Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science Technology

MagLev Trains Annoyingly Loud 251

crem_d_genes writes "You might hear that whistle blowing from that train coming 'round the bend, but tapes of the sounds produced by magnetically levitated and normal trains produced a result that was something of a surprise: Most people rated maglev trains as more disturbing than standard intercity trains. It had been previously known that the two types were about equally loud, but this study analyzed people's reactions to them. Since the effects on the environment will be part of the feasibilty studies for future development, acoustical engineers will have some new challenges. Some participants in the study said the sound made them 'feel insecure, some found it startling, and disliked the occasional shrill sound the maglevs produced.' The researcher postulated that unfamiliarity with the noise might be part of the problem."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

MagLev Trains Annoyingly Loud

Comments Filter:
  • Audio links (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Whispers_in_the_dark ( 560817 ) * <rich@harkins.gmail@com> on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:32AM (#8814495)
    Does anyone know of links to audio samples of a maglev? I've never heard one and some rudimentary googling didn't turn them up.

  • Noise Qualities (Score:5, Interesting)

    by toxic666 ( 529648 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:34AM (#8814506)
    The quality of the noise source is as important as its intensity (i.e. decibels). Some noise patterns are just plain annoying. For instance, in noise studies, helicopters are considered more annoying and have lower acceptable decibel thresholds; the old Hueys are a prime example.
    • I grew up in Sacramento in the 1970s, basically surrounded by Air Force bases. I've always loved the sound of Hueys flying overhead.
      • Reminds me when I was on a summer internship in San Diego, working about 10 miles north of MCAS Miramar. I would hear F/A-18's flying overhead on a daily basis. Too bad I never got any pictures of those, because they had always passed by the time I got my camera out. They also flew choppers, but those were nowhere near as loud, but much easier to snap a photo of.
    • by Gabrill ( 556503 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:05AM (#8814833)
      Speaking of unfamiliar and disturbing phenomena, go back and read some of the reports on the first helicopters. Some of them are quite humorous. "Somebody's WINDMILL just flew by!"
      • The one I liked is this story about one of the early prototype helicopters from Sikorsky landing in a farmer's field; it was just an engine, rotors, and skeletal frame without a proper cockpit or outer skin. This farmer walks up to the test pilot, and asks, "Did'ya build it yourself, son?"

        I can't wait 'til one of the X-Prize guys lands in a farmer's field... "Do'ya come in peace?"
    • What about the sound of a baby crying? Even at whisper-level decibels that shit is gonna make you want to commit infanticide!
    • Re:Noise Qualities (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Simonetta ( 207550 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:48AM (#8815261)
      For instance, in noise studies, helicopters are considered more annoying...

      Maybe it's a Pavlovian response. The sound of an old Huey is basically that of a machine either coming to kill you or coming to carry you off to be killed.

      The huge whirling blades are subliminal reinforcements of the motif of the 'grim reaper'.
      • Re:Noise Qualities (Score:3, Interesting)

        by delus10n0 ( 524126 )
        Reminds me of the Stuka dive bombers of WWII, where the wheel/gear coverings had wind-powered sirens in them.. when they were making a pass, you'd hear it! I don't recall where I read it, but I believe Hitler was the one to come up with the idea, and actually required all Stukas to have this feature.
      • Re:Noise Qualities (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Dirtside ( 91468 )
        Where would the average (e.g.) American have learned to fear the sound of a Huey? A Pavlovian response is a learned response; I don't think most people associate the sound of a helicopter with imminent death.
    • as in the sound they make is used to instill fear and such. There are some real interesting uses of noise.

      Of course what helicopters sound like in movies is usually different than in real life. Friends of mine can tell you what chopper is coming just by the sound from the blades.

      That being said, instead of masking the sound of the train perhaps they can tune it to sound more pleasant :)
      • by whittrash ( 693570 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @12:00PM (#8816158) Journal
        High pitch sounds are more painful to listen to, but they are easier to block than low pitch sounds which can travel thorugh the ground, especially at ground level where barriers can block noises. High pitch sound doesn't travel as far either. I would wager that being right next to the tracks would indeed be a painful experience, but half a block away I bet it isn't as bad and 2 blocks away is probably easily tolerable. I would bet that it has much less vibration which is a big problem for trains. Some steps they can take to mitigate noise:

        1. Planting heavy shrubs near rail lines. Plantings can be designed to absorb specific sound spectrums.
        2. Sound blocking berms or fences.
        3. Double foundation walls with an air cavity between which don't allow sound transfer through the ground.
        4. Larger setbacks from the noise source.
        • You know, if I'm a couple hundred miles away - I wouldn't hear it at all. ;-)

