust a myth?
  • ultimate myth? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Antonymous Flower (848759) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:35AM (#14090602) Homepage
    What myth would the Mythbusters most like to investigate but lack the means to do so?
  • Cool (Score:5, Funny)

    by JWW (79176) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:35AM (#14090604)
    Mythbusters is a great show! Oh, yeah I should ask a question.

    I understand completely why you guys warn us to "not try this at home". But who warns you guys?

    Ok all joking aside. You guys do some really dangerous stuff on the show. What has been the scariest/ most hair raising moment on the show so far, a time when you might have thought "this is really going to hurt"?
  • upside down car (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Marqis (197235) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:35AM (#14090605) Homepage

    I heard that an F1 racing car has enough downdraft to drive upside down at speed. True or false?
  • Fact vs Fun (Score:5, Interesting)

    by elrick_the_brave (160509) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:35AM (#14090609)
    When I watch your show, it's obvious that there is a lot of fun going on. Who wouldn't like blowing up, breaking down, stinking up, falling down, and all-around destroying everything?

    For those of us not of TV-land.. how long does it take for you guys to produce an average episode.. how much of it is fun vs time spent working on getting it right?

    Would you consider a contest to have a guest helper? (Not that I am plugging this potential guest helper at all.. no!).
  • Is it true? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by robyannetta (820243) * on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:36AM (#14090614) Homepage
    Similar to a stunt in a famous James Bond film, can a person really be shot out of a submarine torpedo tube?
  • by tgd (2822) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:36AM (#14090619)
    What is Kari's phone number, and whats her favorite restaurant?
    • by Heliologue (883808) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:42AM (#14090721)
      I agree. Actually, I'm surprised this thread hasn't been overwhelmed with drooling over this very subject. In a related but more serious note: I've noticed that Kari seems to get more and more screen time; disproportionately so. Is there a concerted effort to boost her involvement (and no one is questioning her skill or usefulness) as a way to appeal to fans who, well, want to know her (in the Biblical sense)?
  • by hal2814 (725639) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:36AM (#14090626)
    Did you guys come up with the idea for the show or was it presented to you? If you came up with it yourself, how?
  • Budget (Score:5, Interesting)

    by wobedraggled (549225) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:36AM (#14090627) Homepage
    What is the most you can spend on one myth? What is the most spent so far on one myth? Thanks, and awesome show
  • q: (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TheBeardIsRed (695409) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:36AM (#14090628)
    What was the pitch process like for the show and what myths did you propose to sell the TV execs on it?
  • Impact on the World (Score:5, Interesting)

    by verbatim_verbose (411803) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:37AM (#14090636)
    Of all of the myths you have busted, has any one in particular stood out as changing the way much of the public thinks?
  • Gilligan's Island (Score:5, Interesting)

    by netglen (253539) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:37AM (#14090637)
    QUESTION: Is it possible to create batteries out of coconuts like in all those episodes of Gilligan's Island?
  • Computer myths? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Short Circuit (52384) * <mikemol@gmail.com> on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:37AM (#14090638) Homepage Journal
    Could you take on some computer myths? Like whether or not it was ever possible for a virus to destroy old monitors? It was rumored that if a virus could change the refresh rates to a too low or too high setting, you could fry some of the internal circuitry.
  • Critique (Score:5, Interesting)

    by CrazySailor (20688) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:37AM (#14090643) Homepage Journal
    How would you address the critique that you excessively extrapolate from a single data point to a generality?

    In particular I refer to a show where you were examining fuel mileage on SUVs with windows open vs. air conditioning. As an engineer, I believe that you failed to conduct adequate experimentation to demonstrate anything other than results at a single data point and you didn't make that clear to your viewers.
  • Source Material (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DigitalSorceress (156609) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:38AM (#14090657)
    I've been a fan since your first season, and in that time, you've covered quite a few of the big, classic myths and legends. Are you ever concerned that you'll "use up" all the best source material, sort of running out of steam as it were? or is the internet such a fertile ground for kooks and bad jokes that you figure you can go on indefinitely (or at least until you accidentally cause the spontaneous destruction of the universe while trying to prove a theory about the second gunman in the Grassy Knoll)
  • by dslauson (914147) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:38AM (#14090662) Journal
    Dear Mythbusters-
    It seems like it must be tempting to definitively call a myth "busted", even though the reality is that you just couldn't duplicate the results. Whether something is fact or fiction, scientifically a myth probably shouldn't be considered "busted" unless you have empirically show it to be implausable.

