Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

U.S. Scientists Create Zombie Dogs

Posted by timothy on Mon Jun 27, 2005 02:58 PM
from the ooh-that's-chilly dept.
Alex_Ionescu writes "U.S. scientists have managed to revive dead dogs to life, by using a technique similar to cryogenation, in which the dogs' blood was drained and replaced by a cold, saline liquid. A couple of hours, their blood was replaced, and an electric shock brought them back to life with no brain damage. The technology will be tested on humans within the next year."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • well... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by darthpenguin (206566) * on Monday June 27 2005, @02:59PM (#12924086) Homepage

    The article is somewhat light on facts. From what I recall, during drowning or suffocation, brain damage occurs in humans quite soon (10 minutes?). How is it that this process negates the lack of oxygen to the brain, allowing no damage to occur? Is it the temperature of the liquid used for replacing the blood?

    Also, the article has "Although the animals are clinically dead, their tissues and organs are perfectly preserved." followed immediately by "Damaged blood vessels and tissues can then be repaired via surgery." So, which is it?

    I suppose we'll have to wait for a real scientific journal to publish this before we find out much more.

    Also, another attempt at hibernation, this time in mice [washingtonpost.com], using a different method involving hydrogen sulfide gas.

    • Re:well... (Score:4, Informative)

      by ruggerboy (553525) * on Monday June 27 2005, @03:01PM (#12924131)
      "Damaged blood vessels and tissues can then be repaired via surgery." I think this means gunshot wounds etc.
      • Re:well... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Rei (128717) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:09PM (#12924285) Homepage
        Yep. And the reason that they don't get brain damaged is because their neurons aren't dying. And their neurons aren't dying because they're not metabolizing, and thus needing oxygen. The brain is in hibernation, just like the rest of the body.

        Still, this is ubercreepy. Even the electrical shock at the end bit... sounds like 50s sci-fi. What's next? "The shock required is quite intense, so facilities doing this work will need to affix a lightning rod to their roof and wait for a storm..."?
        • Re:well... (Score:5, Funny)

          by lucabrasi999 (585141) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:14PM (#12924371) Journal
          Still, this is ubercreepy. Even the electrical shock at the end bit... sounds like 50s sci-fi. What's next? "The shock required is quite intense, so facilities doing this work will need to affix a lightning rod to their roof and wait for a storm..."?

          I can hear it now:


          Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Igor, would you mind telling me whose brain I did put in?
          Igor: And you won't be angry?
          Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: I will NOT be angry.
          Igor: Abby someone.
          Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Abby someone. Abby who?
          Igor: Abby Normal.
          Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Abby Normal?
          Igor: I'm almost sure that was the name.
          Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Are you saying that I put an abnormal brain into a seven and a half foot long, fifty-four inch wide GORILLA? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE TELLING ME?
          • a script (Score:5, Interesting)

            by wattersa (629338) <(moc.srettawwerdna) (ta) (werdna)> on Tuesday June 28 2005, @07:59PM (#12937575) Homepage
            Interior, large hospital emergency room

            We hear beeping sounds of monitoring devices; voices from the nearby nurse's station. The lighting is yellowish flourescent in the hallway for a sad, depressing atmosphere. It's a public hospital, so no one thought to have an interior designer make happy colors. The interior of the room is bright with white flouresent light.

            POV: facing LAUREN, just inside doorway. She's just been crying and is still wearing her street clothes.

            POV: LAUREN, looking into room.

            ANDY has just been wheeled into the room with a major gun shot wound to the chest. The wound is covered by a washcloth and shows some blood, but not a lot. He's behind a curtain setup so only his lower body is clearly visible.

            A NURSE (Asian female, early 30's) is facing away from us and is adjusting a piece of equipment.

            A DOCTOR (White female, 40's) is facing away from us and illuminated behind the curtain. She's dictating into a tape recorder between probing ANDY's injuries: "Bleeding from perforation of the left thoracic cavity 8cm from center of sternum." Pause. "Fracture of the fourth thoracic rib." Pause. "Wound track and cavity visible. Left lung perforated approx. 4 cm from inner side." Long pause. "Laceration of the circumflex coronary artery. Fragment not found." Pauses tape. (To NURSE) "Get me the chest x-ray please." Starts tape and continues indistinctly.

            Fade to black.