          Seriously though, why don't they try using small speakers placed along the line of the train which project anti-soundwave patterns so the two cancel each other out. Like the devices now being put into people's homes? And for those inside as well. [soundcoat.com]

          Here's another site about quieting down buses et al. [quietsolution.com]

          Oh well. I looked and could not find the sound device (electronic) which matches incoming sounds and then creates the alternate s
    • Re:Noise Qualities (Score:5, Interesting)

      by JaredOfEuropa ( 526365 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @01:13PM (#8816986) Journal
      Some noise patterns are just plain annoying
      Quite right. My favorite example: a dripping faucet. This noise can be very faint; just on the edge of what you can still hear. But be honest: when you're lying in bed, as soon as you have identified the source of that faint, constant tapping, you just have to get up and turn off that faucet!

      In contrast, a running AC can make quite a bit of noise, but the sound is continuous and similar to white noise. Almost no-one has trouble falling asleep to the sound of an AC, in fact, if you are being kept awake by a dripping faucet or other noises, switch on the AC and its noise may drown out the rest, allowing you to sleep. (I know, not the most environmentally sound solution...)

      That's the problem with sound pollution laws: they only take sound levels into account.
      • by Rich0 ( 548339 )
        I don't think it is the sound of faucet so much as the long pause between drops.

        If the wind is blowing continuously and the frame of your house is creaking continuously you'll probably fall right asleep. If the frame of the house creeks once every 15 seconds you'll think Jack the Ripper is out to get you...
  • by Jin Wicked ( 317953 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:35AM (#8814510) Homepage Journal

    Can anyone explain this to me about um... "traditional" train sound, because I've always wondered: Why are they so loud at night? I know trains run through the city here regularly, and I can't hear the train whistles where I live during the day, even though I know they still toot them, but at night I can here the trains that have got to be at least ten miles from here. Why is that?

    I would be curious if the sound of these kinds of trains carried in the same way. Normal train whistles aren't really unpleasant, but I wouldn't want to be listening to screeching noises from several miles away while I was trying to sleep. (The fact that I usually sleep during the day is irrelevant. =P)

    • by raider_red ( 156642 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:39AM (#8814558) Journal
      You can hear them better because there's less vehicular traffic during the night. When a city is on the move during the day, all the cars effectively produce a blanket of white noise that reduces your perception of all the other sounds.

      • by Anonymous Coward
        Not just cars, but wind.

        In the middle of the night there is no solar heating.

        Have you noticed that during the day there is almost always a breeze (which generates low levels of noise), but often on a clear night there is a dead calm.
      • Interesting...!

        I always thought perhaps there was some peculiar quality of train whistles, since I don't hear far away car horns at night, or things like that...

        • Well, a locomotive's air horn has the "peculiar quality" of being many times louder than a car's horn, so that's probably why you don't hear far away car horns at night. :)

          (Train geekiness follows: Trains haven't normally had "whistles" since the age of steam locomotives. They were quite loud, and could range from pleasant to shrill. Some of the later steam locomotives actually had an air horn as well to use in populated areas. Steam whistles make a little bit of noise when used with normal compressed

      • by dj245 ( 732906 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:42AM (#8815202) Homepage
        When a city is on the move during the day, all the cars effectively produce a blanket of white noise that reduces your perception of all the other sounds.

        White noise is a very good thing if you want to not hear certain sounds. In some doctor's offices they have little noisemakers that plug in and just make a little whirring noise. They serve absolutely no other purpose at all. They just obscure the conversations between the patients and the receptionists.

        I employ a similar technique to reduce the apparent noise I notice from the dorm hallway. I don't actually buy special noisemakers though, instead I have several computers and lots and lots of fans. It works fairly well to drown out talking, but it doesn't get rid of the booming bass from the neighbors.

        • A lot of these exist in workplaces as well. If you're ever up in the plenum and notice what appear to be paint cans hanging around, they're white noise generators. They have become very popular in cube land as you no longer have to listen to absolutely everyone else's conversations
    • White noise. During the day you're probably being bombarded with noise from thousands of sources all at the same time. During the night, that white noise is likely nearly absent.
    • by nomadic ( 141991 ) <`nomadicworld' `at' `gmail.com'> on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:39AM (#8814560) Homepage
      The regular trains actually stop at night, you're just hearing the ghost trains, which are noticeably louder than their corporeal counterparts.
      • Yeah definately, I'm kept awake all night by the eardrum shattering cries of

        'Keep your hands inside the train at all times' and

        'Roollllll up, two tokens a ride, only two tokens a ride! Sit on the outside, the west side it's the best siiiide!'