    You guys generally do a good job of this, though on occasion I've seen an episode where you seemed a little premature. What can you say about where you draw the line, and do you feel like you generally do a good job of following the scientific method to get your results?

    Also, can you get me that redhead's phone number?
  • by GigsVT (208848) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:38AM (#14090663) Journal
    Are Kari and Grant a couple? I noticed Grant let Kari use his TI-30Xa calculator. I can't imagine such a sacrifice would be made lightly.
  • by s20451 (410424) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:38AM (#14090666) Journal
    Let me firstly say that I like your show as entertainment. However, I do not like it as a form of true skepticism or as science. What you do is fun and interesting, but it is not rigorous. I'm thinking particularly of the time you tried to flip a taxi with a jet engine, which failed on your show, but which actually happened in real life. So it's not obvious that a failure on your show means anything.

    My question is this: are you taking yourselves too seriously as "myth busters"? (And a suggestion: why not let a physics prof supervise some of your stunts?)
    • I'll second this! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by raygundan (16760) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:56AM (#14090947) Homepage
      I love the show, and maybe this would ruin the show's mainstream appeal, but I'd LOVE to have a couple of resident Physicists and Engineers advising them to get more rigorous results. Things get waaaaay too oversimplified.

      To add to your jet engine example, my biggest gripe was always their "windows down vs. AC" gas-mileage test. All their test could possibly show was that at the one tested speed in the one tested vehicle, that's what happened. Even their retraction and correction later was oversimplified-- they explained that at some point, the speed of a vehicle becomes great enough that the AC wins over the windows-- but they acted like that number is the same for all cars regardless of all the other variables. (engine size, AC design, window size and position, and overall aerodynamic shape, to name a few)
  • Blasting Zone Myth (Score:5, Interesting)

    by fatboy (6851) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:39AM (#14090673)
    Hey guys, love the show. I was wondering why you have not tackled the "Blasting Zone" myth. You know, were you are asked to turn off 2-way radio equipment and Cell Phones when passing through a "Blasting Zone". I ask this because several years ago there was an accidental blast in my home town and many speculated on the radio that it was caused by RF from a cellphone. Several of us amateur radio operators kind of laughed at that because there are few guys that supposedly tried to set off a blasting cap with radios, just to see if it could be done. They went so far as to even wire the blasting cap into a 100 watt VHF (low band ~50Mhz) radio's antenna jack. Nope it didn't go off. Using inverse square law, it seems very unlikely that a cellphone or 2-way radio could set off a blasting cap at any distance.
  • Budget restrictions? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Mr Bill (21249) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:39AM (#14090677)

    What sort of budget limits do you guys have for your show these days? I remember seeing some earlier episodes where money really seemed to be an issue (spending an extra $700 on helium for the weather baloon lawn chair seemed to cause some concern). Whereas these days you guys seem to have no problem blowing up cement trucks or catapulting a boom lift.

    As a corollary: Which experiment(s) ran rediculously over budget, and which one was surpirisingly cheap to pull off?

  • by unipus (731704) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:39AM (#14090681) Homepage
    Hey guys, great show! Just wondering, what's are the best and worst aspects of moving from behind the scenes to in front of the lens?
  • Question (Score:5, Interesting)

    by lunchlady55 (471982) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:39AM (#14090684)
    What is the most tedious part of busting myths? I'm sure alot of the fun and games gets on camera, but what are we not seeing and why is it still important?
  • Myths you cannot do? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jessejay356 (625312) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:41AM (#14090702) Homepage
    Have there been any myths that were either too expensive or dangerous that you just would not do?
  • by arnie_apesacrappin (200185) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:42AM (#14090729)
    When watching the show, the introduction emphasizes your experience in the special effects industry but I think I recall you referring to yourselves as scientists on occasion. The reason I ask for clarification is that you routinely ignore good scientific methods. The best example I can think of off the top of my head was the windows down vs. air conditioning myth. I know you revisited the myth, but your initial tests were poor science at best. Couldn't you have some sort of science advisor to at least make sure that there is some sort of logical sense to your experiments?