            Fade back in. More people are in the room. An X-RAY TECHNICIAN (Black male, 30's) is wheeling out the x-ray machine. It's digital, so the results appear on a CRT monitor in the room. The DOCTOR and SURGEON (white male, 50 and graying) discuss the x-ray and gesture to parts of it. They are ignoring LAUREN, who is still standing in the doorway. Finally, DOCTOR comes over to LAUREN and removes her bloody gloves.

            DOCTOR: Are you Mrs. Watters?

            LAUREN: Yes.

            DOCTOR: I'm going to explain what happened and what your options are.

            LAUREN: (Bravely) ok.

            Blood begins to drip onto the floor, which LAUREN doesn't notice but we do (center of frame between DOCTOR and LAUREN). NURSE puts absorbent towels onto the small pool that's forming.

            DOCTOR: Your husband was shot in his chest area fairly close to his heart. The bleeding is serious and we're trying to stop it. The biggest problem is that the heart was injured and we can't repair it completely without stopping it.

            NURSE comes up to both of them and stands there.

            LAUREN: What does that mean?

            DOCTOR: (ignoring her question) You have three options. The first option is for us to try open heart surgery. That is risky and means we have to stop the heart and use a heart-lung machine. The second option is for us to do what's called a "saline evacuation," which means we essentially put the body on ice for a couple of hours while we try to repair the heart. That's the most risky by far. The last option is for us to end treatment now.

            LAUREN: ...which one do you recommend?

            DOCTOR: I'm afraid I can't tell you that.

            LAUREN: (Confused) Why not? I have no idea which one I should do.

            DOCTOR: Liability reasons. (To NURSE) Come get me when she chooses.

            DOCTOR leaves the room, giving the impression of indifference to ANDY's condition and LAUREN's confusion.

            NURSE: Ok Mrs. Watters, you need to decide what to do now.

            LAUREN: (Confused) Well what did she mean by "put him on ice?"

            NURSE: It's where we take out all his blood and replace it with icewater.

            LAUREN: (Dumbfounded). Doesn't that mean he would die?

            NURSE: Not exactly. It's a technique they did a few years ago to save wounded army people. The heart stops but everything stays preserved and then you can restart the heart after surgery.

            LAUREN: Surgery?

            NURSE: To repair whatever damage there is. Your husband has a cut in his heart and they can't do anything about it as long as the heart's beating
        • This hits home... (Score:5, Interesting)

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2005, @03:33PM (#12924651)
          On Sunday morning I was playing tennis with an older man I met in an online league. He was turning around to pick up a ball and he suffered a major heart attack and collapsed. His heart stopped for about 10 minutes on the tennis court while a girl from the court next to us performed CPR. He's in a coma in an ICU right now. The doctors said that stabilizing his heart is a primary concern right now, but that in the coming days discerning any damage done to his brain due to oxygen loss will become a primary concern.

          One of the things the doctor told us was that they were going to actually induce hypothermia in him while he is in the ICU. Recent studies have provided evidence that doing so may limit the brain damage caused by the loss of oxygen to the brain. Of course, in his case, it was extremely important (and fortunate) that CPR was started soon after his heart stopped, thus limiting the loss of oxygen to his brain.

          Hopefully studies like this will lead to more treatments which help people recover from heart failure.
        • Re:well... (Score:5, Interesting)

          Yep. And the reason that they don't get brain damaged is because their neurons aren't dying. And their neurons aren't dying because they're not metabolizing, and thus needing oxygen. The brain is in hibernation, just like the rest of the body.

          So is there a temperature limit for metabolizing?

          Cell death is of two kinds - apoptosis or necrosis. Apoptosis is programmed cell death (when the lysosomes break), whereas necrosis is due to cell damage - and in this case, lack of oxygen. Cells that die due to necrosis show a lower level of ATP - so it makes sense that the cell was trying to metabolize the remaining oxygen and ran out.

          From here [bham.ac.uk], you can see that the increase in Ca2+ ions leads to chain of events that eventually leads to necrosis. Ca2+ ions over a certain threshold inhibits the energy and respiratory processes. I guess the question is, what is stopping the neuron from trying to metabolize?

          What I'm assuming is that it takes longer for the blood in the body to cool down, during which time the neurons can continue metabolizing. But when the temperature is suddenly lowered to 7C, metabolysis stops? But we couldn't just quickly lower the temperature of the body to 7C because it would take > 5 min for the blood to cool.
    • Re:well... (Score:5, Informative)

      by Binestar (28861) * on Monday June 27 2005, @03:02PM (#12924146) Homepage
      Also, the article has "Although the animals are clinically dead, their tissues and organs are perfectly preserved." followed immediately by "Damaged blood vessels and tissues can then be repaired via surgery." So, which is it?