        Add to that the 10 year old techno music and it's a cacophony!
    • I think it is just because the ambient noise level tends to be lower during the night so you hear the trains more easily.
    • Here's one mad scientist's explanation [madsci.org].

      To summarize, during the day the presence of "masking" sounds makes it more difficult to hear distant sounds. At night, fewer masking sounds are present.

    • Can anyone explain this to me about um... "traditional" train sound, because I've always wondered

      Choo-choo. Didn't your parents ever buy you toys?

      Next!
    • Why are they so loud at night? I know trains run through the city here regularly, and I can't hear the train whistles where I live during the day, even though I know they still toot them, but at night I can here the trains that have got to be at least ten miles from here. Why is that?

      If there is a large body of water between you and the train tracks, or if you're in an area with weird cooling characteristics, you might be hearing the effects of a temperature inversion.

      Air temperatures right above large

    • Several suggestions out of my arse.

      1) The air is cooler and stiller at night - which lets sound pass through more easily

      2) The trains will toot there horn more at night, as the drivers can't see as far.

      3) At least in the UK, there are relatively more heavy goods trains on the rails at night compared to during the day, which are way heavier and so take much longer to stop - hence they needed louder horns to warn people further away.

      4) As other people have mentioned ambient noise is much lower at night, s
    • by macrom ( 537566 ) <macrom75@hotmail.com> on Friday April 09, 2004 @11:26AM (#8815764) Homepage
      Everyone has all of these theories on white noise and ambient noise and crap during the day. WRONG. I'll tell you the real reason. Train engineers are assholes. I lived next to train tracks for a few years and during the day trains NEVER wailed on their horns. But come night time those f'ers would just sit on the horn for miles. Maybe it's a safety thing, that at night drivers may be sleepy and need advanced warning for a train, but I dunno.

      So keep all of your white noise theories and I'll keep my "train engineers are assholes that just want to wake up all of the sleeping people at 3 a.m." theory.
  • by MrZaius ( 321037 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:36AM (#8814519) Homepage
    Videos of maglev trains, with sound. [calmaglev.org] My apologies in advance to the host.

    Let the /.'ing commence!
    • by Azureflare ( 645778 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:07AM (#8814845)
      Listening to the train_entering_garage_240x180.mov, I think it sounds kind of cool. It reminds me of a spaceship sound from some scifi movie. I think maybe the one at high speed might be worse, but I can't really tell because the sound quality is so low for the ones where the train is going fast.

      Anyway, here's the easiest solution I can think of to this problem of the high pitched noise: Don't live near the tracks if it bothers you!

      Also, they could construct a dome around the tracks... Though that would cost a lot of money.

      For a real solution, perhaps they could also try that method [slashdot.org] the guy at BYU used to reduce noise from cpu fans.

  • by RailGunner ( 554645 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:38AM (#8814543) Journal
    They have these white noise generators that help filter out noises in a cubicle farm, they work by disrupting all sound waves and getting them to cancel out. Maybe there's a way to attach something similar to a MagLev train.

    Of course, if it works too well it'll sound like someone's letting the air out of every tire in the block...

    • by gclef ( 96311 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:50AM (#8815284)
      Those aren't actually cancelling the noise you're hearing, they're just masking it. Basically, it's not that it's quieter in your office, but the noise floor is higher, burying the annoying sounds in white noise.

      The same thing happens on airplanes. If you're ever flying somewhere, bring your walkman/mp3 player. Compare the volume you have it set to for normal use with what you have to crank it to when on the airplane. It's pretty disturbing how high the noise floor is on an airplane. (I wear earplugs on airplanes for just this reason.)
    • They have these white noise generators that help filter out noises in a cubicle farm, they work by disrupting all sound waves and getting them to cancel out.

      No, that's just the air conditioner.
  • by DikSeaCup ( 767041 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:39AM (#8814567) Homepage
    Though they suggest unfamilliarity, one might wonder if it's more of a frequency/pitch or timbre issue.

    The sound of a regular train (been a while since I've heard one) is rythmic, higher pitch clicking. I would guess that the maglev might be more lower frequency. Also, one might wonder if there's a sound beyond the range of human awareness that might be contributing to the feeling that the maglevs are "louder" or more annoying.

    I dunno ... you tend to feel louder high pitched sounds in your ears, whereas the lower ones you might feel more in your body.

    The author of this post would like to point out that unlike other posts, this one was more stream of thought, and less composed than his previous ones. In other words, he's talking out of his ass.