    Even with my harsh comments, I'm not disrespecting your show. I have it setup to record on my DVR every week. I mostly enjoy the shows but occasionally your lack of scientific method is maddening. I realize you are probably cutting a lot out for the sake of TV, but could you at least point out that there are some possibilities you aren't testing?

  • by Aggrazel (13616) <aggrazel@gmail.com> on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:44AM (#14090761) Journal
    I'm a father of a 7 year old who absolutely loves your show. We have it on our tivo and I'm constantly pausing the show to ask him what he thinks will happen in your experiments.

    You start every show with "Don't try this at home" but sometimes there are experiments that you do which you could try this at home. Have you ever considered having a show where you say, "DO Try this at home?" Its fun to see my child get such a love of science in such a fun way.
  • Scientist on staff? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by caveat (26803) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:44AM (#14090766)
    I've noticed you guys have a regard for the scientific method, and make quite an effort to try and keep things controlled with regards to how you run your experiments and derive your conclusions. Have you ever considered bringing a formally trained scientist onto the crew to make sure you're going "by the book", so to speak?
  • M5 Industries (Score:5, Interesting)

    by JBMcB (73720) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:46AM (#14090801)
    Are you still doing special effects for commercials and/or movies, or is Mythbusters your full time job now? Have your mythbusting experiments helped out with your special effects work?
  • by AngryMuppet (876030) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:49AM (#14090834)
    BA Baracus [imdb.com] or Angus MacGyver [imdb.com]?
  • Guests on the show (Score:5, Interesting)

    by LMac (891134) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:51AM (#14090874)
    Have you ever considered having "Guest Busters"? For example if a viewer suggests a good myth to bust and it makes the cut, they get to come on the show and help you guys out.
  • Shown vs. Not Shown (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Craig Maloney (1104) * on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:52AM (#14090886) Homepage
    Hi Guys,

    Has there ever been a segment that you wish had been shown, but didn't make the cut? Conversely, was there a segment that did make the final show that you wish had not been shown?
  • by TheRealMindChild (743925) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @10:56AM (#14090939) Homepage Journal
    What everyone REALLY wants to know is (several questions, but one answer can nail them all):

    - Would you choose to be a Super Hero duo, or a pair of villains, which would you be?
    - Would they be original characters, or someone/something that already exists?
    - Would you wear tights?
    - WHY?
  • Insurance issues (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mattegger (265484) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @11:00AM (#14090996)
    Last year I heard an insurance underwriter speak about the challenges of covering reality TV. I don't want to lump your program in the same category of "reality" TV, but he did mention that there were shows or specific stunts that he was not able to cover. Have you ever been unable to debunk a myth because of liability/insurance reasons?
  • Bloopers! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by binaryDigit (557647) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @11:01AM (#14091019)
    You guys should easily have enough blooper material to fill a show by now, let's have it.

    So, barring, that, my question would be, what are your top 5 "oops" incidents that never made it on to the screen?
  • by iotashan (761097) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @11:03AM (#14091036)
    How do you feel when you've finished exploring a myth in front of the cameras, knowing that your results are being closely scrutinized by geeks worldwide, and, in a lot of cases, by experts in their respective fields?
  • working at M5 (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kin_korn_karn (466864) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @11:07AM (#14091083) Homepage
    How do you recruit talent for M5? What qualifies someone to work there?

  • by tdischino (398464) on Tuesday November 22 2005, @11:10AM (#14091113) Homepage Journal
    What's the naughtiest/kinkiest thing you've ever molded with Ballistics Gel?