      They were refering to the use of this in medical emergencies. Put someone into this state, work on the damaged tissue with no bleeding or time crunch, then revive when they are fixed.

      I'm more interested in knowing who the hell is going to volunteer for this procedure...
      • Re:well... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by daniil (775990) <evilbj8rn@hotmail.com> on Monday June 27 2005, @03:04PM (#12924199) Journal
        I'm more interested in knowing who the hell is going to volunteer for this procedure...

        A mortally wounded gunshot victim?

            • Re:well... (Score:5, Informative)

              by evilpenguin (18720) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:25PM (#12924535)
              The Tuskegee airmen and the Tuskegee syphilus study aren't the same thing! (Although both refer to the same place).

              The evil government experiment was the Tuskegee syphilus study. They told residents of Tuskegee that they would receive free syphilus treatment and then treatment was withheld so the effects of syphilus could be scientifically documented and studied.

              I do not know if any of the Tuskegee Airmen (the only black squadron -- or the first, I don't remember -- in WWII) were in the study also, but they are not the same thing at all.
      • Re:well... (Score:5, Funny)

        by lucabrasi999 (585141) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:05PM (#12924214) Journal
        I'm more interested in knowing who the hell is going to volunteer for this procedure...

        George Romero? [imdb.com]

      • Re:well... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Carnildo (712617) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:05PM (#12924218) Homepage Journal
        Well, one obvious use is for open-heart surgery -- that goes a whole lot easier if you can stop the heart, and heart-lung machines aren't perfect. I think the first human trials will be volunteers who are additionally undergoing major surgery.
      • Re:well... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by kfg (145172) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:38PM (#12924716)
        Once upon a time, a long, long time ago, I was brought into the hospital for lifesaving surgery. . .but my condition was such that it was deemed I would die from the stress of undergoing surgery.

        This is the sort of person who will volunteer. A person who has nothing to lose if the procedure fails, but everything to gain if it succeeds.

        KFG

        P.S. I got better.
        • Re:well... (Score:5, Funny)

          by Rei (128717) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:14PM (#12924364) Homepage
          I'm wondering if the US (or other countries) would allow those on death row to volunteer

          So what... they kill them, bring them back to life, and kill them again? That explains the concept of being given multiple sentences of death ;)

          Besides... from what I heard, as soon as the dogs were brought back, they immediately headed to the nearest computer and started incessently sending out bulk email.
          • Re:well... (Score:5, Funny)

            by dcam (615646) <david.uberconcept@com> on Monday June 27 2005, @08:18PM (#12927385) Homepage
            So what... they kill them, bring them back to life, and kill them again? That explains the concept of being given multiple sentences of death ;)

            It could also be very convenient. Suppose not all the grieving relatives were able to make it to the execution. You could stage it again, possibly even closer to their homes. Think of the possibilities.

            OK, I'll go sit in the corner and take my sense of humour with me.
        • by cnelzie (451984) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:14PM (#12924381) Homepage
          ...they could use this for the next set of Skull Sharing Conjoined Twins in an operation to split them apart.
    • Re:well... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Sosarian (39969) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:06PM (#12924235) Homepage
      Also, the article has "Although the animals are clinically dead, their tissues and organs are perfectly preserved." followed immediately by "Damaged blood vessels and tissues can then be repaired via surgery." So, which is it?
      Um both? If your blood vessels are damaged by a gunshot wound as stated in the article and you have massive bloodloss this would keep you "alive" by keeping you dead for a time while they patched you up.

      Personally I think the fluids would just drain out of whatever wounds you do have.

      I think a better application of this technology will be for these multi-hour operations where they want to repair heart defects or do transplants, in which they currently induce hypothermic states.

    • Re:well... (Score:5, Informative)

      by cmpalmer (234347) * on Monday June 27 2005, @03:09PM (#12924272) Homepage
      There was a good summary of this technique as well as the hydrogen sulfide method in an article in Discover last month. This appears to be a very hot (no pun intended) topic in experimental medicine.

    • Re:well... (Score:5, Informative)

      by Ungrounded Lightning (62228) on Monday June 27 2005, @04:55PM (#12925633) Journal
      From what I recall, during drowning or suffocation, brain damage occurs in humans quite soon (10 minutes?). How is it that this process negates the lack of oxygen to the brain, allowing no damage to occur?