    • I dunno ... you tend to feel louder high pitched sounds in your ears, whereas the lower ones you might feel more in your body.

      The low sounds you can't "hear" are probably outside of your range of hearing. This is why you feel them instead. Sort of like a deaf person. They can feel the vibrations from music, but they can't hear the music.
    • by elwinc ( 663074 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:51AM (#8814700)
      I'd like to hear them too. My guess is the more annoying sounds of maglevs have more high frequency components than traditional trains. there may be a fair amount of energy in very low freqency "thumps" coming from a traditional train. The maglev may be mostly hiss and whistles as the air streams over the body. Also, I'm guessing the maglev goes *much* faster than the wheeled train to make the same overall dbs of sound.

      In my experience, high frequencies (maybe 1000 to 4000 Hz) are more sonically salient than lows. Thats why sirens and car alarms put alot of energy in those bands.

      • by pipingguy ( 566974 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:24AM (#8815022)
        Also, I'm guessing the maglev goes *much* faster than the wheeled train to make the same overall dbs of sound.

        Dopeler Effect: Two similar comments from different ACs within 30 seconds of each other.
      • In my experience, high frequencies (maybe 1000 to 4000 Hz) are more sonically salient than lows. Thats why sirens and car alarms put alot of energy in those bands.

        In your experience, and in everyone else's.
        The Fletcher-Munson Effect [webervst.com] describes equal loudness curves - our ears are signifigantly more sensitive to tones between 1-6 kHz, with a peak sensitivity at 4 kHz. However, as SPL increases, those curves flatten out - at 0 phons, a 100 Hz tone has to be 10,000 times more powerful than 1 kHz tone to sound comparable in level, but at 90 phons, they can be the exact same power level.

        Hypothesis for why this is is that it came upon us during our evolution to enable us to hear baby/animal cries from far away. The physical reason is that it has to do with the resonation frequency of the inner ear cavity.

        -T

    • by Reverberant ( 303566 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @11:26AM (#8815750) Homepage
      Though they suggest unfamilliarity, one might wonder if it's more of a frequency/pitch or timbre issue.

      Having heard the TR08, I tend to disagree - the suckers are just loud at top speeds (although at low speeds, say <100mph, they are almost whisper quiet).

      One unanticipated effect is that at high speeds, the Maglev sound has a rapid onset, which causes a 'startle' effect. Basically, one moment your environment is quiet, the next moment it's very loud, and the moment after that it's quiet again as the vehicle recedes. This might be part of the problem.

      The FRA high-speed train noise guidelines try to account for this.

    • I think the reason why people might be annoyed by the sounds of a maglev passing by is the fact that at the type of speeds maglevs operate (350 km/h to 500 km/h), the noise is NOT caused by physical contact with the overhead wiring and the steel wheel/steel rail contact but the aerodynamic noise caused by the shape of the maglev train itself. This means they'll need to computational fluid dynamics research into reducing the noise footprint of a maglev train.

      Indeed, this was a major issue with the upcoming
  • by JessLeah ( 625838 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:40AM (#8814572)
    "Conventional" trains make noises ranging from low rumbles (slower trains) to what resembles gigantic versions of the "fwooooooooosh" of a racecar passing you (Acela and other modern high-speed trains). But loud, high-pitched sounds coming from a piece of machinery (e.g. a train) could make people think the machine is out of control.

    High-pitched mechanical sounds carry a connotation of machinery operating "out of control", or running faster than it should. I'll put it this way. If you walked into, say, a widget factory, and heard the machines cranking away with a low rumble, wouldn't you feel more comfortable than if they were generating a constant high-pitched whining? In which scenario would you fear, deep down in your gut, that one of those machines is about to go haywire, break down, and shoot a cog in your general direction? This is regardless of the actual speed of the machinery. Low sounds are just less unnerving in this case. (Or so I feel...)

    Perhaps the sound of a maglev operating at 150mph would be more unnerving than that of an Acela train operating at 150mph since the nature of the maglev sounds would make it "sound like" it's more likely than the Acela to disrail (even though, as a maglev, it already is 'disrailed' in a sense ;) ) and crush the hapless onlooker...
    • by Gothmolly ( 148874 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:30AM (#8815066)
      The web in some high speed paper mills moves at 8000 fpm, or about 90 mph. It's a 400 inch wide piece of nylon webbing, on top of which a warm slurry of .5% paper is sprayed at high pressure. It goes over rollers and dewatering points, where the water is sucked out of it by vacuum. Some of the rollers are small, so they have higher RPMs. At the other end of the machine, there are huge heated drums spinning at a faster rate (to pull the paper out). All of this is accompanied by pump noise, air compression noise, and vibration. It is so loud that earplugs are mandatory, and your chest hurts from merely being in the plant.
      But I know exactly what its doing, so its not "out of control".
      • High speed paper machines

        Fun to watch, not to touch.

        Another good one was the reversing exchangers in air separation plants (that technology is now obsolete) whereby the switchover would be accompanied by a thunderous boom. Quite unnerving unless you're used to it. Timing and careful listening could be used to predict when it would happen, so bringing casual visitors to the plant could be properly scheduled.
    • High-pitched mechanical sounds carry a connotation of machinery operating "out of control", or running faster than it should. I'll put it this way. If you walked into, say, a widget factory, and heard the machines cranking away with a low rumble, wouldn't you feel more comfortable than if they were generating a constant high-pitched whining?

      That's an interesting insight. (I don't have mod points, so I'm word-modding. Mod Nazis, bite me.)

      The reason mechanical bits sound "wrong" when making high-pitched soun

    • The Acela train (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward
      I have to say, I live in the city right next to an Acela track, and it's one of the most amazing things I've seen. The tracks in question have MBTA (commuter rail) trains, Acela express trains, and T (above-ground) subway cars pass by on a regular basis.

      The loudest and most annoying are the dilapidated orange line subway cars, which are very old and make a lot of clicks and clacks and screeches. The commuter rail is definitely louder, but it is uch more pleasant - a bassy rumbling, depending ont he speed
  • by indros13 ( 531405 ) * on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:42AM (#8814600) Homepage Journal
    eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaa

    • > eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaa

      Um.... Syndey is that way. But what does that have to do with maglev trains?

    • eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaa"

      "Don't want to meet your daddy... just want you in my caddy..."

      Wait, this was an Outkast sing-along, right? ;)

      -T

  • freight trains (Score:5, Informative)

    by Animaether ( 411575 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:42AM (#8814601) Journal
    We don't get the freigh train whistle in The Netherlands, that I'm aware of. So the first time a freight train passed by me here in the U.S., you bet it freaked me out.
    Now... I'm used to it.

    Remember how when trains were first introduced, cattle would freak out, and the farmers were pissed at the railroad companies ?
    Nowadays, trains zip by cattle many times a day, and they don't even bother to look up anymore.

    Yes - people would just have to get used to the sound.
    Unfortunately, people are still afraid of change - even if it's just a change in the sound of a train.
    • btw, i just love the way tou compare people to cattle. Very funny and so true nowadays.
      Kinda looks like you're saying that cows are better than people, you woulnd't be from India huh?
    • Re:freight trains (Score:2, Interesting)

      by MCZapf ( 218870 )
      Interestingly (to me, at least) cattle are now apparently spooked if a steam locomotive goes by. They just aren't used to them anymore.
    • by pipingguy ( 566974 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @11:14AM (#8815595)
      Nowadays, trains zip by cattle many times a day, and they don't even bother to look up anymore..

      That's because when no one's looking they're standing up and drinking coffee. Cows. Is there anything they *can't* do?
  • by Mr. Roadkill ( 731328 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:42AM (#8814609)
    Some participants in the study said the sound made them 'feel insecure, some found it startling, and disliked the occasional shrill sound the maglevs produced.' The researcher postulated that unfamiliarity with the noise might be part of the problem."
    Given time, people can become comfortable with anything. Who woulda thunk that we could sleep through traffic noise, normal rail noise, low-flying jet aircraft etc?

    Where once upon a time new technologies were just introduced, we now run the risk of getting them bludgeoned to death by special-interest groups and environmental impact statements. There is no reason why in time maglev sounds should not become a familiar part of the soundscape, barely noticed if at all, and a realisation that people might be uncomfortable with something just because it is new may help us determine whether something really is damaging or if it's just a baseless case of NIMBY (as opposed to "it really is damaging, so get it the fuck away from me") when people oppose something new.

    (aplogies if this is incoherent... it's been three hours since my last coffee)

    • I remember seeing a documentary several years ago in which the first steam engines were considered scary "fire breathing metal dragons that crawled up the hillside . . . " Many people would not go near them. . .

      Edison marched men with lightbulbs on their heads through a parade in New York . . . this scared the willy's out of many people because they associated light with fire and thought that these mens' heads were on fire . . .