      The 10 minute limit is for slow suffocation at normal temperatures. Two things happen:

      - First, many of the tiny valves controlling the distribution of blood in the brain capilaries shut, trying to route the remaining oxygen to the neurons controlling things like breathing and heart rate.

      These valves are tiny muscles, which, once contracted, require power (from metabolization) to reopen. Let them be oxygen-starved for too long - about ten minutes - and they get stuck closed. Then, even once oxygen is restored, the blood remains cut off to the areas they control. (It does no good to raise the blood pressure to try to force blood past them: You'll blow the plumbing before they leak. Massive stroke.)

      - Second: As with the muscles, the neurons have continuous chemical reactions going on that cause damage that must be cleaned up by active, powered, systems. Turn down the oxygen while leaving the temperature up and the cleanup systems fail while the damage mechanisms continue. (Firing the nerve uses up additional power, making the problem worse.)

      Let this go on for more than half an hour or so without turning the air back on and the damage gets ahead of the nerve's ability to repair it - causing cell death. That ruptures the cell and releases a glutamate - which tends to force other nearby nerves to fire, consuming their resources and speeding their death, in the "glutamate chain reaction". This easily gets started in regions of the brain fed by still-shut-off plumbing. But with enough glutimate dumped it can spread to nearby areas that have adequate oxygen - because it's not adequate to keep ahead of the massive firing and cell exhaustion.

      The first mechanism sets the normal time limit. But the second is the final catastrophe.

      But diving sets up a condition much like suffocation upon resurfacing: Swimming underwater pressurizes the gas in the lungs, and the organism can remain active for some time before it starts to run out of oxygen. But then it takes time to get back to the surface - and the lowered pressure on the ascent causes oxygen levels in the blood and tissue to crash. Not good.

      Evolution came up with a workaround: The "mamilian diving reflex", so called because it's characteristic of all mamals - happened a LONG time back.

      When the reflex detects a deep dive (cold on the skin - especially on the back of the neck, I think), it modifies the valves' reaction to overall oxygen shortage: Instead of shutting off blood to "unimportant" (for respiration) parts of the brain, it causes ALL the valves to OPEN. Then if they stick they stick open. This risks speeding respiratory failure. But once (if) oxygen is restored, it allows it to reach ALL the brain. Get oxygen back before the cells start dying (after a half hour or so) and they all get the power they nead to clean up and get on with life.

      So if you drown in COLD water you can be breathing-stopped for a half-hour or a bit more and still be restarted with no long-term brain damage.

      This treatment seems to extend on that: Flooding with cold saline will activate the diving reflex, sticking the valves open. Then the rapid oxygen loss will shut down all energy-driven metabolism - both the repair and some of the damage-makers.

      Meanwhile, the deep cooling of the tissue (to essentially refrigerator temperatures) will slow the other damaging chemical reactions, just as refrigeration slows meat spoilage. (It IS slowing meat spoilage! And 7C is about 45F, close to the 40F recommended for refrigerator settings.) This is probably the main factor in getting past the half-hour limit on cold-drowning.

      Separate storage of the blood allows the replacement fluid to be optimized to cool the rest of the body at a more rapid rate than could be accom
  • by NegativeOneUserID (812728) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:00PM (#12924099)
    Ok, looks like taxes are the only sure bet left.
  • by rebug (520669) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:00PM (#12924107)
    New Gravy Brains(TM) brand dog food has the brain flavor your zombie dog craves.
  • Oh no! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by zalas (682627) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:01PM (#12924124) Homepage
    Oh man... I can see the flood of Resident Evil jokes now...
  • Big Deal (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2005, @03:01PM (#12924136)
    I've heard stories of Keith Richards doing this sort of thing since the '70s.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2005, @03:02PM (#12924150)
    The Russians did the same thing in 1940 [archive.org].
    • Right, but in 1940 they were still the Soviet Union. So, technically, dogs created zombie scientists.
      • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 27 2005, @03:50PM (#12924848)
        If I remember the old joke right* :

        Monday: U.S. scientists announce a new discovery.
        Tuesday: Pravda reports that Soviet scientists discovered it 20 years ago.
        Thursday: German engineers invent a device that puts the discovery to use.
        Friday: Japan exports the device to the U.S.

        If only I could remember what happened on Wednesday...