      As new technology becomes familiar, these things become less disturbing and

    • Who woulda thunk that we could sleep through traffic noise, normal rail noise, low-flying jet aircraft etc?

      a friend of mine had an apartment in Chicago where the trains ran 8 feet from his window. every 7 minutes you have a train running by.

      he said it did not bother him... I about lost my mind staying there one weekend. with the window open in summer you cannot yell loud enough to be heard over the passing train.
    • Where once upon a time new technologies were just introduced, we now run the risk of getting them bludgeoned to death by special-interest groups and environmental impact statements.

      You're so right. For example, I have a new technique for extracting gold -- GOLD, I tells ya! -- from common sewage. It involves simply blasting a stream of "quicksilver" through the municipal sewer once a night. The quicksilver bonds with the fluxion and good humors in gold that's suspended in the water as a result of toothbru

      • That balance has yet to be struck, I fear, because of the Precautionary Principle. Anyone can come up with a wild-eyed notion of how a new or existing technology could be dangerous and that person will not only find plenty of support from various hand-wringing alarmists, but legislators ready and willing to regulate things they don't understand and a media eager to scare us. Not only are we strangling technologies and industries that were once considered vital, but now it's starting to get pre-emptive as ex
    • Given time, people can become comfortable with anything. Who woulda thunk that we could sleep through traffic noise, normal rail noise, low-flying jet aircraft etc?

      I understand your point, but at the same time I wonder if "resigned to" might be more appropriate than "comfortable with". Most of the time I never notice all the noise around me, but every now and then I stop and listen to the sound of the ventilation and the computers humming and the traffic outside and think how nice it would be to be able

  • It should read... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by lukewarmfusion ( 726141 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:47AM (#8814656) Homepage Journal
    "MagLev Trains Annoyingly Delayed"

    Most of the articles I see about these (many of them here) are about how the projects are being cancelled, or there are problems that keep holding them back.

    Like the noise issue. Current trains make a lot of noise... is this noise so bad that it outweighs the benefits of a MagLev?
  • Anyone know why mag-lev's are noisy? I was one of the people that thought that these trains would be quiet Apparently they don't record the sound when they show these trains on Discovery Channel or PBS because they're always whisper quiet in the documentaries. . . .
    • Anyone know why mag-lev's are noisy? I was one of the people that thought that these trains would be quiet Apparently they don't record the sound when they show these trains on Discovery Channel or PBS because they're always whisper quiet in the documentaries. . . .

      For a guess - big fast moving train causing atmospheric displacement resulting in vibrations and thus sound. Add to that inter-car vibration, maybe some hum (and harmonics) from the power supplies on the rails, and the fact that the trains are

      • At high speeds would the "ripples on their skins" be what may cause the "shrill" (quoted from the article) sounds?

        I figure that most of the sounds that you cite are probably somewhat similar to the sounds of a conventional train . . . with the exceptions of power supply hum and perhaps the pitch as a function of speed . . . which leads me to exactly your same question . . . how fast was the mag-lev going with respect to the conventional train?

    • Even though they don't have wheels, they still require large engines for power generation. So right there you've got most of the same noise a traditional train makes.

      The rest of the noise is likely from the high voltages and speeds involved. Ever hear a transformer buzz? Or an old flourecent light fixture? Same idea really. The eerie buzzing noises are probably what freak people out.
      =Smidge=
  • by ortholattice ( 175065 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:51AM (#8814699)
    This is a true story.

    Many years ago I had a girlfriend who found the clickety-clack vibration of a train, well, exciting if you know what I mean. One of her fantasies was to spend a night in a sleeper car. Unfortunately the opportunity never came up, at least not with me (:

  • Duh. (Score:4, Funny)

    by Fuzzums ( 250400 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:52AM (#8814708) Homepage
    That is something you'll always have with new technology.

    At first the 'look and feel' of windows scared the hell out of me. While now it still does. Oh, wrong example.

    Other ecample. At first ringtones used to annoy but now it just irritates me. Oh, wrong example again.
  • by Azureflare ( 645778 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:53AM (#8814716)
    I vote that they attach large speakers all over the maglev trains, and play the tie fighter sound while they are going really fast. That'll teach 'em to complain about the noise!!
    • Better yet, for each person who complains, his seat will be bound and folded up until he is unable to breathe. As he is losing consciousness you can play over the loudspeaker, "I find your lack of faith disturbing".
    • Vacuum (Score:3, Funny)

      by Catskul ( 323619 )
      Yeah, those tie fighters are so loud, they are even loud in the vacuum of space !!!
  • by sjames ( 1099 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:55AM (#8814736) Homepage Journal

    I wonder if it's perhaps as simple as our built-in responses to shrill sounds.