        * Last heard this one back in the early 1980's, if that helps put the stereotypes in context.
  • Brains!? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Zediker (885207) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:03PM (#12924171)
    BRA.... errr... BONES!!!
  • by GPLDAN (732269) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:03PM (#12924176)
    From the Desk of Paramount Studios:

    George, baby, love that flick in the theaters now. Yeah, brilliant baby, that whole cpaitalist pig dog thing, and the gore, man you are the best...

    George, baby, I was wondering if we could take lunch next week with you and Stephen. Yeah, we got this new story based on real life, we think it's right up your alley...
  • by sl8763 (777589) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:05PM (#12924209)
    The Good: Zombie dogs are much slower than the normal kind.

    The Bad: Normal dogs will not attempt to eat your juicy, delicious brain.
  • by nizo (81281) * on Monday June 27 2005, @03:05PM (#12924212) Homepage Journal
    The picture that comes with the article sure makes this whole process look really appealing. It reminds me of the picture that the local news station shows when there is any asteroid in the news (a huge moon-sized rock hitting the earth). Aren't stock pictures great?
  • GRAAIIINNNNSSSS...Grains...
  • by DanielMarkham (765899) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:10PM (#12924310) Homepage
    This is a follow-on to an article in Scientific American this month. Interestingly enough, the article concluded that cells stay viable just fine in very high or very low oxygen environments. It's the transition stage that causes all the damage.
    Hence the reason for injecting saline -- it takes the oxygen-carrying blood out of the tisses almost immediately, which is what you want to do. The SA article authors said this seems a little extreme to use in humans, and I agree. They've had some success with mice using Hydrogen Sulfide, I think, mixed in with air. Also, surgery for animals that are "dead" brings in a whole new line of specialties that we haven't developed yet. This is going to be a fascinating area to watch, imo.
  • ObNethack (Score:5, Funny)

    by cswiii (11061) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:28PM (#12924576)

    What do you want to #rub?
    (w) - saline liquid
    What do you want to rub the vial of saline liquid with?
    (Q) - wand of cold
    The vial glows briefly.
    What do you want to wield?
    (w) - saline liquid (cold)
    You break the vial over the little dog's head. --more--
    The little dog yelps! --more--
    The little dog falls asleep.
    The zombie dog awakens! The zombie dog bites! --more--
    The zombie dog bites!
  • by BuckaBooBob (635108) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:39PM (#12924732)
    Just look at a list of other stories they are currently covering

    12-year-old girl gets divorce
    Goats recruited to fight bushfires
    Scientists create robot lobster
    The most dangerous day of the week
    Cookie trail leads to suspects
    Soldiers steal tank to buy vodka
    Bonking, brawls and booze
    Man gets $2600 for plaster Jesus
    New shop to turn away the rich
    Sticky stunt's disastrous end

    Drop the story and move on :)
    • Re:No brain damage (Score:5, Interesting)

      by ScentCone (795499) on Monday June 27 2005, @03:16PM (#12924412)
      You'd have to really know a dog well (and observe its sensory and motor skills, note its emotional stability, and have a sense of its habits) before subjecting it to this sort of process. And then you'd have to pursue the dog's regular activities afterwards and note the changes. Anyone who has lived with a bright, energetic dog can tell you instantly if the animal is "off" in some way. Just like you'd notice it in your child. Now, longer-term issues, who knows. Like, would some degenerative, trauma-induced thing (something Alzheimers-ish) kick in later? No way to know. But no matter how good your brain scans or other imaging techniques may be, these are complex animals, and long-time handler/owner could tell you if you'd dropped a couple of circuits along the way.

      Why would you want to freeze someone indefinately? Let's go for a Sci-Fi answer since we're dealing with a near-Sci-Fi topic. Let's say that you've got the aging examples of some really prize breedings from a particular bloodline (I'm talking dogs here). And then, something ugly not unlike hoof-and-mouth, or bird flu starts turning in a species-specific pandemic. If I were a breeder that had been perfecting a bloodline for 50 years, I'd seriously consider taking a couple of those dogs and letting them have A Big Nap.

      For a lot of breeders, they love the individual dogs, but their truly beloved "pet" is the bloodline out of which they spring. Generations (of human lives) go into creating something as unique as a specialized dog (or bull, or chicken), so ways to put them on ice for later revival once a viral or other threat has been understood (or a vaccine developed) could be very compelling.

      I'd say all the same things about humans, but I'd be very Politically Incorrect at that point, so of course I won't.