    Primates tend to make more shrill prolonged sounds when in distress. We are likely hard wired to go on alert when we hear distressed sounds from another primate. That would explain uneasy feelings and rating the sound as more intrusive and objectionable than a rumble and clicking sound which would be fairly meaningless to the lower parts of the brain.

    It's a two fold problem that will likely call for psychologists and neurologists to determine what is so distressing and annoying about the sound, and then accoustic engineers to figure out how to alter the sound so that it no longer has that characteristic.

    Nothing more than a hypothesis here, but quite testable.

  • Screaming (Score:4, Funny)

    by nightsweat ( 604367 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @09:58AM (#8814766)
    The annoying sound is the one those people with pacemakers make as the train gets going.
  • Not much substance (Score:4, Insightful)

    by suman28 ( 558822 ) <suman28NO@SPAMhotmail.com> on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:01AM (#8814798)
    The article was very skimpy on the details. Where were these tests done. How many people were tested. What kind of noise was it? There is noise pollution everywhere now-a-days. So, even if this comes as a surprise, trains are a great means of transportation, and seeing that the maglev is fast, there have to be more tests done before anything is concluded.
  • The duration of a train traveling at 60 mph is more annoying than a Maglev train of equal length travling 250 mph, simply because you have to put up with it longer.

    Sure the sound is annoying, but if it is gone in 15 seconds as opposed to 1 minute, I think people would get used to it.
  • this test was actually done the old fashioned, wild-west style.

    Test subject puts ear on rail road track, hears train, moves of track.
    Test subject puts ear on maglev track, no vibration, doesn't move off track in time - no wonder they freak out!
  • by telstar ( 236404 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:18AM (#8814953)
    Guy That Sits One Cube Over ... Annoyingly Loud

    My Slashdot submission about this will be enroute to the Slashdot rejected bin in a few minutes ... but subscribers can read it now by stopping by my office.
  • Simply brilliant! (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Aumaden ( 598628 )
    Vos thinks part of the problem might simply be unfamiliarity with the noise. As people get used to it, he says, they might find it less annoying.

    <sarcasm>
    Wonderful approach! Ignore it and maybe the problem will go away. Why would you actually want to try to eliminate the source of the noise?
    </sarcasm>

  • Track Design (Score:2, Interesting)

    by markxz ( 669696 )
    Looking at some of the pictures of Maglev Trains, the track resembled a concreet trough, rather than the conventional flat rail/roadway track. This would cause the air (and sound) movements to be altered and possibly create a different sound
  • by buzban ( 227721 ) <buz.buzban@net> on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:34AM (#8815122) Homepage
    the turbo trains [google.com] of the late 1960s were jet-powered, and also annoyingly loud. Were canned for that same reason.
  • by StateOfTheUnion ( 762194 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:35AM (#8815134) Homepage
    I think that one must consider who they polled to know if the poll is valid or not . . .

    If they polled people living in a city with a lot of commuter trains, then these people might rate the mag-lev more annoying than the conventional trains that they are already accustomed to.

    If they polled people living in an area without any trains and the people weren't used to conventional train sounds, perhaps they would rate the sounds of mag-lev's and conventional trains equally annoying or more close to equally annoying than the previous group.

    Characterizing the difference between these two group may help identify how much of the results of this poll are due to people not liking the idea or sound of any trains near them and how much of the dislike is specifically due to the sound of mag-lev trains.

    Additionally, I think that the results would be significantly different for those that may live in cities that would benefit from mag-lev's and those that live in small towns that high speed mag-levs may pass through without stopping (One may have a more negative opinion about the sound of a mag-lev if the sound does not have any associated benefit for the individual)

    Perhaps the most impartial group to sample would be a group in a city with no trains and no plans to get a mag-lev in the future . . . but then who really cares about these people anyway (with respect to the sound of a mag-lev that they will never have to deal with on a regular basis)?

    Unfortunately this article, like so many others, draws conclusions from the data without giving the reader enough information to draw his or her own conclusions or even agree or disagree with the author.

  • Maybe.. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Tom7 ( 102298 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:38AM (#8815157) Homepage Journal
    .. but tapes of the sounds produced by magnetically levitated and normal trains

    Maybe they shouldn't have used magnetic tape around gigantic magnets.
  • flawed tests ? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    the guy instead of actually asking people who live near a maglev/ordinary tracks what they thought
    he played recordings and then asked subjects (presumably in his lab) which they disliked the most ?

    anyone who lives near a train laine can attest comparing the real thing (and all its physical vibration) to one of a recording played through a 100w labs hifi is laughable, really. if he had about a 50k rig he might get close to the physical vibration and noise factor , ever notice anything is annoying if its not
  • by zazzel ( 98233 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @11:32AM (#8815830)
    Three years ago, I went went on a guided tour to Papenburg/Germany and had the chance to experience the Maglev for about 20 minutes. First of all: don't believe what critics say. Try it yourself - if you get the chance to ;)

    The Maglev is definitely NOT loud, nor does the sound make you feel uneasy (you could barely hear a train passing at 100mph, and a full-speed maglev was not at all annoying either!). Plus, there are no vibrations - a little different from conventional high-speed trains.

    The top speed was 430kph (almost 270mph, on tracks initially developed for a maximum speed of 100mph - the tour guide claimed).

    just my 2 cents
  • by gemtech ( 645045 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @12:10PM (#8816263)
    (Pulse Width Modulation, PWM) of the power to the electromagnets. That frequency can be changed, within limits. I've been on mag-levs at Kings Island (Ohio) years ago, they are a bit annoying.
  • by qualico ( 731143 ) <worldcouchsurferNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Friday April 09, 2004 @12:29PM (#8816473) Journal
    Noise of any type is a result of some inefficiency somewhere. Be it the air displacement from poorly developed skins and attachments or transforming the electricity with inexpensive components. I'm sure they can isolate the offending noise and design it out of the equation. Still did not get a good answer on here as to what exactly was causing the noise. Although there is some good speculation.
  • by ediron2 ( 246908 ) * on Friday April 09, 2004 @12:45PM (#8816653) Journal
    Maglev's high pitch hits me like fingernails on a chalkboard, but that ain't nothin' to the sound of modern warfare. I used to hike near a testground where vulcan guns were shot. Vulcans (GE M61) [af.mil] are a modern gattling gun, using 6 barrels, 20mm rounds and an autofeeder to shoot 100 rounds per second. They make a medium-low pitched 'waaahroooooohn' sort of sound (this (AVI, sorry) is a short firing burst from a vulcan [f-16.net], but all I could find online) that echoed for miles in the mountains I was hiking in. A few-second burst sounds somewhat haunting & moody. The first time, I sort of chuckled and wondered what sort of lovesick moose or whatever make that sound. Then I found out. Wish I hadn't.

    Once I'd seen what they were capable of (you'll have to imagine a hundred 20mm rounds per second hitting a soldier; I'm intentionally not seeking a link), that sound took on a whole new meaning.

    There's a whole ethical debate on this sort of imagery: can national security be weakened by US citizens being repulsed by the carnage our weaponry is capable of? Imagery impacted US public perceptions of the war in Viet Nam, and we've advanced a lot technologically since then.

    I realize I'm off topic by here, but whining about maglev (pun intended) seems silly in comparison. As with jets and computer fans and traffic noise, maglev's purpose is considerably more benign. We can work around or get used to the sound.

  • Not surprising (Score:5, Informative)

    by spahn ( 227384 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @12:49PM (#8816698)
    The frequency content of a sound has a lot to do with how comforting or annoying a sound is. Incredible ammounts of money have been spent on this in the auto industry alone. Studies are done on the sounds of a car door closing to find the sound that makes people feel the most secure when the door has closed. What they've found is that the sounds of car doors closing with more energy in the low end of the frequency spectrum makes people feel more secure in the sound of a door closing.

    Now lets apply this to trains. Normal freight trains generally produce a lot of low frequency sounds. Generally around 300Hz and below. Now the maglev trains could be a lot quieter, but if they make higher frequency sounds, even at lower dB levels, the sound will seem a lot more annoying than freight trains.
  • by martinde ( 137088 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @01:33PM (#8817227) Homepage
    I'm thinking 100 years ago the sound of a steam engine freaked out the locals, their farm animals, etc. I think that the speculation about "it's just unfamiliar" is probably dead on.
  • by jmichaelg ( 148257 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @02:18PM (#8817794) Journal
    The abstract says 1) the annoyance was independent of the driving speed of the maglev train,...

    The maglev goes faster and when it does it pushes more air than a regular train.The power to move the train increases with the square of the velocity due to air friction. That power is what bystanders are hearing. I couldn't read the study but I'd be curious to see how people rated two trains moving at the same speed.

    In any event, if maglev is ever going to prevail, noise is going to have to be dealt with. It can be done either by encasing the train in a tube to isolate the noise or better yet, encase the train in vacuum tube and then really crank up the speed since you're not shoving air out of the way. The inventors of superconducting maglev which uses repulsion instead of attraction like Transrapid figure that a train could go coast to coast in under an hour using the equivalent of about 20 gallons of gas. The cost of course is in building and evacuating a 2000 mile long tunnel.

Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein

Working...